OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

JLab Jbuds Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:250 HzMaximum DPI:2400 DPIWeight:97 g

JLab Jbuds Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

6.2

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Score components

80%

5.6

Technical Score

20%

8.5

User score

â–²Better than 51% of mice
5.6

Technical Score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components

36%

3.5

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.4

Controls

16%

6.6

Design

14%

7.0

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 52% of mice
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on 1,288 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 70% of mice
  • jlab-jbuds
  • jlab-jbuds
  • jlab-jbuds
  • jlab-jbuds
  • jlab-jbuds
  • jlab-jbuds
  • jlab-jbuds
  • jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds
jlab-jbuds

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The JLab JBuds Wireless Mouse is a full-sized ergonomic peripheral featuring an optical sensor with adjustable DPI (1200–2400) and seven programmable buttons customizable via the JLab Work App. It offers versatile tri-mode connectivity, allowing users to switch between three saved devices using Bluetooth 5.2 or a 2.4GHz USB wireless dongle. Key pros include its long-lasting rechargeable 600 mAh battery (lasting up to 4 months), silent-click buttons for quiet workspaces, and a comfortable design that promotes a natural hand position. Some reported cons include occasional lag on reflective surfaces, the lack of a dedicated thumb scroll wheel found on high-end competitors, and a build quality that may feel less premium.

Technical Specifications of mouse JLab Jbuds

Technical Score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

36%

3.5

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.4

Controls

16%

6.6

Design

14%

7.0

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

8.6

Battery & Charging

5.6
JLab Jbuds has a technical score of 5.6 points, which is lower than that of 51.6% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

7.2

Number of reviews

Based on 1,288 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.5
JLab Jbuds has a user score of 8.47 points, which is higher than that of 69.5% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 61% of models
Popularity:
JLab Jbuds has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than that of 61.4% of products in this category.
7.2
JLab Jbuds has a popularity score of 7.2 points, which is higher than that of 61.4% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Score components:

60%

6.2

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.3
JLab Jbuds has a value-for-money score of 7.3 points, which is higher than that of 48% of products in this category.
Brand name
Jlab
Maximum polling rate
250 Hz
Maximum polling rate
250 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, which is lower than 73.8% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
115 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
115 Hz
â–² Better than 66% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 115 Hz, which is higher than 65.8% of mice and equal to 1.9% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5.2
Bluetooth version
5.2
★ Better than 93% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5.2, which is newer than 92.5% of mice and equal to 4.6% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
?
Battery capacity
600 mAh
Battery capacity
600 mAh
â–² Better than 74% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 600 mAh, which is larger than 74.4% of mice and equal to 4.9% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
N. of buttons
7
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
N. of programmable buttons
7
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
97 g
Weight
97 g
â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 97 g, which is heavier than 66.6% of mice and equal to 0.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1 m
Cable length
1 m
â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1 m, which is less than 96.7% of mice and equal to 2.1% of mice.
Cable type
?
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
3
Onboard memory profiles
3
â–² Better than 70% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 3 onboard profiles, which is more than 69.8% of mice and equal to 8.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
no
Suitable for gaming
no
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

JLab Jbuds vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • 2 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    3
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 3 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    3 vs 1
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • 2 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    3
    â–² Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 3 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    3 vs 1
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    5 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 75% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    250 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 18.3% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    97 g
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 97 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    97 g vs 82 g
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.
  • 75% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    250 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 250 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    250 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1,000 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    1,200 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 1200 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    1,200 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    2.4 GHz polling rate
    125 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 71% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    DPI step size
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >400 DPI
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 1 fewer stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    4
    â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 4 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    4 vs 5
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    5 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 18.3% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    97 g
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 97 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    97 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    RGB lighting
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 0.8 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1 m
    â–¼ Worse than 97% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1 m vs 1.8 m
  • 9.9 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    75.9 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 75.9 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    75.9 mm vs 66 mm
  • 3 mm taller mouse height
    Height
    42.7 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <36 mm – >43 mm
    This mouse has a height of 42.7 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    42.7 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • Not suitable for gaming
    Suitable for gaming
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Graphic comparison of JLab Jbuds and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 1,288 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about JLab Jbuds?

  • Exceptional value for money compared to higher-end competitors like the Logitech MX Master series
  • Comfortable ergonomic design that significantly reduces hand and wrist strain during long work sessions
  • Remarkable battery life, with many users reporting several months of use on a single charge
  • Versatile connectivity options, allowing seamless switching between up to three devices via Bluetooth and a USB dongle
  • Silent or very quiet click buttons, making it ideal for shared office environments
  • Highly customizable buttons through the JLab Work app

What customers dislike about JLab Jbuds?

  • Build materials can feel somewhat cheap or 'plasticky' compared to premium alternatives
  • The scroll wheel has been reported by some as feeling flimsy, less smooth, or slow
  • Device switching button is located on the bottom, requiring users to pick up the mouse to toggle between devices
  • Customization software (JLab Work App) is basic and requires the USB dongle to be plugged in to make changes
  • DPI settings are fixed at specific levels (e.g., 1200-2400) rather than being fully customisable
  • Lightweight feel may be perceived as a lack of durability by some users

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare JLab Jbuds with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)