OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Headphones Methodology v1.0
Headphones Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Headphones Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Headphones Methodology v1.0

1more Triple Driver Over Ear Review | 93 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130Form factor:over-earConnectivity:wiredBattery life:N/A hoursActive noise cancellation (ANC):no

1more Triple Driver Over Ear Review: Compare 93 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Headphones category and whether it is worth buying.

1more Triple Driver Over Ear
6.2/10

Overall score

Score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the headphones' quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best headphones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

80%

5.8

Technical score

20%

7.8

User score

â–¼Worse than 51% of headphones
7.3

Value for money

Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 51%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components

52%

6.9

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

4.9

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

4.5

Calls & Controls

â–¼Worse than 56%
7.8

User score

User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 63%
  • 1more-triple-driver-over-ear
  • 1more-triple-driver-over-ear
  • 1more-triple-driver-over-ear
1more-triple-driver-over-ear
1more-triple-driver-over-ear
1more-triple-driver-over-ear
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of pair of headphones 1more Triple Driver Over Ear

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Headphones category across these key areas: Sound, Calls & Controls, Connectivity, Features, Battery, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare headphones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
Score components:

52%

6.9

Sound

20%

4.4

Features

10%

4.9

Design

8%

4.6

Connectivity

6%

4.6

Battery

4%

4.5

Calls & Controls

5.8
User score
User score
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you want to understand how headphones perform in real listening and how reliable they are in terms of comfort, audio quality, battery life, and long-term use.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 63% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

6.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.8
Popularity
Popularity
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the headphones.
When it matters
When you prefer headphones that have already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Popularity:
1more Triple Driver Over Ear has a popularity score of 6.5 points, which is higher than that of 57.7% of products in this category.
6.5
Value for money
Value for money
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the headphones' overall rating with their cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for headphones that offer a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 51% of models
Score components:

70%

6.2

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

7.3
Active noise cancellation (ANC)
no
This pair of headphones does not support active noise cancellation. 27.5% of headphones support active noise cancellation.
Driver type
dynamic
Driver size
40 mm
Market range: <10 mm – >50 mm
This pair of headphones uses a driver size of 40 mm, larger driver size than 28.6% of headphones and equal to 53.3% of headphones.
Number of drivers
3
Market range: <1 – >4
This pair of headphones uses 3 drivers, more drivers than 98.6% of headphones and equal to 0.5% of headphones.
Lowest frequency
20 Hz
Market range: <5 Hz – >20 Hz
This pair of headphones reaches a lowest frequency of 20 Hz, higher lowest frequency than 50.8% of headphones and equal to 47.3% of headphones.
Show more
Noise-canceling microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not support a noise-canceling microphone. 39% of headphones support noise-canceling microphones.
Can be used as a headset
no
This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while 15.1% is. 84.9% of headphones can be used as headsets.
Number of microphones
0
Market range: <0 – >4
This pair of headphones has 0 microphones, fewer microphones than 73.2% of headphones and equal to 26.9% of headphones.
Boom microphone
no
This pair of headphones does not include a boom microphone. 13.5% of headphones have a boom microphone.
Microphone SNR
N/A
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This pair of headphones supports wired connectivity, less flexible connectivity than 49.2% of headphones and equal to 50.8% of headphones.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Maximum Bluetooth range
N/A
Audio latency
N/A
Multipoint support
no
This pair of headphones does not support multipoint. 30.6% of headphones support multipoint.
Show more
Ambient sound mode
no
This pair of headphones does not offer ambient sound mode. 24.9% of headphones support ambient sound mode.
EQ support
no
This pair of headphones does not support EQ customization. 23.2% of headphones support EQ.
Companion app
no
This pair of headphones does not work with a companion app. 21.6% of headphones support companion apps.
Adjustable ANC levels
N/A
Voice assistant support
yes
This pair of headphones supports voice assistants. 39.2% of headphones support voice assistants.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery life with ANC
N/A
Charging time
N/A
Quick charge
no
This pair of headphones does not support quick charging. 33.1% of headphones support quick charge.
Battery capacity
N/A
Show more
Brand name
1more
Form factor
over-ear
Weight
293 g
Market range: <14 g – >340 g
This pair of headphones weighs 293 g, heavier than 79.3% of headphones and equal to 0.3% of headphones.
Acoustic design
closed-back
Clamp force
?
Show more

1more Triple Driver Over Ear vs the average pair of headphones

246810TotalDesignSoundBatteryConnectivityCalls & ControlsFeatures
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 20,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • LDAC support
    This pair of headphones supports LDAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.1% of headphones support LDAC.
  • 2 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (3 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    3 vs 1
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • 2 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (104 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    104 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • Foldable design
    This pair of headphones has a foldable design, the average pair of headphones does not. 48.3% of headphones are foldable.
  • Hi-Res Audio certification
    This pair of headphones has Hi-Res Audio certification, the average pair of headphones does not. 23.1% of headphones are Hi-Res Audio certified.
  • 20,000 Hz higher treble extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher highest frequency than the average pair of headphones (40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz). The average headphones reach a highest frequency of 20,000 Hz.
    40,000 Hz vs 20,000 Hz
  • 2 more drivers
    This pair of headphones uses more drivers than the average pair of headphones (3 vs 1). The average headphones use 1 drivers.
    3 vs 1
  • 2 dB/mW higher sensitivity
    This pair of headphones has a higher sensitivity than the average pair of headphones (104 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW). The average headphones have sensitivity of 102 dB/mW.
    104 dB/mW vs 102 dB/mW
  • Play while charging
    This pair of headphones can play while charging, the average pair of headphones cannot. 29.1% of headphones support play while charging.
  • LDAC support
    This pair of headphones supports LDAC, the average pair of headphones does not. 8.1% of headphones support LDAC.
  • In-line controls
    This pair of headphones includes in-line controls, the average pair of headphones does not. 36.6% of headphones support in-line controls.
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • 34.4% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (293 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    293 g vs 218 g
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • 17 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (43 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    43 mm vs 60 mm
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1
  • 0.2 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.5 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.5 % vs 0.3 %
  • Non-replaceable earpads
    This pair of headphones has non-replaceable earpads, while the average pair of headphones has replaceable ones. 75.6% of headphones have replaceable earpads.
  • 34.4% higher weight
    This pair of headphones is heavier than the average pair of headphones (293 g vs 218 g). The average pair of headphones weighs 218 g.
    293 g vs 218 g
  • 17 mm tighter earcup height
    This pair of headphones has tighter earcup height than the average pair of headphones (43 mm vs 60 mm). The average headphones offer an inner earcup height of 60 mm.
    43 mm vs 60 mm
  • 2 Hz weaker bass extension
    This pair of headphones has a higher lowest frequency than the average pair of headphones (20 Hz vs 18 Hz). The average headphones reach a lowest frequency of 18 Hz.
    20 Hz vs 18 Hz
  • 0.2 % higher distortion
    This pair of headphones has a higher total harmonic distortion than the average pair of headphones (0.5 % vs 0.3 %). The average headphones have total harmonic distortion of 0.3 %.
    0.5 % vs 0.3 %
  • No battery indicator
    This pair of headphones does not show battery level clearly, while the average pair of headphones does. 56.3% of headphones have a battery level indicator.
  • Not headset-ready
    This pair of headphones is not headset-ready, while the average pair of headphones is. 84.8% of headphones can be used as headsets.
  • 1 fewer microphones
    This pair of headphones has fewer microphones than the average pair of headphones (0 vs 1). The average headphones have 1 microphones.
    0 vs 1

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.5
cfldriven
≈ estimated
21/03/2025
Long hands-on review · sound, power and comfort tests
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear sounds impressive for the price and is highly recommended for most listeners, though isolation is limited.
9.0
Shaan Haider
≈ estimated
02/11/2019
Unboxing and review · design, comfort and sound
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear is one of the best options for music listening, though it is wired only and has no app.
9.0
Vimal Chintapatla
≈ estimated
11/04/2019
Hands-on review · build, comfort and listening impressions
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear is outstanding for the price, with top build and sound, though it works best with an amp.
9.5
Adil Zone
≈ estimated
23/02/2019
Long-term test · seven months of use
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear sounds best in its price range, with small gaps in bass, microphone and noise cancelling.
4.0
TotallydubbedHD
≈ estimated
21/12/2018
Hands-on review · sound comparison with rivals
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear is not recommended: the sound feels off and separation is lacking for the price.
9.0
Gamesky
≈ estimated
09/12/2018
Hands-on review · long-term use and genre tests
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear is a strong all-round headphone for many genres, but classical needs EQ.
4.0
Jay Downey
≈ estimated
06/12/2018
Hands-on review · about a week and a half of use, focused on comfort
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear is too uncomfortable to wear for long, so it is not recommended despite the premium presentation.
6.5
Joshua Valour
✓ explicit
24/09/2018
Hands-on review · movie, sound and build tests
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear is a fun, bassy headphone that suits movies well, though it is not the most technical.
9.5
eTeknix
≈ estimated
01/08/2018
Hands-on review · sound, design and price tests
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear has no major faults itself, with outstanding sound and a premium look.
9.0
InnerFidelity
≈ estimated
27/03/2018
Hands-on review · sound tests and measurements
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear sounds very good, especially for listeners who like strong bass.
9.0
OSReviews
≈ estimated
11/02/2018
Hands-on review · sound, comfort and build tests
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear sounds great for all music and films, though it is not eye-catching; a solid overall choice.
9.0
Porta.Fi
≈ estimated
23/10/2017
Hands-on review · sound and build quality
Verdict
1more Triple Driver Over-Ear is spacious, well built and inexpensive, with heavy bass and a few small flaws, so it is recommended.
More graded video reviews (6)
creator’s own scoreestimated by us

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about 1more Triple Driver Over Ear

  • Expansive soundstage and excellent instrument separation for a closed-back design
  • High-quality build using premium materials like anodized aluminum and stainless steel
  • Energetic and detailed sound signature with crisp, clear highs and punchy bass
  • Excellent value for money, often outperforming more expensive competitors
  • Premium packaging and generous accessories including a hard carrying case
  • Easy to drive even with standard smartphones due to 32-ohm impedance
  • Stylish and unique aesthetics with a visible driver design

What customers don't like about 1more Triple Driver Over Ear

  • Small ear cup size often feels more like 'on-ear' than 'over-ear', causing discomfort
  • Lack of an in-line remote or microphone on the standard detachable cable
  • Disappointing passive noise isolation, making them less ideal for loud environments
  • Can cause physical 'hot spots' on the crown of the head or ears during long sessions
  • Sound leakage is noticeable at higher volumes compared to other closed-back models
  • Bass can become less clear and somewhat muddy during complex or busy tracks
  • Recessed mid-range may make vocals and some instruments feel distant

Verdict

The 1MORE Triple Driver Over-Ear headphones feature a unique hybrid acoustic design incorporating a 40mm graphene dynamic driver, a high-efficiency ceramic tweeter, and a passive bass reflector within each aluminum alloy chamber. These Hi-Res certified headphones offer a frequency response of 20Hz–40,000Hz, 32-ohm impedance, and 104dB sensitivity, making them easily drivable by portable devices. Key pros include exceptional build quality with a stainless steel headband and protein leather cushions, a scarily wide and detailed soundstage, and a foldable design for portability. However, notable cons include the lack of an in-line remote or microphone on the detachable cable, and some users find the fit more akin to a large on-ear than a true over-ear design, which can cause heat buildup or ear fatigue over time.

Compare 1more Triple Driver Over Ear with other products in the Headphones category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of 1more Triple Driver Over Ear and other products in the Headphones category

No results found