OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Severin SM3762 Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:350 WCordless:noWeight:0.45 kgStepless variable speed:yesDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Severin SM3762 Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Severin SM3762
6.4/10

Overall score

Score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

65%

6.2

Technical score

25%

6.2

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 75% of immersion blenders
7.4

Value for money

Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 65%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

45%

4.6

Performance

20%

7.6

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.5

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 61%
6.2

User score

User score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

6.2

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.7

Rating

30%

5.9

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 85%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • severin-sm-3762
  • severin-sm-3762
  • severin-sm-3762
  • severin-sm-3762
  • severin-sm-3762
severin-sm-3762
severin-sm-3762
severin-sm-3762
severin-sm-3762
severin-sm-3762
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Severin SM3762

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

45%

4.6

Performance

20%

7.6

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.5

Dimensions

6.2
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
Score components:

70%

6.4

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.4
Power
350 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 350 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 74.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 4.3% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
yes
This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
14,400 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 14,400 RPM, which is slower than the top blade speed of 52.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.6% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
700 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 700 ml, which is larger than the cup of 47% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 21% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1 m, which is shorter reach than 82% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.45 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.45 kg, which is lighter in hand than 99.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.1% of immersion blenders.
Height
38 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 38 cm in height, which is more compact than 70.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
?

Severin SM3762 vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 58.7% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.45 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38 cm vs 40 cm).
    38 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    Severin SM3762 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 80% cheaper
    Severin SM3762 is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • Features stepless variable speed control
    This immersion blender features stepless variable speed control while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 58.7% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.5 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.45 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38 cm vs 40 cm).
    38 cm vs 40 cm
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 21.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    5.9

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.9
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 4.1% worse value for money
    Severin SM3762 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.42 vs 7.7).
    7.42 vs 7.73
  • 100 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 21.5% lower user score
    User score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 85% of models

    6.2

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    5.9

    Popularity

    6.2 vs 7.9
  • 4.1% worse value for money
    Severin SM3762 has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.42 vs 7.7).
    7.42 vs 7.73
  • 350 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (350 W vs 700 W).
    350 W vs 700 W
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 100 RPM lower blade speed
    This immersion blender operates at a lower top RPM, requiring more blending passes through the pot to eliminate graininess compared to the average immersion blender (14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    14,400 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Severin SM3762

  • Versatile 3-in-1 / 4-in-1 set with rich accessories including a 0.7L beaker, whisk, and chopper
  • Ergonomic, non-slip handle ensures a secure and comfortable hold during food prep
  • Simple cleanup thanks to the detachable blending stick with a straightforward 'Turn & Click' mechanism
  • Good value for money for everyday kitchen tasks
  • Reliable results with soft ingredients, soups, sauces, and smoothies using the turbo button

What customers don't like about Severin SM3762

  • The 350W motor reaches its limits with very hard ingredients or frozen foods
  • The sharp 2-blade cutter requires extra care during manual hand washing
  • Main components and connecting couplings are made predominantly of plastic rather than stainless steel

Verdict

The Severin SM3762 is a compact 3-in-1 immersion blender set featuring a 350-watt motor, a sharp 2-blade stainless steel knife, and a 100 cm power cord. Operating with a stepless speed controller and a turbo button that reaches up to 14,400 rpm, it includes a 0.7-litre mixing/measuring cup, a balloon whisk, and a 0.5-litre chopping attachment. Its main characteristics and advantages lie in its versatility for making smoothies, soups, and purees, alongside its ergonomic, non-slip handle and a removable stirring rod equipped with a convenient "turn and click" locking mechanism for quick cleaning and space-saving storage. However, its 350W output is relatively modest for heavy-duty kitchen tasks, and its plastic body housing may offer less overall durability compared to full stainless-steel alternatives.

Compare Severin SM3762 with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Severin SM3762 and other immersion blenders

No results found