OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Ozone Neon X40 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:7200 DPIWeight:98 g

Ozone Neon X40 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Ozone Neon X40
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

80%

5.4

Technical score

20%

7.7

User score

â–¼Worse than 58% of mice
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 59%
5.4

Technical score

Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components

36%

4.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.0

Controls

16%

6.0

Design

14%

5.5

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 58%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 72%
  • ozone-neon-x40
  • ozone-neon-x40
  • ozone-neon-x40
  • ozone-neon-x40
  • ozone-neon-x40
  • ozone-neon-x40
  • ozone-neon-x40
  • ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
ozone-neon-x40
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Ozone Neon X40

Technical score
Technical score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 58% of models
Score components:

36%

4.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

8.0

Controls

16%

6.0

Design

14%

5.5

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

5.4
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Popularity:
Ozone Neon X40 has a popularity score of 5.2 points, which is lower than that of 61.2% of products in this category.
5.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.1
Brand name
Ozone
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
8
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 8 buttons, which is more than 78.5% of mice and equal to 9.6% of mice.
N. of side buttons
4
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 4 side buttons, which is more than 92.5% of mice and equal to 4.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
8
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, which is more than 79.8% of mice and equal to 8.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
?
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
98 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 98 g, which is heavier than 67.6% of mice and equal to 1% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
rubber
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
128 KB
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has 128 KB of onboard memory, which is larger than 88.1% of mice and equal to 2.4% of mice.
Software name
Ozone Neon X40 Software
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Ozone Neon X40 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 2 more programmable buttons
    This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 2 more side buttons
    This mouse has 4 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    4 vs 2
  • 2 more buttons
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 2 more programmable buttons
    This mouse has 8 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 2 more side buttons
    This mouse has 4 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    4 vs 2
  • 2 more buttons
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 19.5% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 98 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    98 g vs 82 g
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 62.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 150 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    150 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 28% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 7,200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    7,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 3.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Ozone Neon X40
    the average mouse
    Ozone Neon X40 has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.71 vs 8).
    7.71 vs 8
  • 62.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 150 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    150 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 28% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 7,200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    7,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 19.5% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 98 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    98 g vs 82 g
  • 3 older release date
    This mouse has a release date of 2018, while the average mouse has a release date of 2021.
    October 2018
    2018 vs 2021
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
Diego LittleLion
≈ estimated
06/11/2018
Unboxing and hands-on review · software setup and comfort
Verdict
Ozone Neon X40 is a very good mouse at a good price, with the lack of side grip as its only drawback.

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hardwaresfera.com
15/01/2019
Summary of the review
Ozone Neon X40 - Review - HardwarEsfera
H
hardzone.es
25/10/2018
Summary of the review
Ozone NEON X40, review: análisis y pruebas de este ratón gaming RGB ambidiestro
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Ozone Neon X40

  • Precise PixArt PMW3330 optical sensor
  • Fully ambidextrous design suitable for both left and right-handed users
  • High-quality Omron switches rated for 20 million clicks
  • Customisable RGB Spectra lighting with 16.8 million colours
  • Lightweight build (approx. 98g) for better agility
  • Eight programmable buttons with on-board memory for profiles
  • Comfortable rubberised top coating for improved grip

What customers don't like about Ozone Neon X40

  • Software limitations where side buttons may be mirrored rather than individually programmable
  • Small form factor may be uncomfortable for users with large hands
  • Lack of Linux-compatible drivers or configuration software
  • The lightweight feel can sometimes be perceived as fragile or 'cheap' compared to heavier mice
  • No physical weight adjustment system
  • Reports of the software causing focus issues (pop-up alerts) in full-screen games

Verdict

The Ozone Neon X40 is a high-performance wired gaming mouse featuring a PixArt PMW 3330 optical sensor with a maximum sensitivity of 7,200 DPI, a 1000 Hz polling rate, and 30G acceleration. Its symmetrical, ambidextrous design is complemented by 8 programmable buttons, durable Omron switches rated for 20 million clicks, and customizable 16.8 million color RGB lighting. Main pros include its lightweight 98g build, versatile on-the-fly DPI switching, and onboard memory for profile storage. Notable cons include its relatively small form factor which may not suit larger hands, and the fact that side buttons are often mirrored in pairs rather than individually customizable for distinct functions.

Compare Ozone Neon X40 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ozone Neon X40 and other products in the Mice category

No results found