Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£180VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:64 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):130 W

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT
5.8/10

Overall score

Score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.5

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

▼Worse than 77% of graphics cards
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

▼Worse than 65%
5.5

Technical score

Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.4

Performance

24%

3.2

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

6.0

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 78%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▲Better than 72%
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
  • sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-6500-xt
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #959 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT

Technical score
Technical score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.4

Performance

24%

3.2

Memory

12%

8.7

Power & Cooling

11%

9.1

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

6.0

Connectivity & Media

5.5
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.3

User ratings

30%

9.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
9.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT has a popularity score of 9 points, which is higher than that of 84.2% of products in this category.
9.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

5.8

Overall score

30%

9.6

Price

6.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
5,085 points
This graphics card scores 5,085 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 84.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
368 points
This graphics card scores 368 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 82.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
9,609 points
This graphics card scores 9,609 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 85.6% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
4,337 points
This graphics card scores 4,337 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 85.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
5.79 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 5.79 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 85.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
4 GB
This graphics card has 4 GB of VRAM, which is less than 88% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
64 bit
This graphics card uses a 64 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 97.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
144 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 144 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 91.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4
This graphics card supports PCIe 4, which is newer than on 22.3% of graphics cards and equal to 52.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
2
This graphics card supports up to 2 displays, which is fewer than 97.8% of graphics cards and equal to 2.1% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
130 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 130 W, which is lower than that of 79.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.2% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
130 W
This graphics card draws 130 W under peak load, which is lower than 80.8% of graphics cards and equal to 3.4% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
400 W
This graphics card recommends a 400 W PSU, which is lower than that of 90.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
130 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 130 W, which is lower than that of 81.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 3.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
130 W
Show more
Size
194x 107x 40 mm
This graphics card measures 194x107x 40 mm, which is more compact than 96.3% of graphics cards and equal in size to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Length
194 mm
This graphics card is 194 mm long, which is shorter than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
107 mm
This graphics card is 107 mm tall, which is shorter than 90.3% of graphics cards and equal in height to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
665 g
This graphics card weighs 665 g, which is lighter than 82.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 12.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2825 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,825 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2420 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,420 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 91 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (194 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    194 mm vs 285 mm
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • 28.5% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2248 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,248 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 18 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (107 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    107 mm vs 125 mm
  • 2.94x cheaper
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT is cheaper than the average graphics card (£180 vs £530).
    £180 vs £530
  • 6.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT
    the average graphics card
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.52 vs 8.000).
    8.52 vs 8
  • 2.14x more popular
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT is more popular than the average graphics card (9.03 vs 4.2).
    9.03 vs 4.22
  • 12.8% higher boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (2825 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    2,825 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 26% higher base clock speed
    This graphics card has a higher base GPU clock than the average graphics card (2420 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    2,420 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • Supports ECC memory
    This graphics card supports ECC memory, the average graphics card does not.
  • 28.5% faster VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (2248 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    2,248 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 63.7% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (107 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    107 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • 39.5% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (130 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    130 W vs 215 W
  • 42.2% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (130 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    130 W vs 225 W
  • 12.2 dB quieter under load
    This graphics card has a lower load noise level than the average graphics card (23.2 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    23.2 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • 83.3% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (2 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    2 W vs 12 W
  • 91 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (194 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    194 mm vs 285 mm
  • 18 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (107 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    107 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • More compact card size
    This graphics card is more compact than the average graphics card (194x107 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm). The average graphics card has a size of 285x127 x 52 mm.
    194x107 x 40 mm vs 285x127 x 52 mm
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 24 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    16 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 120 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (64 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    64 vs 184
  • 24 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    16 vs 40
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 4.1% worse value for money
    Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.91 vs 7.2).
    6.91 vs 7.2
  • 24 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    16 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 120 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (64 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    64 vs 184
  • 24 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    16 vs 40
  • 52.6% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (180.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    180.8 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 44.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (90.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    90.4 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 74.5% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (5.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    5.76 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 57.6% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (9609 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    9,609 points vs 22,653 points
  • 96% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (368 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    368 points vs 9,166 points
  • 65.4% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (5085 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    5,085 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 64.1% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (4337 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    4,337 points vs 12,074 points
  • 74.8% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (5.8 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    5.79 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 61.1% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (11.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    11.57 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 3,328 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1,024 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,024 vs 4,352
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 67.9% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (144 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    144 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 5.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (18000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    18,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • 20% larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (6 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    6 nm vs 5 nm
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 3).
    2.2 vs 3.0
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    January 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • 76.4% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (5400 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    5,400 million vs 22,900 million
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 2 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (2 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    2 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/AV1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • 15 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (110 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    110 °C vs 95 °C
  • 8 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (45 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    45 °C vs 37 °C
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

G
guru3d.com
19/01/2022
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
04/02/2022
Summary of the review
P
pcper.com
23/01/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
20/01/2022
Summary of the review
D
digitalcitizen.life
28/09/2025
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
25/01/2022
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.net
28/04/2022
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
04/02/2022
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
19/01/2022
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
19/01/2022
Summary of the review
N
notebookcheck.nl
29/04/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT

  • Efficient power consumption (90W during gaming)
  • Extremely quiet operation with Dual-X cooling
  • Compact form factor suitable for small builds
  • Effective idle fan-stop feature
  • Capable 1080p performance for eSports titles
  • Low thermal levels (approximately 61°C under load)
  • Includes a protective metal backplate

What we don't like about Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT

  • Severe performance bottleneck on PCIe 3.0 motherboards
  • Limited 4GB VRAM is insufficient for many modern AAA games
  • Lack of hardware video encoding (H.264/H.265/AV1)
  • Narrow 64-bit memory bus restricts bandwidth
  • Only two display outputs (1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort)
  • Poor ray tracing performance
  • Stagnant performance gains compared to previous generations

Verdict

The Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT is an entry-level graphics card built on a 6nm process with RDNA 2 architecture, featuring 1,024 stream processors, a boost clock up to 2825 MHz, and 4GB of GDDR6 memory on a narrow 64-bit bus. Designed for 1080p gaming at moderate settings, it stands out for its high energy efficiency with a 130W board power rating, compact dual-slot design with Dual-X cooling, and silent operation. Main advantages include low power consumption requiring only a 400W PSU, effective thermal management, and support for modern features like Ray Tracing and FidelityFX Super Resolution. However, notable drawbacks include its limited PCIe 4.0 x4 interface which significantly reduces performance on older PCIe 3.0 systems, a lack of dedicated hardware video encoding/decoding (H.264/H.265/AV1), and only two display outputs.

Compare Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 6500 XT and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found