OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95VRAM:1 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):55 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
3.8/10

Overall score

Score
3.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

90%

3.3

Technical score

10%

7.9

User score

â–¼Worse than 98% of graphics cards
5.6

Value for money

Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components

70%

3.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 96%
3.3

Technical score

Technical score
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

44%

1.6

Performance

24%

1.3

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

6.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.1

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 99%
7.9

User score

User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 84%
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
nvidia-geforce-gtx-750
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

Technical score
Technical score
3.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

44%

1.6

Performance

24%

1.3

Memory

12%

8.0

Power & Cooling

11%

6.2

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.1

Connectivity & Media

3.3
User score
User score
7.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.8

User ratings

30%

5.9

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.9
Popularity
Popularity
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 58% of models
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 has a popularity score of 5.9 points, which is higher than that of 58.3% of products in this category.
5.9
Value for money
Value for money
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 96% of models
Score components:

70%

3.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

5.6
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
561 points
Market range: <4k points – >34k points
This graphics card scores 561 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 99.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
Market range: <0 points – >25k points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
3,311 points
Market range: <7.7k points – >36k points
This graphics card scores 3,311 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 96.4% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
1,435 points
Market range: <3.1k points – >26.3k points
This graphics card scores 1,435 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 96.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
1.11 TFLOPS
Market range: <4.38 TFLOPS – >57.42 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 1.11 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
1 GB
Market range: <4 GB – >24 GB
This graphics card has 1 GB of VRAM, which is less than 98.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
Market range: <64 bit – >384 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
80 GB/s
Market range: <168 GB/s – >960 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 80 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 97.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.2
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.2, which is older than on 95.1% of graphics cards and equal to 3.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
Market range: <4 – >4
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
0
Market range: <1 – >3
This graphics card offers 0 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 97.3% of graphics cards and equal to 2.7% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
5.4 Gbps
Market range: <5.4 Gbps – >80 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 87.8% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
55 W
Market range: <60 W – >360 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 55 W, which is lower than that of 96.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
55 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card draws 55 W under peak load, which is lower than 96.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
300 W
Market range: <450 W – >850 W
This graphics card recommends a 300 W PSU, which is lower than that of 94.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.5% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
55 W
Market range: <100 W – >400 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 55 W, which is lower than that of 96.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
45 W
Show more
Size
?
Length
145 mm
Market range: <200 mm – >350 mm
This graphics card is 145 mm long, which is shorter than 98.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
Market range: <109 mm – >146 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
Market range: <2 slot/s – >3.25 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
385 g
Market range: <500 g – >2k g
This graphics card weighs 385 g, which is lighter than 95.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 74.4% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (55 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    55 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 140 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    145 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 75.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (55 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    55 W vs 225 W
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 5.58x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).
    £95 vs £530
  • 5.58x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).
    £95 vs £530
  • 49.8% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (148 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    148 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 74.4% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (55 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    55 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 75.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (55 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    55 W vs 225 W
  • 75% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (55 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    55 W vs 220 W
  • 12 °C lower idle temperature
    This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (25 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    25 °C vs 37 °C
  • 58.3% lower idle power draw
    This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (5 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    5 W vs 12 W
  • 140 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    145 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 62.3% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (385 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    385 g vs 1,021 g
  • 56.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1085 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,085 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 36 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (4 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    4 vs 40
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 46.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1020 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,020 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 27.9% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.63 vs 7.2).
    5.63 vs 7.2
  • 1% lower user score
    User score
    7.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.92 vs 8.000).
    7.92 vs 8
  • 56.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1085 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,085 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 36 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (4 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    4 vs 40
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 46.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1020 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,020 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 152 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (32 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    32 vs 184
  • 90.9% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (34.7 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    34.72 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 90% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (16.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    16.3 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    16 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 95.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    1.04 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 85.4% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (3311 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    3,311 points vs 22,653 points
  • 96.2% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (561 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    561 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 88.1% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (1435 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    1,435 points vs 12,074 points
  • 95.2% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (1.1 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    1.11 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 93.8% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.03 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3,840 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (512 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    512 vs 4,352
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 82.1% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (80 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    80 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 73.7% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (5000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    5,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 28.6% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1250 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,250 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 91.7% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    2 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 5.6x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    28 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 9 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2014 vs 2023).
    February 2014
    2,014 vs 2,023
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4).
    1.2 vs 1.4
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4.0 vs 8
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5 vs 6.8).
    5.0 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 91.8% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1870 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    1,870 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • 3 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (0 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    0 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
    1.4a vs 2.1
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.3).
    1.4 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    1 vs 6
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
    5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps
  • Fewer NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has fewer concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    3 vs 8
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 31 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (31 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    31 dB vs 0 dB
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techpowerup.com
18/02/2014
Summary of the review
ASUS GTX 750 OC 1 GB Review
T
techadvisor.com
02/03/2015
Summary of the review
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 SuperClock budget graphics card review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
25/03/2015
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 and GTX 750tiGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. review
U
uk.pcmag.com
16/06/2014
Summary of the review
Zotac GTX 750 - Review 2014
G
guru3d.com
18/02/2014
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750Go to product viewer dialogue for this item. and 750 TiGo to product viewer dialogue for this item. review
A
au.pcmag.com
17/06/2014
Summary of the review
Zotac GTX 750 Review 2014
L
lesnumeriques.com
18/02/2014
Summary of the review
Test Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti, un appétit de moineau et des performances de premier choix
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.fr
26/02/2014
Summary of the review
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti & GTX 750 : Maxwell fait ses débuts
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

  • High energy efficiency with extremely low power consumption (approx. 55W-75W TDP)
  • Most models do not require an external 6-pin power connector, drawing power directly from the PCIe slot
  • Compact single-slot and small-form-factor designs are ideal for small PC cases or HTPCs
  • Remains capable of running popular e-sports titles (e.g., League of Legends, CS:GO, Minecraft) and older games at 1080p or 720p
  • Runs cool and quiet, making it suitable for silent builds
  • Provides a significant performance upgrade over integrated graphics or older entry-level cards like the GT 710

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750

  • Struggles significantly with modern AAA titles, often requiring 'ultra-low' settings or reduced resolutions
  • Limited VRAM (commonly 1GB or 2GB models), which can cause stuttering or prevent some modern games from launching
  • Lack of full DirectX 12 support (most models are DX11 only), leading to compatibility issues with newer software
  • Poor value as a used purchase in the current market compared to newer, more powerful alternatives like the GTX 1050 or RX 580
  • Older architecture (Maxwell) lacks modern features such as ray tracing, DLSS, or advanced video encoders
  • Known issues with counterfeit or poorly refurbished units when purchasing from unverified third-party sellers

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 is an entry-level graphics card based on the 28nm Maxwell architecture (GM107), featuring 512 CUDA cores, 32 texture mapping units, and 16 ROPs with a base clock of 1020 MHz and a boost clock of 1085 MHz. Typically equipped with 1GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus providing 80 GB/s bandwidth, its primary advantages are exceptional energy efficiency with a low 55W TDP and the fact it requires no external power connectors, making it ideal for compact or low-power office PC upgrades. However, it is hindered by its very limited VRAM which struggles with modern texture loads, an outdated feature level (DirectX 12 level 11_0) that lacks support for modern technologies like DLSS or ray tracing, and performance that is largely insufficient for demanding contemporary gaming beyond low settings at 1080p.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found