Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260VRAM:6 GBMemory bus width:192 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):160 W

EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming
6.0/10

Overall score

Score
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

5.6

Technical score

10%

9.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 76% of graphics cards
6.9

Value for money

Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

â–¼Worse than 65%
5.6

Technical score

Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.0

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

5.9

Connectivity & Media

â–¼Worse than 78%
9.6

User score

User score
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
★Better than 99%
  • evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
  • evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
evga-geforce-rtx-2060-ko-gaming
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming

Technical score
Technical score
5.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

4.2

Performance

24%

4.1

Memory

12%

8.6

Power & Cooling

11%

9.0

Platform & Features

5%

9.6

Design

4%

5.9

Connectivity & Media

5.6
User score
User score
9.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
9.6
Popularity
Popularity
10/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming has a popularity score of 10 points, which is higher than that of 91.9% of products in this category.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.0

Overall score

30%

9.2

Price

6.9
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
7,523 points
This graphics card scores 7,523 points in 3DMark Time Spy, which is lower than 78.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
3DMark Port Royal score
3,866 points
This graphics card scores 3,866 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 75.7% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
13,151 points
This graphics card scores 13,151 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 78% of graphics cards and equal to 0.1% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
20,709 points
This graphics card scores 20,709 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is higher than 84.3% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
6.45 TFLOPS
This graphics card delivers 6.45 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.5% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
6 GB
This graphics card has 6 GB of VRAM, which is less than 82.6% of graphics cards and equal to 5.2% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR6
GDDR version
GDDR6
This graphics card uses GDDR6 memory, which is newer than on 15.9% of graphics cards and equal to 40.3% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
192 bit
This graphics card uses a 192 bit memory bus, which is narrower than that of 50.3% of graphics cards and equal to that of 18.8% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
336 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 336 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 63.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
3
This graphics card supports PCIe 3, which is older than on 77.7% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
12 Ultimate
This graphics card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, which is more advanced than on 22.6% of graphics cards and equal to 77.4% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
1.4
This graphics card supports Vulkan 1.4, which is more advanced than on 20.7% of graphics cards and equal to 79.3% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
4.6
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 1.9% of graphics cards and equal to 98.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
7680x4320
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320, which is higher than that of 9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 91% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
1
This graphics card offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 88.7% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.4
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.4, which is older than on 80.6% of graphics cards and equal to 13.3% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
8.1 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 8.1 Gbps, which is slower than on 65% of graphics cards and equal to 22.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
160 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 160 W, which is lower than that of 68% of graphics cards and equal to that of 4.8% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
164 W
This graphics card draws 164 W under peak load, which is lower than 70.7% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
500 W
This graphics card recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 75.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 8.9% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
192 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 192 W, which is lower than that of 58.8% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.2% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
160 W
Show more
Size
270x 114x 41 mm
Length
202.1 mm
This graphics card is 202.1 mm long, which is shorter than 89.1% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
111.15 mm
This graphics card is 111.15 mm tall, which is shorter than 80.9% of graphics cards and equal in height to 2.5% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
680 g
This graphics card weighs 680 g, which is lighter than 80.5% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more

EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 82.9 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (202.1 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    202.1 mm vs 285 mm
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 13.85 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.15 mm vs 125 mm
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 19.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming
    the average graphics card
    EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.58 vs 8.000).
    9.58 vs 8
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 19.8% higher user score
    User score
    9.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming
    the average graphics card
    EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.58 vs 8.000).
    9.58 vs 8
  • 2.37x more popular
    EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
    10 vs 4.22
  • 2.04x cheaper
    EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming is cheaper than the average graphics card (£260 vs £530).
    £260 vs £530
  • 96 more AI cores
    This graphics card has more AI cores than the average graphics card (240 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    240 vs 144
  • 1 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    1 vs 0
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    500 W vs 650 W
  • 25.6% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (160 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    160 W vs 215 W
  • 7 °C higher thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a higher thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (88 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    88 °C vs 95 °C
  • 82.9 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (202.1 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    202.1 mm vs 285 mm
  • 13.85 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111.15 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 32.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 10 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    30 vs 40
  • 47.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 4.1% worse value for money
    EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.91 vs 7.2).
    6.91 vs 7.2
  • 32.9% lower boost clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1680 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
    1,680 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
  • 28.9% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1365 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    1,365 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • 50.6% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (80.6 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    80.64 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 47.1% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    201.6 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 10 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    30 vs 40
  • 64 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (120 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    120 vs 184
  • 10 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (30 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    30 vs 40
  • 71.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    6.45 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 16 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (48 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    48 vs 64
  • 41.9% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (13151 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    13,151 points vs 22,653 points
  • 48.7% lower gaming score
    This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (7523 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
    7,523 points vs 14,678.5 points
  • 57.8% lower ray tracing score
    This graphics card has a lower ray tracing score than the average graphics card (3866 points vs 9166 points). The average graphics card has a ray tracing score of 9166 points.
    3,866 points vs 9,166 points
  • 2,432 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1920 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    1,920 vs 4,352
  • 71.9% lower compute throughput
    This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (6.5 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
    6.45 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
  • 58.3% lower FP64 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
    0.2 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
  • 6 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (6 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    6 GB vs 12 GB
  • 64 bit narrower memory bus
    This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (192 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
    192 bit vs 256 bit
  • 26.3% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (14000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    14,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 25% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    336 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 87.5% smaller L2 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (3 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    3 MB vs 24 MB
  • 50% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    64 vs 128
  • 2.4x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (12 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    12 nm vs 5 nm
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
    3.0 vs 4.0
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • 3 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2020 vs 2023).
    January 2020
    2,020 vs 2,023
  • Older encoder generation
    This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (7 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
    7 vs 8
  • 50.8% larger GPU die
    This graphics card has a higher GPU die size than the average graphics card (445 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
    445 mm² vs 295 mm²
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    1 vs 3
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 1.4a).
    1.4 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/H.265/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (2.0b vs 2.1).
    2.0b vs 2.1
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
    2.2 vs 2.3
  • Older NVDEC generation
    This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
    4 vs 6
  • 1 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (2 vs 3).
    2 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 7.6 dB noisier under load
    This graphics card has a higher load noise level than the average graphics card (43 dB vs 35.4 dB). The average graphics card has a load noise level of 35.4 dB.
    43 dB vs 35.4 dB
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
lanoc.org
04/02/2020
Summary of the review
P
pcworld.com
31/01/2020
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
20/01/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
03/03/2020
Summary of the review
D
digitalfoundry.net
27/02/2020
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
03/03/2020
Summary of the review
L
lanoc.org
04/02/2020
Summary of the review
H
heise.de
29/04/2020
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming

  • Exceptional workstation performance in Blender due to the repurposed TU104 die
  • Excellent value with a highly competitive price-to-performance ratio for 1080p and 1440p gaming
  • Compact dual-fan design (approx. 200mm) suitable for smaller PC cases
  • Includes a high-quality metal backplate, which is often missing from budget-oriented cards
  • Features 'idle fan stop' which ensures silent operation during light desktop use
  • Reliable out-of-the-box performance without the need for complex BIOS updates

What we don't like about EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming

  • Acoustic performance is louder than the Founders Edition and other rival GPUs under heavy load
  • Overclocking is limited due to a locked power limit that cannot be increased via software
  • Basic port selection with only one HDMI, one DisplayPort, and one DVI-D output
  • Simplified cooling assembly and plastic shroud compared to premium RTX 2060 models
  • Lacks modern USB-C VirtualLink support found on reference cards
  • The 6GB VRAM capacity may act as a bottleneck for future-proofing in highly demanding titles

Verdict

The EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming is a budget-focused graphics card built on the NVIDIA Turing architecture, uniquely often featuring a TU104 die (similar to the RTX 2080) that provides significantly enhanced performance in professional rendering workloads like Blender despite standard gaming performance. It is equipped with 1920 CUDA cores, 6GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus (14 Gbps effective), and a boost clock of 1680 MHz. Key pros include its exceptional price-to-performance ratio for entry-level ray tracing, a compact dual-fan design with an included metal backplate, and a silent idle fan stop feature. However, it comes with several cons, such as a plastic shroud and a basic heatsink that can result in louder operation under load, as well as a limited port selection consisting of only one HDMI, one DisplayPort, and one DVI-D output.

Compare EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 KO Gaming and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found