OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£820RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:7.7 inchesChipset:Exynos 4210

Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Score components

90%

5.3

Technical score

10%

7.1

User score

▼Worse than 74% of tablets
5.3

Technical score

Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

6.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 76% of tablets
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

▼Worse than 84% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £820

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 16GBCheck price
Other versions:
1GB + 64GB1GB + 32GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 76% of models
Score components:

22%

4.5

Performance

20%

5.3

Display

16%

5.7

Camera

14%

4.4

Battery

12%

6.4

Connectivity

8%

6.0

Software & Features

5%

6.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.3
User score
User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 84% of models
Score components

70%

8.0

User ratings

30%

4.9

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

7.1
Popularity
Popularity
4.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 50% of models
Popularity:
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 4.9 points, which is lower than 50.2% of Tablets.
4.9
Value for money
Value for money
5.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 98% of models
Score components:

60%

5.5

Overall score

40%

6.2

Price

5.7
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Process node
45 nm
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 94.9% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
Exynos 4210
Chipset
Exynos 4210
▲ Better than 74% of models
This tablet uses the Exynos 4210 chipset, which is more advanced than the chipsets in 74.4% of tablets and equal to those in 0.3% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1280×800
Screen resolution
1280×800
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1280×800 which is lower than that of 68.1% of tablets and equal to that of 21.7% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
Display type
OLED/AMOLED
★ Better than 93% of models
This tablet uses a OLED/AMOLED display type. 92.5% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
196 ppi
Pixel density
196 ppi
▼ Worse than 64% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 196 ppi which is lower than that of 63.8% of tablets and equal to that of 0.4% of tablets.
Display glass type
?
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
?
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
Front camera megapixels
2 MP
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 2 MP which is lower than in 53.6% of tablets and equal to that in 25.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
Main camera aperture
f/2.6
▼ Worse than 88% of models
This tablet has a main camera aperture of f/2.6 which is narrower than that of 87.5% of tablets and equal to that of 2% of tablets.
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
5,100 mAh
Battery capacity
5,100 mAh
▼ Worse than 63% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 5,100 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 63.4% of tablets and equal to those in 4.6% of tablets.
Charging speed
10 W
Charging speed
10 W
▼ Worse than 61% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 10 W which is slower than in 61% of tablets and equal to speeds in 33.2% of tablets.
Battery life
11 hours
Battery life
11 hours
▲ Better than 61% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 11 hours, which is longer than that of 60.7% of tablets and equal to that of 3.9% of tablets.
video playback
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
no
Fast charging
no
▼ Worse than 50% of models
This tablet does not support fast charging. 49.7% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
yes
LTE support
yes
▲ Better than 37% of models
This tablet supports LTE. 36.8% of tablets include LTE connectivity.
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
yes
GPS
yes
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet supports GPS. 17.3% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Android
Operating system
Android
▲ Better than 23% of models
This tablet uses the Android operating system, which is more advanced than the one used by 23.3%.
Update support duration
short
Update support duration
short
▼ Worse than 53% of models
This tablet offers short update support, which is shorter than the support period of 52.7% of tablets and equal to that of 47.3% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
▲ Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
340 g
Weight
340 g
▲ Better than 84% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 340 g which is lighter than 84% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.9% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 4210
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 4210 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 4,210 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better display type
    Display type
    OLED/AMOLED
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1,000,000:1
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 30.6% lighter
    Weight
    340 g
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (340 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    340 g vs 490 g
  • 1 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    11 hours
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (11 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    11 hours vs 10 hours
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 42.3 mm narrower
    Width
    133 mm
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (133 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    133 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    Exynos 4210
    ▲ Better than 74% of models
    This tablet uses the Exynos 4210 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    Exynos 4,210 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • Better display type
    Display type
    OLED/AMOLED
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    This tablet features a better display type than the average tablet (OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD). The average tablet uses IPS LCD display technology.
    OLED/AMOLED vs IPS LCD
  • Higher contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    1,000,000:1
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    This tablet has a higher contrast ratio than the average tablet (1,000,000:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet contrast ratio is 1015:1.
    1,000,000:1 vs 1,015:1
  • Includes flash
    Flash
    yes
    ▲ Better than 55% of models
    This tablet features a built-in flash, the average tablet does not. 45.2% of tablets include a flash.
  • 1 hours longer battery life
    Battery life
    11 hours
    ▲ Better than 61% of models
    Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
    This tablet offers longer battery life than the average tablet (11 hours vs 10 hours). The average tablet offers 10 hours of battery life.
    video playback
    11 hours vs 10 hours
  • 30.6% lighter
    Weight
    340 g
    ▲ Better than 84% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is lighter than the average tablet (340 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    340 g vs 490 g
  • 42.3 mm narrower
    Width
    133 mm
    ▲ Better than 82% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is narrower than the average tablet (133 mm vs 175.3 mm). The average tablet is 175.3 mm wide.
    133 mm vs 175.3 mm
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400 MP4
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 MP4 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • 3.21x larger process node
    Process node
    45 nm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • 3.15x more expensive
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) is more expensive than the average tablet (£820 vs £260).
    £820 vs £260
  • 24.6% worse value for money
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (5.7 vs 7.1).
    5.7 vs 7.1
  • 13.2% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) has a lower user score than the average tablet (7.07 vs 8.000).
    7.07 vs 8
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    Mali-400 MP4
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    This tablet uses the Mali-400 MP4 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    Mali-400 MP4 vs Mali-G51
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.21x larger process node
    Process node
    45 nm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 30% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.4 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.4 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 38.5% slower GPU clock
    GPU frequency
    400 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    Market range: <311 MHz – >1.1k MHz
    This tablet has a lower GPU frequency than the average tablet (400 MHz vs 650 MHz). The average tablet has GPU frequency of 650 MHz.
    400 MHz vs 650 MHz
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 2.4 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7.7 inches
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7.7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7.7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower screen resolution
    Screen resolution
    1280×800
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet has a lower screen resolution than the average tablet (1280×800 vs 1920×1200). The average tablet has a resolution of 1920×1200.
    1280×800 vs 1920×1200
  • 12.5% lower pixel density
    Pixel density
    196 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower pixel density than the average tablet (196 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    196 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 1 nits lower peak brightness
    Peak brightness
    400 nits
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <320 nits – >750 nits
    This tablet has a lower peak brightness than the average tablet (400 nits vs 401 nits). The average tablet reaches 401 nits peak brightness.
    400 nits vs 401 nits
  • 25 ppi lower screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    196 ppi
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a lower screen sharpness than the average tablet (196 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    196 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • 3 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    2 MP
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (2 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    2 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Worse main-camera video
    Video recording (main camera)
    720 x 30 fps
    ▼ Worse than 77% of models
    This tablet supports worse main-camera video recording than the average tablet (720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps). The average tablet supports 1080x30 fps main-camera video recording.
    720x30 fps vs 1080x30 fps
  • No manual exposure control
    Manual exposure
    no
    ▼ Worse than 64% of models
    This tablet does not offer manual exposure control, the average tablet does. 63.6% of tablets have manual exposure.
  • No HDR photo mode
    HDR photo mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 80% of models
    This tablet does not have HDR photo mode, the average tablet does. 79.6% of tablets support HDR photo mode.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • Narrower main camera aperture
    Main camera aperture
    f/2.6
    ▼ Worse than 88% of models
    This tablet has a worse main camera aperture than the average tablet (f/2.6 vs f/2.2). The average tablet uses f/2.2 main camera aperture.
    f/2.6 vs f/2.2
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 44.4% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    10 W
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (10 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    10 W vs 18 W
  • 22.5% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    5,100 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (5100 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    5,100 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    3.0
    ▼ Worse than 87% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (3 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    3.0 vs 5.0
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Shorter update support
    Update support duration
    short
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet offers shorter update support than the average tablet (short vs medium). The average tablet gets medium of update support.
    short vs medium
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No picture-in-picture mode
    Picture-in-picture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet does not support picture-in-picture, the average tablet does. 61% of tablets support picture-in-picture.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No multi-user mode
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G
    the average tablet
    Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) does not support multi-user mode, the average tablet does. 73.6% of tablets allow multiple user profiles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No location privacy controls
    Location privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not offer location privacy controls, the average tablet does. 76.5% of tablets include location privacy features.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 8 older release date
    Release date
    2011
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2011 vs 2019).
    December 2011
    2011 vs 2019

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

C
cnet.com
26/03/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 (Verizon) review
M
mobiletechreview.com
25/03/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 Review
Y
yugatech.com
19/02/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 P6800 Review
C
cnet.com
28/03/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 review: 7-plus inches of AMOLED goodness
T
theverge.com
22/03/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 for Verizon review
D
digitalreviews.net
22/03/2012
Summary of the review
Best Tablet? Samsung Galaxy 7.7” Tablet- Reviewed
E
expertreviews.co.uk
14/03/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 review
H
hifitest.de
01/01/2012
Summary of the review
Test - technische Daten Tablets - Samsung P6800 Galaxy Tab 7.7
(Translated)Show original
F
futurezone.at
30/04/2012
Summary of the review
Tablet und Telefon: Galaxy Tab 7.7 im Test
(Translated)Show original
A
annabelle.ch
02/03/2012
Summary of the review
Das neue Galaxy Tablet 7.7 von Samsung im Test
(Translated)Show original
C
connect.de
08/09/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 im ersten Test
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
12/02/2008
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7: le début des 7
(Translated)Show original
0
01net.com
12/02/2024
Summary of the review
Test: La Galaxy Tab 7.7 allie design, puissance et autonomie record
(Translated)Show original
C
cnetfrance.fr
05/09/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 - CNET France
(Translated)Show original
A
android-mt.ouest-france.fr
22/07/2012
Summary of the review
Test Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 : Petit mais costaud
(Translated)Show original
V
vrm24.com
Sin fecha específica
Summary of the review
Revisión técnica de Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7'' GT-P6800 en VRM24
(Translated)Show original
T
techzine.nl
24/02/2012
Summary of the review
Review: Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7
(Translated)Show original
T
tweakers.net
26/02/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7: een aparte amoled - Review
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.nl
26/09/2011
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 Review
(Translated)Show original
H
hardware.info
17/02/2012
Summary of the review
Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 review: 7,7 inch met Super Amoled Plus
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB)

  • Vibrant and sharp Super AMOLED Plus display with deep blacks
  • Sleek and premium design featuring a metallic back
  • Extremely thin and lightweight profile, making it highly portable
  • Solid battery life, with some reports of up to 8-10 hours of video playback
  • Included IR blaster for use as a universal remote control
  • Full cellular functionality, including voice calls and SMS
  • Expandable storage via a microSD card slot

What we don't like about Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB)

  • High initial retail price compared to other tablets in its class
  • Absence of standard ports like micro-USB and HDMI
  • Shipped with Android 3.2 Honeycomb, which some found less fluid than later versions
  • Occasional lag or performance hiccups in software transitions and web browsing
  • Proprietary charging and data connector instead of a standard USB port
  • Mediocre camera quality, typical for tablets of that era

Verdict

The Samsung Galaxy Tab 7.7 P6800 3G is a premium, ultra-slim tablet featuring a vibrant 7.7-inch Super AMOLED Plus display with a 1280 x 800 resolution. It is powered by a 1.4 GHz dual-core Exynos 4210 processor paired with 1GB of RAM and offered in storage capacities up to 64GB, expandable via a microSDHC slot. Key advantages include its lightweight metal design, exceptional screen contrast, and long-lasting 5,100 mAh battery that provides up to 10 hours of video playback. However, it is limited by its older Android 3.2 Honeycomb software, a somewhat underwhelming 3.15MP rear camera, and the use of a proprietary 30-pin connector instead of standard micro-USB.

Compare Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Samsung Galaxy Tab 7 7 P6800 3G (1GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found