OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Microphones Methodology v1.0
Microphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Microphones Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Microphones Methodology v1.0

CAD Audio GXL2600USB Review | 76 Data compared

Avg. price:~£80Connection type:USBTransducer type:condenserMax SPL:135 dB SPLSupported sample rates:44.1 kHzOutput connector type:USB

CAD Audio GXL2600USB Review: Compare 76 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Microphones category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the microphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best microphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

75%

6.0

Technical score

25%

6.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 87% of microphones
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

20%

9.0

Audio Performance

20%

4.9

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

3.9

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

7.2

Compatibility

5%

4.9

Connectivity

3%

6.3

Design

3%

6.7

Accessories

â–¼Worse than 76% of microphones
6.6

User score

User score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on 46 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 97% of microphones
  • cad-audio-gxl2600usb
  • cad-audio-gxl2600usb
  • cad-audio-gxl2600usb
cad-audio-gxl2600usb
cad-audio-gxl2600usb
cad-audio-gxl2600usb

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of microphone CAD Audio GXL2600USB

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Microphones category across these key areas: Audio Performance, Connectivity, Recording, Pickup Patterns, Controls & Features, Power, Design, Accessories, Compatibility.
When it matters
When you want to compare microphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

20%

9.0

Audio Performance

20%

4.9

Recording

16%

3.2

Pickup Patterns

16%

3.9

Controls & Features

10%

10

Power

7%

7.2

Compatibility

5%

4.9

Connectivity

3%

6.3

Design

3%

6.7

Accessories

6.0
User score
User score
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Score components

70%

7.7

User ratings

30%

4.2

Number of reviews

Based on 46 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
6.6
Popularity
Popularity
4.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the microphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to buy a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Popularity:
CAD Audio GXL2600USB has a popularity score of 4.2 points, which is lower than 63.8% of microphones.
4.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the microphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a microphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.3
Microphone type
studio
Transducer type
condenser
Diaphragm size
25.4 mm
Capsule type
single
Sensitivity
-35 dBV/Pa
Show more
Connection type
USB
Output connector type
USB
Headphone output
no
Headphone output
no
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
This microphone does not include a headphone output. 62.8% of microphones include this output.
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
3.5 mm audio jack
yes
â–² Better than 37% of models
This microphone includes a 3.5 mm jack. 62.8% of microphones include this connector.
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
6.35 mm audio jack connector
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not include a 6.35 mm jack. 2% of microphones include this connector.
Show more
Supported sample rates
44.1 kHz
Supported bit depths
16 bit
Audio interface sample rate
44.1 kHz
Audio interface sample rate
44.1 kHz
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
This microphone supports an interface sample rate of 44.1 kHz which is lower than that of 98.3% of microphones and equal to that of 1.8% of microphones.
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
Audio interface bit depth
16 bit
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
This microphone supports an interface bit depth of 16 bit which is lower than that of 58.5% of microphones and equal to that of 41.5% of microphones.
Signal-to-noise ratio (DAC)
N/A
Show more
N. of polar patterns
1
N. of polar patterns
1
â–¼ Worse than 25% of models
Market range: <1 – >4
The number of selectable polar patterns offered by this microphone is 1, which is lower than that of 24.6% of microphones and equal to that of 75.4% of microphones.
Cardioid pattern
yes
Cardioid pattern
yes
â–² Better than 9% of models
This microphone supports a cardioid pickup pattern. 91% of microphones support this pattern.
Omnidirectional pattern
no
Omnidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support an omnidirectional pickup pattern. 26.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Hypercardioid pattern
no
Hypercardioid pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone does not support a hypercardioid pickup pattern. 1.5% of microphones support this pattern.
Bidirectional pattern
no
Bidirectional pattern
no
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
This microphone does not support a bidirectional pickup pattern. 17.1% of microphones support this pattern.
Mute function
no
Mute function
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This microphone does not include a mute function. 68.3% of microphones include this control.
Onboard gain control
no
Onboard gain control
no
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
This microphone does not include onboard gain control. 51.3% of microphones include this control.
Volume control levels
0
Volume control levels
0
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Market range: <0 – >2
This microphone offers volume output of 0 which is lower than that of 65.7% of microphones and equal to that of 34.3% of microphones.
Flat DSP mode
no
Flat DSP mode
no
â–¼ Worse than 26% of models
This microphone does not support a flat DSP mode. 25.6% of microphones offer this processing option.
DSP presets
0
DSP presets
0
â–¼ Worse than 17% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This microphone offers 0 DSP presets, which is fewer than 16.6% of microphones and equal to 83.4% of microphones.
Show more
Phantom power required
no
Phantom power required
no
â–² Better than 10% of models
This microphone does not require phantom power. 90.5% of microphones also operate without phantom power.
Phantom power voltage
N/A
USB bus-powered
yes
USB bus-powered
yes
â–² Better than 14% of models
This microphone supports USB bus power. 85.9% of microphones support USB-powered operation.
Battery life
N/A
Height
198 mm
Height
198 mm
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Market range: <130 mm – >252.8 mm
This microphone is 198 mm tall, which is taller than 60% of microphones.
Width
89 mm
Width
89 mm
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
This microphone is 89 mm wide, which is wider than 78.5% of microphones.
Thickness
89 mm
Thickness
89 mm
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
This microphone is 89 mm thick, which is thicker than 71.1% of microphones.
Weight
?
Body material
metal
Show more
Included accessories
stand; shock mount; cable; carrying case
Shock mount included
yes
Shock mount included
yes
â–² Better than 51% of models
This microphone includes a shock mount. 49.3% of microphones include this accessory.
Pop filter included
no
Pop filter included
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This microphone does not include a pop filter. 60.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Windscreen included
no
Windscreen included
no
â–¼ Worse than 32% of models
This microphone does not include a windscreen. 31.8% of microphones include this accessory.
Cable length
3.05 m
Cable length
3.05 m
★ Better than 96% of models
Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
This microphone has a cable length of 3.05 m which is longer than that of 96.3% of microphones.
Android compatibility
no
Android compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Android. 66.3% of microphones are compatible with Android.
iOS compatibility
no
iOS compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This microphone is not compatible with iOS. 61.8% of microphones are compatible with iOS.
Windows compatibility
yes
Windows compatibility
yes
Category Benchmark
This microphone is compatible with Windows. 100% of microphones are compatible with Windows.
macOS compatibility
yes
macOS compatibility
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This microphone is compatible with macOS. 99.5% of microphones are compatible with macOS.
Xbox compatibility
no
Xbox compatibility
no
â–¼ Worse than 2% of models
This microphone is not compatible with Xbox. 1.5% of microphones are compatible with Xbox.
Show more

CAD Audio GXL2600USB vs the average microphone

246810TotalAudio PerformanceConnectivityRecordingPickup PatternsControls & FeaturesPowerDesignAccessoriesCompatibility
  • 14 dB SPL higher limit
    Max SPL
    135 dB SPL
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a higher max SPL than the average microphone (135 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    135 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 24 dB wider dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    120 dB
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a wider dynamic range than the average microphone (120 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    120 dB vs 96 dB
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • 1 dB-A lower equivalent input noise
    Equivalent input noise
    15 dB-A
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <10 dB-A – >28 dB-A
    This microphone has a lower equivalent input noise than the average microphone (15 dB-A vs 16 dB-A). The average microphone has equivalent input noise of 16 dB-A.
    ≤15 dB-A.
    15 dB-A vs 16 dB-A
  • 1.05 m longer cable length
    Cable length
    3.05 m
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a longer cable than the average microphone (3.1 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    3.05 m vs 2 m
  • 14 dB SPL higher limit
    Max SPL
    135 dB SPL
    â–² Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <110 dB SPL – >140 dB SPL
    This microphone has a higher max SPL than the average microphone (135 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL). The average microphone handles a max SPL of 121 dB SPL.
    135 dB SPL vs 121 dB SPL
  • 24 dB wider dynamic range
    Dynamic range
    120 dB
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    Market range: <77.5 dB – >130 dB
    This microphone has a wider dynamic range than the average microphone (120 dB vs 96 dB). The average microphone has a dynamic range of 96 dB.
    120 dB vs 96 dB
  • 1 dB-A lower equivalent input noise
    Equivalent input noise
    15 dB-A
    â–² Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <10 dB-A – >28 dB-A
    This microphone has a lower equivalent input noise than the average microphone (15 dB-A vs 16 dB-A). The average microphone has equivalent input noise of 16 dB-A.
    ≤15 dB-A.
    15 dB-A vs 16 dB-A
  • Includes shock mount
    Shock mount included
    yes
    â–² Better than 51% of models
    This microphone includes a shock mount, the average microphone does not.
  • 1.05 m longer cable length
    Cable length
    3.05 m
    ★ Better than 96% of models
    Market range: <1.4 m – >3 m
    This microphone has a longer cable than the average microphone (3.1 m vs 2 m). The average microphone has a cable length of 2 m.
    3.05 m vs 2 m
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • No on-device controls
    On-device controls
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This microphone does not place key controls on the device, the average microphone does. 79.5% of microphones place key controls on the device.
  • No mute function
    Mute function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This microphone does not include a mute function, the average microphone does.
  • Not compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with iOS, the average microphone is.
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with Android, the average microphone is.
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.
  • 20.8% lower user score
    User score
    6.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the microphone.
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a microphone performs in real use and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    CAD Audio GXL2600USB
    the average microphone
    CAD Audio GXL2600USB has a lower user score than the average microphone (6.65 vs 8.027).
    6.65 vs 8.03
  • 8.3% worse value for money
    CAD Audio GXL2600USB has a lower value-for-money score than the average microphone (7.33 vs 7.9).
    7.33 vs 7.94
  • 48.5% less popular
    CAD Audio GXL2600USB has a lower popularity than the average microphone (4.19 vs 6.2).
    4.19 vs 6.22
  • No headphone output
    Headphone output
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    This microphone does not include a headphone output, the average microphone does.
  • 8 bit lower interface bit depth
    Audio interface bit depth
    16 bit
    â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <16 bit – >24 bit
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface bit depth than the average microphone (16 bit vs 24 bit). The average microphone audio interface supports 24 bit.
    16 bit vs 24 bit
  • 3.9 kHz lower interface sample rate
    Audio interface sample rate
    44.1 kHz
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <48 kHz – >192 kHz
    This microphone supports a lower audio interface sample rate than the average microphone (44.1 kHz vs 48 kHz). The average microphone audio interface supports 48 kHz.
    44.1 kHz vs 48 kHz
  • No gain control
    Onboard gain control
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
    This microphone does not include onboard gain control, the average microphone does.
  • No on-device controls
    On-device controls
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    This microphone does not place key controls on the device, the average microphone does. 79.5% of microphones place key controls on the device.
  • No mute function
    Mute function
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This microphone does not include a mute function, the average microphone does.
  • 5 older release date
    Release date
    2015
    â–¼ Worse than 80% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This microphone is older than the average microphone (2015 vs 2020). The average microphone was released in 2020.
    January 2015.
    2015 vs 2020
  • 33 mm thicker body
    Thickness
    89 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <45 mm – >114 mm
    This microphone is thicker than the average microphone (89 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a thickness of 56 mm.
    89 mm vs 56 mm
  • 33 mm wider body
    Width
    89 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <48 mm – >109 mm
    This microphone is wider than the average microphone (89 mm vs 56 mm). The average microphone has a width of 56 mm.
    89 mm vs 56 mm
  • No pop filter
    Pop filter included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This microphone does not include a pop filter, the average microphone does.
  • Not compatible with Android
    Android compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with Android, the average microphone is.
  • Not compatible with iOS
    iOS compatibility
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This microphone is not compatible with iOS, the average microphone is.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

M
macsources.medium.com
17/08/2015
Summary of the review
CAD Audio GXL2600 USB Microphone Review
M
musicconnection.com
14/09/2015
Summary of the review
New Gear Review: CAD Audio GXL2600USB CondenserGo to product viewer dialog for this item.
M
macsources.medium.com
17/08/2015
Summary of the review
CAD Audio GXL2600 USB Microphone Review
(Translated)Show original
M
musicconnection.com
14/09/2015
Summary of the review
New Gear Review: CAD Audio GXL2600USB Condenser Microphone
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on 46 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about CAD Audio GXL2600USB

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Simple plug-and-play setup for both Windows and Mac
  • Includes essential accessories like a shock mount and long USB cable
  • Solid, high-quality build and professional-looking physical design
  • Good gain levels compared to other entry-level USB microphones
  • Decent performance for home podcasting and basic voiceover work

What we don't like about CAD Audio GXL2600USB

  • Noticeable background hiss or self-noise in some recordings
  • Included desktop tripod stand is often cited as low-set and difficult to adjust
  • Lacks physical hardware controls like gain knobs or headphone jacks for zero-latency monitoring
  • Not recommended for professional vocal auditions or high-fidelity music recording
  • Audio quality may not provide a significant upgrade over some high-end built-in computer mics

Verdict

The CAD Audio GXL2600USB is a large-diaphragm studio condenser microphone featuring a 1-inch Aoedeinâ„¢ capsule and a cardioid polar pattern, designed specifically for high-fidelity computer-based recording. It operates with a frequency response of 20Hz to 20kHz, a sensitivity of -35dB, and can handle a maximum sound pressure level (SPL) of 135dB, utilizing an internal PureToneâ„¢ A/D converter for accurate signal processing. Key pros include its easy plug-and-play USB connectivity for Mac and Windows, professional-grade transient response for vocals and podcasts, and the inclusion of a studio-quality shock mount and desk stand. However, notable cons include the lack of a built-in headphone jack for zero-latency monitoring, reported background hiss or self-noise in some environments, and the absence of physical gain or mute controls on the microphone body.

Compare CAD Audio GXL2600USB with other products in the Microphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of CAD Audio GXL2600USB and other products in the Microphones category

No results found