OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Drones Methodology v2.0
Drones Methodology v2.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontumo Drones Methodology v2.0: technical specifications plus grades from 1,110 independent expert reviews and 2,622 video reviews, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Drones Methodology v2.0

DEERC HT35 Review | 97 Data compared

Avg. price:~£35Max flight time:7 minVideo resolution:N/AMax transmission distance:0.03 km

DEERC HT35 Review: Compare 97 technical specifications and expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Drones category and whether it is worth buying.

4.3

Overall score

Score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the drone's quality, based on technical analyses and grades from independent expert reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best drones on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

100%

4.3

Technical Score

No expert review graded yet
So the overall score is the technical score alone. With 3 full tests, experts would count 25%.
â–¼Worse than 99% of drones
4.3

Technical Score

Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components

26%

3.6

Flight

24%

3.7

Camera

20%

4.5

Safety

16%

4.2

Connectivity

14%

6.6

Battery & Design

â–¼Worse than 98% of drones
?

Review score

Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its overall score is our technical score alone.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
No expert tests yet
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
  • deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35
deerc-ht35

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of drone DEERC HT35

Technical Score
Technical score
4.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the drone's technical performance, covering key areas such as flight performance, camera quality, transmission, safety features, battery life, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare drones based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

26%

3.6

Flight

24%

3.7

Camera

20%

4.5

Safety

16%

4.2

Connectivity

14%

6.6

Battery & Design

4.3
Review score
Review score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves.
Weighting: Big test sites count more, first looks half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Share: The review score is 25% of the overall score with 3+ full tests, less with fewer.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet, so its overall score is our technical score alone.
Shop star ratings are not part of this score.
?
Popularity
Popularity
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the drone.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a drone reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 51% of models
Popularity:
DEERC HT35 has a popularity score of 6.7 points, which is higher than that of 51.5% of products in this category.
6.7
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
6.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the drone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a drone with a good balance between flight quality, camera features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components:

60%

4.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

6.0
Max flight time
7 min
Max flight time
7 min
â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
Market range: <8 min – >40 min
This drone has a max flight time of 7 min, shorter than 92% of drones and equal to 3% of drones.
Max flight distance
0.03 km
Max flight distance
0.03 km
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
This drone has a max flight distance of 0.03 km, shorter-range than 97.8% of drones and equal to 2.2% of drones.
Max flight speed
5 m/s
Max flight speed
5 m/s
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
This drone has a max flight speed of 5 m/s, slower than 77.9% of drones and equal to 10.1% of drones.
Max wind resistance
?
Max service ceiling (ASL)
?
Show more
Video resolution
N/A
4K camera
no
4K camera
no
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
This drone does not support 4K video. 54.6% of drones support 4K video.
Sensor size
N/A
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Max movie bitrate
N/A
Show more
Obstacle detection
no
Obstacle detection
no
â–¼ Worse than 31% of models
This drone does not support obstacle detection. 31% of drones support obstacle detection.
Return to Home (RTH)
no
Return to Home (RTH)
no
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
This drone does not support Return-to-Home (RTH). 67.5% of drones support Return-to-Home (RTH).
GPS
no
GPS
no
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This drone does not support GPS. 65.2% of drones support GPS.
GNSS systems supported
none
GNSS systems supported
none
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
This drone supports none GNSS systems, which are less comprehensive than those of 65.8% and the same as those of 34.2%.
Obstacle sensing directions
N/A
Show more
Max transmission distance
0.03 km
Max transmission distance
0.03 km
â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
This drone has a max transmission distance of 0.03 km, shorter-range than 98% of drones and equal to 2% of drones.
Transmission latency
N/A
Video transmission system
N/A
Live view quality
N/A
Remote control
yes
Remote control
yes
â–² Better than 5% of models
This drone has a handheld remote controller. 5% of drones offer this.
Show more
Battery capacity
600 mAh
Battery capacity
600 mAh
â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
This drone has a battery capacity of 600 mAh, smaller than 89.1% of drones.
Battery energy
?
Charging time
?
Weight
?
Removable battery
yes
Removable battery
yes
â–² Better than 1% of models
This drone has a removable battery. 0.5% of drones have a removable battery.
Show more

DEERC HT35 vs the average drone

246810TotalFlightCameraSafetyConnectivityBattery & Design
  • Less restrictive EU class
    EU class marking
    C0
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This drone is rated as C0 under the EU drone class system, while the average drone is rated as None.
    C0 vs None
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • 5.71x cheaper
    DEERC HT35 is cheaper than the average drone (£35 vs £200).
    £35 vs £200
  • 5.71x cheaper
    DEERC HT35 is cheaper than the average drone (£35 vs £200).
    £35 vs £200
  • 3 years newer release date
    Release date
    2026
    ★ Better than 92% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This drone is newer than the average drone (2026 vs 2023). The average drone was released in 2023.
    2026 vs 2023
  • Less restrictive EU class
    EU class marking
    C0
    â–² Better than 79% of models
    This drone is rated as C0 under the EU drone class system, while the average drone is rated as None.
    C0 vs None
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • 13 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    7 min
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (7 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    7 min vs 20 min
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    none vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • 1,600 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    600 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (600 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    600 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • 16.6% worse value for money
    DEERC HT35 has worse value for money than the average drone (6.03 vs 7).
    6.03 vs 7.03
  • 13 min shorter flight time
    Max flight time
    7 min
    â–¼ Worse than 92% of models
    Market range: <8 min – >40 min
    This drone offers shorter max flight time than the average drone (7 min vs 20 min). The average drone offers 20 min of max flight time.
    7 min vs 20 min
  • 10 m/s slower flight speed
    Max flight speed
    5 m/s
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <4 m/s – >21 m/s
    This drone reaches a lower max flight speed than the average drone (5 m/s vs 15 m/s). The average drone reaches 15 m/s.
    5 m/s vs 15 m/s
  • 0.97 km shorter flight distance
    Max flight distance
    0.03 km
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >24 km
    This drone has a shorter max flight distance than the average drone (0 km vs 1 km). The average drone can fly up to 1 km.
    0.03 km vs 1 km
  • Simpler motor design
    Motor type
    brushed
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone uses brushed motors, while the average drone uses brushless motors.
    brushed vs brushless
  • Non-foldable design
    Foldable design
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not have a foldable design, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer photo format options
    Photo formats supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none photo formats, while the average drone supports JPEG, DNG (RAW).
    none vs JPEG, DNG (RAW)
  • Fewer video codec options
    Video codecs supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
    This drone supports none video codecs, while the average drone supports H.264/AVC.
    none vs H.264/AVC
  • No memory card slot
    Memory card slot
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 74% of models
    This drone does not have a memory card slot, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer video format options
    Video formats
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none video formats, while the average drone supports MP4.
    none vs MP4
  • More basic focus system
    Focus system
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 94% of models
    This drone uses none for focusing, while the average drone uses fixed focus.
    none vs fixed focus
  • Fewer color profile options
    Color profiles
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models
    This drone supports none color profiles, while the average drone supports Normal.
    none vs Normal
  • 3 x lower digital zoom
    Digital zoom
    0 x
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    Market range: <0 x – >16 x
    This drone offers less digital zoom than the average drone (0 x vs 3 x). The average drone offers 3 x of digital zoom.
    0 x vs 3 x
  • No 4K video
    4K camera
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
    This drone does not support 4K video, while the average drone does.
  • No CMOS sensor
    CMOS sensor
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 93% of models
    This drone does not have a CMOS sensor, while the average drone does.
  • 128 GB lower memory card limit
    Max external memory supported
    0 GB
    â–¼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >512 GB
    This drone supports less external storage than the average drone (0 GB vs 128 GB). The average drone supports up to 128 GB of external storage.
    0 GB vs 128 GB
  • Fewer GNSS systems
    GNSS systems supported
    none
    â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
    This drone supports none GNSS systems, while the average drone supports GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou.
    none vs GPS, GLONASS, Galileo, BeiDou
  • No subject tracking
    Subject tracking
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This drone cannot track subjects, while the average drone can.
  • No return-to-home (RTH)
    Return to Home (RTH)
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
    This drone does not support return-to-home (RTH), while the average drone does.
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This drone does not have GPS, while the average drone does.
  • 3 fewer flight modes
    N. of intelligent flight modes
    1
    â–¼ Worse than 75% of models
    Market range: <0 – >8
    This drone offers fewer intelligent flight modes than the average drone (1 vs 4). The average drone offers 4 intelligent flight modes.
    1 vs 4
  • No compass
    Compass
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 69% of models
    This drone does not have a compass, while the average drone does.
  • No beginner mode
    Beginner mode
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 56% of models
    This drone does not support beginner mode, while the average drone does.
  • Fewer frequency bands
    Operating frequency bands
    2.4 GHz
    â–¼ Worse than 70% of models
    This drone supports 2.4 GHz operating frequency bands, while the average drone supports 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz, 5.8 GHz
  • 0.97 km shorter transmission range
    Max transmission distance
    0.03 km
    â–¼ Worse than 98% of models
    Market range: <0.05 km – >15 km
    This drone has a shorter max transmission distance than the average drone (0 km vs 1 km). The average drone reaches 1 km of transmission distance.
    0.03 km vs 1 km
  • Basic companion app
    Companion app
    None
    â–¼ Worse than 86% of models
    This drone uses the None companion app, while the average drone uses HS FPV.
    None vs HS FPV
  • No wireless file transfer
    Wireless file transfer
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
    This drone does not support wireless file transfer, while the average drone does.
  • 1,600 mAh less battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    600 mAh
    â–¼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <550 mAh – >5k mAh
    This drone has a smaller battery capacity than the average drone (600 mAh vs 2200 mAh). The average drone battery has a capacity of 2200 mAh.
    600 mAh vs 2,200 mAh
  • Plainer color finish
    Color
    yellow
    â–¼ Worse than 100% of models
    This drone comes in yellow, while the average drone comes in gray.
    yellow vs gray

Third-party reviews

Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What we like about DEERC HT35

  • Two-in-1 design drives as a car and flies as a drone
  • 360-degree flips, circle flight and one-key controls
  • Altitude hold and headless mode for easy control
  • About seven minutes per 600 mAh battery
  • No app or phone needed

What we don't like about DEERC HT35

  • No camera
  • Very short range of about 30 m
  • Brushed motors wear faster
  • Short flight time

Verdict

The DEERC HT35 is a two-in-1 mini drone and remote-control car for children, so it can race across the floor and then lift off into the air. The toy includes playful tricks such as 360-degree flips, circle flight and one-key controls, which make it easy for younger kids to get impressive results quickly. Altitude hold keeps the height steady, and headless mode means the controls work the same way whatever direction it faces. A 600 mAh battery gives about seven minutes of flight. There is no camera, GPS or app, and the control range of roughly 30 m makes it an indoor or back-garden toy. Brushed motors help keep the price low but wear faster than brushless ones. For parents looking for a versatile, simple gift that keeps children busy with both driving and flying, it is a fun option.

Compare DEERC HT35 with other drones

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of DEERC HT35 and other drones

No results found