Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Taurus 750EASY Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:750 WCordless:noWeight:1.26 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Taurus 750EASY Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Taurus 750EASY
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

65%

5.7

Technical score

25%

5.7

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 90% of immersion blenders
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 75%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

5.4

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.1

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 75%
5.7

User score

User score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

5.7

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.5

Rating

30%

6.5

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 92%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • taurus-750easy
  • taurus-750easy
  • taurus-750easy
  • taurus-750easy
  • taurus-750easy
  • taurus-750easy
taurus-750easy
taurus-750easy
taurus-750easy
taurus-750easy
taurus-750easy
taurus-750easy
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Immersion Blenders model ranking

Ranked #507 of 725 models in Immersion Blenders (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Taurus 750EASY

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

45%

4.9

Performance

20%

5.4

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.1

Dimensions

5.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.1
Power
750 W
This immersion blender delivers 750 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 54.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
1
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
?
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
500 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 500 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1 m, which is shorter reach than 82% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.26 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.26 kg, which is heavier in hand than 59.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
34 cm
This immersion blender stands 34 cm in height, which is more compact than 87.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Taurus 750EASY vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34 cm vs 40 cm).
    34 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    Taurus 750EASY is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 80% cheaper
    Taurus 750EASY is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 6 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (34 cm vs 40 cm).
    34 cm vs 40 cm
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 27.8% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    5.7

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.5

    Rating

    30%

    6.5

    Popularity

    5.7 vs 7.9
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 27.8% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    5.7

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.5

    Rating

    30%

    6.5

    Popularity

    5.7 vs 7.9
  • 8.6% worse value for money
    Taurus 750EASY has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.11 vs 7.7).
    7.11 vs 7.73
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 15.7% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.26 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Taurus 750EASY

  • Powerful 750W motor allows for fast and efficient blending
  • Anti-splash bell design keeps the workspace clean and mess-free
  • Ergonomic, lightweight, and compact body is easy to handle
  • Removable rod features a bayonet lock system for quick and simple assembly
  • Components are BPA-free and dishwasher-safe for convenient cleanup
  • Turbo Rotation System ensures smooth, homogenous purees and textures
  • Provides reliable everyday performance at an affordable, budget-friendly price point

What customers don't like about Taurus 750EASY

  • Features only a single speed setting with one control button, offering limited speed regulation
  • The basic version includes a plastic rod rather than durable stainless steel
  • Motor casing can feel warm or emit a minor smell if overloaded or run continuously for too long on thick mixtures
  • The standard 'Easy' entry-level model comes with minimal accessories compared to higher-end sets

Verdict

The Taurus Robot 750 Easy Inox is a compact 750W immersion blender featuring a sturdy stainless steel shaft, high-performance dual-effect blades, and an anti-splash bell with the Turbo Rotation System. Key advantages include an ergonomic grip, a 500 ml measuring cup, and dishwasher-safe, BPA-free components for easy maintenance. Limitations include a lack of variable speed control for precise texture management and plastic assembly components that may reduce long-term durability under heavy use.

Compare Taurus 750EASY with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Taurus 750EASY and other immersion blenders

No results found