OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Braun MQ10.202M Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:450 WCordless:noWeight:1.002 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Braun MQ10.202M Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Braun MQ10.202M
6.5/10

Overall score

Score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
Score components

65%

5.6

Technical score

25%

8.5

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 70% of immersion blenders
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 62%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

45%

3.9

Performance

20%

6.5

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 79%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 50% of models

70%

8.8

Rating

30%

7.8

Popularity

â–²Better than 50%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
  • braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
braun-mq10202m
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Braun MQ10.202M

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

45%

3.9

Performance

20%

6.5

Accessories

15%

7.9

Design

10%

5.8

Usability

10%

7.9

Dimensions

5.6
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components:

70%

6.5

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.5
Power
450 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 450 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated wattage of 66.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
1
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 1 speed levels, which is less adjustable than 79.1% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
no
This immersion blender does not support turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
no
This immersion blender does not feature a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
350 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 350 ml, which is smaller than the mini-chopper of 88.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.1% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.2 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.2 m, which is longer reach than 22.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 27.8% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.002 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.002 kg, which is lighter in hand than 52.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 9.3% of immersion blenders.
Height
37.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 37.5 cm in height, which is more compact than 74.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.2% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.8x 6.8

Braun MQ10.202M vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 2.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (37.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    37.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    Braun MQ10.202M is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 7.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 50% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    7.8

    Popularity

    8.5 vs 7.9
  • 8% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.002 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 80% cheaper
    Braun MQ10.202M is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 7.6% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 50% of models

    70%

    8.8

    Rating

    30%

    7.8

    Popularity

    8.5 vs 7.9
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 2.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (37.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    37.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 8% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.002 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 250 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (450 W vs 700 W).
    450 W vs 700 W
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 150 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (350 ml vs 500 ml).
    350 ml vs 500 ml
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 2.6% worse value for money
    Braun MQ10.202M has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.53 vs 7.7).
    7.53 vs 7.73
  • 2.6% worse value for money
    Braun MQ10.202M has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.53 vs 7.7).
    7.53 vs 7.73
  • Does not support turbo mode
    This immersion blender does not support turbo mode while the average immersion blender does.
  • 250 W less motor power
    This immersion blender has a lower wattage motor that may struggle when blending thick purees or fibrous stalks compared to the average immersion blender (450 W vs 700 W).
    450 W vs 700 W
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 1 speed levels fewer
    This immersion blender has fewer speed increments, giving less nuance between gentle stirring and intense pureeing compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 150 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (350 ml vs 500 ml).
    350 ml vs 500 ml
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Braun MQ10.202M

  • Extremely lightweight design makes it highly comfortable and easy to hold during extended use
  • Intuitive one-touch button system allows for simple and ergonomic operation
  • EasyTwist system provides quick and seamless switching of kitchen attachments
  • Comes with a useful bundle of accessories including a 350ml chopper, a whisk, and a 600ml beaker
  • Equipped with a solid 450-watt motor that efficiently processes simple recipes, soups, and sauces
  • Detachable parts and accessories are dishwasher-safe, which simplifies the cleanup process

What customers don't like about Braun MQ10.202M

  • Limited to a single-speed setting, which offers less precision for customized textures
  • Struggles to blend large batches of fibrous ingredients smoothly, occasionally leaving a grainy texture
  • Lacks the capability to crush ice efficiently compared to more powerful multi-speed models
  • The 450W motor can overheat if pushed to process overly thick mixtures like nut butters

Verdict

The Braun MultiQuick 1 MQ10.202M is an entry-level corded electric immersion blender featuring a 450-watt motor, a stainless steel blending shaft, and an ultra-lightweight ergonomic design weighing just 626 to 630 grams. It utilizes a simple one-touch, single-speed control mechanism and comes equipped with a 600 ml BPA-free plastic mixing beaker, a 350 ml mini food chopper, and a stainless steel balloon whisk, all swappable via a click-and-twist EasyTwist attachment system. Main advantages include its highly maneuverable, low-fatigue lightweight build, effortlessly quick accessory swapping, and dishwasher-safe detachable parts that make clean-up highly efficient. However, its primary drawbacks are the restrictive single-speed operation that limits precise texture control, a lack of a pulse function, and a relatively modest 450W power threshold that may struggle with exceptionally tough or dense ingredients.

Compare Braun MQ10.202M with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Braun MQ10.202M and other immersion blenders

No results found