OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

Aigostar Mixmaster Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:1000 WCordless:noWeight:1.3 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

Aigostar Mixmaster Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

Aigostar Mixmaster
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 52% of models
Score components

65%

7.2

Technical score

25%

7.2

User score

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–²Better than 52% of immersion blenders
8.0

Value for money

Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–²Better than 60%
7.2

Technical score

Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components

45%

8.0

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

8.8

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

6.7

Dimensions

â–²Better than 62%
7.2

User score

User score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

7.2

Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.0

Rating

30%

8.5

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 72%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
  • aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
aigostar-mixmaster
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender Aigostar Mixmaster

Technical score
Technical score
7.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 62% of models
Score components:

45%

8.0

Performance

20%

4.6

Accessories

15%

8.8

Design

10%

6.8

Usability

10%

6.7

Dimensions

7.2
Value for money
Value for money
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 60% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

8.0
Power
1,000 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 1,000 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 65.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
6
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 6 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 65.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 1.6% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
yes
This immersion blender supports turbo mode.
Maximum RPM
15,000 RPM
Market range: <10k RPM – >20k RPM
This immersion blender spins up to 15,000 RPM, which is faster than the top blade speed of 56.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.3% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
yes
This immersion blender features a safety lock.
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
1
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 1 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 55.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 24.1% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
no
This immersion blender does not include the chopper attachment.
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
yes
This immersion blender includes the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
600 ml
Market range: <600 ml – >800 ml
This immersion blender includes a measuring beaker of 600 ml, which is smaller than the cup of 53.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 38.2% of immersion blenders.
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
1 m
Market range: <1 m – >2.5 m
This immersion blender has a power cord length of 1 m, which is shorter reach than 82% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 14.4% of immersion blenders.
Weight
1.3 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 1.3 kg, which is heavier in hand than 60.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 3.2% of immersion blenders.
Height
39.7 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 39.7 cm in height, which is more compact than 54.3% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.3

Aigostar Mixmaster vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 300 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,000 W vs 700 W).
    1,000 W vs 700 W
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 4 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (6 vs 2).
    6 vs 2
  • 500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • 80% cheaper
    Aigostar Mixmaster is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 0.3 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39.7 cm vs 40 cm).
    39.7 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    Aigostar Mixmaster is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 4% better value for money
    Aigostar Mixmaster has better value for money than the average immersion blender (8.03 vs 7.7).
    8.03 vs 7.73
  • 300 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (1,000 W vs 700 W).
    1,000 W vs 700 W
  • 1 more blade points
    This immersion blender draws food inwards from multiple angles for faster, more uniform pureeing inside deep cooking pots than the average immersion blender (4 vs 3).
    4 vs 3
  • 4 speed levels more
    This immersion blender allows starting on gentle low RPM to avoid splashing before ramping up to high speed compared to the average immersion blender (6 vs 2).
    6 vs 2
  • 500 RPM higher blade speed
    This immersion blender shears through cooked vegetables faster, producing silky lump-free emulsified textures in seconds compared to the average immersion blender (15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM).
    15,000 RPM vs 14,500 RPM
  • Features a safety lock
    This immersion blender features a safety lock while the average immersion blender does not.
  • Supports an indicator light
    This immersion blender supports an indicator light while the average immersion blender does not.
  • 0.3 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (39.7 cm vs 40 cm).
    39.7 cm vs 40 cm
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • 8.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

    7.2

    Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.0

    Rating

    30%

    8.5

    Popularity

    7.2 vs 7.9
  • 19.4% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.3 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m
  • 8.9% lower user score
    User score
    7.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 72% of models

    7.2

    Mark 8.2 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.0

    Rating

    30%

    8.5

    Popularity

    7.2 vs 7.9
  • Does not include the whisk attachment
    This immersion blender does not include the whisk attachment while the average immersion blender does.
  • 100 ml smaller beaker volume
    This immersion blender provides a smaller blending cup that fills quickly when whipping liquids or multiple fruit servings compared to the average immersion blender (600 ml vs 700 ml).
    600 ml vs 700 ml
  • 1 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (1 vs 2).
    1 vs 2
  • Does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip
    This immersion blender does not support a non-slip handle coating or grip while the average immersion blender does.
  • 19.4% heavier
    This immersion blender is heavier to hold continuously, causing more arm strain when pureeing large stockpots compared to the average immersion blender (1.3 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    1.3 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 0.2 m shorter power cord
    This immersion blender has a shorter mains cord that may limit movement around spacious kitchen countertops compared to the average immersion blender (1 m vs 1.2 m).
    1 m vs 1.2 m

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Aigostar Mixmaster

  • Powerful 1000-watt motor that blends food quickly
  • Six adjustable speeds plus a turbo function for maximum power
  • Ergonomic handle with a soft, comfortable grip coating
  • Detachable stainless steel blending foot that is dishwasher safe
  • Corrugated blade guard design that effectively prevents splashing
  • Four stainless steel blades capable of crushing ice and hard foods
  • Includes useful accessories like a 600ml measuring beaker

What customers don't like about Aigostar Mixmaster

  • The main motor unit is quite heavy to hold during long tasks
  • The plastic connecting sleeve between the motor and shaft feels thin and fragile
  • Adjusting the top speed dial requires two hands while blending
  • The included measuring beaker lacks a lid to prevent small splashes

Verdict

The Aigostar Mixmaster is a powerful 1000W immersion hand blender featuring a high-efficiency pure copper motor that reaches speeds up to 15,000 RPM, four 304 stainless steel blades, and a corrugated anti-splatter base design. Its main advantages include versatile control through a 6-speed rotary dial combined with a maximum-power turbo function, a comfortable ergonomic handle with a soft coating, and dishwasher-safe detachable parts that include a BPA-free 600ml beaker. However, a notable drawback is that it does not include a container lid, which can occasionally lead to minor splashing if the beaker is not carefully covered during high-speed operation.

Compare Aigostar Mixmaster with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Aigostar Mixmaster and other immersion blenders

No results found