OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Black+Decker BXHBA750E Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:750 WCordless:noWeight:1.1 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Black+Decker BXHBA750E Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Black+Decker BXHBA750E
7.0/10

Overall score

Score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 53% of models
Score components

65%

7.0

Technical score

25%

7.0

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 53% of immersion blenders
7.9

Value for money

Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–²Better than 55%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components

45%

6.8

Performance

20%

6.2

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

6.5

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

â–²Better than 56%
7.0

User score

User score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 75% of models

7.0

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

6.6

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 75%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
  • blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
blackdecker-bxhba750e
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Black+Decker BXHBA750E

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 56% of models
Score components:

45%

6.8

Performance

20%

6.2

Accessories

15%

8.7

Design

10%

6.5

Usability

10%

7.4

Dimensions

7.0
Value for money
Value for money
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

7.0

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.9
Power
750 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 750 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 54.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
20
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 20 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 85.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.2% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
?
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
3
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 3 attachments, which is more versatile than 52.6% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 30.3% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
yes
This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
350 ml
Market range: <350 ml – >700 ml
This immersion blender provides a chopper capacity of 350 ml, which is smaller than the mini-chopper of 88.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 8.1% of immersion blenders.
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
500 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 500 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 91.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 7.1% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Plastic
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1.1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1.1 m, which is shorter reach than 77.7% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.3% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.1 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.1 kg, which is heavier in hand than 50.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Height
38.5 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 38.5 cm in height, which is more compact than 65.9% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6x 6

Black+Decker BXHBA750E vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 1.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    38.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    Black+Decker BXHBA750E is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • 2.3% better value for money
    Black+Decker BXHBA750E has better value for money than the average immersion blender (7.9 vs 7.7).
    7.9 vs 7.73
  • 80% cheaper
    Black+Decker BXHBA750E is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 2.3% better value for money
    Black+Decker BXHBA750E has better value for money than the average immersion blender (7.9 vs 7.7).
    7.9 vs 7.73
  • 18 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (20 vs 2).
    20 vs 2
  • 50 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (750 W vs 700 W).
    750 W vs 700 W
  • Includes the chopper attachment
    This immersion blender includes the chopper attachment while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more accessories
    This immersion blender handles whisking, chopping, and mashing right out of the box without separate appliance purchases compared to the average immersion blender (3 vs 2).
    3 vs 2
  • 1.5 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38.5 cm vs 40 cm).
    38.5 cm vs 40 cm
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 150 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (350 ml vs 500 ml).
    350 ml vs 500 ml
  • 11.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models

    7.0

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    6.6

    Popularity

    7.0 vs 7.9
  • 0.1 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.1 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 11.4% lower user score
    User score
    7.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models

    7.0

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    6.6

    Popularity

    7.0 vs 7.9
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 200 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (500 ml vs 700 ml).
    500 ml vs 700 ml
  • 150 ml smaller chopper volume
    This immersion blender has a smaller mini-chopper bowl, requiring multiple chopping batches for meal prep compared to the average immersion blender (350 ml vs 500 ml).
    350 ml vs 500 ml
  • 0.1 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1.1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 1% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.1 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.1 kg vs 1.089 kg

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Black+Decker BXHBA750E

  • Powerful 750W motor that effortlessly blends and purees a wide variety of foods.
  • Highly precise speed control with 20 adjustable levels to achieve the perfect texture.
  • Turbo function provides an immediate boost of maximum power for harder ingredients.
  • Effective anti-splash design that keeps the kitchen workspace clean during operation.
  • Easy to clean with a detachable rod and dishwasher-safe accessories.
  • Constructed with high-quality, durable stainless steel blades and BPA-free materials.

What customers don't like about Black+Decker BXHBA750E

  • The 20-speed dial control can feel less fluid or slightly stiff to adjust during active use compared to other models.
  • The handle lacks a rubberized, non-slip grip, making it a bit slippery when handling with wet hands.
  • Can become noticeably noisy when running at its maximum 20th speed level or under heavy turbo loads.

Verdict

The Black+Decker BXHBA750E is a corded electric immersion blender featuring a 750-watt motor, a dual stainless steel blade system, and 20 adjustable speed settings plus a turbo function. Key highlights include an anti-splash foot design to keep work surfaces clean, BPA-free plastic housing parts, and a versatile three-piece accessory bundle consisting of a 500 ml measuring beaker, a 350 ml chopper, and a whisk attachment. Main pros include its highly customizable velocity settings, dishwasher-safe detachable parts for effortless maintenance, and sufficient power to efficiently puree, chop, and blend demanding ingredients. On the downside, the unit's plastic body lacks a premium rubberized grip coating to prevent slipping with wet hands, and it can operate with noticeable noise at its maximum speed level.

Compare Black+Decker BXHBA750E with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Black+Decker BXHBA750E and other immersion blenders

No results found