OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):60 W

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked

4.0/10

▼Worse than 97% of graphics cards

5.8

▼Worse than 94%

3.4

▼Worse than 99%

9.2

▲Better than 87%

1.7
Gaming
Gaming
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
1.0
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.1
Video editing
Video editing
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
1.0
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.7
1080p
1080p
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
1.0
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.3
1440p
1440p
1.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
30.0%
1.0
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.3
4K
4K
1.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
35.0%
1.0
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

Check price

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked

4.0

Show more

Hide

Performance

1.7

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

1.6

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

6.5

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

5.1

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

7.7

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

60 W

Show more

Design

8.9

Show more

Hide

Size

170x 111x 38 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked vs the average graphics card

Why is EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

72.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (60 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
60 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
3.09x faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
5,400 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
115 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
170 mm vs 285 mm
83.1% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (38 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
38 W vs 225 W
13.85 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
111.15 mm vs 125 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
14.5% higher user score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked
the average graphics card
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.16 vs 8.000).
9.16 vs 8

14.5% higher user score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked
the average graphics card
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.16 vs 8.000).
9.16 vs 8
4.08x cheaper
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked is cheaper than the average graphics card (£130 vs £530).
£130 vs £530
2.37x more popular
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
10 vs 4.22

3.09x faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
5,400 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

49.8% smaller GPU die
This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (148 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
148 mm² vs 295 mm²

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

72.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (60 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
60 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
83.1% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (38 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
38 W vs 225 W
72.3% lower peak power draw
This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (61 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
61 W vs 220 W
50% lower idle power draw
This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
6 W vs 12 W

115 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
170 mm vs 285 mm
13.85 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
111.15 mm vs 125 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
62.2% lighter card weight
This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (386 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
386 g vs 1,021 g

Why is EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

49.9% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1255 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,255 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
10 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
2 GB vs 12 GB
128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
35 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (5 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
5 vs 40
5.6x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
28 nm vs 5 nm
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
2 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
1 vs 3
144 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (40 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
40 vs 184

25% worse value for money
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.76 vs 7.2).
5.76 vs 7.2

49.9% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1255 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,255 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
35 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (5 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
5 vs 40
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
144 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (40 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
40 vs 184
38.8% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1176 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,176 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
88.7% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (42.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
42.9 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
88.5% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (18.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
18.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
48 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
16 vs 64
144 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
0 vs 144
94.2% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1.3 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
1.31 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
82.8% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (3901 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
3,901 points vs 22,653 points
91.3% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (1278 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
1,278 points vs 14,678.5 points
85.7% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (1727 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
1,727 points vs 12,074 points
94.6% lower FP16 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (1.6 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
1.61 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
93% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (1.6 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
1.61 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
89.6% lower FP64 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
0.05 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS
3,712 fewer FP32 units
This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (640 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
640 vs 4,352

10 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
2 GB vs 12 GB
128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
80.7% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (86.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
86.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
71.6% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (5400 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
5,400 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
91.7% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
2 MB vs 24 MB
50% smaller L1 cache
This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
64 vs 128

5.6x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
28 nm vs 5 nm
No DLSS support
This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
9 older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2014 vs 2023).
February 2014
2,014 vs 2,023
Older PCIe version
This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
3.0 vs 4.0
No mesh shaders
This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No XeSS support
This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
Worse SAM support
This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
4.0 vs 8
Older DirectX version
This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
12 vs 12 Ultimate
No sampler feedback
This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
91.8% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1870 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
1,870 million vs 22,900 million
Older shader model
This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
6.7 vs 6.8
Older FSR version
This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
3.0 vs 3.1

2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
1 vs 3
No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
1 fewer displays supported
This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
3 vs 4
No AV1 decoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No DSC support
This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Older HDMI version
This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
1.4a vs 2.1
Older DisplayPort version
This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
1.2 vs 1.4a
Narrower encode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Narrower decode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
H.264/H.265/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
Older HDCP version
This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (2.2 vs 2.3).
2.2 vs 2.3
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (1 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
1 vs 6
Lower display resolution
This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
Not VR ready
This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
Fewer NVENC sessions
This graphics card has fewer concurrent NVENC sessions than the average graphics card (3 vs 8). The average graphics card has 8 concurrent NVENC sessions.
3 vs 8

2 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
1 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No fan stop
This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
39 dB noisier at idle
This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (39 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
39 dB vs 0 dB

No backplate
This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

forums.overclockers.co.uk

25/06/2014

Summary of the review

EVGA GeForce GTX 750Ti: Quick Look, mini review. If you are looking for specific benchmark datasets or information regarding its architecture, let me...

The user-submitted mini-review on the Overclockers UK Forums evaluates the EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti as a highly capable and budget-friendly graphics card. The reviewer was highly impressed by its low power consumption and massive overclocking potential, which allows users to tweak clock speeds significantly without stability issues. A major standout feature is the card's thermal management, featuring an inaudible cooler that remains completely silent even when the card is overclocked and pushed under maximum system load. Furthermore, the card is highly efficient during standard desktop usage, scaling down its clock speeds aggressively to optimize power draw while rendering flawless multimedia and movie playback. In terms of performance, the reviewer highlights several clear pros and cons regarding gaming resolutions. The primary pros include its surprising ability to handle gaming at 1440p resolution, making it an incredibly ideal and cheap option for budget gamers who want decent frame rates without breaking the bank. However, a subtle con implied by the reviewer is that the card's hardware limitations mean it is ideally suited for 1080p gaming rather than higher resolutions. While 1440p...

digitalstorm.com

23/02/2014

Summary of the review

EVGA GTX 750 Ti and 750 Ti SC | By: Nav - Digital Storm Forums

The Digital Storm forum thread reviews the NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti and EVGA Superclocked (SC) variant, highlighting their introduction into the mainstream market based on the Maxwell architecture. A major pro emphasized by the community is its extreme power efficiency; the reference card is capable of running strictly off the power drawn from the PCIe slot without requiring any external PCIe power connections. Additionally, EVGA’s custom models feature a unique, non-reference cooling design with a solid copper core. Priced around $150, users noted that it delivers entry-level performance comparable to the older GTX 570 while being half the physical size and consuming a fraction of the electricity. However, the discussion uncovers a few cons and limitations regarding performance and integration. While the base specifications are highly praised for budget builds, Digital Storm employees noted that standard pre-built configurations (like their Vanquish Level 2 system) typically implement the standard card rather than the factory-overclocked SC version unless explicitly requested. Furthermore, a notable performance-enthusiast con was raised by a community member who expressed skepticism regarding its low power draw, stating a preference...

forum.tomshw.it

18/02/2014

Summary of the review

UFFICIALE - Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 & 750 Ti Would you like me to look for benchmarks comparing this specific Superclocked version against the standard...

The Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti, based on the 28nm Maxwell architecture (GM107 core), offers a significant architectural leap for mainstream 1080p gaming by featuring 640 CUDA cores and 2GB of GDDR5 memory. The card primarily competes with AMD's Radeon R7 260X/265, providing solid performance in titles like Battlefield 4. YouTube · Key pros include exceptional power efficiency, with a 60W TDP that allows for fanless or no-external-power operation, making it ideal for compact PCs. However, the 128-bit memory interface creates bottlenecks at higher resolutions, and it may not be the best value for raw performance per dollar compared to alternatives.

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked

Exceptional power efficiency with low TDP (approx. 60W), often requiring no external power connector from the PSU.
Great 'bang for your buck' value, offering solid 1080p gaming performance for its original budget price point.
Compact single-slot or short dual-slot designs make it ideal for small-form-factor (SFF) and HTPC builds.
Quiet and cool operation, with the Superclocked edition featuring efficient cooling that maintains low temperatures under load.
Easy 'plug-and-play' installation, making it a popular choice for upgrading older pre-built systems with weak power supplies.
Solid overclocking potential, further enhanced by EVGA's Precision X software.

What we don't like about EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked

Lack of SLI support, preventing users from pairing two cards for increased performance.
Performance limitations in modern titles; the 2GB VRAM can cause stuttering or failures in demanding games at high settings.
Limited long-term viability due to lack of full DirectX 12 support, causing some newer games to fail to launch.
The 128-bit memory bus can bottle-neck performance at resolutions higher than 1080p.
Some users reported a 'plasticky' feel to the build quality compared to higher-end models.
Early fan profiles were noted to be somewhat aggressive/audible at idle, though this was addressed in later BIOS updates.

Verdict

The EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked is a compact mid-range graphics card based on the 28nm Maxwell architecture, featuring 640 CUDA cores and 2GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus. This factory-overclocked edition operates at a base clock of 1176 MHz with a boost speed of 1255 MHz, providing a significant performance uplift over the reference model while maintaining a low 60W TDP. Its primary advantages include extreme power efficiency—often requiring no external 6-pin power connector—quiet operation, and a small form factor ideal for budget HTPC builds. However, its main drawbacks include the lack of SLI support for multi-GPU configurations and limited performance in modern DirectX 12 titles due to its older feature level 11_0 support.

Best alternatives

ASUS TUF GeForce GTX 1650 Super Gaming

Graphics cards

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 LP

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming

Graphics cards

ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1630

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT LP

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4GT

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Mech 8GB

Graphics cards

Gainward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon HD 6850

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Superclocked and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found