OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

Ferrari Cavallino T250 Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£110Form factor:on-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

Ferrari Cavallino T250 Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

Ferrari Cavallino T250
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

80%

5.7

Technical score

20%

6.1

User score

â–¼Worse than 77% of headphones
7.0

Value for money

Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

â–¼Worse than 73%
5.7

Technical score

Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components

52%

6.1

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

7.4

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

5.4

Battery

4%

7.6

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 64%
6.1

User score

User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

2.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 96%
  • ferrari-cavallino-t250
  • ferrari-cavallino-t250
  • ferrari-cavallino-t250
  • ferrari-cavallino-t250
  • ferrari-cavallino-t250
  • ferrari-cavallino-t250
ferrari-cavallino-t250
ferrari-cavallino-t250
ferrari-cavallino-t250
ferrari-cavallino-t250
ferrari-cavallino-t250
ferrari-cavallino-t250
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Headphones model ranking

Ranked #1 of 1,029 models in Headphones (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones Ferrari Cavallino T250

Technical score
Technical score
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 64% of models
Score components:

52%

6.1

Sound

20%

4.0

Features

10%

7.4

Design

8%

4.0

Connectivity

6%

5.4

Battery

4%

7.6

Calls & Controls

5.7
User score
User score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

7.8

User ratings

30%

2.1

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
6.1
Popularity
Popularity
2.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Popularity:
Ferrari Cavallino T250 has a popularity score of 2.1 points, which is lower than that of 72.1% of products in this category.
2.1
Value for money
Value for money
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 73% of models
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.9

Price

7.0
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
1
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 1 drivers, fewer drivers than 4% of headphones and equal to 96% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
yes
This pair of headphones supports a noise-canceling microphone. 61.1% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
yes
This pair of headphones is headset-ready, 84.8% is not. 15.2% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
1
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 1 microphones, more microphones than 26.9% of headphones and equal to 50.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
?
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
no
This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants. 60.9% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
Ferrari
Form factor
on-ear
Weight
221 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 221 g, heavier than 51.8% of headphones and equal to 0.1% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

Ferrari Cavallino T250 vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • 8 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    110 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • Clear call microphone
    This pair of headphones offers a clear call microphone, while the average pair of headphones does not. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • 1.2 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (1.5 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    1.5 % vs 0.3 %
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 31.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Ferrari Cavallino T250
    the average pair of headphones
    Ferrari Cavallino T250 has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.1 vs 8).
    6.1 vs 8
  • 2.76x less popular
    Ferrari Cavallino T250 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (2.13 vs 5.9).
    2.13 vs 5.87
  • 3.7% worse value for money
    Ferrari Cavallino T250 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7.01 vs 7.3).
    7.01 vs 7.27
  • 4 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2012 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    October 2012
    2012 vs 2016
  • 31.2% lower user score
    User score
    6.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Ferrari Cavallino T250
    the average pair of headphones
    Ferrari Cavallino T250 has a lower user score than the average pair of headphones (6.1 vs 8).
    6.1 vs 8
  • 2.76x less popular
    Ferrari Cavallino T250 is less popular than the average pair of headphones (2.13 vs 5.9).
    2.13 vs 5.87
  • 3.7% worse value for money
    Ferrari Cavallino T250 has worse value for money than the average pair of headphones (7.01 vs 7.3).
    7.01 vs 7.27
  • 1.2 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (1.5 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    1.5 % vs 0.3 %
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No voice assistant support
    This pair of headphones does not support voice assistants, the average pair of headphones does. 60.8% of headphones support voice assistants.
  • 4 older release date
    This pair of headphones was released earlier than the average pair of headphones (2012 vs 2016). The average headphones were released in 2016.
    October 2012
    2012 vs 2016

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

8.0
nlmb 13
≈ estimated
28/08/2013
Hands-on review · sound, fit and accessory tests
Verdict
Ferrari Cavallino T250 is a good-sounding on-ear headphone with clear mids, though its lows run a bit strong and the fit suits average-sized heads.
Overview video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

cnet.com
21/08/2012
Hands-on review · Luxury leather headphones
Verdict
The Ferrari by Logic3 T250 sounds good and looks even better, but its premium price is hard to justify over other options.
telegraph.co.uk
15/08/2012
Hands-on review · Branded leather headphones
Verdict
The Ferrari Cavallino T250 is a comfortable, sturdy pair with good sound, but it suits buyers who want the Ferrari prancing horse badge.
trustedreviews.com
27/09/2012
Hands-on test · Closed on-ear headphones
Verdict
The Ferrari Cavallino T250 looks neat and feels solidly built with a generous cable set, but its muddy, congested sound doesn't match its price.
whathifi.com
20/11/2012
Listening test · Closed-back headphones
Verdict
The Ferrari Cavallino T250 looks and feels upmarket and comfortable, but its flabby bass and muddy sound don't justify the price.
T
thedigitallifestyle.com
06/01/2013
Summary of the review
Ferrari by Logic3 T250 Headphones Review - The Digital Lifestyle
telegraph.co.uk
15/08/2012
Hands-on review · Leather and metal build
Verdict
The Ferrari Cavallino T250 is comfortable and well made with decent sound, but it mainly suits buyers who want the Ferrari look.
huffingtonpost.co.uk
27/07/2012
Hands-on review · Build and sound
Verdict
The Ferrari Cavallino T250 is solidly built and sounds good, if bass-heavy, but its weight and lack of noise cancelling count against it.
macwelt.de
06/08/2012
Hands-on test · Leather over-ear headphones
Verdict
The Ferrari T250 is a well-built, comfortable pair with warm, bass-heavy sound that suits pop and rock, but other headphones sound better for less money.
xataka.com
03/07/2012
Hands-on test · Luxury headphones
Verdict
The Ferrari Cavallino T250 is a well-made, clean-sounding pair with good materials, but its high price makes value questionable.
A
av2d.com
23/11/2012
Summary of the review
Logic3 Ferrari Headphones Review
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about Ferrari Cavallino T250

  • Premium build quality with machined metal and real lambskin leather
  • Stylish, elegant design featuring the iconic 'Prancing Horse' logo
  • Extremely comfortable for long listening sessions with soft padding
  • Excellent selection of accessories, including multiple braided anti-tangle cables and a hard carry case
  • Solid noise isolation for an on-ear design due to a tight, secure fit
  • Low noise leakage, making them suitable for use in public spaces like commuting

What customers don't like about Ferrari Cavallino T250

  • High retail price that is difficult to justify based on sound quality alone
  • Muddled or 'congested' sound profile with a lack of clarity and instrument separation
  • Bass response can be 'flabby' or overpowering, lacking the tight precision expected at this price
  • Small ear cups may cause discomfort or pressure for some users over time
  • Lacks modern features like Bluetooth connectivity or Active Noise Cancellation (ANC)
  • Significant 'brand tax' where a large portion of the cost goes toward the Ferrari licensing

Verdict

The Ferrari Cavallino T250 is a luxury wired on-ear headphone featuring high-efficiency 40mm dynamic drivers, a frequency response of 20Hz–20,000Hz, and a sensitivity of 110dB at 32 Ohms impedance. Its premium construction includes machined metal arms and breathable lambskin leather ear cups, complemented by an ergonomic two-way folding design and a generous bundle of three detachable, anti-tangle woven cables with in-line remotes for Apple and other mobile devices. Main pros include its solid build quality, stylish aesthetic inspired by GT craftsmanship, and excellent passive noise isolation. However, some users have noted cons such as a slightly 'muddled' sound profile that can feel congested compared to high-end rivals, small ear cups that may cause discomfort during long sessions, and a relatively high price point mainly attributed to the brand's exclusivity.

Compare Ferrari Cavallino T250 with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Ferrari Cavallino T250 and other products in the Headphones category

No results found