Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Grado PS1000 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£1,500Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Grado PS1000 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Grado PS1000
5.5/10

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

4.8

Technical score

20%

8.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 88% of headphones
4.6

Value for money

Value for money
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

2.6

Price

â–¼Worse than 98%
4.8

Technical score

Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

52%

5.3

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

4.8

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

3.8

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 95%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 70%
  • grado-ps1000
  • grado-ps1000
  • grado-ps1000
grado-ps1000
grado-ps1000
grado-ps1000
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Grado PS1000

Technical score
Technical score
4.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

52%

5.3

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

4.8

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

4.0

Battery

4%

3.8

Calls & Controls

4.8
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

6.2

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Grado PS1000 has a popularity score of 6.2 points, which is higher than that of 53.5% of products in this category.
6.2
Value for money
Value for money
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.5

Overall score

30%

2.6

Price

4.6
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 50 mm, larger driver size than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 8.2% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
5 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 5 Hz, lower lowest frequency than 86.3% of headphones and equal to 10.8% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
no
This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while 15.1% is. 84.9% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
0
This pair of headphones has 0 microphones, fewer microphones than 73.2% of headphones and equal to 26.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Grado
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
500 g
This pair of headphones weighs 500 g, heavier than 98.5% of headphones and equal to 0.2% of headphones.
Acoustic design
open-back
Clamp force
3.5
This pair of headphones has a clamp force of 3.5, lower clamp force than 68.4% of headphones and equal to 5.3% of headphones.
Show more

Grado PS1000 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 10 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (50 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    50 mm vs 40 mm
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 30,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (50,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    50,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 1.8 m longer cable length
    This pair of headphones offers a more useful cable length than the average pair of headphones (3 m vs 1.2 m). The average headphones have a cable length of 1.2 m.
    3 m vs 1.2 m
  • 5 mm more spacious earcup height
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup height than the average pair of headphones (65 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    65 mm vs 60 mm
  • 0.8 lower clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a lower clamp force than the average pair of headphones (3.5 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    3.5 vs 4.3
  • 0.45 dB tighter channel balance
    This pair of headphones has a lower channel balance tolerance than the average pair of headphones (0.1 dB vs 0.5 dB). The average headphones have channel balance tolerance of 0.5 dB.
    0.05 dB vs 0.5 dB
  • 1.8 m longer cable length
    This pair of headphones offers a more useful cable length than the average pair of headphones (3 m vs 1.2 m). The average headphones have a cable length of 1.2 m.
    3 m vs 1.2 m
  • 5 mm more spacious earcup height
    This pair of headphones offers more spacious earcup height than the average pair of headphones (65 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    65 mm vs 60 mm
  • 0.8 lower clamp force
    This pair of headphones has a lower clamp force than the average pair of headphones (3.5 vs 4.3). The average headphones have a clamp force of 4.3.
    3.5 vs 4.3
  • 10 mm larger driver size
    This pair of headphones uses a larger driver size than the average pair of headphones (50 mm vs 40 mm). The average headphones use a driver size of 40 mm.
    50 mm vs 40 mm
  • 13 Hz lower bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a lower lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (5 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    5 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 30,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (50,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    50,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 0.2 % lower distortion
    This pair of headphones has a lower total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.1 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.1 % vs 0.3 %
  • 0.45 dB tighter channel balance
    This pair of headphones has a lower channel balance tolerance than the average pair of headphones (0.1 dB vs 0.5 dB). The average headphones have channel balance tolerance of 0.5 dB.
    0.05 dB vs 0.5 dB
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • 2.29x higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (500 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    500 g vs 218 g
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • 4 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (98 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    98 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 16.67x more expensive
    Grado PS1000 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£1,500 vs £90).
    £1,500 vs £90
  • 57.7% worse value for money
    Grado PS1000 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (4.61 vs 7.3).
    4.61 vs 7.27
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 16.67x more expensive
    Grado PS1000 is more expensive than the average pair of headphones (£1,500 vs £90).
    £1,500 vs £90
  • 57.7% worse value for money
    Grado PS1000 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (4.61 vs 7.3).
    4.61 vs 7.27
  • 2.29x higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (500 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    500 g vs 218 g
  • Fixed cable
    This pair of headphones has a fixed cable, while the average pair of headphones has a detachable one. 62% of headphones have a detachable cable.
  • Tangle-prone cable
    This pair of headphones uses a tangle-prone cable, while the average pair of headphones is easier to manage. 64.2% of headphones use a tangle-free cable.
  • No travel bag
    This pair of headphones does not include a travel bag, the average pair of headphones does. 65.4% of headphones include a travel bag.
  • No passive noise reduction
    This pair of headphones does not offer passive noise reduction, while the average pair of headphones does. 82.6% of headphones have passive noise reduction.
  • 4 dB/mW lower sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a lower sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (98 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    98 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • 12 dB lower max SPL
    This pair of headphones has a lower max SPL than the average pair of headphones (98 dB vs 110 dB). The average headphones reach a max SPL of 110 dB.
    98 dB vs 110 dB
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 7 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2009 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    March 2009
    2009 vs 2016

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
swimsonny
≈ estimated
25/05/2013
Hands-on review · sound, design and value
Verdict
Grado PS1000 has superb sound, but the price is hard to justify, so audition it before buying.
Shop video
Not graded yet
Not graded yet
Not graded yet

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

cnet.com
14/10/2009
Listening test · Home and iPod use
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 is well built and very open, with more scale and bass than the RS-1i, but it is meant for home use rather than travel.
theabsolutesound.com
14/11/2009
First look · Early listening impressions
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 is a very good, transparent headphone with clear separation, but its bass is less convincing and it is no bargain for the money.
6
6moons.com
01/01/2010
Summary of the review
techradar.com
07/01/2010
Hands-on test · Live versus recorded sound
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 is tonally neutral and highly detailed with strong dynamics, but its weight and thin headband can make long listening uncomfortable.
H
head-fi.org
05/05/2010
Summary of the review
theabsolutesound.com
17/05/2010
Listening review · Competitor comparison
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 is a well-balanced, very detailed headphone with smooth treble, but its bass is a little soft and it lacks big punch.
whathifi.com
09/02/2011
Listening test · Top-end headphone
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 is a very detailed, dynamic headphone that needs a top source and amp, but cannot match speakers for soundstage or physical bass impact.
trustedreviews.com
27/05/2011
Listening review · Sound and comfort
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 has powerful bass and a wide, detailed sound, but it is hard to justify on value and its weight and open design keep it at home.
H
head-fi.org
18/06/2012
Summary of the review
enjoythemusic.com
01/10/2012
Listening review · Source and amp pairing
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 lets recordings come through very transparently, with detail that sounds natural rather than analytical, but it needs strong sources and amplifiers.
H
head-fi.org
09/05/2010
Summary of the review
fidelity-online.de
04/01/2016
Listening test · Tube amplifier pairing
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 shows huge detail and a rich midrange through a good amp, and suits listeners who can accept its size and fit.
A
avguide.ch
16/03/2011
Summary of the review
threshold-lovers.com
14/04/2012
Hands-on test · Source comparison
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 offers outstanding detail and emotion, but it is heavy, has cheap-looking packaging and sometimes sounds sharp on 's' sounds, so its price is hard to justify.
A
afdigitale.it
05/03/2019
Summary of the review
fwdmagazine.be
10/02/2012
Listening test · Open-back headphones
Verdict
The Grado PS1000 sounds accurate and detailed with real bass impact, but it is heavy, very expensive and needs a good amp.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Grado PS1000

  • Exceptional transparency and micro-detail retrieval
  • Expansive, speaker-like soundstage with pinpoint imaging
  • Rich, lifelike midrange especially for vocals and acoustic instruments
  • Deep, well-controlled bass with more 'fun' and impact than typical Grados
  • Very easy to drive; performs well even with portable devices
  • High-quality hybrid construction using mahogany and chrome-plated metal
  • Large 'G-Cush' foam pads provide a spacious fit and good temperature regulation

What customers don't like about Grado PS1000

  • Significantly heavy (approx. 1.4 lbs), causing neck strain or 'tippy' feel during movement
  • Extremely high price point compared to rivals with similar performance
  • Open-back design results in total sound leakage and zero isolation
  • Treble can be bright or peaky, making poorly mastered tracks sound harsh
  • Minimalist packaging and lack of accessories (no carrying case or travel bag)
  • Non-detachable, thick 'garden hose' cable can be cumbersome and heavy
  • Bass may lack the extreme sub-bass 'slam' found in some planar magnetic competitors

Verdict

The Grado PS1000 is a flagship open-back dynamic headphone featuring a unique hybrid chamber design that combines a handcrafted mahogany inner core with a non-resonant metal alloy outer housing. Technically, it boasts 50mm matched drivers (within 0.05dB), an ultra-wide frequency response of 5Hz to 50kHz, a 32-ohm impedance, and a high-purity 8-conductor copper cable. Main characteristics include an expansive soundstage aided by oversized 'G-cush' foam pads and a highly transparent, detailed sonic signature that remains musical across genres. Its primary pros are its exceptional clarity, deep yet controlled bass, and a comfortable, low-clamping fit for long listening sessions. However, notable cons include its significant weight (approx. 420g–500g), high price point compared to rivals, and total lack of noise isolation due to its open-air design.

Compare Grado PS1000 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Grado PS1000 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found