OVERALL
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
ALTERNATIVES

AMD Radeon R7 265 Review | 118 Data compared

double-arrow
  • Avg. price: ~£95
  • VRAM: 2 GB
  • Memory bus width: 256 bit
  • Thermal Design Power (TDP): 150 W

AMD Radeon R7 265 review. Compare 118 technical specifications and user reviews to see how it ranks among graphics cards and if it is worth buying.

3.7

Overall score

What it is: An overall evaluation of the graphics card's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.

When it matters: When you need a quick reference to identify the best graphics cards on the market.

Score components:

90.0%

3.2

Technical Score

10.0%

7.8

User score

Poor
3.2

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

1.5

Performance

24.0%

2.9

Memory

12.0%

5.0

Power & Cooling

11.0%

5.6

Platform & Features

5.0%

7.5

Design

4.0%

6.5

Connectivity & Media

Poor
7.8

User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

8.6

User reviews

30.0%

5.8

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.3
(90)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.4
(90)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

Very good
  • 3.1
    Gaming

    Score components:

    45.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 4.1
    Video editing

    Score components:

    35.0%

    7.0

    AV1 encode

    30.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    15.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 2.4
    1080p

    Score components:

    55.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    25.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    10.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    10.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 2.4
    1440p

    Score components:

    50.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    30.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    15.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • 2.7
    4K

    Score components:

    40.0%

    1.0

    Floating-point performance

    35.0%

    1.0

    VRAM

    20.0%

    ?

    Ray tracing cores / units

    5.0%

    7.6

    PCI Express (PCIe) version

  • amd-radeon-r7-265
amd-radeon-r7-265

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

?

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).
All: ranking among all products in the database.

Verdict

The AMD Radeon R7 265 is a mid-range graphics card based on the 28nm Pitcairn (Curacao) architecture, featuring 1024 stream processors, 64 texture mapping units, and 32 ROPs. It is equipped with 2GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit interface, delivering a memory bandwidth of 179.2 GB/s with a base core clock of 900 MHz and a boost up to 925 MHz. Main characteristics include support for DirectX 12 (feature level 11_1), Mantle, and CrossFire, requiring a single 6-pin power connector for its 150W TDP. Its primary pros are its strong 1080p gaming performance and excellent price-to-performance ratio at launch. However, notable cons include a higher power consumption compared to competitors like the GTX 750 Ti and the lack of support for AMD's TrueAudio technology.

Technical Specifications of AMD Radeon R7 265

Technical Score

What it is: An assessment of the graphics card's technical performance, covering key areas such as gaming and rendering performance, ray tracing, memory configuration, power efficiency, cooling, connectivity, features, and build quality.

When it matters: When you want to compare graphics cards based on technical performance and available features.

Score components:

44.0%

1.5

Performance

24.0%

2.9

Memory

12.0%

5.0

Power & Cooling

11.0%

5.6

Platform & Features

5.0%

7.5

Design

4.0%

6.5

Connectivity & Media

3.2
AMD Radeon R7 265 has a technical score of 3.2 points, which is lower than that of 95.9% of products in this category.
User score

What it is: A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the graphics card.

When it matters: When you want to understand how a graphics card performs in real use and how reliable it is in terms of performance, temperatures, noise, stability, and long-term ownership.

Score components:

70.0%

8.6

User reviews

30.0%

5.8

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.3
(90)
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.4
(90)

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

7.8
AMD Radeon R7 265 has a user score of 7.75 points, which is lower than that of 79.6% of products in this category.
Popularity
What it is: An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you prefer a graphics card that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
5.8
AMD Radeon R7 265 has a popularity of 5.8 points, which is higher than 64.7% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price

What it is: An indicator that combines the graphics card's overall rating with its cost.

When it matters: When you are looking for a graphics card that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.

Score components:

60.0%

3.7

Overall score

40.0%

10

Price

5.6
AMD Radeon R7 265 has a quality-to-price ratio of 5.6 points, which is lower than 89.4% of products in this category.
3DMark Time Spy benchmark score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Time Spy, a synthetic DirectX 12 test often used as a quick gaming-performance reference.
When it matters: When you need a fast rough performance sort before digging into game-specific reviews and frame-rate data.

Importance: LOW

?
3DMark Port Royal score
What it is: Benchmark result from 3DMark Port Royal, a synthetic test focused on ray tracing performance.
When it matters: When ray tracing matters in the games you actually play and you want one quick way to separate stronger and weaker RT cards.

Importance: LOW

N/A
PassMark (G3D) result
What it is: Overall GPU performance score in PassMark G3D benchmark
When it matters: When you need one broad score to sort cards into rough performance tiers.

Importance: LOW

?
PassMark (DirectCompute) result
What it is: PassMark score for DirectCompute performance tests
When it matters: When compute workloads matter alongside gaming performance.

Importance: LOW

?
Floating-point performance
What it is: Theoretical floating-point compute performance of the GPU.
When it matters: When rendering, AI, or heavy compute work needs strong single-precision throughput.

Importance: LOW

1.894 TFLOPS
AMD Radeon R7 265 delivers 1.894 TFLOPS floating-point performance, which is lower than that of 96.9% of graphics cards.
Show more
VRAM
What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

Importance: HIGH

2 GB
AMD Radeon R7 265 has 2 GB of VRAM, which is less than 94.5% of graphics cards and equal to 3.9% of graphics cards.
Memory type
What it is: Type of graphics memory used (GDDR6, HBM2e, etc.)
When it matters: When memory technology is part of the buying decision because it affects bandwidth class, power use, and product positioning.

Importance: LOW

GDDR5
GDDR version
What it is: Generation of GDDR memory used by the graphics card.
When it matters: When you want to separate older memory generations from newer ones before comparing bandwidth, power behavior, and market tier.

Importance: LOW

GDDR5
AMD Radeon R7 265 uses GDDR5 memory, which is older than on 85% of graphics cards and equal to 13.2% of graphics cards.
Memory bus width
What it is: Width of the memory interface bus in bits
When it matters: When you care about steadier performance at higher resolutions, heavier texture settings, or ray-traced workloads that stress memory traffic.

Importance: HIGH

256 bit
AMD Radeon R7 265 uses a 256 bit memory bus, which is wider than that of 49.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 36.1% of graphics cards.
Maximum memory bandwidth
What it is: Maximum data transfer rate between GPU and its memory
When it matters: When 4K gaming, ray tracing, or creator work can choke a slower memory subsystem.

Importance: HIGH

179.2 GB/s
AMD Radeon R7 265 reaches 179.2 GB/s memory bandwidth, which is lower than that of 89.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 0.1% of graphics cards.
Show more
PCI Express (PCIe) version
What it is: Version of PCI Express interface supported
When it matters: When you are pairing the card with an older motherboard and want to avoid leaving bandwidth or future compatibility on the table.

Importance: LOW

3.0
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports PCIe 3.0, which is older than on 77.6% of graphics cards and equal to 20.3% of graphics cards.
PCIe lanes
What it is: Number of PCI Express lanes used for communication
When it matters: When limited lane width could bottleneck the card in some systems.

Importance: LOW

x16
AMD Radeon R7 265 uses x16 PCIe lanes, which is more than 31.5% of graphics cards and equal to 68.6% of graphics cards.
DirectX version
What it is: Highest supported DirectX API version
When it matters: When you play newer Windows games that depend on the latest graphics features.

Importance: LOW

12
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports DirectX 12, which is older than on 92.7% of graphics cards and equal to 7.1% of graphics cards.
Vulkan version
What it is: Highest supported Vulkan API version
When it matters: When modern games, emulators, or creative apps lean on Vulkan support.

Importance: LOW

1.2
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports Vulkan 1.2, which is older than on 96% of graphics cards and equal to 2.5% of graphics cards.
OpenGL version
What it is: Highest supported OpenGL API version
When it matters: When older games or pro apps still depend on OpenGL compatibility.

Importance: LOW

4.6
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports OpenGL 4.6, which is more advanced than on 4.8% of graphics cards and equal to 95.2% of graphics cards.
Show more
Max displays supported
What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously
When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

Importance: LOW

6
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports up to 6 displays, which is more than 98.8% of graphics cards and equal to 1.2% of graphics cards.
Max digital resolution
What it is: Maximum supported digital display resolution
When it matters: When you plan to drive 4K or 8K panels at their native resolution.

Importance: LOW

4096x2160
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports a maximum digital resolution of 4096x2160, which is lower than that of 56.4% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.4% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort outputs
What it is: Number of DisplayPort video outputs
When it matters: When your setup needs several high-refresh monitors without adapters.

Importance: LOW

1
AMD Radeon R7 265 offers 1 DisplayPort outputs, which is fewer than 89.5% of graphics cards and equal to 8.6% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort version
What it is: Version of DisplayPort standard supported
When it matters: When your monitor setup depends on newer DisplayPort features for higher refresh rates, higher resolution, or better cable flexibility.

Importance: LOW

1.2
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports DisplayPort 1.2, which is older than on 93.6% of graphics cards and equal to 4.8% of graphics cards.
DisplayPort link rates
What it is: Supported data link rates for DisplayPort connections
When it matters: When you are pushing high resolution and refresh rate over DisplayPort.

Importance: LOW

5.4 Gbps
AMD Radeon R7 265 supports DisplayPort link rates up to 5.4 Gbps, which is slower than on 90.9% of graphics cards and equal to 8% of graphics cards.
Show more
Thermal Design Power (TDP)
What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

Importance: MEDIUM

150 W
AMD Radeon R7 265 has a TDP of 150 W, which is lower than that of 73% of graphics cards and equal to that of 2.5% of graphics cards.
Power consumption while under peak load
What it is: Peak power draw of the graphics card under maximum load.
When it matters: When transient-heavy gaming loads could stress your power supply.

Importance: LOW

150 W
AMD Radeon R7 265 draws 150 W under peak load, which is lower than 74.2% of graphics cards and equal to 1.5% of graphics cards.
Recommended PSU wattage
What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

Importance: LOW

500 W
AMD Radeon R7 265 recommends a 500 W PSU, which is lower than that of 76.2% of graphics cards and equal to that of 9.6% of graphics cards.
Board power limit
What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

Importance: LOW

150 W
AMD Radeon R7 265 has a board power limit of 150 W, which is lower than that of 74.5% of graphics cards and equal to that of 1.4% of graphics cards.
PCIe power spec
What it is: PCIe power delivery specification followed
When it matters: When you are checking whether the slot and external cables match the card's intended power-delivery standard.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more
Size
What it is: Physical size of the GPU card
When it matters: When you need the card to fit a compact case without blocking nearby hardware.

Importance: LOW

?
Length
What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

Importance: LOW

210 mm
AMD Radeon R7 265 is 210 mm long, which is shorter than 86.8% of graphics cards and equal in length to 0.5% of graphics cards.
Height
What it is: Physical height of the GPU card
When it matters: When side panels, brackets, or tight case layouts reduce vertical clearance.

Importance: LOW

?
Slot width
What it is: Number of PCIe slots occupied by the card
When it matters: When you need room for another PCIe card or better airflow under the GPU.

Importance: LOW

2 slot/s
AMD Radeon R7 265 occupies 2 slot/s, which is slimmer than 49.2% of graphics cards and equal in width to 47.3% of graphics cards.
Weight
What it is: Total weight of the graphics card
When it matters: When sag, bracket support, or shipping stress matters in your build.

Importance: LOW

?
Show more

AMD Radeon R7 265 vs the average graphics card

  • 2 more displays supported
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
    What it is: Total number of external displays supported simultaneously
    When it matters: When you run a multi-monitor desk for sim racing, trading, or editing.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.6 vs 4
  • 75.37 mm shorter card length
    AMD Radeon R7 265 is shorter than the average graphics card (210 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.
    What it is: Physical length of the GPU card
    When it matters: When front radiators or drive cages leave only limited GPU clearance.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon R7 265 is shorter than the average graphics card (210 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.210 mm vs 285.37 mm
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
    What it is: Recommended wattage of the system power supply
    When it matters: When you are checking whether your current power supply is enough.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.500 W vs 650 W
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
    What it is: Typical power consumption under full load (TDP)
    When it matters: When you need a realistic idea of power draw before choosing a PSU or case.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.150 W vs 215 W
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
    What it is: Number of DVI display outputs available
    When it matters: When you still use an older monitor that depends on DVI.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.2 vs 0
  • 5.58x cheaper
    AMD Radeon R7 265 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).
    AMD Radeon R7 265 is cheaper than the average graphics card (£95 vs £530).£95 vs £530
  • 31.8% lower board power limit
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
    What it is: Maximum configurable power limit for the GPU board
    When it matters: When you care about how far the card can be pushed through tuning or factory power settings.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.150 W vs 220 W
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
    What it is: Ratio of double-precision (FP64) to single-precision (FP32) performance
    When it matters: When you need to know whether FP64 is merely present or genuinely useful.

    Importance: LOW

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).1:16 vs 1:64
  • Better FP64 ratio
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a better FP64 ratio than the average graphics card (1:16 vs 1:64).
  • Supports multi-GPU linking
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports multi-GPU linking, the average graphics card does not.
  • 2 more displays supported
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports more displays than the average graphics card (6 vs 4). The average graphics card supports 4 displays.
  • 2 more DVI outputs
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has more DVI outputs than the average graphics card (2 vs 0). The average graphics card has 0 DVI outputs.
  • 23.1% lower PSU requirement
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower PSU requirement than the average graphics card (500 W vs 650 W). The average graphics card has a PSU requirement of 650 W.
  • 30.2% lower TDP
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower TDP than the average graphics card (150 W vs 215 W). The average graphics card has a TDP of 215 W.
  • 31.8% lower board power limit
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower board power limit than the average graphics card (150 W vs 220 W). The average graphics card has a board power limit of 220 W.
  • 11 °C lower load temperature
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower load temperature than the average graphics card (56 °C vs 67 °C). The average graphics card has a load temperature of 67 °C.
  • 75.37 mm shorter card length
    AMD Radeon R7 265 is shorter than the average graphics card (210 mm vs 285.37 mm). The average graphics card has a length of 285.37 mm.

Total
Overall
Performance
Platform & Features
Connectivity & Media
Power & Cooling
Design
  • 63% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (925 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
  • 24 fewer compute units
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
  • 53.1% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (900 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
  • 120 fewer TMUs
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (64 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
  • 82.1% lower pixel rate
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (29.6 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
  • 32 fewer ROPs
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer ROPs than the average graphics card (32 vs 64). The average graphics card has 64 ROPs.
  • 91.7% lower FP32 performance
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower FP32 performance than the average graphics card (1.9 TFLOPS vs 22.86 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP32 performance of 22.86 TFLOPS.
  • 91.8% lower compute throughput
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower compute throughput than the average graphics card (1.9 TFLOPS vs 23.105 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has compute throughput of 23.105 TFLOPS.
  • 74.5% lower FP64 performance
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower FP64 performance than the average graphics card (0.1 TFLOPS vs 0.4651 TFLOPS). The average graphics card has FP64 performance of 0.4651 TFLOPS.
  • 3,328 fewer FP32 units
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer FP32 units than the average graphics card (1,024 vs 4,352). The average graphics card has 4,352 FP32 units.
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
  • 70.5% slower memory speed
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower effective memory speed than the average graphics card (5,600 MHz vs 19,000 MHz). The average graphics card reaches an effective memory speed of 19,000 MHz.
  • 60% lower memory bandwidth
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower memory bandwidth than the average graphics card (179.2 GB/s vs 448 GB/s). The average graphics card has a memory bandwidth of 448 GB/s.
  • 20% slower VRAM clock
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower VRAM clock than the average graphics card (1,400 MHz vs 1,750 MHz). The average graphics card runs its VRAM at 1,750 MHz.
  • 87.5% smaller L1 cache
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer L1 cache than the average graphics card (16 vs 128). The average graphics card has 128 L1 cache.
  • 5.6x larger process node
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
  • No ray tracing
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support ray tracing, the average graphics card does.
  • 9 older
    AMD Radeon R7 265 was released earlier than the average graphics card (2,014 vs 2,023).
  • Older PCIe version
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports an older PCIe version than the average graphics card (3 vs 4.0).
  • No XeSS support
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support XeSS, the average graphics card does.
  • No mesh shaders
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support mesh shaders, the average graphics card does.
  • Older Vulkan version
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports an older Vulkan version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4).
  • No DirectStorage support
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support DirectStorage, the average graphics card does.
  • Older DirectX version
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports an older DirectX version than the average graphics card (12 vs 12 Ultimate).
  • Older OpenCL version
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports an older OpenCL version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 3.0).
  • Older shader model
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports an older shader model than the average graphics card (5.1 vs 6.8).
  • No sampler feedback
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support sampler feedback, the average graphics card does.
  • 87.2% fewer transistors
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer transistors than the average graphics card (2,800 million vs 21,900 million). The average graphics card has 21,900 million transistors.
  • 2 fewer DisplayPort outputs
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer DisplayPort outputs than the average graphics card (1 vs 3). The average graphics card has 3 DisplayPort outputs.
  • No AV1 encoding
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support AV1 encoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No AV1 decoding
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support AV1 decoding, the average graphics card does.
  • No DSC support
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support DSC, the average graphics card does.
  • Older HDMI version
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports an older HDMI version than the average graphics card (1.4a vs 2.1).
  • Older DisplayPort version
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports an older DisplayPort version than the average graphics card (1.2 vs 1.4a).
  • Not VR ready
    AMD Radeon R7 265 is not VR ready, while the average graphics card is.
  • Narrower decode codec support
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports narrower hardware decode codec support than the average graphics card (H.264 vs H.264/H.265/AV1/VP9).
  • Lower display resolution
    AMD Radeon R7 265 supports a lower maximum digital resolution than the average graphics card (4096x2160 vs 7680x4320). The average graphics card supports a maximum digital resolution of 7680x4320.
  • 2 fewer fans
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
  • No fan stop
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not support fan stop, the average graphics card does.
  • No backplate
    AMD Radeon R7 265 does not include a backplate, the average graphics card does.
  • 63% lower boost clock speed
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (925 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.
    What it is: Maximum boost frequency the GPU can reach under load
    When it matters: When you want a rough idea of peak advertised frequency, while knowing real sustained clocks still depend on cooling and power limits.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower boost GPU clock than the average graphics card (925 MHz vs 2,500 MHz). The average graphics card has a boost GPU clock of 2,500 MHz.925 MHz vs 2500 MHz
  • 5.6x larger process node
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.
    What it is: Size of the manufacturing process in nanometers
    When it matters: When process node differences may affect power, heat, and overall efficiency.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a higher process node than the average graphics card (28 nm vs 5 nm). The average graphics card uses a process node of 5 nm.28 nm vs 5 nm
  • 2 fewer fans
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).
    What it is: Total number of cooling fans
    When it matters: When you compare cooler designs and want one more clue about thermal potential.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer fans than the average graphics card (1 vs 3).1 vs 3
  • 10 GB less VRAM
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.
    What it is: Total video memory available on the graphics card
    When it matters: When you play at high settings, use texture mods, or work with large creative projects.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer VRAM than the average graphics card (2 GB vs 12 GB). The average graphics card has 12 GB VRAM.2 GB vs 12 GB
  • 24 fewer compute units
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.
    What it is: Total number of shader multiprocessors or compute units
    When it matters: When you want a better sense of the GPU's overall parallel hardware resources before relying on game benchmarks alone.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer compute units than the average graphics card (16 vs 40). The average graphics card has 40 compute units.16 vs 40
  • 53.1% lower base clock speed
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (900 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.
    What it is: Base operating frequency of the GPU core under standard conditions
    When it matters: When you want to understand the card's guaranteed starting frequency instead of looking only at optimistic boost figures.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower base GPU clock than the average graphics card (900 MHz vs 1,920 MHz). The average graphics card has a base GPU clock of 1,920 MHz.900 MHz vs 1920 MHz
  • 120 fewer TMUs
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (64 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.
    What it is: Total count of texture mapping units on the GPU
    When it matters: When texture-heavy gaming performance matters and you want extra hardware context behind texture-rate claims.

    Importance: HIGH

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has fewer TMUs than the average graphics card (64 vs 184). The average graphics card has 184 TMUs.64 vs 184
  • 82.1% lower pixel rate
    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (29.6 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.
    What it is: Number of pixels the GPU can render per second
    When it matters: When you play at high resolutions or care about older raster-heavy games.

    Importance: MEDIUM

    AMD Radeon R7 265 has a lower pixel rate than the average graphics card (29.6 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s). The average graphics card has a pixel rate of 165.2 GPixel/s.29.60 GPixel/s vs 165.2 GPixel/s
Total
Overall
Performance
Memory
Platform & Features
Connectivity & Media
Power & Cooling
Design

Graphic comparison of AMD Radeon R7 265 and

Attribute category
Attribute
No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom
amazon
4.3
90 Reviews
United States
Amazon_logo.png
4.4
90 Reviews

(Reviews last updated: June 2026)

What customers like about AMD Radeon R7 265?

  • Strong performance for its price bracket, often outperforming the NVIDIA GTX 750 Ti
  • Excellent for 1080p gaming on medium to high settings
  • High overclocking potential, with some users reaching significant speed increases
  • Runs relatively cool and quiet under load, particularly with third-party coolers like Sapphire's Dual-X
  • Mature and stable drivers due to the established Pitcairn architecture
  • Compact physical size (approx. 20-21cm) making it suitable for HTPC and small builds

What customers dislike about AMD Radeon R7 265?

  • Higher power consumption (150W TDP) compared to more efficient competitors like the Maxwell-based GTX 750 Ti
  • Lacks support for newer AMD features like TrueAudio
  • Primarily a rebrand of the older Radeon HD 7850, offering little architectural innovation
  • Limited future-proofing for newer DirectX 12 titles as it only supports feature level 11_1
  • Single 6-pin power connector required, which may be a constraint for very low-end power supplies

Expert reviews

T
techpowerup.com
13/02/2014
Sapphire Radeon R7 265 2 GB Review | TechPowerUp

The Sapphire Radeon R7 265 Dual-X, priced at $149, delivers strong value as a "Pitcairn" based, 28 nm GPU with 20% overclocking headroom and a very cool-running (60°C) Dual-X cooler. Its pros include excellent price-to-performance, solid build quality with high-quality memory, and versatile 4-output connectivity. Conversely, the card is essentially a rebranded Radeon HD 7850,...Read more

A
anandtech.com
13/02/2014
The AMD Radeon R7 265 & R7 260 Review: Feat. Sapphire & ASUS

The AnandTech review evaluates the AMD Radeon R7 265 and R7 260, highlighting how AMD uses these cards to fill critical price gaps in the budget-friendly sub-$150 GPU market. The Radeon R7 265 (partnered with Sapphire's Dual-X cooler) is essentially a rebranded and factory-overclocked Radeon HD 7850 built on the 28nm "Pitcairn" architecture. It comes equipped with 1,024 stream...Read more

G
guru3d.com
13/02/2014
AMD Radeon R7-265 Review - Guru 3d

The Guru3D AMD Radeon R7-265 Review highlights the graphics card as an affordable entry into budget-friendly 1080P Full HD gaming. Originally pushed to the market for $149 USD to counter NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 750 series, the card features 1024 Stream processors, 2 GB of GDDR5 memory on a wide 256-bit interface, and a 925 MHz maximum boost clock. Architecturally, Guru3D identifies the...Read more

H
hardwarecanucks.com
12/02/2014
AMD Radeon R7 265 Review - Hardware Canucks

The AMD Radeon R7 265 2GB launched as a highly competitive $149 entry in a crowded mid-range market, strategically utilizing a slightly modified, two-year-old "Curacao" (originally Pitcairn) GCN core architecture shared with the HD 7850. Tested on an Intel i7 3930K testbed using FCAT frame-time analysis, the card positions itself perfectly between the cheaper R7 260X and the more...Read more

B
bit-tech.net
08/05/2014
AMD Radeon R7 265 Review feat. XFX | bit-tech.net

The AMD Radeon R7 265, reviewed here via the XFX Core Edition 2GB variant, serves as a budget-oriented refresh of the older HD 7850 graphics card. Built on the 28nm Pitcairn Pro GPU architecture, it features 1,024 stream processors, 64 texture units, and 32 ROPs. AMD increased performance over its predecessor by raising the core clock speed to 925MHz and boosting the 2GB GDDR5...Read more

H
hothardware.com
13/02/2014
AMD Radeon R7 265 Mainstream GPU Review | HotHardware

The HotHardware review covers the launch of the AMD Radeon R7 265, a mid-range graphics card introduced to compete against NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 650 Ti Boost in the sub-$200 market. The card is essentially a rebranded and optimized version of the older Radeon HD 7850, utilizing the exact same silicon but boasting higher clock speeds. The peak engine clock is increased to 925MHz (up...Read more

B
bit-tech.net
08/05/2014
AMD Radeon R7 265 Review feat. XFX | bit-tech.net

The bit-tech.net review analyzes the XFX Radeon R7 265 Core Edition 2GB, a mid-range graphics card built on AMD’s 28nm "Pitcairn" silicon architecture. The review highlights excellent out-of-the-box performance for budget-conscious gamers, successfully bridging the market gap between the R7 260X and the R9 270. Testing across demanding titles like Battlefield 4 shows that while the...Read more

T
trustedreviews.com
21/03/2014
GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs Radeon R7 265: Best 1080p Graphics Card

The Trusted Reviews comparison highlights the AMD Radeon R7 265 as the superior performer for 1080p gaming, boasting higher raw processing power with 3DMark scores of 4,630 and stronger frame rates, including 60.1 fps on Ultra, compared to the Nvidia GTX 750 Ti. While offering better average performance, a notable downside of the R7 265 is its poor minimum frame rate of 16.38 fps on...Read more

T
tech-review.de
23/11/2014
Club 3D Radeon R7 265 royalQueen: Im TRV-Test!

The Club 3D Radeon R7 265 royalQueen offers an impressive performance boost over the competing Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti, outperforming it by an average of 16% in gaming benchmarks. Built on the 28 nm Pitcairn PRO architecture with a 256-bit memory interface and 2 GB of GDDR5 VRAM, the card features a light factory overclock of 925 MHz (955 MHz Boost). The review notes exceptional...Read more

(Translated)Show original
H
hardwareluxx.de
04/06/2014
Club3D Radeon R7 265 royalQueen im Test

This review evaluates the Club3D Radeon R7 265 royalQueen, a graphics card positioned at the €135 "sweet spot" designed for budget-conscious gamers. Based on AMD's 28nm "Pitcairn" architecture from the older Radeon HD 7000 series, the card features 1,024 shader units, 64 texture units, 32 ROPs, and 2 GB of GDDR5 memory running on a 256-bit wide interface. Club3D introduces a mild...Read more

(Translated)Show original
G
geeknetic.es
13/02/2014
AMD Radeon R7 265 [Análisis Completo en Español]

AMD Radeon R7 265 Review Summary The AMD Radeon R7 265 is a factory-optimized variant of the older Radeon 7850 graphics card, built on the Graphics Core Next (GCN) architecture. It features 2GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering a memory bandwidth exceeding 150 GB/s. This model includes 1024 shader engines, 16 processing units, 64 texturing units, and 32 ROPs. Performance...Read more

(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
14/02/2014
Conclusioni - Tom's Hardware If you need help gathering technical benchmarks or comparing this exact GPU architecture to newer models, let me know whi...

The AMD Radeon R7 265 is identified as a compelling budget graphics card priced around 130 Euros, delivering superior performance compared to the HD 7850 while bridging the gap between the R7 260X and R9 270. Key advantages include its excellent price-to-performance ratio and strong 1080p gaming capabilities, though it faces competition from the Nvidia GTX 660. Reviewers highlighted...Read more

(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
13/02/2014
AMD Radeon R7 265 review: aanval als beste verdediging - Battlefield 4 & Assassin's Creed 4

The Hardware Info review written by Koen Crijns on 13 February 2014 analyzes the AMD Radeon R7 265 graphics card, highlighting its performance across several benchmarks with a specific focus on Battlefield 4 and Assassin's Creed 4. Built on the Curacao GPU architecture with 1,024 cores, a clock speed of 925 MHz, and 2,048 MB of 256-bit GDDR5 memory, the card targets the...Read more

(Translated)Show original

Video reviews

Best alternatives

asus-geforce-gtx-650
ASUS GeForce GTX 650

Graphics cards

4.0
amd-radeon-rx-460
AMD Radeon RX 460

Graphics cards

3.9
sapphire-pulse-radeon-rx-5500-xt-8gb
Sapphire Pulse Radeon RX 5500 XT 8GB

Graphics cards

5.0
asus-phoenix-geforce-gt-1030-oc-edition
ASUS Phoenix GeForce GT 1030 OC Edition

Graphics cards

3.9
amd-radeon-hd-7750
AMD Radeon HD 7750

Graphics cards

3.6
amd-radeon-r7-360
AMD Radeon R7 360

Graphics cards

3.6
amd-radeon-rx-590
AMD Radeon RX 590

Graphics cards

5.4
amd-radeon-r7-250
AMD Radeon R7 250

Graphics cards

3.5
sapphire-nitro-radeon-rx-590-special-edition
Sapphire Nitro Radeon RX 590 Special Edition

Graphics cards

5.2
asus-radeon-rx-560-2gb
ASUS Radeon RX 560 2GB

Graphics cards

3.7
amd-radeon-pro-wx-2100
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Graphics cards

3.4
asrock-radeon-rx-6400-challenger-itx-4gb
ASRock Radeon RX 6400 Challenger ITX 4GB

Graphics cards

4.4

Compare AMD Radeon R7 265 with

VS
VS

Compare