OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Taurus Rocket 1500 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:1500 WCordless:noWeight:1.08 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Taurus Rocket 1500 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Taurus Rocket 1500
7.5/10

Overall score

Score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 63% of models
Score components

65%

7.5

Technical score

25%

7.5

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 63% of immersion blenders
8.2

Value for money

Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–²Better than 69%
7.5

Technical score

Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

45%

8.5

Performance

20%

4.4

Accessories

15%

9.1

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.7

Dimensions

â–²Better than 70%
7.5

User score

User score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models

7.5

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

7.4

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 66%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
  • taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
  • taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
  • taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
  • taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
  • taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
  • taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
taurus-rocket-nero-1500w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Taurus Rocket 1500

Technical score
Technical score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

45%

8.5

Performance

20%

4.4

Accessories

15%

9.1

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

8.7

Dimensions

7.5
Value for money
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components:

70%

7.5

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

8.2
Power
1,500 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 1,500 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 94.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.4% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
20
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 20 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 85.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.2% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
14,400 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 14,400 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 52.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.6% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
?
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
1.08 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.08 kg, which is lighter in hand than 50.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
41 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 41 cm in height, which is taller than 61.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 6.7% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6x 6

Taurus Rocket 1500 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 800 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,500 W vs 700 W).
    1,500 W vs 700 W
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 80% cheaper
    Taurus Rocket 1500 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 6.5% better value for money
    Taurus Rocket 1500 has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.23 vs 7.7).
    8.23 vs 7.73
  • 0.8% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.08 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 80% cheaper
    Taurus Rocket 1500 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 6.5% better value for money
    Taurus Rocket 1500 has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.23 vs 7.7).
    8.23 vs 7.73
  • 800 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,500 W vs 700 W).
    1,500 W vs 700 W
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.8% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.08 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm
  • 5.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models

    7.5

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.4

    Popularity

    7.5 vs 7.9
  • 100 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 5.1% lower user score
    User score
    7.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models

    7.5

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.4

    Popularity

    7.5 vs 7.9
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • 1 cm taller wand profile
    This immersion blender has a longer body that may require separating the motor and wand for drawer storage compared to the average immersion blender (41 cm vs 40 cm).
    41 cm vs 40 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Taurus Rocket 1500

  • High-power 1500W motor easily handles blending, chopping, and emulsifying tasks.
  • Stepless technology allows for progressive and precise speed regulation through a single button.
  • Ergonomic handle features a soft-touch finish for stable, comfortable usage over extended periods.
  • Anti-splash bell design keeps the kitchen counter clean during operation.
  • Built with robust, high-performance stainless steel blades and a highly durable stainless steel rod.
  • Easy to clean with detachable, dishwasher-safe accessories made from BPA-free materials.

What customers don't like about Taurus Rocket 1500

  • High power capability makes the unit noisy and noticeably loud at maximum speeds.
  • The powerful motor base can run hot and overheat when continuously processing heavy, thick ingredients like nut butter.
  • The handheld body is relatively heavy due to its large internal motor and stainless steel components.

Verdict

The Taurus Rocket 1500 is a powerful hand blender featuring a high-performance 1500-watt motor, Stepless Technology for pressure-controlled progressive speed regulation, and a durable, high-resistance stainless steel rod paired with high-performance stainless steel blades. Its primary advantages include an ergonomic soft-touch grip for stable handling, a clean-assisting anti-splash bell design, and dishwasher-safe, BPA-free components that simplify cleanup. Depending on the exact package tier chosen (such as the Plus variant), it also supports high versatility with its included 500ml chopper, 700ml measuring cup, and emulsifier attachments; however, its substantial 1500W power may make the unit feel slightly heavier or more intense to manage during prolonged or single-handed operations.

Compare Taurus Rocket 1500 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Taurus Rocket 1500 and other immersion blenders

No results found