OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:600 WCordless:noWeight:0.92 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:no

Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W
5.9/10

Overall score

Score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
Score components

65%

5.7

Technical score

25%

5.7

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 91% of immersion blenders
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 75%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

45%

4.5

Performance

20%

6.6

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 76%
5.7

User score

User score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models

5.7

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.4

Rating

30%

6.8

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 92%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
  • salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
salter-retro-3-in-1-600w
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

45%

4.5

Performance

20%

6.6

Accessories

15%

8.3

Design

10%

4.0

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

5.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
Score components:

70%

5.9

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.1
Power
600 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 600 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
no
This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
500 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 500 ml, which is more spacious than the mini-chopper of 14.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 59.2% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Plastic
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
ABS
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
?
Show more
Power cord length
1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1 m, which is shorter reach than 82% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
0.92 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.92 kg, which is lighter in hand than 68.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
38 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 38 cm in height, which is more compact than 70.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.5x 6.5

Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 15.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.92 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38 cm vs 40 cm).
    38 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 80% cheaper
    Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38 cm vs 40 cm).
    38 cm vs 40 cm
  • 15.5% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.9 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.92 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 27.8% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models

    5.7

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.4

    Rating

    30%

    6.8

    Popularity

    5.7 vs 7.9
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 9% worse value for money
    Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.09 vs 7.7).
    7.09 vs 7.73
  • 27.8% lower user score
    User score
    5.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models

    5.7

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.4

    Rating

    30%

    6.8

    Popularity

    5.7 vs 7.9
  • 9% worse value for money
    Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.09 vs 7.7).
    7.09 vs 7.73
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 100 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (600 W vs 700 W).
    600 W vs 700 W
  • Does not have dishwasher-safe parts
    This immersion blender does not have dishwasher-safe parts while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W

  • Aesthetic retro design that adds a stylish vintage touch to countertops.
  • Decent 600W motor performance capable of handled daily blending, whisking, and chopping tasks easily.
  • Versatile 3-in-1 multi-functional bundle including a whisk, blending rod, and 500ml chopping bowl.
  • Easy to clean due to simple, detachable components.
  • Compact footprint with a space-saving 500ml bowl size that does not clutter the kitchen.

What customers don't like about Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W

  • Limited speed settings with only 2 choices, offering less precise control compared to variable-speed models.
  • The power base can feel slightly top-heavy or heavy to hold for long periods during extended use.
  • Does not include a standard measuring/blending jug in the box, requiring users to use their own containers.
  • The 500ml chopping bowl capacity is small for larger family meal preparations.

Verdict

The Salter Retro 3-in-1 immersion blender features a powerful 600W motor paired with two basic manual speed settings, enabling efficient whipping, mixing, and chopping tasks. Constructed with a sturdy plastic ergonomic handle housing, the set includes durable stainless steel blades, a stainless steel whisk attachment, and a compact 500ml BPA-free chopping bowl designed for quick meal prep, sauces, and dips. Key pros include its versatile multi-functional design, space-saving footprint, a charming vintage aesthetic available in pastel shades, and detachable components that ensure quick, effortless cleaning. However, notable cons include its limited speed variations compared to higher-end models offering continuous variable speed control, and the predominantly plastic main unit housing which may feel less premium over long-term heavy-duty use.

Compare Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Salter Retro 3-in-1 600W and other immersion blenders

No results found