OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Immersion Blenders Methodology v3.0

AFRA 800W Review | 40 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Power:800 WCordless:noWeight:0.75 kgStepless variable speed:noDishwasher-safe parts:yes

AFRA 800W Review: Compare 40 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Immersion Blenders category and whether it is worth buying.

6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, ratings from across the web and best-of lists.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 65%, User score 25%, List score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 60% of models
Score components

65%

6.3

Technical score

25%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 60% of immersion blenders
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 55%
6.3

Technical score

Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components

45%

5.5

Performance

20%

4.4

Accessories

15%

8.9

Design

10%

6.5

Usability

10%

9.3

Dimensions

â–¼Worse than 61%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 25% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 10% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • No image
No image
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of immersion blender AFRA 800W

Technical score
Technical score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 65% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
Score components:

45%

5.5

Performance

20%

4.4

Accessories

15%

8.9

Design

10%

6.5

Usability

10%

9.3

Dimensions

6.3
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the immersion blender's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for an immersion blender with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.7
Power
800 W
Market range: <200 W – >1.2k W
This immersion blender delivers 800 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated wattage of 57.5% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 5.7% of immersion blenders.
Number of speeds
2
Market range: <1 – >21
This immersion blender features 2 speed levels, which is more finely adjustable than 21% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 31.9% of immersion blenders.
Stepless variable speed
no
This immersion blender does not feature stepless variable speed control.
Turbo mode
?
Maximum RPM
?
Show more
Commercial use
no
This immersion blender not designed for commercial use.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This immersion blender has dishwasher-safe parts.
Safety lock
?
Cordless
no
This immersion blender does not support cordless operation.
Battery type
-
Show more
Number of accessories
0
Market range: <1 – >6
This immersion blender comes with 0 attachments, which is fewer add-ons than 79.8% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 20.2% of immersion blenders.
Chopper included
?
Chopper capacity
-
Measuring cup/glass included
no
This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup.
Measuring cup/glass capacity
-
Show more
Shaft material
Stainless steel
Blade material
Stainless steel
Body material
Stainless steel
Detachable shaft
yes
This immersion blender supports a detachable shaft.
No-splash design
yes
This immersion blender supports a no-splash design.
Show more
Power cord length
?
Weight
0.75 kg
Market range: <0.5 kg – >3 kg
This immersion blender weighs 0.75 kg, which is lighter in hand than 87.2% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 0.5% of immersion blenders.
Height
38 cm
Market range: <28 cm – >48 cm
This immersion blender stands 38 cm in height, which is more compact than 70.4% of immersion blenders and equal to that of 2.9% of immersion blenders.
Width/Depth
6.5x 6.5

AFRA 800W vs the average immersion blender

246810TotalPerformanceUsabilityAccessoriesDesignDimensions
  • 31.1% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.75 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • 2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38 cm vs 40 cm).
    38 cm vs 40 cm
  • 80% cheaper
    AFRA 800W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 80% cheaper
    AFRA 800W is cheaper than the average immersion blender (£25 vs £45).
    £25 vs £45
  • 100 W more motor power
    This immersion blender purees dense root vegetables and fibrous soups directly in hot pans with greater torque and less stalling than the average immersion blender (800 W vs 700 W).
    800 W vs 700 W
  • 31.1% lighter
    This immersion blender causes substantially less wrist and forearm fatigue during extended pot pureeing than the average immersion blender (0.8 kg vs 1.1 kg).
    0.75 kg vs 1.089 kg
  • 2 cm shorter wand profile
    This immersion blender fits neatly into kitchen drawers and shallow cutlery organizers without disassembling compared to the average immersion blender (38 cm vs 40 cm).
    38 cm vs 40 cm
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 0.1% worse value for money
    AFRA 800W has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.74 vs 7.7).
    7.74 vs 7.73
  • 0.1% worse value for money
    AFRA 800W has worse value for money than the average immersion blender (7.74 vs 7.7).
    7.74 vs 7.73
  • 1 fewer blade points
    This immersion blender uses a standard 2-point blade requiring more stirring motion to draw chunks into the cutting zone compared to the average immersion blender (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 2 fewer accessories
    This immersion blender comes as a minimal wand kit, requiring extra accessory purchases for whipping cream or chopping nuts compared to the average immersion blender (0 vs 2).
    0 vs 2
  • Does not include the measuring cup
    This immersion blender does not include the measuring cup while the average immersion blender does.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about AFRA 800W

  • Powerful 800W motor provides reliable and fast blending performance
  • Dual-speed settings offer simple and straightforward texture control
  • Durable stainless steel shaft and cross blades ensure consistent results
  • Slim, compact handheld design allows for direct blending in pots or bowls
  • Easy to clean due to its detachable components
  • Backed by a confidence-building 2-year manufacturer warranty

What customers don't like about AFRA 800W

  • Limited speed versatility with only two speed options compared to models with variable dials
  • Lacks extra multi-functional accessories like a food chopper, whisk, or milk frother
  • Can feel heavy or induce hand fatigue during continuous, long-duration usage
  • Requires a corded power connection which limits maneuverability around the kitchen

Verdict

The AFRA 800W Hand Blender is a powerful kitchen appliance featuring an 800-watt motor that delivers reliable blending performance for everyday recipes like smoothies, soups, and sauces. Its core characteristics include durable stainless steel blades, a resilient stainless steel blending shaft, an ergonomic slim handheld design for direct-pot blending, and 2 manual speed settings for tailored control. Key advantages include a generous 2-year manufacturer warranty, effortless cleaning due to its detachable structure, and efficient processing of a variety of ingredient textures. However, potential drawbacks include a lack of multiple advanced speed settings compared to multi-speed competitors and an omission of a diverse multi-piece attachment kit (such as specialized food processor bowls or whisks) out of the box.

Compare AFRA 800W with other immersion blenders

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AFRA 800W and other immersion blenders

No results found