OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

Ardor Gaming Executor 3 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£20Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:12400 DPIWeight:111.4 g

Ardor Gaming Executor 3 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

5.2/10

Overall score

Score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

80%

5.2

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 77% of mice
6.7

Value for money

Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 78%
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

36%

5.1

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.5

Controls

16%

5.6

Design

14%

4.7

Features

7%

9.5

Connectivity

5%

4.2

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 62%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • No image
No image
Where to buy
    N/A~ £20
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Mice model ranking

Ranked #850 of 920 models in Mice (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of mouse Ardor Gaming Executor 3

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

36%

5.1

Performance & Sensor

22%

4.5

Controls

16%

5.6

Design

14%

4.7

Features

7%

9.5

Connectivity

5%

4.2

Battery & Charging

5.2
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Popularity:
Ardor Gaming Executor 3 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 83.8% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Score components:

70%

5.2

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.7
Brand name
Ardor
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 33.4% of mice and equal to 46.9% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
no Bluetooth mode.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: USB.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
integrated
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
8
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 8 buttons, which is more than 78.5% of mice and equal to 9.6% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
?
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
111.4 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 111.4 g, which is heavier than 82.7% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
fabric
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
ARDOR GAMING Executor 3
Firmware upgradable
?
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Ardor Gaming Executor 3 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 24% higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12,400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    12,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 2 more buttons
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • 75% cheaper
    Ardor Gaming Executor 3 is cheaper than the average mouse (£20 vs £35).
    £20 vs £35
  • 75% cheaper
    Ardor Gaming Executor 3 is cheaper than the average mouse (£20 vs £35).
    £20 vs £35
  • 24% higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 12,400 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    12,400 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Usable while charging
    This mouse can be used while charging, while the average mouse cannot. 47.5% of mice can be used while charging.
  • 2 more buttons
    This mouse has 8 buttons, while the average mouse has 6 buttons.
    8 vs 6
  • 35.9% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 111.4 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    111.4 g vs 82 g
  • 20 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 10 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    10 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 6.38x less popular
    Ardor Gaming Executor 3 is less popular than the average mouse (1 vs 6.4).
    1 vs 6.38
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 6.38x less popular
    Ardor Gaming Executor 3 is less popular than the average mouse (1 vs 6.4).
    1 vs 6.38
  • 9.7% worse value for money
    Ardor Gaming Executor 3 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.67 vs 7.3).
    6.67 vs 7.31
  • 45% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 220 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    220 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 200 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 25% lower maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 30 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    30 G vs 40 G
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: USB.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 20 million clicks shorter switch lifespan
    This mouse has a switch durability of 10 million clicks, while the average mouse has a switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    10 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • 35.9% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 111.4 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    111.4 g vs 82 g
  • 10 mm wider mouse width
    This mouse has a width of 76 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    76 mm vs 66 mm
  • 2.1 mm taller mouse height
    This mouse has a height of 41.8 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    41.8 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Ardor Gaming Executor 3

  • High maximum sensitivity of 12,400 DPI with a dedicated switching button
  • Customisable RGB lighting for a personalised setup
  • Features 8 programmable buttons, offering more input complexity than many competitors
  • Responsive performance with a 1,000 Hz polling rate
  • Comes with a 2-year manufacturer's warranty, which is longer than some budget alternatives
  • Reliable wired USB connection for stable, low-latency gaming

What customers don't like about Ardor Gaming Executor 3

  • Relatively heavy at 103.9g compared to modern 'ultra-light' gaming mice
  • Lacks onboard memory profiles, requiring software for setting changes
  • No tilting or thumb scroll wheel, limiting horizontal navigation options
  • Minimum DPI starts at 1000, which may be too high for some precision tasks
  • Tracking speed (100 IPS) and acceleration (30G) are lower than higher-end gaming sensors
  • Wired-only design lacks the flexibility of wireless or Bluetooth connectivity

Verdict

The Ardor Gaming Executor 3 is a wired right-handed gaming mouse equipped with a PixArt PMW3327 optical sensor, offering a maximum sensitivity of 12,400 DPI and a polling rate of 1,000 Hz. It features 8 programmable buttons, including a dedicated DPI switch, and supports a maximum speed of 100 IPS with 30G acceleration. Key advantages include its customizable RGB lighting, a generous 1.8-metre cable for movement freedom, and 2-year manufacturer warranty. However, notable drawbacks include its relatively high weight of 103.9 grams compared to modern ultralight alternatives and a lacks of onboard memory for saving multiple hardware profiles.

Compare Ardor Gaming Executor 3 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ardor Gaming Executor 3 and other products in the Mice category

No results found