OVERALL

ALTERNATIVES

SPECS

VS AVERAGE

REVIEWS

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Review | 118 Data compared

Avg. price:~£130VRAM:2 GBMemory bus width:128 bitThermal Design Power (TDP):60 W

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Review: Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Graphics cards category and whether it is worth buying.

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

3.9/10

▼Worse than 97% of graphics cards

5.7

▼Worse than 95%

3.4

▼Worse than 99%

9.2

★Better than 90%

1.7
Gaming
Gaming
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for gaming performance.
When it matters
When you want to play demanding mobile games, 3D titles, or run graphics-intensive apps smoothly.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
45.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
1.0
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
4.1
Video editing
Video editing
4.1/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for video editing performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific video editing needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
35.0%
7.0
AV1 encode
30.0%
1.0
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
15.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.7
1080p
1080p
1.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1080p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1080p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
55.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
25.0%
1.0
VRAM
10.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
10.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.3
1440p
1440p
1.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 1440p performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 1440p needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
50.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
30.0%
1.0
VRAM
15.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version
1.3
4K
4K
1.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Evaluates core hardware and software specifications for 4k performance.
When it matters
When evaluating how effectively this graphics-cards meets your specific 4k needs.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components
40.0%
1.0
Floating-point performance
35.0%
1.0
VRAM
20.0%
1.0
Ray tracing cores / units
5.0%
7.6
PCI Express (PCIe) version

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of graphics card EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

3.9

Show more

Hide

Performance

1.6

Show more

Hide

3DMark Time Spy benchmark score

3DMark Port Royal score

PassMark (G3D) result

PassMark (DirectCompute) result

Floating-point performance

Show more

Memory

1.6

Show more

Hide

VRAM

Memory type

GDDR5

GDDR version

Memory bus width

Maximum memory bandwidth

Show more

Platform & Features

6.3

Show more

Hide

PCI Express (PCIe) version

PCIe lanes

DirectX version

Vulkan version

OpenGL version

Show more

Connectivity & Media

5.2

Show more

Hide

Max displays supported

Max digital resolution

DisplayPort outputs

DisplayPort version

DisplayPort link rates

Show more

Power & Cooling

7.7

Show more

Hide

Thermal Design Power (TDP)

Power consumption while under peak load

Recommended PSU wattage

Board power limit

PCIe power spec

60 W

Show more

Design

8.9

Show more

Hide

Size

170.18x 111.15x 38.1 mm

Length

Height

Slot width

Weight

Show more

EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs the average graphics card

Why is EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti better than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

72.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (60 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
60 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
3.09x faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
5,400 MHz vs 1,750 MHz
115 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
170 mm vs 285 mm
73.3% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (60 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
60 W vs 225 W
13.85 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
111.15 mm vs 125 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
15.5% higher user score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
the average graphics card
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.24 vs 8.000).
9.24 vs 8

15.5% higher user score
User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.
Score distribution
▼
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
the average graphics card
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has a higher user score than the average graphics card (9.24 vs 8.000).
9.24 vs 8
4.08x cheaper
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is cheaper than the average graphics card (£130 vs £530).
£130 vs £530
2.37x more popular
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is more popular than the average graphics card (10 vs 4.2).
10 vs 4.22

90.42x higher FP64 performance
This graphics card has a higher FP64 performance than the average graphics card (43.4 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.48 TFLOPS.
43.4 TFLOPS vs 0.48 TFLOPS

3.09x faster VRAM clock
This graphics card has a higher VRAM clock than the average graphics card (5400 MHz vs 1750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1750 MHz.
5,400 MHz vs 1,750 MHz

49.8% smaller GPU die
This graphics card has a lower GPU die size than the average graphics card (148 mm² vs 295 mm²). The average graphics card has a GPU die size of 295 mm².
148 mm² vs 295 mm²

1 more DVI outputs
This graphics card has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
1 vs 0

72.1% lower TDP
This graphics card has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (60 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
60 W vs 215 W
53.8% lower PSU requirement
This graphics card has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (300 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
300 W vs 650 W
73.3% lower board power limit
This graphics card has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (60 W vs 225 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 225 W.
60 W vs 225 W
72.7% lower peak power draw
This graphics card has a lower peak power draw than the average graphics card (60 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a peak power draw of 220 W.
60 W vs 220 W
12 °C lower idle temperature
This graphics card has a lower idle temperature than the average graphics card (25 °C vs 37 °C). The average graphics card has an idle temperature of 37 °C.
25 °C vs 37 °C
50% lower idle power draw
This graphics card has a lower idle power draw than the average graphics card (6 W vs 12 W). The average graphics card has an idle power draw of 12 W.
6 W vs 12 W

115 mm shorter card length
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (170 mm vs 285 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285 mm.
170 mm vs 285 mm
13.85 mm lower card height
This graphics card is shorter than the average graphics card (111.2 mm vs 125 mm). The average graphics card has a height of 125 mm.
111.15 mm vs 125 mm
0.5 slot/s slimmer design
This graphics card occupies fewer slots than the average graphics card (2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s). The average graphics card occupies 2.5 slot/s.
2 slot/s vs 2.5 slot/s
62.2% lighter card weight
This graphics card is lighter than the average graphics card (386 g vs 1021 g). The average graphics card weighs 1021 g.
386 g vs 1,021 g

Why is EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti worse than the average graphics card?

Show more

Hide

56.7% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1085 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,085 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
10 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
2 GB vs 12 GB
128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
35 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (5 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
5 vs 40
5.6x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
28 nm vs 5 nm
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
2 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
1 vs 3
46.9% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1020 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,020 MHz vs 1,920 MHz

25.9% worse value for money
EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti has worse value for money than the average graphics card (5.71 vs 7.2).
5.71 vs 7.2

56.7% lower boost clock speed
This graphics card has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (1085 MHz vs 2505 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2505 MHz.
1,085 MHz vs 2,505 MHz
35 fewer compute units
This graphics card has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (5 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
5 vs 40
40 fewer ray tracing cores
This graphics card has fewer ray tracing cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 ray tracing cores.
0 vs 40
46.9% lower base clock speed
This graphics card has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (1020 MHz vs 1920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1920 MHz.
1,020 MHz vs 1,920 MHz
144 fewer TMUs
This graphics card has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (40 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
40 vs 184
88.6% lower texture rate
This graphics card has a lower texture rate than the average graphics card (43.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s). The average graphics card has a texture rate of 381.2 GTexel/s.
43.4 GTexel/s vs 381.2 GTexel/s
88.5% lower pixel rate
This graphics card has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (18.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 163.2 GPixel/s.
18.8 GPixel/s vs 163.2 GPixel/s
48 fewer ROPs
This graphics card has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (16 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
16 vs 64
144 fewer AI cores
This graphics card has fewer AI cores than the average graphics card (0 vs 144). The average graphics card has 144 AI cores.
0 vs 144
93.8% lower FP32 performance
This graphics card has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1.4 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.57 TFLOPS.
1.39 TFLOPS vs 22.57 TFLOPS
82.8% lower PassMark score
This graphics card has a lower PassMark score than the average graphics card (3901 points vs 22653 points). The average graphics card has a PassMark score of 22653 points.
3,901 points vs 22,653 points
91.3% lower gaming score
This graphics card has a lower gaming score than the average graphics card (1279 points vs 14678.5 points). The average graphics card has a gaming score of 14678.5 points.
1,279 points vs 14,678.5 points
85.6% lower compute score
This graphics card has a lower compute score than the average graphics card (1742 points vs 12074 points). The average graphics card has a compute score of 12074 points.
1,742 points vs 12,074 points
94% lower compute throughput
This graphics card has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (1.4 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 22.98 TFLOPS.
1.39 TFLOPS vs 22.98 TFLOPS
3,712 fewer FP32 units
This graphics card has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (640 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
640 vs 4,352

10 GB less VRAM
This graphics card has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
2 GB vs 12 GB
128 bit narrower memory bus
This graphics card has a narrower memory bus than the average graphics card (128 bit vs 256 bit). The average graphics card has a memory bus width of 256 bit.
128 bit vs 256 bit
80.7% lower memory bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (86.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
86.4 GB/s vs 448 GB/s
71.6% slower memory speed
This graphics card has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (5400 MHz vs 19000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19000 MHz.
5,400 MHz vs 19,000 MHz
91.7% smaller L2 cache
This graphics card has fewer L2 cache than the average graphics card (2 MB vs 24 MB). The average graphics card has 24 MB L2 cache.
2 MB vs 24 MB
50% smaller L1 cache
This graphics card has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (64 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
64 vs 128

5.6x larger process node
This graphics card has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
28 nm vs 5 nm
No DLSS support
This graphics card does not support DLSS, the average graphics card does.
No ray tracing
This graphics card does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
9 older
This graphics card was released earlier than the average graphics card (2014 vs 2023).
February 2014
2,014 vs 2,023
Older PCIe version
This graphics card supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4).
3.0 vs 4.0
No AI upscalers
This graphics card does not support AI upscalers, the average graphics card does.
No mesh shaders
This graphics card does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No XeSS support
This graphics card does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
No DirectStorage support
This graphics card does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
Older encoder generation
This graphics card uses an older encoder generation than the average graphics card (4 vs 8). The average graphics card uses encoder generation 8.
4 vs 8
Worse SAM support
This graphics card offers worse SAM support than the average graphics card (no vs yes).
Older DirectX version
This graphics card supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
12 vs 12 Ultimate
No sampler feedback
This graphics card does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
91.8% fewer transistors
This graphics card has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (1870 million vs 22900 million). The average graphics card has 22900 million transistors.
1,870 million vs 22,900 million
Older shader model
This graphics card supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (6.7 vs 6.8).
6.7 vs 6.8
Older FSR version
This graphics card supports an older FSR version than the average graphics card (1 vs 3.1).
1.0 vs 3.1

2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
This graphics card has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
1 vs 3
No AV1 encoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
1 fewer displays supported
This graphics card supports fewer displays than the average graphics card (3 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
3 vs 4
No AV1 decoding
This graphics card does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No DSC support
This graphics card does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
Older HDMI version
This graphics card supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
1.4a vs 2.1
Older DisplayPort version
This graphics card supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
1.2 vs 1.4a
Narrower encode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware encode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
H.264/H.265 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9
Narrower decode codec support
This graphics card supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1).
H.264/MPEG-2/VC-1 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9/MPEG-2/VC-1
Older HDCP version
This graphics card supports an older HDCP version than the average graphics card (1.4 vs 2.3).
1.4 vs 2.3
Lower display resolution
This graphics card supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
4096x2160 vs 7680x4320
Not VR ready
This graphics card is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
No vs yes
2 fewer monitors per output type
This graphics card supports fewer monitors per output type than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card supports 3 monitors per output type.
1 vs 3
Older NVDEC generation
This graphics card has a lower NVDEC generation than the average graphics card (2 vs 6). The average graphics card offers NVDEC generation 6.
2 vs 6
73% lower DisplayPort bandwidth
This graphics card has a lower DisplayPort bandwidth than the average graphics card (5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps). The average graphics card has DisplayPort bandwidth of 20 Gbps.
5.4 Gbps vs 20 Gbps

2 fewer fans
This graphics card has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
1 vs 3
No dual BIOS
This graphics card does not include dual BIOS, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No fan stop
This graphics card does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
33 dB noisier at idle
This graphics card has a higher idle noise level than the average graphics card (33 dB vs 0 dB). The average graphics card has an idle noise level of 0 dB.
33 dB vs 0 dB

No backplate
This graphics card does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
No vs yes
No RGB lighting
This graphics card does not include RGB lighting, the average graphics card does.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

techradar.com

29/06/2014

Summary of the review

EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW review If you need help finding benchmark numbers for specific games or want a comparison of the technical specifications between...

The EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW is a pre-overclocked mainstream graphics card that pushes performance past Nvidia’s reference specifications. Equipped with an Active Cooling eXtreme (ACX) cooling array, it boasts a base clock of 1,189MHz and a boost clock of 1,268MHz, which consistently reaches up to 1,333MHz during testing. While this 16% frequency boost translates to slight performance gains in synthetic benchmarks and gaming—averaging 27 fps in Heaven 4.0 and 38 fps in Battlefield 4 at 1080p—the overall frame rate hike is generally minimal. Furthermore, due to the heavy factory overclock and extra cooling hardware, this specific model requires a six-pin PCIe power connector, which restricts its versatility as a drop-in upgrade for basic budget PCs. Pros and Cons Pro: Impressive cooling array that drops peak operating temperatures to a chilly 45°C. Con: Small real-world gaming performance boost compared to reference cards. Con: Relatively pricey with a high premium compared to competing models. Con: The dual-fan ACX cooling solution runs rather loud during operation. Ultimately, TechRadar concludes that the card is a decent performer but falls short of being a...

pcper.com

19/03/2014

Summary of the review

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Roundup: EVGA, Galaxy and PNY Overclocked

The EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti ACX FTW is a non-reference, factory-overclocked graphics card featuring NVIDIA's power-efficient Maxwell architecture. Operating at a base clock of 1189 MHz and a boost clock of 1268 MHz, it delivers roughly a 10% performance advantage over reference speeds out of the box. Key advantages of this specific model include highly stable, best-in-class overclocking results and an added 6-pin power connector to support performance stability. Additionally, it remains an appealing choice for power-limited system upgrades due to its high efficiency. However, the card carries several distinct drawbacks. Its bulkier design makes it significantly larger than the reference model, detracting from its appeal for ultra-small or tight PC builds. A major design flaw is its non-PWM fan configuration, which restricts the dual-fan cooler from dropping below a 42% speed threshold. While a firmware update helps manage the noise, this limitation prevents the card from running more quietly during idle tasks, even though the fans rarely need to exceed that 42% threshold during heavy gaming workloads.

forums.overclockers.co.uk

25/06/2014

Summary of the review

EVGA GeForce GTX 750Ti: Quick Look, mini review Would you like more technical specifications for a specific EVGA variant, or are you looking for newer...

for the EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti graphics card: The Overclockers UK review highlights the EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti as an ideal, budget-friendly graphics card for mainstream gamers targeting 1080p performance. A major standout feature is its excellent power efficiency and quiet operation, with the custom cooler remaining completely inaudible even when the card is running under maximum load while overclocked. Additionally, the card boasts massive manual overclocking potential and exhibits highly optimized power management, clocking down incredibly low during everyday desktop tasks and smooth media playback. The reviewer was even pleasantly surprised by its unexpected capability to handle light workloads at a higher 1440p resolution. Despite these strengths, the review notes clear limitations when pushing the entry-level Maxwell card past its intended limits. The hardware reaches its performance boundaries in higher-resolution 1440p environments, meaning users must lower modern in-game settings to achieve fluid framerates. Furthermore, community discussions surrounding this specific GPU model emphasize its lack of SLI multi-GPU support, which limits prospective buyers from pairing multiple cheap cards together for a higher-end performance boost.

fudzilla.com

10/03/2014

Summary of the review

EVGA GTX 750Ti FTW ACX reviewed

The Fudzilla review of the EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW ACX highlights a high-performance, power-efficient card, featuring a significant factory overclock (1189MHz base) and a 6-pin power connector that enables substantial manual overclocking. The custom ACX dual-fan cooler keeps temperatures below 50°C under load while remaining quiet. However, the card lacks an SLI connector for multi-GPU setups, and the 2-wire fan design enforces a minimum 42% RPM, preventing silent idle operation. Despite these limitations, it is praised for smooth 1080p gaming performance-per-watt against competitors like the AMD R7 265.

overclockers.com

18/02/2014

Summary of the review

EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW Graphics Card Review

The Overclockers.com review of the EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW highlights the Maxwell-based card's high factory overclock (1189 MHz base/1268 MHz boost) and efficient performance, bolstered by a 6-pin connector for improved power delivery. The card features the dual-fan ACX cooling solution, ensuring cool and quiet operation with 2 GB of GDDR5 memory. Pros include excellent power efficiency, high factory speeds, and a 6-pin input allowing for solid manual overclocking. Cons noted in the review involve the lack of SLI support, limitations from a 128-bit memory bus, and a longer form factor compared to other 750 Ti models.

hexus.net

04/03/2014

Summary of the review

Review: EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti FTW ACX

The EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti FTW ACX is an overclocked graphics card built on Nvidia's highly energy-efficient Maxwell architecture, offering a solid performance baseline for 1080p gaming. EVGA opts for a premium performance-oriented approach by including a factory-overclocked core that boosts to an average of 1,268MHz, a dual-fan ACX cooling solution, and an enhanced four-phase power supply. To appeal to PC enthusiasts who want to push clocks and voltages further, the physical layout includes a larger 170mm PCB extended to 220mm by the custom cooler, a supportive rear brace, full-sized HDMI and DisplayPort outputs, and a six-pin PCIe power connector. The primary pros of the card include its highly efficient Maxwell foundation, excellent aesthetics with a matching black bracket, full-sized display outputs, a generous transferrable three-year warranty, and an included game bundle. However, the card has notable cons, such as its restrictive 128-bit memory bus paired with EVGA's missed opportunity to factory-overclock the default 5,400MHz memory. Additionally, the required six-pin PCIe power connector acts as a redundant feature for such an energy-sipping GPU, it only drives three outputs instead...

cowcotland.com

18/02/2014

Summary of the review

Carte graphique Nvidia GTX 750 Ti : GPU-Z, page 2

The Cowcotland review of the Nvidia GTX 750 Ti highlights the debut of the 28nm Maxwell architecture, featuring 640 CUDA cores and 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit interface. The card demonstrated exceptional stability and overclocking potential, MHz GPU boost without voltage adjustments, while maintaining, in some tests, similar performance to the AMD R7 260X, including 47 fps in Bioshock Infinite. Pros include an exceptionally low power draw—only 51W idle and 141W full load for the system—and the lack of an external PCI-E power connector, offering great efficiency. Cons include limited performance in demanding scenarios, with frame rates dropping to 18 fps in Hitman Absolution with anti-aliasing, and falling slightly behind the R7 260X in specific titles.

overclockers.com

18/02/2014

Summary of the review

EVGA GTX 750 Ti FTW Graphics Card Review - Overclockers

The EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti FTW w/ ACX Cooler is a highly capable, non-reference card leveraging Nvidia’s Maxwell architecture, featuring a 17% factory overclock (1189 MHz base/1268 MHz boost) and 2GB GDDR5 memory. Pros highlighted include the dual-fan ACX cooler for superior thermal management and a custom 6-pin connector providing 25W extra power to enhance overclocking headroom. YouTube · Conversely, the mandatory 6-pin connector prevents it from being a drop-in upgrade for low-power OEM systems lacking PCIe power, a limitation noted in the review. Additional cons include a total lack of SLI support and a larger physical footprint due to the ACX cooler, which prevents installation in compact, low-profile HTPC cases.

hardware.info

17/03/2017

Summary of the review

Hardware.Info Vrijdagmiddag Deals - Week 11

The AOC u3477Pqu is a 34-inch ultrawide monitor featuring an IPS panel with a sharp resolution of 3440x1440 pixels and a pixel density of 110 ppi. It is equipped with multiple connectivity options, including DVI, HDMI, and DisplayPort inputs. Designed for productivity and media consumption, the display offers a typical brightness level of 300 cd/m², a standard 1000:1 static contrast ratio, and a 5 ms response time. During this specific promotional period, the monitor was listed at a heavily discounted price of €599.00 including shipping, making it 6.81% cheaper than the next lowest retail price. In terms of advantages, the monitor’s primary strength lies in its large 34-inch ultrawide screen and high-resolution IPS panel, which provides excellent viewing angles, vibrant color reproduction, and expansive desktop real estate for multitasking. The inclusion of diverse video inputs (DVI, HDMI, and DisplayPort) ensures excellent compatibility with both older and modern hardware configurations. However, a notable disadvantage for gaming enthusiasts is its standard refresh rate and a 5 ms response time, which may result in minor motion blur compared to dedicated high-refresh-rate gaming displays....

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.

Reviews last updated: June 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Extremely low power consumption, often requiring no external 6-pin power connector.
Compact single-slot or short dual-slot designs fit easily in small-form-factor (SFF) or HTPC cases.
Runs very cool and quiet, even under heavy gaming loads.
Reliable performance for 1080p gaming on medium settings for older or less demanding titles.
Excellent 'plug-and-play' upgrade for older pre-built systems with weak power supplies.

What we don't like about EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Shows its age with modern, demanding titles, often struggling to maintain playable frame rates at 1080p.
Lacks support for modern standards like HDMI 2.0 or 4K HEVC video decoding.
No SLI support for multi-GPU configurations.
Some enthusiast variants (like the FTW edition) require a 6-pin power connector, reducing its versatility for some OEM PCs.
Performance is relatively flat compared to the previous generation's higher-tier cards like the GTX 650 Ti Boost.

Verdict

The EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti is a mid-range graphics card built on NVIDIA's 28nm Maxwell architecture, specifically the GM107 GPU. It features 640 CUDA cores, 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 128-bit bus, and an effective memory clock speed of 5400 MHz, providing a bandwidth of 86.4 GB/s. Standard base and boost clocks are 1020 MHz and 1085 MHz respectively, though EVGA variants like the FTW or Superclocked editions offer factory-overclocked speeds reaching up to 1268 MHz. Its main pros include exceptional power efficiency with a low 60W TDP that often removes the need for an external power connector, a compact design ideal for small-form-factor PCs, and reliable 1080p performance for light to moderate gaming. However, its primary cons are the lack of SLI support for multi-GPU setups, aging performance that struggles with modern AAA titles, and limited DirectX 12 feature level support.

Best alternatives

ASUS TUF GeForce GTX 1650 Super Gaming

Graphics cards

ZOTAC Gaming GeForce GTX 1650 LP

Graphics cards

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti G1 Gaming

Graphics cards

ASUS Phoenix GeForce GTX 1630

Graphics cards

GIGABYTE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 4GT LP

Graphics cards

MSI GeForce GTX 1050 Ti OC 4GT

Graphics cards

ASUS Dual GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Graphics cards

MSI Radeon RX 5500 XT Mech 8GB

Graphics cards

Gainward GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

Graphics cards

AMD Radeon HD 6850

Graphics cards

See best alternatives in Buying Guide

Compare EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti with other products in the Graphics cards category

Graphic comparison of EVGA GeForce GTX 750 Ti and other products in the Graphics cards category

No results found