OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

Intel Core i3 8145U Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price in UK: ~£230
Avg. price in US: ~$280
PassMark benchmark result: 3771
N. of physical cores: 2
CPU boost clock speed: 3.9 GHz

Intel Core i3 8145U review. Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among processors and if it is worth buying.

3.8

Poor

3.8

Poor

?

3.5
Gaming
Score components:
30.0%
3.1
PassMark single-core benchmark score
25.0%
5.5
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
20.0%
4.3
CPU boost clock speed
17.0%
1.6
L3 cache
8.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
1.3
Video editing
Score components:
45.0%
1.2
Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
20.0%
1.0
N. of physical cores
20.0%
1.6
CPU threads
15.0%
1.6
L3 cache

No image

No image

Best prices in UK

N/A~ £230

Best rankings

#540 in Best Mobile CPUs

Verdict

The Intel Core i3-8145U is an 8th-generation dual-core mobile processor based on the Whiskey Lake architecture, featuring 4 threads and a 14nm lithography. It operates at a base frequency of 2.10 GHz and can reach a maximum turbo frequency of 3.90 GHz, supported by 4 MB of Intel Smart Cache and a default TDP of 15W. Its main advantages include integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 for 4K video support at 60Hz, compatibility with up to 64 GB of DDR4-2400 memory, and energy efficiency ideal for light multitasking and everyday office tasks. However, it is limited by having only two physical cores, a locked multiplier that prevents overclocking, and performance that struggles with modern demanding games or heavy professional creative workloads.

Technical Specifications of processor Intel Core i3 8145U

Overall score

3.8

Show more

Hide

?

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.

When it matters: When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.

Platform

7.6

Show more

Hide

Brand name

What it is: The manufacturer or brand of the product.

When it matters: When you prefer a specific ecosystem, support network, or design philosophy.

Importance: MEDIUM

Intel

Processor type

What it is: The kind of system the processor is built for, such as desktop PCs, laptops, workstations, or servers.

When it matters: When you want a processor meant for the kind of machine you are actually building or buying, rather than a chip aimed at a different class of system.

Importance: HIGH

CPU socket

What it is: The physical socket the processor fits into on the motherboard.

When it matters: When you need to make sure the CPU can actually be installed on a specific motherboard.

Importance: HIGH

Chipset

What it is: The motherboard chipset families officially meant to work with the processor.

When it matters: When you are checking whether a CPU will work with the motherboard features and platform you plan to use.

Importance: HIGH

N/A

CPU architecture

What it is: The processor family or design generation behind the chip, such as Zen 4 or Raptor Lake.

When it matters: When you are comparing CPUs across generations and want a clearer sense of their design age, feature level, and expected performance class.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Performance

2.7

Show more

Hide

N. of physical cores

What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.

When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 8+

CPU threads

What it is: The total number of processing threads the CPU can handle at once.

When it matters: When you run heavily threaded workloads or multitask a lot.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: 16+

Threads per core

What it is: The number of threads each physical core can handle at once.

When it matters: When you want to understand how much thread-level parallelism each core can provide in multitasking or heavily threaded work.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: 2

CPU boost clock speed

What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.

When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >4.7 GHz

CPU base clock speed

What it is: The processor's normal all-core starting frequency before boost behavior raises clocks temporarily.

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance in longer workloads rather than short burst speed alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

Show more

Cache & Architecture

4.7

Show more

Hide

Semiconductor size

What it is: The manufacturing process node used to produce the processor, usually expressed in nanometers.

When it matters: When efficiency, heat, and the relative modernity of the chip-making process matter to your comparison.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <10 nm

Foundry

What it is: The semiconductor manufacturer that physically fabricates the processor chip.

When it matters: When process source, manufacturing generation, or foundry differences matter to your comparison more than day-to-day performance alone.

Importance: MEDIUM

L3 cache

What it is: The total amount of L3 cache available on the processor.

When it matters: When you want better performance in cache-sensitive workloads and games.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=16 MB

L2 cache

What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.

When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=6 MB

L1 cache

What it is: The total amount of L1 cache built into the processor, which sits closest to the cores.

When it matters: When you are comparing low-level CPU design details rather than the broader performance picture buyers usually notice first.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=512 KB

Show more

Memory & PCIe

4.5

Show more

Hide

DDR memory version

What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.

When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: DDR5

Maximum memory speed

What it is: The highest official memory speed supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you choose RAM and want to know the supported speed ceiling.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=4800 MHz

Max memory speed (JEDEC)

What it is: The highest official RAM speed the processor supports under standard JEDEC settings, before any memory overclocking profiles are applied.

When it matters: When officially supported stock RAM speed matters more than XMP, EXPO, or manual memory tuning.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5600 MHz

Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)

What it is: The highest memory speed supported through XMP or EXPO profiles.

When it matters: When you want faster RAM through memory profiles.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=5200 MHz

N/A

Maximum memory capacity

What it is: The largest total amount of memory officially supported by the processor.

When it matters: When you plan a system with very large RAM capacity.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: >=128 GB

Show more

Integrated Graphics

6.3

Show more

Hide

Integrated graphics

What it is: Includes built-in graphics, so the system can output video without a separate graphics card.

When it matters: When you want the PC to work without a dedicated GPU, or you are building an office, media, compact, or troubleshooting-friendly system.

Importance: HIGH

Integrated GPU model

What it is: The model name of the integrated graphics processor, if present.

When it matters: When you plan to use the CPU's built-in graphics.

Importance: MEDIUM

Integrated GPU execution units

What it is: The number of execution units available in the integrated graphics part of the processor.

When it matters: When you plan to rely on built-in graphics and want a better sense of its light gaming, display, or media capability.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=24

Integrated GPU base frequency

What it is: The base operating frequency of the integrated GPU.

When it matters: When integrated graphics performance matters to you.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: >=350 MHz

Integrated media encoders/decoders

What it is: The hardware media formats the processor can encode or decode directly.

When it matters: When you stream, edit video, or rely on hardware media acceleration.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Thermal

7.6

Show more

Hide

TDP (Thermal design power)

What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.

When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.

Importance: HIGH

Good value: <30 W

Base power (PL1)

What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.

When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <30 W

Boost power (PL2)

What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.

When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <50 W

Tau (power duration limit)

What it is: The time limit the CPU can stay at higher boost power before dropping toward sustained power.

When it matters: When you want to understand turbo behavior under longer loads.

Importance: MEDIUM

Good value: <=28 s

Configurable TDP

What it is: Allows the processor to run in alternate power modes instead of being fixed to one default TDP target.

When it matters: When you want more control over heat, noise, and power draw in compact systems, quieter builds, or thermally limited machines.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Intel Core i3 8145U vs the average processor

Why is Intel Core i3 8145U better than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

66.7% lower base power
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
What it is: The sustained power target used for longer CPU loads.
When it matters: When you choose cooling and power delivery for sustained workloads.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <30 W
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
60.9% lower boost power
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (25 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
What it is: The short-term boost power limit the processor may draw under heavier turbo loads.
When it matters: When you size cooling and power delivery for peak turbo behavior.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: <50 W
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (25 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.25 W vs 64 W
29.5% higher single-core score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1905 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects single-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you care about snappy everyday performance in lighter apps, browsing, office work, or tasks that do not scale well across many cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >2000
Intel Core i3 8145U has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1905 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.1,905 vs 1,471
66.7% lower TDP
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
What it is: The rated thermal design power, which gives a general idea of cooling and power needs.
When it matters: When you choose a cooler or build in a tighter case.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: <30 W
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.15 W vs 45 W
Includes crypto acceleration
Intel Core i3 8145U includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
What it is: Built-in hardware support for accelerating encryption and cryptographic tasks.
When it matters: When encryption speed or secure workloads matter to you.
Importance: LOW
Intel Core i3 8145U includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.AES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA
Newer DDR support
Intel Core i3 8145U supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR3 vs DDR4).
What it is: The RAM generation the processor is designed to support, such as DDR4 or DDR5.
When it matters: When you need the CPU to match the kind of memory platform you want to buy or reuse.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: DDR5
Intel Core i3 8145U supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR3 vs DDR4).DDR4/LPDDR3 vs DDR4
16.7% more L3 per core
Intel Core i3 8145U has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
What it is: The amount of L3 cache effectively available per CPU core.
When it matters: When you are comparing how much shared cache each core can draw on in deeper technical analysis.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=2 MB/core
Intel Core i3 8145U has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
Includes crypto acceleration
Intel Core i3 8145U includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not.
29.5% higher single-core score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1905 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
16.7% more L3 per core
Intel Core i3 8145U has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
Newer DDR support
Intel Core i3 8145U supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/LPDDR3 vs DDR4).
66.7% lower base power
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower base power draw than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
60.9% lower boost power
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower boost power draw than the average processor (25 W vs 64 W). The average processor has a boost power draw of 64 W.
66.7% lower TDP
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower TDP than the average processor (15 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.

Cache & Architecture

Power & Thermal

Why is Intel Core i3 8145U worse than the average processor?

Show more

Hide

Older CPU socket
Intel Core i3 8145U uses an older CPU socket than the average processor (FCBGA1,528 vs FP2).
2 year/s older release date
Intel Core i3 8145U has an older release date than the average processor (2018 vs 2020).
August 2018
76.4% weaker multi-core performance
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (657 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Core i3 8145U has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
38.8% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (296 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
76.6% lower multi-core score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,120 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
64.2% lower PassMark score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (3,771 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
17% weaker single-core performance
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2060 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
9.3% lower boost clock
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
4 fewer CPU threads
Intel Core i3 8145U has fewer CPU threads than the average processor (4 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
50% lower bus transfer rate
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower bus transfer rate than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor offers bus transfer rate of 8 GT/s.
50% lower bus speed
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower bus speed than the average processor (4 GT/s vs 8 GT/s). The average processor runs at bus speed of 8 GT/s.
7 lower clock multiplier
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (21 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
80% smaller L2 cache
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
16.7% larger process node
Intel Core i3 8145U has a higher process node than the average processor (14 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
66.7% smaller L1 cache
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower L1 cache than the average processor (128 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
50% less L2 per core
Intel Core i3 8145U has less L2 cache per core than the average processor (0.3 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
50% smaller L3 cache
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower L3 cache than the average processor (4 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
Lower JEDEC memory speed
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (LPDDR3-2133 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
18.1% lower memory bandwidth
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower memory bandwidth than the average processor (37.5 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
18.2% lower memory speed
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower maximum memory speed than the average processor (2,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2,933 MHz.
Limited PCIe bifurcation
Intel Core i3 8145U supports less flexible PCIe bifurcation than the average processor (x4, x2/x2, x2/x1/x1, x1/x1/x1/x1 vs x16, x8/x8).
Narrower media codec support
Intel Core i3 8145U supports fewer media codecs than the average processor (VC-1 (HW decode) vs H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode/encode), AV1 (HW decode)).
76.4% weaker multi-core performance
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (657 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 score that reflects how well the processor handles long, heavy rendering workloads across many cores.
When it matters: When you care about sustained multi-core performance in rendering, compiling, heavy creation work, or productivity workloads that use many threads.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4700
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower multi-core performance than the average processor (657 vs 2,783). The average processor scores 2,783 in Cinebench R20 multi-core.657 vs 2,783
4 fewer CPU cores
Intel Core i3 8145U has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
What it is: The number of physical CPU cores on the processor.
When it matters: When you run workloads that benefit from more real cores.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: 8+
Intel Core i3 8145U has fewer CPU cores than the average processor (2 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.2 vs 6
38.8% lower Cinebench R20 single-core score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (296 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
What it is: A Cinebench R20 benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about lighter workloads, interface responsiveness, or software that still depends heavily on one fast core.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >600
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (296 vs 484). The average processor scores 484 in Cinebench R20 single-core.296 vs 484
76.6% lower multi-core score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,120 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
What it is: A Geekbench 6 score that reflects multi-core CPU performance in mixed modern workloads.
When it matters: When you want a quick picture of multi-core speed in everyday mixed workloads, multitasking, and broadly optimized software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >8500
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (1,120 vs 4,793). The average processor scores 4,793 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.1,120 vs 4,793
64.2% lower PassMark score
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (3,771 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.
What it is: A benchmark score that gives a broad idea of overall processor performance.
When it matters: When you want a quick overall performance comparison.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >19000
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (3,771 vs 10,532.5). The average processor scores 10,532.5 in PassMark benchmark.3,771 vs 10,532.5
17% weaker single-core performance
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2060 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.
What it is: A benchmark score that reflects single-core CPU performance.
When it matters: When you care about responsiveness in lighter or older software.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >3200
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower PassMark single-core score than the average processor (2060 vs 2,483). The average processor scores 2,483 in PassMark single-core.2,060 vs 2,483
80% smaller L2 cache
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
What it is: The total amount of L2 cache available across the processor.
When it matters: When you want to compare CPU design efficiency and how much fast intermediate cache the cores have available.
Importance: MEDIUM
Good value: >=6 MB
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower L2 cache than the average processor (0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.0.5 MB vs 2.5 MB
9.3% lower boost clock
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
What it is: The highest clock speed the processor can reach under boost conditions.
When it matters: When you care about peak speed in short bursts.
Importance: HIGH
Good value: >4.7 GHz
Intel Core i3 8145U has a lower boost clock speed than the average processor (3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.3.9 GHz vs 4.3 GHz

Cache & Architecture

Integrated Graphics

Graphic comparison of Intel Core i3 8145U and other processors

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Intel Core i3 8145U?

Excellent for everyday office work, document editing, and web browsing
Highly energy efficient, contributing to good laptop battery life
Great value for money in the budget laptop segment
Capable of handling light multitasking thanks to multithreading (2 cores, 4 threads)
Reliable performance for students and basic home use
Supports modern operating systems like Windows 11 effectively

What customers dislike about Intel Core i3 8145U?

Dual-core architecture limits performance in heavy multitasking or professional workloads
Weak integrated graphics (Intel UHD 620) make it unsuitable for modern 3D gaming
Can struggle and hit 100% CPU usage with heavy browser tabs or unoptimized apps
Noticeably slower and less competitive compared to newer Ryzen 3 or i3 generations
Base clock speed is relatively low at 2.1 GHz
Uses older 14nm process technology which is less efficient than newer 7nm or 10nm alternatives

Expert reviews

consumerreports.org

N/A

Summary of the review

Onn I3 laptop Laptop & Chromebook Review Note: These results exclusively cover the Intel Core i3-8145U, a 2-core, 4-thread Whiskey Lake processor, and...

The onn. 14-inch i3 laptop (m400213) is a budget-focused Windows machine featuring an Intel Core i3-8145U processor, 4GB of RAM, and a 128GB SSD. Key advantages include its low price, a solid chassis for the price point, and a 1080p display that surpasses the 720p screens on many competitors. It is highly portable at 3.2 pounds and provides roughly 8.5 hours of battery life. Significant limitations include a lack of an HDMI port, weak speakers, and a stiff keyboard. The 4GB of memory and 128GB of storage are minimal for modern Windows use, which can lead to performance limitations. While suitable for basic web browsing and office tasks, it is not recommended for heavy multitasking or gaming.

openbenchmarking.org

Q2 2020

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-8145U - OpenBenchmarking.org

The Intel Core i3-8145U is an 8th-generation "Whiskey Lake" dual-core processor with 4 threads, a 2.1 GHz base clock, and a 3.9 GHz boost, designed for efficient, thin-and-light devices. Key advantages include its 15W TDP (configurable to 7.5W), high single-core performance suitable for daily tasks, and integrated UHD Graphics 620. Conversely, limitations consist of only two physical cores which hinder heavily multi-threaded workloads, limited gaming capabilities, and the lack of newer, higher-end technologies. For more details, visit OpenBenchmarking.org.

cpubenchmark.net

N/A

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-8145U @ 2.10GHz - CPU Benchmarks

The Intel Core i3-8145U is a Whiskey Lake dual-core mobile processor for entry-to-mid-range laptops, operating at 2.1 GHz up to 3.9 GHz with 4MB L3 cache. It offers improved single-core performance over its predecessor, supporting standard office tasks and 4K media consumption. Key advantages include high power efficiency with a 15W TDP and strong single-thread performance, while disadvantages are limited multi-threaded capability and unsuitable 3D gaming performance. For the full technical breakdown, visit cpubenchmark.net.

laptopmedia.com

N/A

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-8145U - LaptopMedia

The Intel Core i3-8145U is a Whiskey Lake dual-core, four-thread processor (2.10 - 3.90 GHz) designed for thin and light laptops. Built on a 14nm++ process, it offers good single-core performance suitable for daily office tasks and web browsing, with responsiveness comparable to older i7-7600U models. A primary pro is its power efficiency and capable performance for basic operations, but the main con is limited multi-core capability due to having only two physical cores, leading to struggles in heavy multitasking or 3D rendering. The integrated Intel UHD Graphics 620 is sufficient for basic media consumption rather than modern gaming. Offering a 12% single-core boost over the previous i3-8130U, it remains a viable budget option for student or home-office laptops. For more details, visit LaptopMedia.

pcmag.com

15/11/2019

Summary of the review

onn. I3 Review - PCMag

The Walmart onn. I3 is a budget-friendly, $399 14-inch laptop featuring surprisingly solid build quality and a 1080p Full HD display that outperforms typical low-cost competition. Driven by an Intel Core i3-8145U processor, it is suitable for basic web surfing and productivity tasks, though it is limited by 4GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. Key compromises for the price include a lack of an HDMI port, weak speakers, and a stiff keyboard. Despite these drawbacks, the device offers roughly 8.5 hours of battery life and represents a respectable, basic Windows 10 experience for cost-conscious users. For more details, visit PCMag.

ultrabookreview.com

01/09/2018

Summary of the review

Acer Swift 3 review (SF314-55G - i3-8145U, Nvidia MX150)

The 2018 Acer Swift 3 (SF314-55G) is a well-built, compact, and affordable ultraportable featuring an all-metal design, a 180-degree hinge, and a solid selection of ports including USB-A and HDMI. While praised for its durability, the review notes minor drawbacks like sharp bottom edges and a lack of Thunderbolt 3 support. Powered by Intel Core U-series processors and NVIDIA MX150 graphics, the device handles everyday tasks efficiently, supplemented by a quality, backlit keyboard. However, the laptop is hindered by a dim, color-inaccurate 14-inch IPS display, making it difficult to use in bright environments. Battery life is a major strength, with the 48 Wh battery delivering a respectable 8–10 hours of video playback, suitable for a "road warrior". Additional features include a good, yet plastic, trackpad and a fingerprint reader, though the downward-firing speakers lack bass and the keyboard produces a "chattery" sound.

laptopmedia.com

20/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-8145U – the Ice Lake one wins thanks to its GPU

According to LaptopMedia, the Intel Core i3-1005G1 (Ice Lake) is the superior choice over the i3-8145U (Whiskey Lake) due to a 61% faster integrated GPU, supporting better casual gaming. While the older i3-8145U offers roughly 5% better raw CPU performance due to higher clock speeds, the i3-1005G1 benefits from a more advanced 10nm process and faster memory support (DDR4-3200). Overall, the i3-1005G1 is recommended for its significantly better graphics capabilities and modern architecture. Copy

laptopmedia.com

12/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-10110U vs i3-8145U - the Comet Lake CPU wins the match

The Intel Core i3-10110U outperforms the i3-8145U by offering 35% faster performance in benchmarks, thanks to a higher 4.10 GHz boost clock and support for faster DDR4-2666 memory. While sharing the same dual-core, quad-thread structure and 15W TDP, the 10th-gen chip offers superior efficiency and speed without increased power consumption, proving to be a significant upgrade for budget notebooks. However, as entry-level chips, both processors may struggle under heavy, sustained workloads, and the i3-10110U does not increase core counts over the previous generation. Copy

uk.pcmag.com

15/11/2019

Summary of the review

onn. I3 Review - Laptops - PCMag UK

The onn. 14-inch laptop from Walmart offers a robust build and a 1080p display, distinguishing itself from competitors with better screen quality for the price. Equipped with an Intel Core i3-8145U processor, it is capable of basic productivity, though performance is limited by 4GB of RAM and a 128GB SSD. Despite weak speakers, a lack of an HDMI port, and a shallow keyboard, the budget-friendly machine provides clean software and over 8 hours of battery life. Copy

laptopmedia.com

09/05/2019

Summary of the review

ASUS VivoBook S14 S430 review - another decent 14-incher

The Asus VivoBook S14 S430 is a budget-friendly 14-inch laptop featuring an 18mm thin design with a functional ErgoLift hinge for improved typing and cooling. While the exterior is professional, the base feels plasticky and exhibits some flex. Performance relies on a conservative, quiet thermal setup that prioritizes low temperatures over maximum speed, making it better suited for daily tasks than heavy processing. LaptopMediaThe Full HD IPS display provides decent contrast and is PWM-free, but it suffers from narrow color coverage (53% sRGB), limiting its suitability for professional creative work. A major highlight is the battery, offering over 11 hours of web browsing. The S430 also includes useful, easy-to-access internal upgrade slots for RAM and storage. Pros include excellent battery life, a lightweight design, and a comfortable keyboard, while cons focus on the weak 53% sRGB color gamut and the lack of USB-C charging. The laptop also uses older USB 2.0 ports and tends to throttle heavily under high, sustained workloads.

notebookcheck.com

01/10/2019

Summary of the review

Dell Latitude 3400 Review: Affordable Business Laptop with Long Battery Life

The Dell Latitude 3400 is an entry-level 14-inch business laptop highlighted by exceptional battery life (approx. 11 hours in web browsing with the 56 Wh battery), a sturdy, functional design, and a comprehensive selection of modern and legacy ports. Performance is reliable for office tasks, bolstered by 8th-generation Intel processors, fast SSD storage, and quiet operation under load. Key drawbacks include a dim, low-contrast IPS display with poor color coverage and a keyboard that offers a "mushy" typing experience. Overall, the device serves as a budget-conscious, durable workhorse, though it is let down by its screen quality and limited tactile input, with the system capable of high internal temperatures under sustained stress.

notebooks-und-mobiles.de

26/02/2019

Summary of the review

Whiskey Lake - Intel Core i3-8145U Review

The Intel Core i3-8145U, a dual-core Whiskey Lake processor, serves as a capable, power-efficient option for entry-level office work and web browsing. According to notebooks-und-mobiles.de, the CPU boasts impressive single-core efficiency with boost clocks up to 3.9 GHz, yet faces significant limitations in multi-threaded tasks. While praised for its low power consumption, the processor is held back by integrated Intel UHD 620 graphics and limited performance for intensive workloads.

laptopmedia.com

20/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-8145U – Ice Lake wins thanks to its GPU

The Intel Core i3-1005G1 (Ice Lake) and Core i3-8145U (Whiskey Lake) share a similar dual-core foundation, but the i3-1005G1 offers superior memory support (DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733) as a key advantage. A major disadvantage for the newer i3-1005G1 is its lower base (1.20 GHz) and boost (3.40 GHz) frequencies compared to the 2.10 GHz base and 3.90 GHz boost of the i3-8145U. While CPU performance is nearly identical—with the older i3-8145U being roughly 5% faster—the i3-1005G1 holds a decisive advantage with its significantly more powerful UHD Graphics G1, which outperforms the aged UHD 620 in the older model. Ultimately, the i3-1005G1 is declared the winner for providing better value at the same price point, due to its superior iGPU and memory support. Both chips face criticism for being expensive dual-cores, with an additional drawback that similar pricing can sometimes secure a faster quad-core Core i5-1035G1.

computerbase.de

29/11/2018

Summary of the review

Intel Core i5-8265U & i3-8145U Review", "Testing the Intel Core i5-8265U & i3-8145U

ComputerBase evaluated Intel's 15-watt Whiskey Lake processors (Core i5-8265U/i3-8145U), which utilize an optimized 14nm++ process to deliver significantly higher single-core Turbo Boost clocks over previous Kaby Lake Refresh models. The primary pros include improved burst performance for daily tasks and a modernized platform featuring integrated Gigabit Wi-Fi and faster native USB 3.1 Gen 2 support. However, key cons involve limited sustained performance, as the 15W TDP constraints cause aggressive downclocking during long workloads, and the continued use of the aging UHD Graphics 620. Copy

ratake.com

23/07/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-8145U Specifications and Review

The Intel Core i3-8145U is a dual-core Whiskey Lake processor operating at 2.1 GHz with a 3.9 GHz boost, manufactured on a 14nm++ process to power 15W TDP ultra-low voltage mobile devices. It features impressive single-thread speed ideal for office tasks and 4K playback, while Supporting up to 64GB of RAM and integrated UHD Graphics 620. However, its two-core design limits multitasking and is unsuitable for heavy 3D gaming or intensive editing, with newer generations offering superior performance.

laptopmedia.com

20/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs. Core i3-8145U Comparison

LaptopMedia concludes that the Intel Core i3-1005G1 (Ice Lake) is superior to the Core i3-8145U (Whiskey Lake) due to vastly superior integrated graphics, which perform 61% higher, despite both sharing a $281.00 USD price tag. While the i3-8145U offers a negligible 5% higher CPU clock speed, the i3-1005G1 provides better memory support (DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733) and better casual gaming performance, although it has a slightly higher 13W "TDP down". Ultimately, the review recommends the i3-1005G1 for its improved, future-proofed efficiency.

cpu-monkey.com

05/02/2026

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-8145U Benchmarks & Specs

The Intel Core i3-8145U is a 14nm++ Whiskey Lake-U dual-core processor (2 cores/4 threads) designed for thin laptops, operating at 2.10 GHz with a 3.90 GHz boost and a 15W TDP. It delivers improved single-core performance over its predecessors, suitable for daily office tasks and featuring integrated UHD Graphics 620 with modern codec support. However, as a dual-core chip, it faces limitations in multi-tasking compared to quad-core alternatives, and its performance is highly dependent on thermal management. For detailed technical specifications, visit CPU-Monkey.

laptopmedia.com

20/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-8145U – The Ice Lake model wins thanks to its GPU

LaptopMedia declares the 10nm Intel Core i3-1005G1 (Ice Lake) superior to the 14nm Core i3-8145U (Whiskey Lake) due to its 61% faster UHD Graphics G1 and faster RAM support (DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733), despite having lower base/boost clock speeds. While the older i3-8145U boasts higher turbo speeds and a slight ~5% advantage in raw CPU benchmarks, the i3-1005G1 offers better power efficiency (TDP-down) and substantially improved gaming capabilities for budget devices. Ultimately, the Ice Lake chip wins in overall value and graphical performance, making it the better choice for modern, light-duty computing. For more details, visit LaptopMedia.

laptopmedia.com

20/11/2019

Summary of the review

Intel Core i3-1005G1 vs Core i3-8145U – the Ice Lake one wins thanks to its GPU

This LaptopMedia comparison highlights the Intel Core i3-1005G1 (Ice Lake) as the superior budget processor over the Core i3-8145U (Whiskey Lake), primarily due to its advanced 10nm architecture, faster memory support (DDR4-3200/LPDDR4-3733), and, most notably, the significantly better Intel UHD Graphics G1. While the i3-8145U offers a 5% higher raw CPU performance advantage thanks to its higher clock speeds, it falls behind in graphical tasks. The i3-1005G1 demonstrates superior, smoother performance in casual gaming compared to the i3-8145U’s outdated UHD 620, proving itself to be the better choice for integrated graphics performance. Both processors are priced equally, despite the i3-1005G1 providing more modern technology. Pros for the i3-1005G1 include its vastly superior GPU and modern architecture, with the only con being slightly lower raw CPU frequency; the i3-8145U’s only pro is a marginal 5% CPU advantage, while its cons are a weak GPU and slow memory support. The review concludes that for the same price, the i3-1005G1 is the better purchase. For more details, visit LaptopMedia.

hardware.info

07/03/2020

Summary of the review

The best budget laptop under 500 euros (ASUS VivoBook Flip 14 i3-8145U Review)

This March 2020 Hardware Info guide highlights budget laptop alternatives under €500, emphasizing that, while alternatives exist to top picks like the Acer Swift 1 and HP 14s, staying in this price range requires significant compromises. Pros of these alternatives include options for larger 15.6-inch displays for better multitasking and varied processor setups suitable for basic productivity. Conversely, cons involve sacrificing build quality for weaker plastic chassis, limited multitasking performance, and inferior display quality with poor viewing angles. Copy

tweakers.net

01/10/2019

Summary of the review

Laptop Best Buy Guide - October 2019 (HP 14 with i3-8145U Review)

The Tweakers Laptop Best Buy Guide for October 2019 recommends the HP 14s-dq1015nd for budget users, praising its Ice Lake processor and rare IPS screen, despite its plastic chassis. For the basic segment, the Lenovo ThinkPad E595 is highlighted for its superior keyboard and build, though its screen is quite dim. The ThinkBook 13s-IWL tops the Thin & Light category for its robust aluminum construction, excellent battery life, and high-quality display. However, it lacks an SD card reader and has limited RAM expandability. These selections emphasize a balance of performance and display quality, offering strong options for different price points in the 2019 market. Detailed reviews for these laptops are available on the Tweakers website. Copy

hardware.info

09/08/2019

Summary of the review

A lot of notebook for a little: Asus VivoBook X512FA vs. Lenovo IdeaPad S145-15IWL review

Hardware Info compares the budget-friendly ASUS VivoBook X512FA and Lenovo IdeaPad S145-15IWL, both featuring Intel Core i3-8145U processors and 256GB SSDs. The ASUS is highlighted for its modern design, thin "NanoEdge" bezels, and the ergonomic ErgoLift hinge, while the Lenovo is characterized by a more functional, sturdy plastic chassis. The review indicates the ASUS VivoBook often features a superior Full HD display, along with premium additions like a fingerprint scanner and USB Type-C, which are frequently absent on the Lenovo model. Conversely, the Lenovo IdeaPad S145 is noted for offering slightly better battery life in real-world scenarios, making it a reliable option for extended usage. Ultimately, the ASUS is recommended for its better display and design, with pros including a sleek look and versatile ports, despite a shorter battery life. The Lenovo is favored for its competitive, low-cost price point and robust build, although it faces disadvantages regarding display quality and fewer modern features.

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9965WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9995WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper 7970X

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9985WX

Processors

Intel Core Ultra 9 285

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 9975WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7985WX

Processors

AMD Ryzen 9 9950x3d

Processors

Intel Core i9 13900K

Processors

AMD Ryzen Threadripper Pro 7965WX

Processors

Compare Intel Core i3 8145U with other processors

Compare