Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£150VRAM:4 GBMemory bus width:64 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):75 W

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
4.5/10

Overall score

Score
4.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.1

Technical score

10%

8.5

User score

â–¼Worse than 92% of graphics cards
6.1

Value for money

Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

â–¼Worse than 89%
4.1

Technical score

Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

2.6

Performance

24%

2.1

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

7.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.7

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 93%
8.5

User score

User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–²Better than 71%
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
  • nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
nvidia-geforce-gtx-1630
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

Technical score
Technical score
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

2.6

Performance

24%

2.1

Memory

12%

7.8

Power & Cooling

11%

7.6

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.7

Connectivity & Media

4.1
User score
User score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.5

User ratings

30%

8.5

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
8.5
Popularity
Popularity
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 has a popularity score of 8.5 points, which is higher than that of 78.9% of products in this category.
8.5
Value for money
Value for money
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.5

Overall score

30%

9.7

Price

6.1
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
1,061 points
This graphics card scores 1,061 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 98.4% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
4,993 points
This graphics card scores 4,993 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 94% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
2,122 points
This graphics card scores 2,122 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 94.6% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
1.83 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 1.83 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 96.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
4 GB
This graphics card has 4 GB of VRAM, which is less than 88% of graphics cards and equal to 6% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
64 bit
This graphics card uses a 64 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 97.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
96 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 96 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 96.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12
This graphics card supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 81.8% of graphics cards and equal to 16.9% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4a
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4a, which is more advanced than on 19.5% of graphics cards and equal to 47.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
75 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 75 W, which is lower than that of 90.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.7% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
75 W
This graphics card draws 75 W under peak load, which is lower than 91.9% of graphics cards and equal to 2.3% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
300 W
This graphics card recommends a 300 W PSU, which is lower than that of 94.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.5% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
75 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 75 W, which is lower than that of 91.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
75 W
Show more
Size
20.45x 12.49x 4.56 mm
Length
145 mm
This graphics card is 145 mm long, which is shorter than 98.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 1% of graphics cards.
Height
69 mm
This graphics card is 69 mm tall, which is shorter than 92.4% of graphics cards and equal in height to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
1 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 1 slot/s, which is slimmer than 96.1% of graphics cards and equal in width to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Weight
328 g
This graphics card weighs 328 g, which is lighter than 96.9% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 65.1% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    75 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 140 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    145 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 56 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (69 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    69 mm vs 125 mm
  • 66.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    75 W vs 225 W
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 3.53x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£150 vs £530).
    £150 vs £530
  • 3.53x cheaper
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£150 vs £530).
    £150 vs £530
  • 6.1% higher user score
    User score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630
    the average graphics card
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 has a higher user score than the average graphics card (8.49 vs 8.000).
    8.49 vs 8
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 65.1% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (75 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    75 W vs 215 W
  • 53.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    300 W vs 650 W
  • 66.7% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (75 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    75 W vs 225 W
  • 65.9% lower peak power draw
    This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (75 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
    75 W vs 220 W
  • 140 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (145 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    145 mm vs 285 mm
  • 1.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    1 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 56 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (69 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    69 mm vs 125 mm
  • 67.9% lighter card weight
    This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (328 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
    328 g vs 1,021 g
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 28.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1785 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,785 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 32 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (8 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    8 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 152 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (32 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    32 vs 184
  • 85% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (57.1 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    57.12 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 18.3% worse value for money
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.08 vs 7.2).
    6.08 vs 7.2
  • 28.7% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1785 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,785 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 32 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (8 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    8 vs 40
  • 152 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (32 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    32 vs 184
  • 85% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (57.1 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    57.12 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 82.5% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (28.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    28.56 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 48 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    16 vs 64
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 91.9% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1.8 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    1.83 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 78% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (4993 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    4,993 points vs 22,653 points
  • 92.8% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (1061 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    1,061 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 9.4% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1740 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,740 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 82.4% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (2122 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    2,122 points vs 12,074 points
  • 92% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (1.8 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    1.83 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 87.7% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (3.7 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    3.66 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 87.5% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.06 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 3,840 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (512 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    512 vs 4,352
  • 192 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (64 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    64 bit vs 256 bit
  • 8 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (4 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    4 GB vs 12 GB
  • 78.6% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (96 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    96 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 36.8% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (12000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    12,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 95.8% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (1 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    1 MB vs 24 MB
  • 14.3% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1500 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,500 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (5 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    5 vs 8
  • Lower VRS tier
    This graphics card supports a lower VRS tier than the average graphics card (Tier 1 vs Tier 2).
    Tier 1 vs Tier 2
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
    12 vs 12 Ultimate
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2022 vs 2023).
    June 2022
    2,022 vs 2,023
  • 79.5% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (4700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    4,700 million vs 22,900 million
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No VRR support
    This graphics card does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • Fewer NVENC sessions
    This graphics card has fewer concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
    3 vs 8
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • 35 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (35 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    35 dB vs 0 dB
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

P
pcmag.com
29/12/2023
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
04/08/2022
Summary of the review
T
techspot.com
07/07/2022
Summary of the review
K
kitguru.net
06/07/2022
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
28/06/2022
Summary of the review
P
profesionalreview.com
29/06/2022
Summary of the review
T
tweakers.net
28/06/2022
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

  • Extremely low power consumption, making it one of the most efficient cards under load.
  • Operates very quietly and maintains low temperatures during use.
  • Compact physical design allows it to fit into almost any small-form-factor case.
  • Includes updated video encoders and more modern output options compared to the older GT 1030.
  • Some models do not require a dedicated power connector from the PSU.

What we don't like about NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630

  • Poor performance-per-dollar value compared to similarly priced alternatives like the RX 6400.
  • Slower than older 'budget' legends like the GTX 1050 Ti and even the RX 570.
  • Heavily constrained by a narrow 64-bit memory bus and only 4GB of VRAM.
  • Unplayable frame rates in modern AAA games at 1080p, even on medium settings.
  • Lacks support for modern features like Ray Tracing, AI acceleration, and DLSS.
  • Often requires a 6-pin power connector on many models despite its low performance level.

Verdict

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 1630 is an entry-level graphics card launched in 2022, built on the 12nm Turing architecture with a TU117-150-KA-A1 GPU. It features 512 CUDA cores, a boost clock speed of 1785 MHz, and 4 GB of GDDR6 memory operating on a narrow 64-bit bus with a bandwidth of 96 GB/s. Key advantages include its low 75W power consumption—often requiring no external power connectors—and support for the NVENC encoder, making it suitable for compact HTPCs or basic 1080p esports gaming. However, significant drawbacks include its poor price-to-performance ratio compared to the GTX 1650 or RX 6400, lack of DLSS or ray-tracing support, and inability to handle modern AAA titles at high settings.

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1630 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found