OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Processors Methodology v1.0
Processors Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Processors Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Processors Methodology v1.0

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£400PassMark benchmark result:16815N. of physical cores:6CPU boost clock speed:4.55 GHzCPU socket:FP7TDP (Thermal design power):28 W

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Processors category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the processor's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best processors on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

90%

6.3

Technical score

10%

?

User score

â–²Better than 60% of processors
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

60%

5.9

Performance

18%

6.3

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.3

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.7

Power & Thermal

4%

7.9

Platform

1%

7.8

Integrated Graphics

â–²Better than 61% of processors
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £400

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of processor AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the processor's technical performance, covering key areas such as processing performance, core configuration, efficiency, platform support, integrated features, and thermal behavior.
When it matters
When you want to compare processors based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

5.9

Performance

18%

6.3

Cache & Architecture

10%

7.3

Memory & PCIe

7%

7.7

Power & Thermal

4%

7.9

Platform

1%

7.8

Integrated Graphics

6.3
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you want to know how a processor performs in real workloads and how reliable it is for gaming, productivity, and efficiency according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the processor.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a processor reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U has a popularity score of 1 point, which is higher than that of 0% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the processor's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a processor with a good balance between performance, efficiency, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

8.4

Price

7.0
Brand name
AMD
Processor type
mobile
Processor type
mobile
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
This processor belongs to the mobile processor class, which is more advanced than that of 7.3% of processors and equal to that of 48.6% of processors.
CPU socket
FP7
CPU socket
FP7
â–¼ Worse than 48% of models
This processor uses the FP7 CPU socket, which is newer than that of 47.4% of processors and equal to that of 4.4% of processors.
Chipset
N/A
CPU architecture
x86-64
CPU architecture
x86-64
â–² Better than 2% of models
This processor uses the x86-64 architecture, which is more advanced than that of 1.7% of processors and equal to that of 98.3% of processors.
Show more
N. of physical cores
6
N. of physical cores
6
â–² Better than 50% of models
Market range: <2 – >12
This processor has 6 CPU cores, which is more than 49.9% of processors and equal to 13.4% of processors.
CPU threads
12
CPU threads
12
â–² Better than 55% of models
Market range: <4 – >24
This processor offers 12 CPU threads, which is more than 55% of processors and equal to 14.1% of processors.
Threads per core
2
Threads per core
2
â–² Better than 30% of models
Market range: <0 – >2.5
This processor offers 2 threads per core, which is more than 30.3% of processors and equal to 69.7% of processors.
CPU boost clock speed
4.55 GHz
CPU boost clock speed
4.55 GHz
â–² Better than 62% of models
Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
This processor reaches a boost clock of 4.55 GHz which is higher than that of 62.3% of processors and equal to that of 0.1% of processors.
CPU base clock speed
6x 2.9 GHz
CPU base clock speed
6x 2.9 GHz
â–² Better than 60% of models
This processor has a base clock of 6x2.9 GHz which is higher than that of 60.1% of processors and equal to that of 0.5% of processors.
Show more
Semiconductor size
6 nm
Semiconductor size
6 nm
â–² Better than 83% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
This processor uses a 6 nm process node, which is more advanced than that of 82.5% of processors and equal to that of 2.6% of processors.
Foundry
TSMC 6 nm
Foundry
TSMC 6 nm
â–² Better than 81% of models
This processor is built on the TSMC 6 nm foundry process, which is more advanced than that of 81.1% of processors and equal to that of 2.6% of processors.
L3 cache
16 MB
L3 cache
16 MB
â–² Better than 64% of models
Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
This processor has an L3 cache of 16 MB which is larger than that of 64.2% of processors and equal to that of 12.7% of processors.
L2 cache
3 MB
L2 cache
3 MB
â–² Better than 51% of models
Market range: <1 MB – >16 MB
This processor has an L2 cache of 3 MB which is larger than that of 50.5% of processors and equal to that of 4.4% of processors.
L1 cache
384 KB
L1 cache
384 KB
â–² Better than 45% of models
Market range: <128 KB – >1.2k KB
This processor has an L1 cache of 384 KB which is larger than that of 44.9% of processors and equal to that of 15.7% of processors.
Show more
DDR memory version
DDR4/DDR5
DDR memory version
DDR4/DDR5
â–² Better than 79% of models
This processor supports DDR DDR4/DDR5, which is newer than that of 79.1% of processors and equal to that of 9.7% of processors.
Maximum memory speed
6,400 MHz
Maximum memory speed
6,400 MHz
â–² Better than 84% of models
Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
This processor supports memory speeds up to 6,400 MHz, which is higher than that of 83.9% of processors and equal to 8.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5-6400 MHz
Max memory speed (JEDEC)
LPDDR5-6400 MHz
â–² Better than 84% of models
This processor supports JEDEC memory speeds up to LPDDR5-6400 MHz, which is higher than that of 84.4% of processors and equal to 3.1% of processors.
Max memory speed (XMP / EXPO)
N/A
Maximum memory capacity
64 GB
Maximum memory capacity
64 GB
â–¼ Worse than 44% of models
Market range: <32 GB – >256 GB
This processor supports up to 64 GB of memory, which is more than 28.4% of processors and equal to 27.5% of processors.
Show more
Integrated graphics
yes
Integrated graphics
yes
â–² Better than 12% of models
This processor includes integrated graphics. 12.4% of processors include integrated graphics.
Integrated GPU model
Radeon 660M
Integrated GPU model
Radeon 660M
★ Better than 91% of models
This processor uses the Radeon 660M integrated GPU, which is more advanced than that in 91.2% of processors and equal to that in 0.5% of processors.
Integrated GPU execution units
6
Integrated GPU execution units
6
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Market range: <6 – >64
This processor has 6 GPU execution units, which is fewer than 83.8% of processors and equal to 6.3% of processors.
Integrated GPU base frequency
400 MHz
Integrated GPU base frequency
400 MHz
â–² Better than 69% of models
Market range: <300 MHz – >800 MHz
This processor has an integrated GPU clock of 400 MHz which is higher than that of 68.7% of processors and equal to that of 7.9% of processors.
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode)
Integrated media encoders/decoders
H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode)
â–² Better than 80% of models
This processor supports H.264 (HW decode/encode), H.265 (HW decode/encode), VP9 (HW decode), MPEG-2 (HW decode), VC-1 (HW decode), JPEG (HW decode) media codecs, which is broader support than 79.6% of processors.
Show more
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
TDP (Thermal design power)
28 W
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a TDP of 28 W which is lower than that of 67.5% of processors and equal to that of 7% of processors.
Base power (PL1)
28 W
Base power (PL1)
28 W
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <15 W – >90 W
This processor has a base power of 28 W which is lower than that of 67.2% of processors and equal to that of 7.2% of processors.
Boost power (PL2)
?
Tau (power duration limit)
N/A
Configurable TDP
yes
Configurable TDP
yes
â–² Better than 47% of models
This processor supports configurable TDP. 47.3% of processors support configurable TDP.
cTDP: 15 W
Show more

AMD Ryzen 5 7535U vs the average processor

246810TotalPlatformPerformanceCache & ArchitectureMemory & PCIeIntegrated GraphicsPower & Thermal
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Rembrandt R
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Rembrandt R vs Kaby Lake).
    Rembrandt R vs Kaby Lake
  • 2.89x higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Cinebench R20 single-core benchmark score
    1,414
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <282 – >775
    This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (1,414 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    1,414 vs 489
  • 4.23x faster classroom rendering
    Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
    1,414
    Category Benchmark
    Market range: <97 – >1.3k
    This processor has a lower Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (1,414 vs 334.1). The average processor needs 334.1 for the Blender Classroom test.
    1,414 vs 334.1
  • 2.18x higher memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    6,400 MHz
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
    This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (6400 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    6,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • 59% higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    16,815
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (16,815 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    16,815 vs 10,572.5
  • 50% smaller process node
    Semiconductor size
    6 nm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
    This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (6 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    6 nm vs 12 nm
  • Newer PCIe version
    PCIe version
    4.0
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
    4.0 vs 3.0
  • 27% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    3,176
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >4k
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,176 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    3,176 vs 2,500
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2023
    â–² Better than 71% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This processor has a newer release date than the average processor (2023 vs 2020).
    January 2023
    2023 vs 2020
  • 2.89x higher Cinebench R20 single-core score
    Cinebench R20 single-core benchmark score
    1,414
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Market range: <282 – >775
    This processor has a higher Cinebench R20 single-core score than the average processor (1,414 vs 489). The average processor scores 489 in Cinebench R20 single-core.
    1,414 vs 489
  • 4.23x faster classroom rendering
    Blender (bmw27) benchmark result
    1,414
    Category Benchmark
    Market range: <97 – >1.3k
    This processor has a lower Blender Classroom render time than the average processor (1,414 vs 334.1). The average processor needs 334.1 for the Blender Classroom test.
    1,414 vs 334.1
  • 59% higher PassMark score
    PassMark benchmark result
    16,815
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <2.5k – >32.5k
    This processor has a higher PassMark benchmark score than the average processor (16,815 vs 10,572.5). The average processor scores 10,572.5 in PassMark benchmark.
    16,815 vs 10,572.5
  • 27% better single-core performance
    PassMark single-core benchmark score
    3,176
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <1.4k – >4k
    This processor has a higher PassMark single-core score than the average processor (3,176 vs 2,500). The average processor scores 2,500 in PassMark single-core.
    3,176 vs 2,500
  • 43.3% higher multi-core score
    Geekbench 6 multi-core benchmark score
    6,919
    â–² Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <763 – >14k
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 multi-core score than the average processor (6,919 vs 4,829). The average processor scores 4,829 in Geekbench 6 multi-core.
    6,919 vs 4,829
  • 4 more CPU threads
    CPU threads
    12
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <4 – >24
    This processor has more CPU threads than the average processor (12 vs 8). The average processor has 8 CPU threads.
    12 vs 8
  • 5.8% higher boost clock
    CPU boost clock speed
    4.55 GHz
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <3 GHz – >5.5 GHz
    This processor has a higher boost clock speed than the average processor (4.6 GHz vs 4.3 GHz). The average processor reaches boost clock speed of 4.3 GHz.
    4.55 GHz vs 4.3 GHz
  • 18.5% higher single-core score
    Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
    1,743
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    Market range: <561 – >2.7k
    This processor has a higher Geekbench 6 single-core score than the average processor (1,743 vs 1,471). The average processor scores 1,471 in Geekbench 6 single-core.
    1,743 vs 1,471
  • Higher base clock
    CPU base clock speed
    6 x 2.9 GHz
    â–² Better than 60% of models
    This processor has a higher base clock than the average processor (6x2.9 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz).
    6x2.9 GHz vs 4x3.3 GHz
  • More advanced microarchitecture
    Microarchitecture codename
    Rembrandt R
    â–² Better than 85% of models
    This processor uses a more advanced microarchitecture than the average processor (Rembrandt R vs Kaby Lake).
    Rembrandt R vs Kaby Lake
  • 50% smaller process node
    Semiconductor size
    6 nm
    â–² Better than 83% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >24 nm
    This processor has a lower process node than the average processor (6 nm vs 12 nm). The average processor uses a process node of 12 nm.
    6 nm vs 12 nm
  • More advanced foundry
    Foundry
    TSMC 6 nm
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    This processor uses a more advanced foundry process than the average processor (TSMC 6 nm vs Intel 14 nm).
    TSMC 6 nm vs Intel 14 nm
  • 2x larger L3 cache
    L3 cache
    16 MB
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <2 MB – >32 MB
    This processor has a higher L3 cache than the average processor (16 MB vs 8 MB). The average processor has L3 cache of 8 MB.
    16 MB vs 8 MB
  • 2.18x higher memory speed
    Maximum memory speed
    6,400 MHz
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <1.5k MHz – >6.5k MHz
    This processor has a higher maximum memory speed than the average processor (6400 MHz vs 2933 MHz). The average processor supports memory speed of 2933 MHz.
    6,400 MHz vs 2,933 MHz
  • Newer PCIe version
    PCIe version
    4.0
    â–² Better than 62% of models
    This processor supports a newer PCIe version than the average processor (4 vs 3).
    4.0 vs 3.0
  • Newer DDR support
    DDR memory version
    DDR4/DDR5
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This processor supports a newer DDR generation than the average processor (DDR4/DDR5 vs DDR4).
    DDR4/DDR5 vs DDR4
  • 4 more PCIe lanes
    PCIe lane count
    20
    â–² Better than 58% of models
    Market range: <10 – >30
    This processor has more PCIe lanes than the average processor (20 vs 16). The average processor offers 16 PCIe lanes.
    16 usable lanes
    20 vs 16
  • 67.7% higher memory bandwidth
    Maximum memory bandwidth
    76.8 GB/s
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <25 GB/s – >100 GB/s
    This processor has a higher memory bandwidth than the average processor (76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s). The average processor offers memory bandwidth of 45.8 GB/s.
    76.8 GB/s vs 45.8 GB/s
  • Supports ECC memory
    ECC memory support
    yes
    â–² Better than 68% of models
    This processor supports ECC memory, the average processor does not. 32.5% of processors support ECC memory.
  • Higher JEDEC memory speed
    Max memory speed (JEDEC)
    LPDDR5-6400 MHz
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    This processor has a higher JEDEC memory speed than the average processor (LPDDR5-6400 MHz vs DDR4-3200 MHz). The average processor supports JEDEC memory speed of DDR4-3200 MHz.
    LPDDR5-6,400 MHz vs DDR4-3,200 MHz
  • Better integrated GPU
    Integrated GPU model
    Radeon 660M
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This processor uses a better integrated GPU than the average processor (Radeon 660M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630).
    Radeon 660M vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
  • 1 more supported displays
    Maximum supported displays
    4
    â–² Better than 56% of models
    Market range: <1 – >6
    This processor has more supported displays than the average processor (4 vs 3). The average processor supports 3 displays.
    4 vs 3
  • 5 °C lower CPU temperature
    CPU temperature
    95 °C
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
    This processor has a lower CPU temperature than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor runs at a CPU temperature of 100 °C.
    95 °C vs 100 °C
  • 37.8% lower base power
    Base power (PL1)
    28 W
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a lower base power draw than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a base power draw of 45 W.
    28 W vs 45 W
  • 37.8% lower TDP
    TDP (Thermal design power)
    28 W
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <15 W – >90 W
    This processor has a lower TDP than the average processor (28 W vs 45 W). The average processor has a TDP of 45 W.
    28 W vs 45 W
  • 5 °C lower TJ Max
    Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
    95 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
    This processor has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
    95 °C vs 100 °C
  • 17.5% larger die size
    Die size
    208 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (208 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    208 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 60% more expensive
    AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is more expensive than the average processor (£400 vs £250).
    £400 vs £250
  • 75% fewer GPU execution units
    Integrated GPU execution units
    6
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <6 – >64
    This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (6 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
    6 vs 24
  • Older TPM support
    TPM type
    fTPM 2.0
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 60% more expensive
    AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is more expensive than the average processor (£400 vs £250).
    £400 vs £250
  • Older TPM support
    TPM type
    fTPM 2.0
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This processor supports an older TPM version than the average processor (fTPM 2 vs PTT 2).
    fTPM 2.0 vs PTT 2.0
  • 17.5% larger die size
    Die size
    208 mm²
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <99 mm² – >257 mm²
    This processor has a higher die size than the average processor (208 mm² vs 177 mm²). The average processor has a die size of 177 mm².
    208 mm² vs 177 mm²
  • 75% fewer GPU execution units
    Integrated GPU execution units
    6
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
    Market range: <6 – >64
    This processor has fewer GPU execution units than the average processor (6 vs 24). The average processor has 24 GPU execution units.
    6 vs 24
  • 5 °C lower TJ Max
    Maximum operating temperature (TJ Max)
    95 °C
    â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <95 °C – >105 °C
    This processor has a lower TJ Max than the average processor (95 °C vs 100 °C). The average processor has a TJ Max of 100 °C.
    95 °C vs 100 °C

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cpubenchmark.net
Daily Update (First Seen Q2 2023)
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U - CPU Benchmarks (PassMark)
B
browser.geekbench.com
01/04/2023
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U Benchmarks - Geekbench Browser
L
laptopmedia.com
01/05/2023
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U - LaptopMedia Benchmarks
L
laptopmedia.com
15/01/2023
Summary of the review
AMD Ryzen 5 7535U - Benchmarks and Specs
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

  • Excellent performance for office work, multitasking, and productivity tasks like Word, Excel, and light programming.
  • High energy efficiency, especially when working on battery power.
  • Runs quietly with low fan noise during everyday tasks.
  • Provides a smooth, snappy user experience even without being connected to a power source.
  • Good value for money, often found in affordable budget-friendly laptops.
  • Modern connectivity features including support for USB 4, PCIe Gen 4, and fast DDR5/LPDDR5 memory.

What we don't like about AMD Ryzen 5 7535U

  • Integrated Radeon 660M graphics are not suitable for high-end or latest demanding games; limited to older or light titles at lower settings.
  • Minor incremental upgrade over the previous Ryzen 5 6600U, offering very similar architecture and performance.
  • Can get hot during gaming or intensive workloads, sometimes leading to power throttling.
  • Performance is noticeably weaker than Zen 4-based processors in both raw speed and power efficiency.
  • Naming convention can be confusing, as the '7000' series branding may lead some users to expect newer Zen 4 architecture rather than the Zen 3+ refresh used here.

Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 5 7535U is a 6-core, 12-thread mobile processor based on the Zen 3+ (Rembrandt Refresh) architecture and 6nm FinFET technology. It features a base clock speed of 2.9 GHz, a max boost clock of 4.55 GHz, and 16 MB of L3 cache, with a configurable TDP typically ranging from 15W to 30W. Main pros include its support for modern standards like DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM, PCIe 4.0, and USB4, alongside solid integrated graphics performance from the Radeon 660M (6 cores at 1900 MHz). However, as a refresh of the older Ryzen 5 6600U, it offers only marginal performance gains and lacks the latest Zen 4 architecture improvements found in newer 7040 series chips.

Compare AMD Ryzen 5 7535U with other processors

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Ryzen 5 7535U and other processors

No results found