OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Sharkoon Light 200 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:16000 DPIWeight:62 g

Sharkoon Light 200 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Sharkoon Light 200
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Score components

80%

6.3

Technical score

20%

8.5

User score

â–²Better than 64% of mice
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 61%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components

36%

6.5

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.9

Controls

16%

8.8

Design

14%

10

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 61%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 71%
  • sharkoon-light-200
sharkoon-light-200
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Sharkoon Light 200

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

36%

6.5

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.9

Controls

16%

8.8

Design

14%

10

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

6.3
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.4

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 64% of models
Popularity:
Sharkoon Light 200 has a popularity score of 7.4 points, which is higher than that of 64% of products in this category.
7.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.7
Brand name
Sharkoon
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
62 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 62 g, which makes it lighter than 73.6% of mice and equal to 0.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
5
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, which is more than 81.4% of mice and equal to 18.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
64 KB
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has 64 KB of onboard memory, which is larger than 87.9% of mice.
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Sharkoon Light 200 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 24.4% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 62 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    62 g vs 82 g
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 60% higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 16,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    16,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 2 more stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 7 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    7 vs 5
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 60% higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 16,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    16,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 150 DPI lower minimum setting
    This mouse goes as low as 50 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    50 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 2 more stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 7 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    7 vs 5
  • 24.4% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 62 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    62 g vs 82 g
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 2.3 mm taller mouse height
    This mouse has a height of 42 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42 mm vs 39.7 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
Tech With Dom Archive
≈ estimated
02/05/2020
Unboxing and gaming test · weight, comfort and RGB
Verdict
Sharkoon Light 200 is light, comfortable and good-looking, though the shape takes getting used to during gaming sessions.
9.0
Nicolas11x12 English
≈ estimated
19/04/2020
Hands-on review · ergonomics, sensor and customisation
Verdict
Sharkoon Light 200 is recommended for its light weight, fast sensor, customisation and value, despite a minor lighting issue.
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techpowerup.com
19/05/2020
Summary of the review
Sharkoon Light² 200 Review | TechPowerUp
K
kitguru.net
27/01/2020
Summary of the review
Sharkoon Light² 200 Mouse Review - KitGuru
R
rtings.com
15/10/2021
Summary of the review
Sharkoon Light² 200 Mouse Review - RTINGS.com Do you need a comparison of these reviews or specific technical specifications for this model?
B
basic-tutorials.com
04/02/2020
Summary of the review
The Sharkoon Light² 200 in the test: Ultralight gaming mouse at E-Sport level?
T
techspinreview.com
21/06/2020
Summary of the review
AMAZING & precise! Sharkoon Light2 200 gaming mouse - Techspin Would you like a comparison of the technical specifications or sensor performance found...
K
kitguru.net
27/01/2020
Summary of the review
Sharkoon Light² 200 Mouse Review - KitGuru

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Sharkoon Light 200

  • Extremely lightweight at approximately 62g
  • High-end PixArt PMW 3389 sensor provides excellent precision
  • Comfortable ergonomic shape similar to the popular Zowie EC series
  • Highly customizable with swappable top covers (honeycomb vs. solid) and interchangeable DPI buttons
  • Smooth gliding pure PTFE feet with an extra replacement set included in the box
  • Flexible paracord-like braided cable that reduces drag
  • Good value for money compared to other ultra-light gaming mice
  • On-board memory allows for profile saving without needing permanent software

What customers don't like about Sharkoon Light 200

  • Wired-only design may be cumbersome for travel or tight spaces
  • Main mouse buttons (M1/M2) can feel stiff or hard to press for some users, especially when spamming
  • The scroll wheel may feel less tactile with steps that are not very well-defined
  • Honeycomb design on the sides can be slippery for users with sweaty hands without grip tape
  • Potential for minor shell creaking over long-term use in some units
  • Higher click latency compared to some top-tier FPS-oriented gaming mice

Verdict

The Sharkoon Light² 200 is an ultra-lightweight, right-handed gaming mouse featuring a modular honeycomb design and a high-performance PixArt PMW3389 optical sensor with up to 16,000 DPI. Weighing just 62 grams, it is built with durable Omron switches rated for 20 million clicks and 100% PTFE feet for smooth gliding. Key pros include its highly customizable build with interchangeable top covers and DPI buttons, a flexible paracord-like cable, and a very low, adjustable lift-off distance. However, some users have noted cons such as higher click latency compared to competitors and minor shell creaking under pressure.

Compare Sharkoon Light 200 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sharkoon Light 200 and other products in the Mice category

No results found