OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£880PassMark benchmark result:33222N. of physical cores:12CPU boost clock speed:5.1 GHzCPU socket:FP8TDP (Thermal design power):28 W

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

8.4

Overall score

Score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

90%

8.4

Technical score

10%

?

User score

★Better than 92% of processors
8.4

Technical score

Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components

60%

8.6

Performance

18%

8.3

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.6

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.6

Power & Thermal

4%

8.3

Platform

1%

8.9

Integrated Graphics

★Better than 92% of processors
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £880

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370

Technical score
Technical score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Score components:

60%

8.6

Performance

18%

8.3

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.6

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.6

Power & Thermal

4%

8.3

Platform

1%

8.9

Integrated Graphics

8.4
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is higher than that of 0% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components:

60%

8.4

Overall score

40%

5.9

Price

7.6
Brand name
AMD
Processor type
mobile
Processor type
mobile
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
This processor belongs to the mobile processor class, which is more advanced than that of 7.3% of processors and equal to that of 48.6% of processors.
CPU socket
FP8
CPU socket
FP8
â–² Better than 52% of models
This processor uses the FP8 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 52% of processors and equal to that of 1.9% of processors.
Chipset
N/A
CPU architecture
x86-64
CPU architecture
x86-64
â–² Better than 2% of models
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
12
N. of physical cores
12
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has 12 CPU cores, which is more than 81.5% of processors and equal to 5.5% of processors.
CPU threads
24
CPU threads
24
★ Better than 90% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor offers 24 CPU threads, which is more than 90.3% of processors and equal to 4% of processors.
Threads per core
2
Threads per core
2
â–² Better than 30% of models
Market range: <0 – >2.5
This processor offers 2 threads per core, which is more than 30.3% of processors and equal to 69.7% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
5.1 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
5.1 GHz
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 5.1 GHz which is higher than that of 86.1% of processors and equal to that of 4.1% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
4x 2.0 GHz & 8x 2.0 GHz
CPU base clock speed
4x 2.0 GHz & 8x 2.0 GHz
â–² Better than 75% of models
This processor has a base clock of 4x2.0 GHz & 8x2.0 GHz which is higher than that of 74.7% of processors and equal to that of 0.2% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
4 nm
Semiconductor size
4 nm
â–² Better than 88% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor uses a 4 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 88.5% of processors and equal to that of 7.4% of processors.
Foundry
TSMC 4 nm
Foundry
TSMC 4 nm
â–² Better than 87% of models
This processor is built on the TSMC 4 nm foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 87% of processors and equal to that of 7.5% of processors.
L3 cache
24 MB
L3 cache
24 MB
â–² Better than 82% of models
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 24 MB which is larger than that of 81.5% of processors and equal to that of 5.8% of processors.
L2 cache
12 MB
L2 cache
12 MB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 12 MB which is larger than that of 84.8% of processors and equal to that of 2.7% of processors.
L1 cache
960 KB
L1 cache
960 KB
â–² Better than 85% of models
Market range: <128 KB – >1.2k KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 960 KB which is larger than that of 85.2% of processors and equal to that of 0.8% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR5
DDR memory version
DDR5
â–² Better than 66% of models
This processor supports DDR DDR5, which is newer than that of 66.4% of processors and equal to that of 12.6% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
8,000 MHz
Maximum memory speed
8,000 MHz
★ Better than 97% of models
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 8,000 MHz, which is higher than that of 97.1% of processors and equal to 1.2% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5X-8000 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5X-8000 MHz
★ Better than 97% of models
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to LPDDR5X-8000 MHz, which is higher than that of 97.2% of processors and equal to 1.2% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
N/A
Maximum memory capacity
256 GB
Maximum memory capacity
256 GB
â–² Better than 89% of models
Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
This processor supports up to 256 GB of memory, which is more than 89.5% of processors and equal to 8.2% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
yes
Integrated graphics
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This processor includes integrated graphics. 12.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
Radeon 890M
Integrated GPU model
Radeon 890M
★ Better than 98% of models
This processor uses the Radeon 890M integrated GPU, which is more advanced than that in 98.2% of processors and equal to that in 0.2% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
16
Integrated GPU execution units
16
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Market range: <6 – >64
This processor has 16 GPU execution units, which is fewer than 56.4% of processors and equal to 6.2% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
800 MHz
Integrated GPU base frequency
800 MHz
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <300 MHz – >800 MHz
This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 800 MHz which is higher than that of 86.7% of processors and equal to that of 6.4% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), AV1 (HW decode/encode)
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), AV1 (HW decode/encode)
★ Better than 91% of models
This processor supports H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), AV1 (HW decode/encode) media codecs, which is broader support than 90.7% of processors and equal to 3.4% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a TDP of 28 W which is lower than that of 67.5% of processors and equal to that of 7% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
28 W
Base power (PL1)
28 W
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a base power of 28 W which is lower than that of 67.2% of processors and equal to that of 7.2% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
?
Tau (power duration limit)
N/A
Configurable TDP
yes
Configurable TDP
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This processor supports configurable TDP. 47.3% of processors support configurable TDP.
cTDP: 15-54 W
Show more

AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • 3.18x higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    15,354
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <763 – >14k
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (15,354 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    15,354 vs 4,829
  • 3.14x higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    33,222
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (33,222 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    33,222 vs 10,572.5
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Strix Point
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Strix Point vs Kaby Lake).
    Strix Point vs Kaby Lake
  • 59.4% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    3,985
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >4k
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,985 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    3,985 vs 2,500
  • 16 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    24
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <4 – >24
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (24 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    24 vs 8
  • 6 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    12
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (12 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    12 vs 6
  • 18.6% higher boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    5.1 GHz
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    5.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 4.8x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    12 MB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (12 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    12 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • 4 years newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2024 vs 2020).
    October 2024
    2024 vs 2020
  • Includes crypto acceleration
    Cryptographic acceleration
    AES, SHA, RSA/PKA
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This processor includes crypto acceleration, the average processor does not. 0.00% of processors include crypto acceleration.
    AES, SHA, RSA/PKA vs AES, SHA
  • Supports HMP
    Uses HMP
    yes
    â–² Better than 77% of models
    This processor supports HMP, the average processor does not. 22.7% of processors support HMP.
  • 3.18x higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    15,354
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <763 – >14k
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (15,354 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    15,354 vs 4,829
  • 3.14x higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    33,222
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (33,222 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    33,222 vs 10,572.5
  • 59.4% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    3,985
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >4k
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,985 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    3,985 vs 2,500
  • 16 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    24
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    Market range: <4 – >24
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (24 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    24 vs 8
  • 6 more CPU cores
    N. of physical cores
    12
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This processor has more CPU cores than the average processor (12 vs 6). The average processor has 6 CPU cores.
    12 vs 6
  • 18.6% higher boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    5.1 GHz
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (5.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    5.1 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    4 x 2.0 GHz & 8 x 2.0 GHz
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (4x2 GHz & 8x2 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    4x2.0 GHz & 8x2.0 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • 4 wider front-end design
    Front-end width
    8
    ★ Better than 94% of models
    Market range: <2 – >7
    This processor has a higher front-end width than the average processor (8 vs 4). The average processor uses front-end width of 4.
    8 vs 4
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Strix Point
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Strix Point vs Kaby Lake).
    Strix Point vs Kaby Lake
  • 4.8x larger L2 cache
    L2 cache
    12 MB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
    This processor has a higher L2 cache than the average processor (12 MB vs 2.5 MB). The average processor has L2 cache of 2.5 MB.
    12 MB vs 2.5 MB
  • 66.7% smaller process node
    Semiconductor size
    4 nm
    â–² Better than 88% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
    This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (4 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    4 nm vs 12 nm
  • Uses big.LITTLE design
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This processor uses a big.LITTLE design, the average processor does not. 20.5% of processors use a big.LITTLE design.
    Zen 5 + Zen 5c cores
  • More advanced foundry
    Foundry
    TSMC 4 nm
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
    TSMC 4 nm vs Intel 14 nm
  • 2.5x larger L1 cache
    L1 cache
    960 KB
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    Market range: <128 KB – >1.2k KB
    This processor has a higher L1 cache than the average processor (960 KB vs 384 KB). The average processor has L1 cache of 384 KB.
    960 KB vs 384 KB
  • 3x larger L3 cache
    L3 cache
    24 MB
    â–² Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (24 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    24 MB vs 8 MB
  • 2x more L2 per core
    L2 per core
    1 MB/core
    â–² Better than 63% of models
    Market range: <0.25 MB/core – >2 MB/core
    This processor has more L2 cache per core than the average processor (1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core). The average processor provides 0.5 MB/core of L2 cache per core.
    1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core
  • 16.7% more L3 per core
    L3 per core
    2 MB/core
    â–² Better than 52% of models
    Market range: <1 MB/core – >3 MB/core
    This processor has more L3 cache per core than the average processor (2 MB/core vs 1.7 MB/core). The average processor provides 1.714 MB/core of L3 cache per core.
    2 MB/core vs 1.714 MB/core
  • 2.73x higher memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    8,000 MHz
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
    This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (8000 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    8,000 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • 4x more memory capacity
    Maximum memory capacity
    256 GB
    â–² Better than 89% of models
    Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
    This processor has more maximum memory capacity than the average processor (256 GB vs 64 GB). The average processor supports 64 GB of memory.
    256 GB vs 64 GB
  • Newer PCIe version
    PCIe version
    4.0
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
    4.0 vs 3.0
  • Newer DDR support
    DDR memory version
    DDR5
    â–² Better than 66% of models
    This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR5 vs DDR4).
    DDR5 vs DDR4
  • Higher JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    LPDDR5X-8000 MHz
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (LPDDR5X-8000 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    LPDDR5X-8000 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory support
    yes
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    This processor supports ECC memory, the average processor does not. 32.5% of processors support ECC memory.
  • Better integrated GPU
    Integrated GPU model
    Radeon 890M
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Radeon 890M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
    Radeon 890M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • 2.29x higher GPU clock speed
    Integrated GPU base frequency
    800 MHz
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <300 MHz – >800 MHz
    This processor has a higher integrated GPU frequency than the average processor (800 MHz vs 350 MHz). The average processor has integrated GPU frequency of 350 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 350 MHz
  • 1 more supported displays
    Maximum supported displays
    4
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
    4 vs 3
  • 37.8% lower base power
    Base power (PL1)
    28 W
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a lower base power draw than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    28 W vs 45 W
  • 37.8% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    28 W
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a lower TDP than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    28 W vs 45 W
  • 31.6% larger die size
    Die size
    233 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (233 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    233 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 3.52x more expensive
    AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 is more expensive than the average processor (£880 vs £250).
    £880 vs £250
  • Older TPM support
    TPM type
    fTPM 2.0
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 8 lower clock multiplier
    Clock multiplier
    20
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <16 – >38
    This processor has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (20 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
    20 vs 28
  • 3.52x more expensive
    AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 is more expensive than the average processor (£880 vs £250).
    £880 vs £250
  • Older TPM support
    TPM type
    fTPM 2.0
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 8 lower clock multiplier
    Clock multiplier
    20
    â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <16 – >38
    This processor has a lower clock multiplier than the average processor (20 vs 28). The average processor has a clock multiplier of 28.
    20 vs 28
  • 31.6% larger die size
    Die size
    233 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (233 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    233 mm² vs 177 mm²

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
phoronix.com
28/07/2024
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: 100+ Benchmarks Validate Zen 5's Captivating Power Efficiency & Performance
K
kitguru.net
28/07/2024
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 powered ASUS Zenbook S 16 OLED review
N
notebookcheck.net
17/04/2025
Summary of the review
Framework Laptop 13.5 Ryzen AI 9 review: Skip the Intel version for better performance
G
geekompc.com
24/03/2026
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Review: Benchmarking the New AI King
P
pcmasters.de
22/01/2026
Summary of the review
Sapphire EDGE AI 370 Review - Testing the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Version
(Translated)Show original
H
hardwareluxx.de
28/07/2024
Summary of the review
Initial performance benchmarks for the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370", "First performance analysis of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
(Translated)Show original
G
geekom.fr
04/01/2026
Summary of the review
Intel Core Ultra 9 285H vs AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370
(Translated)Show original
G
geekom.fr
05/12/2025
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 : Nouveau Roi de l'IA Mis à l'Épreuve
(Translated)Show original
P
pausehardware.com
24/07/2024
Summary of the review
The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370: A New Industry Benchmark
(Translated)Show original
C
cpubenchmark.net
27/03/2026
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 - CPU Benchmarks
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370

  • Exceptional power efficiency and battery life, outperforming Intel competition in real-world endurance tests.
  • Superior integrated graphics performance with the Radeon 890M, capable of solid 1080p gaming on AAA titles.
  • Significant multi-threading gains for productivity and content creation, such as 4K video editing and rendering.
  • Strong on-device AI performance with 50 TOPS NPU, suitable for local LLM inference and creative AI tools.
  • Excellent thermal management, maintaining quiet operation and lower temperatures under moderate loads.
  • Full compatibility with Windows 11 Copilot+ and mature x86 application support.

What we don't like about AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370

  • Large latency penalty in cross-CCX communication between Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, potentially affecting specific high-performance tasks.
  • Gaming performance can be inconsistent, with some users reporting minor stutters or results nearly identical to previous generations in GPU-bound scenarios.
  • Premium pricing makes laptops equipped with this chip significantly more expensive than mid-range alternatives.
  • Higher power usage and heat output during 'idle' or simple tasks in early Linux implementations.
  • Some users reported crashes in specific titles like Battlefield 6 and Death Stranding 2.
  • Single-core performance gains are viewed as marginal by some reviewers compared to the drastic multi-core improvements.

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370 is a flagship enterprise-grade mobile processor based on the 'Strix Point' Zen 5 architecture, featuring a hybrid 12-core/24-thread configuration (4x Zen 5 and 8x Zen 5c cores) with a 5.1 GHz max boost clock and a 36MB total cache. Key characteristics include an integrated XDNA 2 NPU delivering up to 50 TOPS of AI performance (80 TOPS total) and the powerful Radeon 890M iGPU with 16 RDNA 3.5 compute units. Main pros include exceptional power efficiency on TSMC's 4nm process, leadership-class integrated graphics for 1080p gaming and content creation, and AMD PRO technologies for enhanced security and manageability. Available cons include a locked multiplier that prevents traditional overclocking, performance dependency on high-speed LPDDR5x-8000 RAM, and potentially high heat output in compact systems under heavy multi-core loads.

Compare AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX Pro 370 and other processors

No results found