Scored using Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Camera lenses Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Camera lenses Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Camera lenses Methodology v1.0

Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM Review | 54 Data compared

Avg. price:~£480Lens mount:Canon EFMaximum focal length:35 mmMaximum aperture (telephoto end):2.8Optical image stabilization:noMaximum angle of view:108.2 °

Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM Review: Compare 54 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Camera lenses category and whether it is worth buying.

7.1

Overall score

Score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the camera lens's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best camera lenses on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

80%

6.7

Technical score

20%

8.7

User score

▲Better than 62% of camera-lenses
6.7

Technical score

Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

7.3

Optics & Aperture

24%

7.8

Build & Handling

20%

6.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

▲Better than 57% of camera-lenses
8.7

User score

User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 964 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
▲Better than 63% of camera-lenses
  • canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
  • canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
  • canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
  • canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
  • canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
  • canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm
canon-ef-16-35mm-f-2-8l-ii-usm

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of camera lens Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM

Technical score
Technical score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Camera lenses category across these key areas: Mount & Format, Optics & Aperture, Focus & Controls, Stabilization, Build & Handling, Lab Scores.
When it matters
When you want to compare camera lenses based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

7.3

Optics & Aperture

24%

7.8

Build & Handling

20%

6.8

Focus & Controls

10%

?

Lab Scores

8%

1.0

Stabilization

3%

1.0

Mount & Format

6.7
User score
User score
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When real-world owner satisfaction and review volume matter to your decision.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

8.6

User ratings

30%

8.7

Number of reviews

Based on 964 buyer reviews from online shops.
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.7
Popularity
Popularity
8.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the camera lens.
When it matters
When you want to see which camera lenses attract the most buyer attention and review activity.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Popularity:
Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM has a popularity score of 8.7 points, which is higher than 73.2% of camera lenses.
8.7
Value for money
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the camera lens's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you want to know how much overall quality you get for the price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

60%

7.1

Overall score

40%

8.0

Price

7.4
Lens type
zoom
Lens mount
Canon EF
Sensor format coverage
Full-frame
Filter thread size
82 mm
Teleconverter compatibility
no
Teleconverter compatibility
no
This camera lens does not support teleconverters. 15.3% of camera lenses support teleconverters.
Only unofficial third-party options are mentioned.
Show more
Minimum focal length
16 mm
Maximum focal length
35 mm
Optical zoom
2.2xx
Maximum angle of view
108.2 °
Minimum angle of view
63 °
Show more
Focus motor
ring USM
Minimum focus distance
0.28 m
Minimum focus distance
0.28 m
This camera lens focuses as close as 0.28 m, which is closer than 57.1% of camera lenses and equal to 6.6% of camera lenses.
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.22xx
Maximum reproduction ratio
0.22x
This camera lens reaches a reproduction ratio of 0.22x, which is higher than 61.6% of camera lenses and equal to 2.7% of camera lenses.
Full-time manual focus
yes
Full-time manual focus
yes
This camera lens supports full-time manual focus. 68.3% of camera lenses support full-time manual focus.
Internal focusing
yes
Internal focusing
yes
This camera lens supports internal focusing. 83.6% of camera lenses support internal focusing.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
This camera lens does not support optical image stabilization. 29.1% of camera lenses include optical image stabilization.
Stabilization effectiveness (CIPA stops)
N/A
Weight
670 g
Weight
670 g
This camera lens weighs 670 g, which is heavier than 65.5% of camera lenses and equal to the weight of 0.3% of camera lenses.
Lens length
111.6 mm
Lens length
111.6 mm
This camera lens is 111.6 mm long, which is longer than 68.3% of camera lenses.
Lens diameter
88.5 mm
Lens diameter
88.5 mm
This camera lens has a diameter of 88.5 mm, which is wider than 82% of camera lenses and equal to that of 1.4% of camera lenses.
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
Weather sealing (splashproof)
yes
This camera lens supports weather sealing. 50.2% of camera lenses support weather sealing.
Front filter required for full sealing.
Metal mount
yes
Metal mount
yes
This camera lens uses a metal lens mount. 93.6% of camera lenses use a metal lens mount.
Show more
DxOMark overall score
?
DxOMark sharpness score
?
DxOMark transmission
?
DxOMark distortion
?
DxOMark vignetting
?
Show more

Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM vs the average camera lens

246810TotalMount & FormatOptics & ApertureFocus & ControlsStabilizationBuild & HandlingLab Scores
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • Has internal zoom
    Internal zoom
    yes
    This camera lens has internal zoom, the average camera lens does not. 10.1% of camera lenses support internal zoom.
    Maintains length during zooming.
  • 1 more aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    3
    This camera lens has more aspherical elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    3 vs 2
  • 0.03 x higher maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.22 x
    This camera lens has a higher maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.2 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.22 x vs 0.192 x
  • 1 more aspherical elements
    Aspherical elements
    3
    This camera lens has more aspherical elements than the average camera lens (3 vs 2). The average lens has 2 aspherical elements.
    3 vs 2
  • Has focus distance scale
    Focus distance scale
    yes
    This camera lens has a focus distance scale, the average camera lens does not. 48.6% of camera lenses include a focus distance scale.
  • Has internal zoom
    Internal zoom
    yes
    This camera lens has internal zoom, the average camera lens does not. 10.1% of camera lenses support internal zoom.
    Maintains length during zooming.
  • 0.03 x higher maximum reproduction ratio
    Maximum reproduction ratio
    0.22 x
    This camera lens has a higher maximum reproduction ratio than the average camera lens (0.2 x vs 0.2 x). The average lens has a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.192 x.
    0.22 x vs 0.192 x
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • 11.5 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    88.5 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (88.5 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    88.5 mm vs 77 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2007
    This camera lens was released earlier than the average camera lens.
    April 2007
    2007 vs 2016
  • 160 g heavier
    Weight
    670 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (670 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    670 g vs 510 g
  • 19.35 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    111.6 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (111.6 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    111.6 mm vs 92.25 mm
  • 2 fewer aperture blades
    Aperture blades
    7
    This camera lens has fewer aperture blades than the average camera lens (7 vs 9). The average lens has 9 aperture blades.
    7 vs 9
  • 11.5 mm wider lens barrel
    Lens diameter
    88.5 mm
    This camera lens is wider than the average camera lens (88.5 mm vs 77 mm). The average lens has a diameter of 77 mm.
    88.5 mm vs 77 mm
  • Older release date
    Release date
    2007
    This camera lens was released earlier than the average camera lens.
    April 2007
    2007 vs 2016
  • 160 g heavier
    Weight
    670 g
    This camera lens is heavier than the average camera lens (670 g vs 510 g). The average lens weighs 510 g.
    670 g vs 510 g
  • 19.35 mm longer lens
    Lens length
    111.6 mm
    This camera lens is longer than the average camera lens (111.6 mm vs 92.25 mm). The average lens has a length of 92.25 mm.
    111.6 mm vs 92.25 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

L
lenstip.com
29/09/2009
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
24/10/2013
Summary of the review
I
indiawilds.com
10/06/2012
Summary of the review
S
snapshot.canon-asia.com
12/12/2013
Summary of the review
T
the-digital-picture.com
23/02/2011
Summary of the review
K
kenrockwell.com
20/12/2016
Summary of the review
P
photozone.de
Spring 2007
Summary of the review
I
imaging-resource.com
22/02/2007
Summary of the review
P
pointsinfocus.com
09/10/2013
Summary of the review
R
reduser.net
15/05/2007
Summary of the review
Z
zielfoto.com
19/08/2024
Summary of the review
D
doctor-speed.de
15/05/2015
Summary of the review
P
photozone.de
15/02/2009
Summary of the review
C
cuk.ch
24/08/2007
Summary of the review
N
naturepixel.com
2007 (mai/juin)
Summary of the review
D
digitalcamaralens.com
01/05/2026
Summary of the review
P
photo-review.com
14/01/2014
Summary of the review
C
canonistas.com
11/08/2008
Summary of the review
B
basmeelker.nl
N/A
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
14/03/2011
Summary of the review
F
focus-review.com
24/10/2013
Summary of the review

Third-party reviews

Based on 964 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: July 2026 · How we calculate this

What we like about Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM

  • Fast f/2.8 constant aperture which is excellent for low-light conditions and creating background separation
  • Exceptional L-series build quality with weather sealing when a front filter is attached
  • Rapid and nearly silent autofocus thanks to the Ring USM system
  • Excellent sharpness and resolution in the center of the frame throughout the zoom range
  • Superior contrast and color reproduction compared to consumer-grade lenses
  • Smooth and internal zoom/focusing movements that keep the physical length constant

What we don't like about Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM

  • Significant softness and corner degradation at wide apertures, particularly at the 16mm focal length
  • Large and expensive 82mm filter thread that may not match existing 77mm filter kits
  • Heavy vignetting at 16mm on full-frame sensors, though this can be corrected in post-processing
  • Noticeable barrel distortion at the widest setting
  • Prone to chromatic aberration at the edges of the frame when used wide open
  • Disappointing bokeh quality compared to some competitors, often showing rings or a 'busy' background

Verdict

The Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM is a professional-grade ultra-wide-angle zoom lens featuring a fast, constant f/2.8 maximum aperture, a 16-35mm focal range, and an 82mm filter thread. Its optical design integrates three high-precision aspherical and two Ultra-Low Dispersion (UD) elements to maximize image quality, alongside a ring-type Ultrasonic Motor (USM) for rapid, silent autofocus with full-time manual override. Main pros include a robust, weather-sealed magnesium alloy construction, exceptional center-frame sharpness, a minimum focusing distance of 28 cm, and strong low-light performance suitable for journalism and landscapes. However, notable cons include significant corner softness and prominent vignetting when shooting wide open at 16mm, a lack of built-in image stabilization, and susceptibility to barrel distortion and lens flare.

Compare Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM with other products in the Camera lenses category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Canon EF 16 35mm F 2 8L II USM and other products in the Camera lenses category

No results found