Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon RX 460 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£95VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):75 W

AMD Radeon RX 460 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon RX 460
4.0/10

Overall score

Score
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

3.6

Technical score

10%

8.0

User score

â–¼Worse than 97% of graphics cards
5.8

Value for money

Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 94%
3.6

Technical score

Technical score
3.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

1.6

Performance

24%

1.5

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

7.3

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

7.2

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 98%
8.0

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 83%
  • amd-radeon-rx-460
  • amd-radeon-rx-460
  • amd-radeon-rx-460
  • amd-radeon-rx-460
  • amd-radeon-rx-460
  • amd-radeon-rx-460
  • amd-radeon-rx-460
amd-radeon-rx-460
amd-radeon-rx-460
amd-radeon-rx-460
amd-radeon-rx-460
amd-radeon-rx-460
amd-radeon-rx-460
amd-radeon-rx-460
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Graphics cards model ranking

Ranked #1243 of 2,195 models in Graphics cards (Overall score)

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon RX 460

Technical score
Technical score
3.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

1.6

Performance

24%

1.5

Memory

12%

8.1

Power & Cooling

11%

7.3

Platform & Features

5%

9.3

Design

4%

7.2

Connectivity & Media

3.6
User score
User score
8.0/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

7.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.0
Popularity
Popularity
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon RX 460 has a popularity score of 7 points, which is higher than that of 65.6% of products in this category.
7.0
Value for money
Value for money
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

5.8
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
1,800 points
This graphics card scores 1,800 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
4,124 points
This graphics card scores 4,124 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 95% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
1,634 points
This graphics card scores 1,634 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 95.9% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
2.2 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 2.2 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 94.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
2 GB
This graphics card has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.8% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
128 bit
This graphics card uses a 128 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 69.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 26% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
112 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 112 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 94.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x8
This graphics card uses x8 PCIe lanes, which is fewer than 76.7% of graphics cards and equal to 22.2% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.3
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.3, which is older than on 79.4% of graphics cards and equal to 15.7% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
6
This graphics card supports up to 6 displays, which is more than 98.7% of graphics cards and equal to 1.3% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
4096x2160
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
25.92 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 25.92 Gbps, which is faster than on 52.7% of graphics cards and equal to 4.4% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
75 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 75 W, which is lower than that of 90.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
75 W
This graphics card draws 75 W under peak load, which is lower than 91.9% of graphics cards and equal to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
400 W
This graphics card recommends a 400 W PSU, which is lower than that of 90.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
75 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 75 W, which is lower than that of 91.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
75 W
Show more
Size
170x 111x 35 mm
Length
170 mm
This graphics card is 170 mm long, which is shorter than 94.4% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.8% of graphics cards.
Height
111.5 mm
This graphics card is 111.5 mm tall, which is shorter than 79.9% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
344 g
This graphics card weighs 344 g, which is lighter than 96.2% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon RX 460 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 65.1% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    75 W vs 215 W
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • 115 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    170 mm vs 285 mm
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 66.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    75 W vs 225 W
  • 13.5 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.5 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.5 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • 5.58x cheaper
    AMD Radeon RX 460 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).
    £95 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    1:16 vs 1:64
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 58.3% smaller GPU die
    This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (123 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    123 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 2 more displays supported
    This graphics card supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    6 vs 4
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 65.1% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    75 W vs 215 W
  • 38.5% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (400 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    400 W vs 650 W
  • 66.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    75 W vs 225 W
  • 65.9% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    75 W vs 220 W
  • 115 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    170 mm vs 285 mm
  • 13.5 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.5 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.5 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 66.3% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (344 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    344 g vs 1,021 g
  • 52.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1200 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,200 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • 2.8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    14 nm vs 5 nm
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 23.8% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon RX 460 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.81 vs 7.2).
    5.81 vs 7.2
  • 0.4% lower user score
    User score
    8.0/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon RX 460
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon RX 460 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.97 vs 8.000).
    7.97 vs 8
  • 52.1% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1200 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,200 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 43.2% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1090 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,090 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 128 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (56 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    56 vs 184
  • 82.4% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (67.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    67.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 88.2% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (19.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    19.2 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    16 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 90.3% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (2.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    2.2 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 81.8% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (4124 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    4,124 points vs 22,653 points
  • 87.7% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (1800 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    1,800 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 86.5% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (1634 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    1,634 points vs 12,074 points
  • 92.8% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (2.2 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    2.15 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 90.4% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (2.2 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    2.2 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 3,456 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (896 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    896 vs 4,352
  • 72.9% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.13 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 128 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    128 bit vs 256 bit
  • 75% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (112 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    112 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 63.2% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (7000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    7,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 95.8% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    1 MB vs 24 MB
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    16 vs 128
  • 2.8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (14 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    14 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Fewer PCIe lanes
    This graphics card has fewer PCIe lanes than the average graphics card (x8 vs x16). The average graphics card has x16 PCIe lanes.
    x8 vs x16
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • 7 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2016 vs 2023).
    August 2016
    2,016 vs 2,023
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    4.0 vs 8
  • Older Vulkan version
    This graphics card supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.3 vs 1.4).
    1.3 vs 1.4
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 3).
    2.1 vs 3.0
  • 86.9% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (3000 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    3,000 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
    6.7 vs 6.8
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
    1.0 vs 3.1
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265/VP9 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

H
hothardware.com
08/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
08/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
08/08/2016
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
10/08/2016
Summary of the review
R
rockpapershotgun.com
02/11/2017
Summary of the review
T
trustedreviews.com
22/02/2017
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.fr
06/03/2017
Summary of the review
L
lesnumeriques.com
29/07/2016
Summary of the review
G
ginjfo.com
08/08/2016
Summary of the review
G
geektopia.es
15/08/2016
Summary of the review
P
pc-gaming.it
11/12/2016
Summary of the review
H
hwupgrade.it
10/08/2016
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon RX 460

  • Excellent value for budget-conscious gamers, originally priced around $100.
  • Efficient power consumption with many models requiring no external PCIe power connector, making it ideal for office PC upgrades.
  • Strong performance in eSports titles like CS:GO, League of Legends, and Overwatch at 1080p/60fps.
  • Good thermal management, often operating coolly and quietly.
  • Significant performance boost in modern APIs like DirectX 12 and Vulkan compared to older entry-level cards.
  • Support for modern features like HDMI 2.0 and DisplayPort 1.4 for 4K content playback.

What we don't like about AMD Radeon RX 460

  • Struggles with demanding AAA titles, often requiring medium or low settings to maintain playable frame rates.
  • The 4GB VRAM model is often considered poor value as its price point is too close to the significantly more powerful RX 470.
  • Lacks a competitive edge in older DirectX 11 or OpenGL games compared to rival cards like the GTX 950.
  • Some factory-overclocked models require a 6-pin power connector, negating the low-power advantage for some users.
  • Limited future-proofing for modern gaming without heavy reliance on software upscaling like AMD FSR.
  • Actual market prices at launch often exceeded the suggested MSRP, affecting its value proposition.

Verdict

The AMD Radeon RX 460 is a budget-tier graphics card based on the 14nm Polaris 11 architecture, featuring 896 stream processors, a base clock of 1090 MHz (boostable to 1200 MHz), and either 2GB or 4GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit interface. Its primary strengths are a low 75W power draw that often eliminates the need for external power connectors, making it an excellent entry-level choice for 1080p eSports titles like CS:GO and League of Legends. However, it struggles with modern AAA titles even at medium settings and is significantly outperformed by the slightly more expensive RX 470.

Compare AMD Radeon RX 460 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon RX 460 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found