OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Mice Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Attack Shark X2 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:500 HzMaximum DPI:2400 DPIWeight:95 g

Attack Shark X2 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

5.4

Overall score

Score
5.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

80%

4.9

Technical score

20%

7.4

User score

â–¼Worse than 72% of mice
4.9

Technical score

Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

36%

2.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.4

Controls

16%

6.6

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

8.1

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 70% of mice
7.4

User score

User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

5.1

Number of reviews

Based on 122 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–¼Worse than 81% of mice
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
  • attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2
attack-shark-x2

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse Attack Shark X2

Technical score
Technical score
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components:

36%

2.9

Performance & Sensor

22%

5.4

Controls

16%

6.6

Design

14%

3.7

Features

7%

10

Connectivity

5%

8.1

Battery & Charging

4.9
User score
User score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

5.1

Number of reviews

Based on 122 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
7.4
Popularity
Popularity
5.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Popularity:
Attack Shark X2 has a popularity score of 5.1 points, which is lower than that of 62.5% of products in this category.
5.1
Value for money
Value for money
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

60%

5.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.8
Brand name
Attack
Maximum polling rate
500 Hz
Maximum polling rate
500 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 500 Hz, which is lower than 72.3% of mice and equal to 1.4% of mice.
Wired polling rate
500 Hz
Wired polling rate
500 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 500 Hz, which is lower than 87% of mice and equal to 1.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 33% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
125 Hz
â–² Better than 68% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 125 Hz, which is higher than 67.8% of mice and equal to 30.7% of mice.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
Connectivity
wireless+wired
â–² Better than 57% of models
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
yes
Bluetooth support
yes
â–² Better than 65% of models
This mouse supports Bluetooth. 64.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
5
Bluetooth version
5
â–² Better than 74% of models
This mouse uses Bluetooth 5, which is newer than 73.9% of mice and equal to 12.3% of mice.
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
â–² Better than 39% of models
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
Receiver included
yes
â–² Better than 38% of models
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
200 hours
Battery life
200 hours
â–² Better than 87% of models
Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
This mouse lasts 200 hours on a charge, which is longer than 87.1% of mice and equal to 6.6% of mice.
Battery capacity
800 mAh
Battery capacity
800 mAh
â–² Better than 86% of models
Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
This mouse has a battery capacity of 800 mAh, which is larger than 85.8% of mice and equal to 5.7% of mice.
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
yes
Rechargeable battery
yes
â–² Better than 54% of models
This mouse uses a rechargeable battery. 54.2% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
7
N. of buttons
7
â–² Better than 63% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 7 buttons, which is more than 63.3% of mice and equal to 15.1% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
7
N. of programmable buttons
7
â–² Better than 67% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, which is more than 66.9% of mice and equal to 12.7% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
95 g
Weight
95 g
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 95 g, which is heavier than 63.4% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.5 m
Cable length
1.5 m
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1.5 m, which is less than 87.2% of mice and equal to 8.3% of mice.
Cable type
?
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Onboard memory profiles
0
â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Onboard memory size
0 KB
â–¼ Worse than 13% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Attack Shark X2 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • 115 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    200 hours
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 200 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    200 hours vs 85 hours
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • 2 more paired devices
    Multi-device pair count
    3
    â–² Better than 75% of models
    Market range: <1 – >3
    This mouse pairs with 3 devices, while the average mouse pairs with 1 devices.
    3 vs 1
  • Multi-device pairing
    Multi-device pairing
    yes
    â–² Better than 80% of models
    This mouse supports multi-device pairing, while the average mouse does not. 20.3% of mice support multi-device pairing.
  • Versatile connectivity
    Connectivity
    wireless+wired
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / Bluetooth / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Bluetooth support
    Bluetooth support
    yes
    â–² Better than 65% of models
    This mouse supports Bluetooth, while the average mouse does not. 35.5% of mice support Bluetooth.
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    Receiver storage in mouse
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 115 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    200 hours
    â–² Better than 87% of models
    Market range: <50 hours – >500 hours
    This mouse lasts 200 hours on a charge, while the average mouse lasts 85 hours on a charge.
    200 hours vs 85 hours
  • Usable while charging
    Use while charging
    yes
    â–² Better than 53% of models
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • Rechargeable battery
    Rechargeable battery
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse uses a rechargeable battery, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
  • Wireless charging
    Wireless charging
    yes
    ★ Better than 90% of models
    This mouse supports wireless charging, while the average mouse does not. 10.6% of mice support wireless charging.
  • 60% larger battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    800 mAh
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    Market range: <300 mAh – >800 mAh
    This mouse has a battery capacity of 800 mAh, while the average mouse has a battery capacity of 500 mAh.
    800 mAh vs 500 mAh
  • Silent primary switches
    Silent primary switches
    yes
    â–² Better than 86% of models
    This mouse uses silent primary switches, while the average mouse does not. 14.1% of mice use silent primary switches.
  • 1 more programmable buttons
    N. of programmable buttons
    7
    â–² Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <0 – >9
    This mouse has 7 programmable buttons, while the average mouse has 6 programmable buttons.
    7 vs 6
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • Detachable cable
    Detachable cable
    yes
    â–² Better than 57% of models
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 3 newer release date
    Release date
    2024
    â–² Better than 78% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This mouse was released in 2024, while the average mouse was released in 2021.
    2024 vs 2021
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    5 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 50% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    500 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 500 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    500 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 50% lower wired polling rate
    Wired polling rate
    500 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 500 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    500 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 15.9% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    95 g
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 95 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    95 g vs 82 g
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 7.7% lower user score
    User score
    7.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Attack Shark X2
    the average mouse
    Attack Shark X2 has a lower user score than the average mouse (7.43 vs 8.000).
    7.43 vs 8
  • 7.6% worse value for money
    Attack Shark X2 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.8 vs 7.3).
    6.8 vs 7.31
  • 92.5% lower tracking speed
    Maximum tracking speed
    30 IPS
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <30 IPS – >650 IPS
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 30 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    30 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 50% lower maximum polling rate
    Maximum polling rate
    500 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 500 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    500 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 76% lower maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    2,400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    2,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 50% lower wired polling rate
    Wired polling rate
    500 Hz
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
    This mouse has a wired polling rate of 500 Hz, while the average mouse has a wired polling rate of 1000 Hz.
    500 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 67% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 75% lower maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    10 G
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 10 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    10 G vs 40 G
  • No angle snapping support
    Angle snapping
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 54% of models
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    DPI step size
    400 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >400 DPI
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    Default DPI
    800 DPI
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • 25 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    5 million clicks
    â–¼ Worse than 82% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse has a switch durability of 5 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    5 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 15.9% higher mouse weight
    Weight
    95 g
    â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 95 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    95 g vs 82 g
  • 0.3 m shorter cable
    Cable length
    1.5 m
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.5 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.5 m vs 1.8 m
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    0
    â–¼ Worse than 52% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Third-party reviews

Based on 122 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about Attack Shark X2

  • Unique transparent design with visually appealing 3D RGB lighting
  • Very quiet silent-click buttons, ideal for office or library use
  • Highly functional magnetic charging dock (Pro model) that simplifies recharging
  • Digital battery percentage display on the mouse provides clear power tracking
  • Tri-mode connectivity (2.4GHz, Bluetooth, and Wired) offers great versatility
  • Lightweight and comfortable ergonomic shape suitable for long sessions

What we don't like about Attack Shark X2

  • Build quality can feel 'cheap' or 'plasticky' compared to premium brands
  • Sensor performance (PixArt 3212) may exhibit stuttering or lag during fast movements in gaming
  • Occasional connectivity issues, specifically with the Bluetooth and 2.4GHz dongle failing
  • Lack of reliable or updated software for deep customization and macros
  • Charging dock magnet strength is somewhat weak, making placement slightly finicky
  • Quality control concerns with reports of early scroll wheel or button failures

Verdict

The Attack Shark X2 is a versatile tri-mode gaming mouse featuring 2.4GHz wireless, Bluetooth 5.0, and USB-C wired connectivity with a PixArt 3212 optical sensor. Key specifications include five adjustable DPI levels up to 2400 (or 4000 on the Pro model), an 800mAh rechargeable battery with smart auto-sleep, and an ergonomic transparent shell that highlights its 12-mode 3D RGB lighting. Its main strengths are the near-silent click technology that reduces noise by 90%, lightweight non-porous design, and wide compatibility across Windows, Mac, and mobile platforms. However, notable drawbacks include a relatively low max DPI for competitive play compared to higher-end models, a plastic build that some users find less premium, and potential long-term reliability issues such as scroll wheel inconsistencies reported by some users.

Compare Attack Shark X2 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Attack Shark X2 and other products in the Mice category

No results found