Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6 Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£290Lens mount:Canon RFMaximum focal length:300 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):5.6Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:32.2 °

Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6 Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

4.6

Overall score

Score
4.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

3.7

Technical score

20%

8.6

User score

â–¼Worse than 99% of camera-lenses
3.7

Technical score

Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

3.6

Optics & Aperture

24%

4.7

Build & Handling

20%

1.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

â–¼Worse than 99% of camera-lenses
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 274 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 58% of camera-lenses
  • canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
  • canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
  • canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
  • canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
  • canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
  • canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
  • canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6
canon-rf-75-300mm-f-4-5-6

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6

Technical score
Technical score
3.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

3.6

Optics & Aperture

24%

4.7

Build & Handling

20%

1.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

3.7
User score
User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

9.2

User ratings

30%

7.1

Number of reviews

Based on 274 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.6
Popularity
Popularity
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6 has a popularity score of 7.1 points, which is lower than 52.2% of camera lenses.
7.1
Value for money
Value for money
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

4.6

Overall score

40%

9.0

Price

5.9
Lens type
telephoto zoom
Lens mount
Canon RF
Sensor format coverage
Full-frame
Filter thread size
58 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Show more
Minimum focal length
75 mm
Maximum focal length
300 mm
Optical zoom
4xx
Maximum angle of view
32.2 °
Minimum angle of view
8.2 °
Show more
Focus motor
DC motor
Minimum focus distance
1.5 m
Minimum focus distance
1.5 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 1.5 m, which is farther than 93.1% of camera lenses and equal to 1.5% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.25xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.25x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.25x, which is higher than 70% of camera lenses and equal to 4.5% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
no
Full-time manual focus
no
This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
no
Internal focusing
no
This camera lens does not support internal focusing. 83.7% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
540 g
Weight
540 g
This camera lens weighs 540 g, which is heavier than 53.6% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.6% of camera lenses.
Lens length
146.1 mm
Lens length
146.1 mm
This camera lens is 146.1 mm long, which is longer than 85.1% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
71.2 mm
Lens diameter
71.2 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 71.2 mm, which is slimmer than 68.2% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
Weather sealing (splashproof)
no
This camera lens does not support weather sealing. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Metal mount
no
Metal mount
no
This camera lens does not use a metal lens mount. 93.7% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6 vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2025 vs 2016
  • 0.06 x higher maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.25 x
    This camera lens has a higher maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.3 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.25 x vs 0.192 x
  • 5.8 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    71.2 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (71.2 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    71.2 mm vs 77 mm
  • 0.06 x higher maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.25 x
    This camera lens has a higher maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.3 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.25 x vs 0.192 x
  • Newer release date
    Release date
    2025
    This camera lens was released more recently than the average camera lens.
    2025 vs 2016
  • 5.8 mm narrower lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    71.2 mm
    This camera lens is slimmer than the average camera lens (71.2 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    71.2 mm vs 77 mm
  • 2.8 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    5.6
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/5.6 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    5.6 vs 2.8
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • No internal focusing
    Internal focusing
    no
    This camera lens does not support internal focusing, the average camera lens does. 83.7% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
  • No metal mount
    Metal mount
    no
    This camera lens does not use a metal lens mount, the average camera lens does. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • 53.85 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    146.1 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (146.1 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    146.1 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 15.9% worse value for money
    Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6 has a worse value-for-money score than the average camera lens (5.94 vs 6.9).
    5.94 vs 6.89
  • 2.8 higher f-number at telephoto end
    Maximum aperture (telephoto end)
    5.6
    This camera lens has a dimmer maximum telephoto aperture than the average camera lens (f/5.6 vs f/2.8). The average lens has a maximum telephoto aperture of f/2.8.
    5.6 vs 2.8
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • 2 fewer aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    0
    This camera lens has fewer aspherical elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    0 vs 2
  • 2 fewer low-dispersion elements
    Low-dispersion elements
    0
    This camera lens has fewer low-dispersion elements than the average camera lens (0 vs 2). The average lens has 2 low-dispersion elements.
    0 vs 2
  • No full-time manual focus
    Full-time manual focus
    no
    This camera lens does not support full-time manual focus, the average camera lens does. 68.4% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
  • No internal focusing
    Internal focusing
    no
    This camera lens does not support internal focusing, the average camera lens does. 83.7% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
  • 1.2 m longer minimum focus distance
    Minimum focus distance
    1.5 m
    This camera lens has a higher minimum focus distance than the average camera lens (1.5 m vs 0.3 m). The average lens has a minimum focus distance of 0.3 m.
    1.5 m vs 0.3 m
  • Rotating front element
    Non-rotating front element
    no
    This camera lens does not have a non-rotating front element, the average camera lens does. 96.8% of camera lenses have a non-rotating front element.
  • Not weather-sealed
    Weather sealing (splashproof)
    no
    This camera lens does not support weather sealing, the average camera lens does. 50.3% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
  • No metal mount
    Metal mount
    no
    This camera lens does not use a metal lens mount, the average camera lens does. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
  • 53.85 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    146.1 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (146.1 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    146.1 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 30 g heavier
    Weight
    540 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (540 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    540 g vs 510 g

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
the-digital-picture.com
21/08/2025
Summary of the review
D
digitalcameraworld.com
23/05/2025
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 274 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6

  • Extremely affordable and budget-friendly for a full-frame telephoto zoom lens
  • Highly accessible and straightforward option for beginners and casual hobbyists
  • Lightweight, compact, and easy to carry for everyday use or travel
  • Provides a versatile telephoto zoom range (75-300mm) suitable for wildlife, sports, and zoo photography
  • Delivers surprisingly decent center sharpness and acceptable image quality for social media and basic printing when stopped down
  • Produces pleasing bokeh and background compression, especially at the longer end of the zoom range

What we don't like about Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6

  • Lacks optical image stabilization (IS), making handheld shooting at 300mm difficult without fast shutter speeds or a tripod
  • Autofocus motor (older DC motor design) is slow, loud, and can struggle to track fast-moving action
  • Noticeable drop in image quality, contrast, and sharpness at wider apertures (especially wide open at the 200-300mm range)
  • Prone to optical imperfections such as visible chromatic aberration (purple fringing) and soft edges/corners
  • The front filter element rotates during focusing, which complicates the use of polarizing or graduated filters
  • Cheap, barebones consumer-grade plastic construction that completely lacks weather sealing
  • Lacks the customizable lens control ring found natively on most other modern Canon RF lenses

Verdict

The Canon RF 75-300mm f/4-5.6 is an ultra-affordable, entry-level telephoto zoom lens designed for the EOS R mirrorless system, compatible with both full-frame and APS-C bodies (offering a 120-480mm equivalent reach on the latter). Weighing approximately 507g and featuring a 7-blade circular aperture, it delivers a versatile focal range suitable for wildlife and sports photography with a minimum focusing distance of 1.5m and a 0.25x maximum magnification. Its primary advantages include its extremely low price point, lightweight and compact design, and Super Spectra Coating for reduced flare and ghosting. However, it lacks built-in image stabilization (IS) and a control ring, utilizes a relatively loud and slow DC autofocus motor, and features an older optical design that can result in softer image quality and chromatic aberration at the longer end of the zoom range.

Compare Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6 with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon RF 75 300mm F 4 5 6 and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found