OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Taurus Robot 750 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:750 WCordless:noWeight:0.61 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Taurus Robot 750 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Taurus Robot 750
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

65%

6.3

Technical score

25%

6.3

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 74% of immersion blenders
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 65%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

45%

5.9

Performance

20%

5.4

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 61%
6.3

User score

User score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models

6.3

Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

6.4

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 84%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • taurus-robot750
  • taurus-robot750
  • taurus-robot750
  • taurus-robot750
  • taurus-robot750
  • taurus-robot750
  • taurus-robot750
  • taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
taurus-robot750
Where to buy
    N/A~ £25
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #662 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Taurus Robot 750

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

45%

5.9

Performance

20%

5.4

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.8

Dimensions

6.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.4
Power
750 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 750 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 54.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
16,700 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 16,700 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 83% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
500 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 500 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.15 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.15 m, which is shorter reach than 77.5% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.61 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.61 kg, which is lighter in hand than 93.7% of immersion blenders.
Height
40 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 40 cm in height, which is more compact than 44.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Taurus Robot 750 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 2,200 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,700 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,700 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 44% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.6 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.61 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 80% cheaper
    Taurus Robot 750 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 80% cheaper
    Taurus Robot 750 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 2,200 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (16,700 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    16,700 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 44% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.6 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.61 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 20.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models

    6.3

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    6.4

    Popularity

    6.3 vs 7.9
  • 0.05 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.2 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.15 m vs 1.2 m
  • 3.8% worse value for money
    Taurus Robot 750 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.44 vs 7.7).
    7.44 vs 7.73
  • 20.3% lower user score
    User score
    6.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 84% of models

    6.3

    Mark 7.7 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    6.4

    Popularity

    6.3 vs 7.9
  • 3.8% worse value for money
    Taurus Robot 750 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.44 vs 7.7).
    7.44 vs 7.73
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 0.05 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.2 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.15 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Taurus Robot 750

  • Powerful 750W motor blends, chops, and purees food quickly
  • Turbo Rotation System creates smooth and homogenous textures
  • Ergonomic, lightweight, and highly comfortable handle design
  • Anti-splash bell design keeps kitchens clean during use
  • Easy assembly via a quick-click or bayonet lock system
  • Dishwasher-safe blending rod and BPA-free accessories
  • Excellent value for money compared to pricier brands

What customers don't like about Taurus Robot 750

  • Some variations feature plastic blending rods instead of stainless steel
  • Occasional complaints regarding fragile plastic connection pieces between the motor and the arm
  • Limited speed settings, relying primarily on two speeds and a manual turbo function
  • Can struggle with very thick recipes or harder ingredients without overheating

Verdict

The Taurus Robot 750 is a compact and ergonomic 750-watt immersion blender designed for efficient everyday mixing, chopping, and pureeing. Its standout technical characteristic is the proprietary Turbo Rotation System, which elevates food circulation through high-performance dual-action stainless steel blades to achieve uniform results. Key advantages include an anti-splash bell design that preserves kitchen hygiene, a convenient bayonet-locking detachable rod, a lightweight frame that reduces hand fatigue, and BPA-free, dishwasher-safe components for effortless cleanup. However, depending on the specific variation (such as the base Robot 750 versus the Easy models), it features a highly limited speed configuration of either one or two speeds with a manual Turbo pulse, which restricts precise texture control compared to multi-speed competitors.

Compare Taurus Robot 750 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Taurus Robot 750 and other immersion blenders

No results found