Scored using Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Graphics cards Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Graphics cards Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Graphics cards Methodology v1.0

AMD Radeon HD 6850 Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£140VRAM:1 GBMemory bus width:256 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):127 W

AMD Radeon HD 6850 Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

AMD Radeon HD 6850
4.6/10

Overall score

Score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

90%

4.3

Technical score

10%

7.7

User score

▼Worse than 91% of graphics cards
6.2

Value for money

Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

4.6

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

▼Worse than 87%
4.3

Technical score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

44%

2.9

Performance

24%

3.3

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

5.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.6

Connectivity & Media

▼Worse than 92%
7.7

User score

User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
▼Worse than 87%
  • amd-radeon-hd-6850
  • amd-radeon-hd-6850
  • amd-radeon-hd-6850
  • amd-radeon-hd-6850
amd-radeon-hd-6850
amd-radeon-hd-6850
amd-radeon-hd-6850
amd-radeon-hd-6850
Best prices
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card AMD Radeon HD 6850

Technical score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Graphics cards category across these key areas: Performance, Memory, Platform & Features, Connectivity & Media, Power & Cooling, Design.
When it matters
When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

44%

2.9

Performance

24%

3.3

Memory

12%

7.6

Power & Cooling

11%

5.8

Platform & Features

5%

8.9

Design

4%

5.6

Connectivity & Media

4.3
User score
User score
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.2

User ratings

30%

6.6

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
7.7
Popularity
Popularity
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
AMD Radeon HD 6850 has a popularity score of 6.6 points, which is higher than that of 62.7% of products in this category.
6.6
Value for money
Value for money
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

4.6

Overall score

30%

9.8

Price

6.2
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
?
3DMark Port Royal score
0 points
This graphics card scores 0 points in 3DMark Port Royal, which is lower than 83.2% of graphics cards and equal to 16.8% of graphics cards.
PassMark (G3D) result
2,232 points
This graphics card scores 2,232 points in PassMark G3D, which is lower than 97.9% of graphics cards.
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
890 points
This graphics card scores 890 points in PassMark DirectCompute, which is lower than 97.8% of graphics cards.
Floating-point performance
?
Show more
VRAM
1 GB
This graphics card has 1 GB of VRAM, which is less than 98.3% of graphics cards and equal to 1.7% of graphics cards.
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR version
GDDR5
This graphics card uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85.9% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
256 bit
This graphics card uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.7% of graphics cards and equal to that of 35.9% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
128 GB/s
This graphics card reaches 128 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 92.6% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.7% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
2.1
This graphics card supports PCIe 2.1, which is older than on 98.1% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
x16
This graphics card uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 23.4% of graphics cards and equal to 76.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
11.2
This graphics card supports DirectX 11.2, which is older than on 98.8% of graphics cards and equal to 0.7% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
N/A
OpenGL version
4.4
This graphics card supports OpenGL 4.4, which is older than on 98.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.6% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
3
This graphics card supports up to 3 displays, which is fewer than 91.8% of graphics cards and equal to 5.9% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
2560x1600
This graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 2560x1600, which is lower than that of 97.9% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
2
This graphics card offers 2 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 79.1% of graphics cards and equal to 9.5% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
1.2
This graphics card supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.9% of graphics cards and equal to 5.1% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
10.8 Gbps
This graphics card supports DisplayPort link rates up to 10.8 Gbps, which is slower than on 62.9% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
127 W
This graphics card has a TDP of 127 W, which is lower than that of 82.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
127 W
This graphics card draws 127 W under peak load, which is lower than 84.4% of graphics cards and equal to 0.2% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
450 W
This graphics card recommends a 450 W PSU, which is lower than that of 84.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
127 W
This graphics card has a board power limit of 127 W, which is lower than that of 85.1% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
127 W
Show more
Size
198x 111x 38 mm
Length
198 mm
This graphics card is 198 mm long, which is shorter than 91% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.1% of graphics cards.
Height
111 mm
This graphics card is 111 mm tall, which is shorter than 83.5% of graphics cards and equal in height to 5.1% of graphics cards.
Slot width
2 slot/s
This graphics card occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 53.4% of graphics cards and equal in width to 42.5% of graphics cards.
Weight
820 g
This graphics card weighs 820 g, which is lighter than 69.6% of graphics cards and equal in weight to 0.3% of graphics cards.
Show more

AMD Radeon HD 6850 vs the average graphics card

246810TotalPerformanceMemoryPlatform & FeaturesConnectivity & MediaPower & CoolingDesign
  • 21.33x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (512 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    512 MB vs 24 MB
  • 30.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    450 W vs 650 W
  • 40.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (127 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    127 W vs 215 W
  • 87 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (198 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    198 mm vs 285 mm
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 43.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (127 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    127 W vs 225 W
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 3.79x cheaper
    AMD Radeon HD 6850 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£140 vs £530).
    £140 vs £530
  • Better FP64 ratio
    This graphics card has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:4 vs 1:64).
    1:4 vs 1:64
  • 21.33x larger L2 cache
    This graphics card has more L2 cache than the average graphics card (512 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
    512 MB vs 24 MB
  • 2 more GPUs supported
    This graphics card supports more GPUs in multi-GPU mode than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card supports 0 GPUs in multi-GPU mode.
    2 vs 0
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    This graphics card supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    2 vs 0
  • 30.8% lower PSU requirement
    This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (450 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    450 W vs 650 W
  • 40.9% lower TDP
    This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (127 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    127 W vs 215 W
  • 43.6% lower board power limit
    This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (127 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
    127 W vs 225 W
  • 87 mm shorter card length
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (198 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
    198 mm vs 285 mm
  • 14 mm lower card height
    This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
    111 mm vs 125 mm
  • 0.5 slot/s slimmer design
    This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
    2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • 8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (40 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    40 nm vs 5 nm
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • 59.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (775 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    775 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 136 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    48 vs 184
  • 16.8% worse value for money
    AMD Radeon HD 6850 has worse value for money than the average graphics card (6.16 vs 7.2).
    6.16 vs 7.2
  • 3.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.7/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    AMD Radeon HD 6850
    the average graphics card
    AMD Radeon HD 6850 has a lower user score than the average graphics card (7.75 vs 8.000).
    7.75 vs 8
  • 40 fewer ray tracing cores
    This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
    0 vs 40
  • 26 fewer compute units
    This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (14 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    14 vs 40
  • 59.6% lower base clock speed
    This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (775 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
    775 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
  • No CUDA support
    This graphics card does not support CUDA, the average graphics card does.
  • 136 fewer TMUs
    This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (48 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    48 vs 184
  • 90.2% lower texture rate
    This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (37.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
    37.2 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
  • 84.8% lower pixel rate
    This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (24.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
    24.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
  • 144 fewer AI cores
    This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
    0 vs 144
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
    32 vs 64
  • 93.4% lower FP32 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1.5 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
    1.49 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
  • 90.1% lower PassMark score
    This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (2232 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
    2,232 points vs 22,653 points
  • 92.6% lower compute score
    This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (890 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
    890 points vs 12,074 points
  • 95% lower FP16 performance
    This graphics card has a lower FP16 performance than the average graphics card (1.5 TFLOPS vs 29.7 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP16 performance of 29.725 TFLOPS.
    1.49 TFLOPS vs 29.725 TFLOPS
  • 3,392 fewer FP32 units
    This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (960 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
    960 vs 4,352
  • 11 GB less VRAM
    This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (1 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    1 GB vs 12 GB
  • 78.9% slower memory speed
    This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (4000 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
    4,000 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
  • 71.4% lower memory bandwidth
    This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (128 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
    128 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
  • 42.9% slower VRAM clock
    This graphics card has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1000 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
    1,000 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
  • 93.8% smaller L1 cache
    This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (8 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
    8 vs 128
  • 8x larger process node
    This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (40 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    40 nm vs 5 nm
  • No DLSS support
    This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No ray tracing
    This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • Older PCIe version
    This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (2.1 vs 4).
    2.1 vs 4.0
  • No FSR support
    This graphics card does not support FSR, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 13 older
    This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2010 vs 2023).
    October 2010
    2,010 vs 2,023
  • No AI upscalers
    This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No XeSS support
    This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No DirectStorage support
    This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Worse SAM support
    This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
  • Older DirectX version
    This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (11.2 vs 12 Ultimate).
    11.2 vs 12 Ultimate
  • Older OpenCL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 3).
    1.2 vs 3.0
  • Older shader model
    This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5 vs 6.8).
    5.0 vs 6.8
  • No sampler feedback
    This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • Older OpenGL version
    This graphics card supports an older OpenGL version than the average graphics card (4.4 vs 4.6).
    4.4 vs 4.6
  • 92.6% fewer transistors
    This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1700 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
    1,700 million vs 22,900 million
  • Older FSR version
    This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (3 vs 3.1).
    3.0 vs 3.1
  • No AV1 encoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer displays supported
    This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    3 vs 4
  • No AV1 decoding
    This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • 1 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
    2 vs 3
  • No DSC support
    This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older HDMI version
    This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
    1.4a vs 2.1
  • No VRR support
    This graphics card does not support VRR, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • Older DisplayPort version
    This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
    1.2 vs 1.4a
  • Narrower encode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
    H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
  • Older HDCP version
    This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.1 vs 2.3).
    1.1 vs 2.3
  • Narrower decode codec support
    This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
    H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
  • Lower display resolution
    This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (2560x1600 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
    2560x1600 vs 7680x4320
  • Not VR ready
    This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
    No vs yes
  • 2 fewer monitors per output type
    This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
    1 vs 3
  • 2 fewer fans
    This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    1 vs 3
  • No dual BIOS
    This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No fan stop
    This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • 14 °C higher load temperature
    This graphics card has a higher load temperature than the average graphics card (81 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
    81 °C vs 67 °C
  • 37 dB noisier at idle
    This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (37 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
    37 dB vs 0 dB
  • 9 °C higher idle temperature
    This graphics card has a higher idle temperature than the average graphics card (46 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
    46 °C vs 37 °C
  • 5 °C lower thermal ceiling
    This graphics card has a lower thermal ceiling than the average graphics card (100 °C vs 95 °C). The average graphics card has a thermal ceiling of 95 °C.
    100 °C vs 95 °C
  • 58.3% higher idle power draw
    This graphics card has a higher idle power draw than the average graphics card (19 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
    19 W vs 12 W
  • No backplate
    This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
    No vs yes
  • No RGB lighting
    This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
techspot.com
26/04/2011
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
06/11/2010
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
21/10/2010
Summary of the review
W
wsgf.org
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
G
gamingnexus.com
23/01/2011
Summary of the review
W
wsgf.org
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
28/11/2010
Summary of the review
L
legitreviews.com
21/10/2010
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
T
techpowerup.com
21/10/2010
Summary of the review
A
alphr.com
29/09/2014
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
01/04/2011
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
28/11/2010
Summary of the review
B
bit-tech.net
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
M
m.hexus.net
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
T
techradar.com
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
T
techgage.com
22/10/2010
Summary of the review
H
hothardware.com
21/10/2010
Summary of the review
T
tomshardware.com
21/10/2010
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about AMD Radeon HD 6850

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio for mid-range gaming
  • Highly energy efficient with low power consumption under load
  • Operates quietly during both idle and normal gaming use
  • Strong cooling performance, generally maintaining stable temperatures around 50-60°C
  • Good multi-display support via mature Eyefinity ecosystem
  • Capable of handling popular e-sports and older titles at 1080p

What we don't like about AMD Radeon HD 6850

  • Performance can be inconsistent compared to competing Nvidia cards like the GTX 460
  • Lack of support for modern graphics APIs like Vulkan or DirectX 12
  • Limited to 1GB VRAM, which is insufficient for modern high-resolution gaming
  • Some partner models (like HIS) were reported to have noisy fans or lower build quality
  • Reference models may run hotter under peak load compared to previous generations
  • Only features one dual-link DVI port on many standard designs

Verdict

The AMD Radeon HD 6850 is a mid-range graphics card based on the 40nm 'Barts' architecture, featuring 960 shading units, a 775 MHz core clock, and 1 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit interface. It is notable for its excellent performance-to-price ratio at launch, low power consumption requiring only a single 6-pin connector, and support for advanced display technologies like AMD Eyefinity for up to six monitors and HDMI 1.4a for 3D content. However, its main drawbacks include a lack of support for modern APIs like Vulkan and newer DirectX versions beyond 11.2, limited 1 GB VRAM which struggles with modern high-resolution textures, and the end of official driver support in 2016.

Compare AMD Radeon HD 6850 with other products in the Graphics cards category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon HD 6850 and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found