Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Cooler Master Mizar Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:8200 DPIWeight:100 g

Cooler Master Mizar Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

Cooler Master Mizar
5.6/10

Overall score

Score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

5.3

Technical score

20%

6.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 65% of mice
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 68%
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

36%

5.0

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

5.7

Design

14%

9.1

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 61%
6.8

User score

User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 92%
  • cooler-master-mizar
cooler-master-mizar
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Cooler Master Mizar

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

36%

5.0

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.3

Controls

16%

5.7

Design

14%

9.1

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

5.3
User score
User score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

7.6

User ratings

30%

5.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.8
Popularity
Popularity
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Cooler Master Mizar has a popularity score of 5.2 points, which is lower than that of 61.2% of products in this category.
5.2
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.6

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.9
Brand name
Cooler
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
100 g
This mouse weighs 100 g, which is heavier than 70.5% of mice and equal to 2% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
braided
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
4
This mouse stores 4 onboard profiles, which is more than 78.1% of mice and equal to 3.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
128 KB
This mouse has 128 KB of onboard memory, which is larger than 88.1% of mice and equal to 2.4% of mice.
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Cooler Master Mizar vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 3 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 4 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    4 vs 1
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 5.6 mm narrower mouse width
    This mouse is 60.4 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    60.4 mm vs 66 mm
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 5.6 mm narrower mouse width
    This mouse is 60.4 mm wide, while the average mouse is 66 mm wide.
    60.4 mm vs 66 mm
  • 3 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 4 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    4 vs 1
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • 22% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 100 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    100 g vs 82 g
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 62.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 150 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    150 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Thin glide feet
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 16.9% lower user score
    User score
    6.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Cooler Master Mizar
    the average mouse
    Cooler Master Mizar has a lower user score than the average mouse (6.85 vs 8).
    6.85 vs 8
  • 5.6% worse value for money
    Cooler Master Mizar has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.92 vs 7.3).
    6.92 vs 7.31
  • 62.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 150 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    150 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 18% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 8,200 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    8,200 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 1 fewer stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 4 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    4 vs 5
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 10 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 20 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    20 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 22% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 100 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    100 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • Thin glide feet
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 7 older release date
    This mouse has a release date of 2014, while the average mouse has a release date of 2021.
    February 2014
    2014 vs 2021

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

I
in.ign.com
20/03/2014
Summary of the review
I
invisioncommunity.co.uk
14/11/2014
Summary of the review
O
overclockersclub.com
19/11/2014
Summary of the review
M
modders-inc.com
27/12/2014
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
18/02/2015
Summary of the review
K
kbmod.com
27/03/2015
Summary of the review
D
daveplays.co.uk
23/09/2015
Summary of the review
L
legitreviews.com
15/12/2014
Summary of the review
G
geeknetic.es
30/12/2014
Summary of the review
E
elchapuzasinformatico.com
07/07/2014
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Cooler Master Mizar

  • Ergonomic and comfortable right-handed shape inspired by the classic Microsoft IntelliMouse
  • Effective textured rubber side grips that maintain control even with sweat
  • Lightweight design (approx. 100g without cable) preferred by many for fast-paced gaming
  • High-performance Avago ADNS-9800 laser sensor with up to 8200 DPI
  • On-the-fly DPI switching with dedicated buttons and multi-color LED indicators
  • Smooth gliding experience thanks to high-quality Teflon feet
  • Comprehensive software allowing for deep macro customization and profile management
  • Durable 1.8m braided USB cable

What customers don't like about Cooler Master Mizar

  • The laser sensor may exhibit slight acceleration issues, particularly on soft mouse pads
  • Lighting is limited to only 7 preset colors despite using an RGB LED in the logo
  • The scroll wheel LED is fixed to white, making it impossible to match perfectly with the palm logo
  • Lack of a weight adjustment system for users who prefer a heavier mouse
  • Some users find the plastic material feels a bit cheap compared to higher-end models
  • The high arch profile may feel 'too tall' for palm grip users with specific hand shapes
  • Side buttons can feel slightly recessed or less tactile than the primary Omron switches

Verdict

The Cooler Master Mizar is a right-handed laser gaming mouse equipped with the Avago ADNS-9800 sensor, offering a maximum sensitivity of 8,200 DPI, 150 IPS tracking speed, and 30G acceleration. Key characteristics include an ergonomic palm-grip design with a soft-touch finish, reinforced rubber side grips, and seven fully programmable buttons using Omron switches. Its main pros are the highly customizable software with 128KB onboard memory for four profiles, a 1,000Hz polling rate for low latency, and a durable 1.8-meter braided cable. However, notable cons include the lack of a dedicated weight adjustment system, a fixed lift-off distance that some users find high, and software that can be unintuitive for advanced macro editing.

Compare Cooler Master Mizar with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Cooler Master Mizar and other products in the Mice category

No results found