Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Master & Dynamic MW60 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wirelessBattery life:16 hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Master & Dynamic MW60 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Master & Dynamic MW60
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.0

Technical score

20%

?

User score

â–¼Worse than 63% of headphones
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 79%
6.0

Technical score

Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

6.6

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

5.8

Design

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

4.5

Battery

4%

7.8

Calls & Controls

â–²Better than 55%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

  • master-dynamic-mw60
  • master-dynamic-mw60
  • master-dynamic-mw60
  • master-dynamic-mw60
  • master-dynamic-mw60
  • master-dynamic-mw60
  • master-dynamic-mw60
master-dynamic-mw60
master-dynamic-mw60
master-dynamic-mw60
master-dynamic-mw60
master-dynamic-mw60
master-dynamic-mw60
master-dynamic-mw60
Where to buy
    N/A~ £260
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Master & Dynamic MW60

Technical score
Technical score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

6.6

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

5.8

Design

8%

5.8

Connectivity

6%

4.5

Battery

4%

7.8

Calls & Controls

6.0
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

?

User ratings

30%

?

Number of reviews

?
Popularity
Popularity
1.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Master & Dynamic MW60 has a popularity score of 1 point, which is lower than that of 73.4% of products in this category.
1.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.9
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
45 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 45 mm, larger driver size than 83.7% of headphones and equal to 2.4% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 5 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 10.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wireless
This pair of headphones supports wireless connectivity, more flexible connectivity than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 49.2% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
4.1
This pair of headphones uses Bluetooth version 4.1, newer Bluetooth version than 62.3% of headphones and equal to 5.4% of headphones.
Maximum Bluetooth range
?
Audio latency
200 ms
This pair of headphones has audio latency of 200 ms, higher audio latency than 71.4% of headphones and equal to 13.9% of headphones.
Multipoint support
yes
This pair of headphones supports multipoint. 69.4% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
16 hours
This pair of headphones offers battery life of 16 hours, lower battery life than 77% of headphones and equal to 2.3% of headphones.
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
3 hours
This pair of headphones needs 3 hours to charge, higher charging time than 66.7% of headphones and equal to 20.8% of headphones.
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
?
Show more
Brand name
Master & Dynamic
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
345 g
This pair of headphones weighs 345 g, heavier than 90.8% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
6.5
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 6.5, higher clamp force than 92.6% of headphones and equal to 0.4% of headphones.
Show more

Master & Dynamic MW60 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 5 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (45 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    45 mm vs 40 mm
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 21 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (65 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    65 mm vs 44 mm
  • 21 mm more spacious earcup width
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup width than the average pair of headphones (65 mm vs 44 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup width of 44 mm.
    65 mm vs 44 mm
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 5 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (45 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    45 mm vs 40 mm
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 4 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (106 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    106 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 5,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (25,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    25,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 15 dB higher max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a higher max SPL than the average pair of headphones (125 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    125 dB vs 110 dB
  • Rechargeable battery
    This pair of headphones has a rechargeable battery, the average pair of headphones does not. 47.9% of headphones have a rechargeable battery.
  • Multipoint support
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint, the average pair of headphones does not. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
  • More flexible connectivity
    This pair of headphones offers more flexible connectivity than the average pair of headphones (wireless vs wired). The average headphones support wired connectivity.
    wireless vs wired
  • AAC codec support
    This pair of headphones supports AAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 32.2% of headphones support AAC.
  • AptX support
    This pair of headphones supports aptX, the average pair of headphones does not. 18.4% of headphones support aptX.
  • Multipoint connections
    This pair of headphones supports multipoint connections, while the average pair of headphones does not. 30.2% of headphones support multipoint connections.
    supports multipoint for up to 2 devices.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • On-device controls
    This pair of headphones includes on-device controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 46.8% of headphones support on-device controls.
  • 58.3% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (345 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    345 g vs 218 g
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 50 ms higher audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a higher audio latency than the average pair of headphones (200 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    200 ms vs 150 ms
  • 14 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (16 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    16 hours vs 30 hours
  • 2.2 higher clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (6.5 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    6.5 vs 4.3
  • 5.87x less popular
    Master & Dynamic MW60 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 2.89x more expensive
    Master & Dynamic MW60 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£260 vs £90).
    £260 vs £90
  • 4.9% worse value for money
    Master & Dynamic MW60 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.93 vs 7.3).
    6.93 vs 7.27
  • 5.87x less popular
    Master & Dynamic MW60 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (1 vs 5.9).
    1 vs 5.87
  • 2.89x more expensive
    Master & Dynamic MW60 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£260 vs £90).
    £260 vs £90
  • 4.9% worse value for money
    Master & Dynamic MW60 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (6.93 vs 7.3).
    6.93 vs 7.27
  • 58.3% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (345 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    345 g vs 218 g
  • 2.2 higher clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a higher clamp force than the average pair of headphones (6.5 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    6.5 vs 4.3
  • 1 hours longer charging time
    This pair of headphones has a higher charging time than the average pair of headphones (3 hours vs 2 hours). The average headphones need 2 hours to charge.
    3 hours vs 2 hours
  • 14 hours shorter battery life
    This pair of headphones has a lower battery life than the average pair of headphones (16 hours vs 30 hours). The average headphones offer battery life of 30 hours.
    16 hours vs 30 hours
  • 50 ms higher audio latency
    This pair of headphones has a higher audio latency than the average pair of headphones (200 ms vs 150 ms). The average headphones have audio latency of 150 ms.
    200 ms vs 150 ms

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

W
wired.com
05/11/2015
Summary of the review
A
audiophilia.com
27/11/2015
Summary of the review
H
head-fi.org
27/01/2016
Summary of the review
A
audioholics.com
13/03/2016
Summary of the review
C
cnet.com
16/03/2016
Summary of the review
J
jewishjournal.com
06/04/2016
Summary of the review
F
forums.appleinsider.com
27/11/2016
Summary of the review
E
everydaylistening.net
17/03/2018
Summary of the review
H
headphonereview.com
04/05/2018
Summary of the review
H
headphonecheck.com
11/06/2019
Summary of the review
T
theverge.com
01/12/2015
Summary of the review
U
uk.pcmag.com
30/12/2015
Summary of the review
T
the-gadgeteer.com
20/07/2017
Summary of the review
A
audiophile-heaven.com
18/04/2019
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
24/03/2016
Summary of the review
L
lecafedugeek.fr
02/12/2019
Summary of the review
V
vonguru.fr
18/11/2018
Summary of the review
L
lemondenumerique.ouest-france.fr
26/11/2018
Summary of the review
D
digitec.ch
17/01/2017
Summary of the review
F
forum.lesnumeriques.com
24/03/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Master & Dynamic MW60

  • Premium build quality with stainless steel and genuine leather
  • Immersive and wide soundstage with rich, balanced audio
  • Excellent Bluetooth range thanks to the external aluminum antenna
  • Convenient, easily replaceable magnetic ear pads
  • Generous selection of luxury accessories and carrying cases
  • Solid battery life of up to 16 hours with optional passive wired playback

What customers don't like about Master & Dynamic MW60

  • High premium retail price point
  • Heavy design that can cause hot spots or ear fatigue over extended wear
  • Thin headband lacks sufficient cushioning
  • Significant sound leakage at medium to high volumes
  • Lacks modern features like Active Noise Cancellation (ANC)
  • Outdated micro-USB charging port instead of USB-C

Verdict

The Master & Dynamic MW60 is a premium wireless over-ear headphone featuring custom 45mm neodymium drivers, a 5-25,000 Hz frequency response, and 32-ohm impedance. It is characterized by its high-end industrial design, utilizing grain cowhide leather, lambskin-wrapped memory foam ear pads, and stainless steel foldable hinges. Key pros include an exceptionally wide Bluetooth 4.1 range (up to 4x the industry average) powered by an external aluminum antenna, 16-hour battery life, and a rich, balanced sound signature with aptX support. Main cons include a relatively high price point, a heavy build weighing 345g, the use of outdated Micro-USB charging, and the lack of active noise cancellation.

Compare Master & Dynamic MW60 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Master & Dynamic MW60 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found