OVERALL

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

ALTERNATIVES

XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price: ~£130
VRAM: 4 GB
Memory bus width: 128 bit
Thermal Design Power (TDP): 75 W

XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

3.6

Poor

3.2

Poor

7.1

Very good

6.4
Gaming
Score components:
45.0%
?
Floating-point performance
25.0%
1.6
VRAM
20.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.7
Video editing
Score components:
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
1.6
VRAM
20.0%
?
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
6.4
1080p
Score components:
55.0%
?
Floating-point performance
25.0%
1.6
VRAM
10.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
6.1
1440p
Score components:
50.0%
?
Floating-point performance
30.0%
1.6
VRAM
15.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
5.7
4K
Score components:
40.0%
?
Floating-point performance
35.0%
1.6
VRAM
20.0%
?
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

Verdict

The XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB is an entry-level graphics card based on the 14nm Polaris 11 architecture, featuring 896 stream processors, 14 compute units, and a 128-bit memory interface. This specific XFX variant typically offers a factory-overclocked boost clock of 1220MHz and is equipped with 4GB of GDDR5 memory running at an effective 7Gbps, providing a memory bandwidth of 112 GB/s. Its main pros include high power efficiency with a low TDP of 75W, support for modern APIs like DirectX 12 and Vulkan, and specialized features such as XFX's Double Dissipation cooling with removable fans for easy maintenance. However, it is largely limited to 1080p gaming at medium settings in modern titles, and some high-performance XFX models require an additional 6-pin power connector despite the low-power nature of the base chip.

Technical Specifications of XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB

Overall score

3.6

Show more

Hide

Popularity

What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.

Performance

1.5

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.

When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?

3DMark Port Royal score

What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.

When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

N/A

PassMark (G3D) result

What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark

When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests

When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?

Floating-point performance

What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.

When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

Memory

1.7

Show more

Hide

VRAM

What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card

When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

Memory type

What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)

When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

GDDR5

GDDR version

What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

Memory bus width

What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits

When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

Maximum memory bandwidth

What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory

When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

Show more

Platform & Features

6.0

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported

When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

PCIe lanes

What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication

When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

DirectX version

What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version

When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

?

Vulkan version

What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version

When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

OpenGL version

What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version

When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Connectivity & Media

5.4

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously

When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

Max digital resolution

What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution

When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

?

DisplayPort outputs

What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs

When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort version

What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported

When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

DisplayPort link rates

What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections

When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

Show more

Power & Cooling

7.0

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)

When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

Power consumption while under peak load

What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.

When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

Recommended PSU wattage

What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply

When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

?

Board power limit

What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board

When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

?

PCIe power spec

What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed

When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

75 W

Show more

Design

7.9

Show more

Hide

Size

What it is: Physical size of the GPU card

When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?

Length

What it is: Physical length of the GPU card

When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

Height

What it is: Physical height of the GPU card

When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

Slot width

What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card

When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

Weight

What it is: Total weight of the graphics card

When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?

Show more

XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB vs the average graphics card

Why is XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

65.1% lower TDP
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.
Importance: MEDIUM
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.75 W vs 215 W
47.37 mm shorter card length
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB is shorter than the average graphics card (238 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.
Importance: LOW
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB is shorter than the average graphics card (238 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.238 mm vs 285.37 mm
1 more DVI outputs
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
What it is: Number of DVI display outputs available
When it matters: When you still use an older monitor that depends on DVI.
Importance: LOW
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.1 vs 0
4.08x cheaper
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£130 vs £530).
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB is cheaper than the average graphics card (£130 vs £530).£130 vs £530
Better FP64 ratio
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.
Importance: LOW
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
59.6% smaller GPU die
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (123 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
What it is: Total die area of the GPU chip
When it matters: When you are comparing how physically large different GPU chips are across generations and tiers.
Importance: LOW
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (123 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².123 mm² vs 304.25 mm²
Supports multi-GPU linking
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
What it is: Supports NVIDIA SLI or AMD CrossFire multi-GPU setup
When it matters: When you still run legacy multi-GPU gaming or rendering workflows.
Importance: LOW
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
65.9% lower peak power draw
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.
Importance: LOW
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.75 W vs 220 W
Better FP64 ratio
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
59.6% smaller GPU die
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (123 mm² vs 304.25 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 304.25 mm².
Supports multi-GPU linking
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
1 more DVI outputs
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
65.1% lower TDP
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
65.9% lower peak power draw
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
47.37 mm shorter card length
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB is shorter than the average graphics card (238 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Why is XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

51.2% lower boost clock speed
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,220 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
26 fewer compute units
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
43.2% lower base clock speed
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,090 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
128 fewer TMUs
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
84.4% lower texture rate
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (58.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
88.2% lower pixel rate
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (19.5 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
48 fewer ROPs
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
92.7% lower FP16 performance
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (2.2 TFLOPS vs 29.5 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.5 TFLOPS.
3,456 fewer FP32 units
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (896 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
71.1% lower FP64 performance
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.4651 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.4651 TFLOPS.
128 bit narrower memory bus
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
8 GB less VRAM
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
75% lower memory bandwidth
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (112 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
63.2% slower memory speed
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (7,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
87.5% smaller L1 cache
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
2.8x larger process node
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
Fewer PCIe lanes
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
Older PCIe version
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4.0).
7 older
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,016 vs 2,023).
No XeSS support
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
No mesh shaders
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
Older Vulkan version
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
Older encoder generation
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (3.4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
86.3% fewer transistors
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (3,000 million vs 21,900 million). The average graphics card has 21,900 million transistors.
Older shader model
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
No AV1 encoding
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
1 fewer displays supported
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
No AV1 decoding
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No DSC support
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
Older DisplayPort version
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
Older HDMI version
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
Older HDCP version
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
Not VR ready
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
1 fewer monitors per output type
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 monitors per output type.
1 fewer fans
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
6.9 dB noisier under load
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (41.9 dB vs 35 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35 dB.
No backplate
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
51.2% lower boost clock speed
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,220 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,220 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.1220 MHz vs 2500 MHz
128 bit narrower memory bus
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.128 bit vs 256 bit
26 fewer compute units
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.14 vs 40
2.8x larger process node
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.
Importance: MEDIUM
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.14 nm vs 5 nm
8 GB less VRAM
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.4 GB vs 12 GB
43.2% lower base clock speed
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,090 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1,090 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.1090 MHz vs 1920 MHz
128 fewer TMUs
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.56 vs 184
84.4% lower texture rate
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (58.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.
What it is: Number of textured pixels the GPU can process per second
When it matters: When fast texture handling matters in high-refresh gaming workloads.
Importance: HIGH
XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (58.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 376.8 GTexel/s.58.6 GTexel/s vs 376.8 GTexel/s

Platform & Features

Connectivity & Media

Power & Cooling

Graphic comparison of XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB and

Attribute category

Attribute

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom

United States

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB?

Excellent value for budget 1080p gaming and eSports titles like Overwatch and CS:GO.
The 4GB VRAM provides better texture headroom compared to the 2GB models.
Efficient cooling system, particularly on the Double Dissipation model with removable fans for easy cleaning.
Compact physical footprint, with single-slot and low-profile versions available for small form factor builds.
Low power consumption; many models run entirely off the PCIe slot without needing extra power cables.
Strong performance in modern APIs like Vulkan and DirectX 12.

What customers dislike about XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB?

Struggles with modern AAA titles at high settings, often requiring medium or low presets for 60 FPS.
Price-to-performance ratio can be poor compared to the slightly more expensive RX 470 or GTX 1050 Ti.
Occasional driver stability issues and software glitches reported by some users.
Some XFX variants require a 6-pin power connector, which may limit compatibility with very basic OEM power supplies.
Limited overclocking headroom; performance gains from manual tuning are often negligible.

Expert reviews

willwork4games.net

30/09/2016

XFX Radeon RX 460 Review, the Esports Graphics Card

The XFX Radeon RX 460 Double Dissipation (2GB variant) is an entry-level, budget-friendly graphics card designed specifically for esports enthusiasts aiming for 1080p or 720p gaming. Structurally, it features a dual-slot layout, a full-length PCB, an aluminum heatsink, and a 6-pin power connector, while operating at a core clock of 1220MHz with 896 stream processors. In terms of...Read more

notebookcheck.net

15/08/2016

XFX Radeon RX 460 4 GB Double Dissipation Review - NotebookCheck

The XFX Radeon RX 460 Double Dissipation (4 GB) is an affordable desktop graphics card built on AMD’s 14 nm Polaris 11 architecture, targeted at budget-conscious gamers. In synthetic benchmarks, the card underperforms slightly, trailing the older Radeon R7 370 and the mobile GTX 965M. However, it reverses this trend in actual gaming tests, outperforming both of those chips, though...Read more

tweakpc.de

01/08/2016

XFX Radeon RX 460 im Test - TweakPC

The XFX Radeon RX 460 (2 GB) is an entry-level graphics card based on AMD’s 14nm Polaris-11 architecture, specifically targeted at casual gaming, esports, and MOBA/MMO titles like DOTA and League of Legends. Positioned as a budget-friendly option retailing between €119 and €169 depending on the model, it features 896 stream processors, a 128-bit memory interface, and 112 GB/s of...Read more

comptoir-hardware.com

08/08/2016

Test • RADEON RX 460

The AMD Radeon RX 460 review evaluated the graphics card's performance using a 12-game test suite, highlighted by 5 titles utilizing modern DX12 and Vulkan APIs, alongside a comprehensive evaluation of its thermal, noise, and energy profiles. Architecturally, the card debuts the "Baffin" (Polaris 11) GPU, replacing the aging "Bonaire" silicon from 2013, with a heavy emphasis on...Read more

tomshw.it

04/04/2026

XFX Radeon RX 460 Heatsink Edition - Tom's Hardware

The XFX Radeon RX 460 Heatsink Edition is a compact, 337-gram, dual-slot graphics card designed for 100% silent operation, utilizing a custom heatsink for completely passive cooling. Pros include its small form factor, silent operation, lack of need for an external PCIe power connector, and a price point that remains close to standard, actively cooled models. However, the card’s...Read more

notebookcheck.it

07/09/2018

F1 2018 Benchmarks Notebook e Desktop (test della variante XFX RX-460P4DFG5)

Performance and Technical Overview The benchmark review of F1 2018 highlights that the game operates on Codemasters' EGO Engine 4.0, delivering similar system requirements and performance results to its predecessor, F1 2017. While the game demands roughly 38 GB of storage space, it features relatively short loading times, and allows players to apply visual changes instantly without...Read more

Video reviews

Best alternatives

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 580 8GB

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX 580

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 580 Armor 8GB

Graphics cards

Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 580 8GB

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE Radeon RX 580 Gaming 8GB

Graphics cards

ASRock Phantom Gaming D Radeon RX 580 OC 8GB

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual Radeon RX 580 OC 8GB

Graphics cards

XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition OC

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 580

Graphics cards

XFX Radeon RX 580 GTR Xxx OC 8GB

Graphics cards

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 580 4GB

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon RX 590

Graphics cards

Compare XFX Radeon RX 460 4GB with

Compare