OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Tablets Methodology v1.0
Tablets Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are evaluated mathematically under Frontumo Tablets Methodology v1.0 using verified laboratory benchmarks, technical specifications, and authentic consumer ratings with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Tablets Methodology v1.0

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) Review | 168 Data compared

Avg. price:~£260RAM capacity:1 GBInternal storage:64 GBScreen size:7 inchesChipset:TI OMAP 4470

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) Review: Compare 168 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Tablets category and whether it is worth buying.

5.5

Overall score

Score
5.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the smartphone's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best Tablets on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components

90%

5.2

Technical score

10%

8.9

User score

▼Worse than 72% of tablets
5.2

Technical score

Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components

22%

4.3

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software & Features

5%

5.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

▼Worse than 80% of tablets
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

▲Better than 86% of tablets
  • No image
No image

Best prices

    N/A~ £260

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Available versions:
1GB + 32GBCheck price
Other versions:
1GB + 64GB
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of tablet Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB)

Technical score
Technical score
5.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the smartphone's technical performance, covering eight key areas: performance & hardware, software, camera, connectivity, display, battery, audio, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare Tablets based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 80% of models
Score components:

22%

4.3

Performance

20%

5.2

Display

16%

5.1

Camera

14%

5.0

Battery

12%

5.9

Connectivity

8%

6.8

Software & Features

5%

5.6

Design

3%

4.8

Audio & Multimedia

5.2
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
When it matters
When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 86% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User ratings

30%

10

Number of reviews

No reviews for this version.

Check reviews from other versions.

8.9
Popularity
Popularity
10.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the smartphone.
When it matters
When you prefer to purchase a product chosen and reviewed by many other consumers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 92% of models
Popularity:
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) has a user popularity of 10 points, which is lower than 91.8% of Tablets.
10
Value for money
Value for money
6.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the smartphone's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a smartphone with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 72% of models
Score components:

60%

5.5

Overall score

40%

9.2

Price

6.6
RAM capacity
1 GB
RAM capacity
1 GB
▼ Worse than 78% of models
Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
This tablet has a RAM capacity of 1 GB which is smaller than the RAM capacity of 77.8% of tablets and equal to that of 19.3% of tablets.
Process node
45 nm
Process node
45 nm
▼ Worse than 95% of models
Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
This tablet is built on a 45 nm process node, which is larger than the node size used in 94.9% of tablets and equal to the node used in 4.4% of tablets.
Internal storage
64 GB
Internal storage
64 GB
▼ Worse than 43% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >250 GB
This tablet has an internal storage capacity of 64 GB which is larger than the storage of 39.5% of tablets and equal to that of 17.1% of tablets.
Geekbench 6 single-core benchmark score
?
Chipset
TI OMAP 4470
Chipset
TI OMAP 4470
▼ Worse than 68% of models
This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4470 chipset, which is less advanced than the chipsets in 67.8% of tablets and equal to those in 0.2% of tablets.
Show more
Screen resolution
1920×1200
Screen resolution
1920×1200
▼ Worse than 42% of models
This tablet has a screen resolution of 1920×1200 which is higher than that of 39.2% of tablets and equal to that of 18.8% of tablets.
Refresh rate
60 Hz
Refresh rate
60 Hz
▼ Worse than 26% of models
Market range: <60 Hz – >120 Hz
This tablet supports a refresh rate of 60 Hz which is equal to that in 73.8% of tablets.
Display type
IPS LCD
Display type
IPS LCD
▲ Better than 17% of models
This tablet uses a IPS LCD display type. 17% of tablets use this display technology.
Pixel density
254 ppi
Pixel density
254 ppi
▲ Better than 70% of models
Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
This tablet has a pixel density of 254 ppi which is higher than that of 69.6% of tablets and equal to that of 0.1% of tablets.
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
Display glass type
Corning Gorilla Glass
▲ Better than 45% of models
This tablet uses Corning Gorilla Glass display glass which is stronger than that on 45.4% of tablets and equal to that on 32.7% of tablets.
Show more
Optical image stabilization
no
Optical image stabilization
no
Category Benchmark
This tablet does not support optical image stabilization. 0.4% of tablets include OIS.
Main camera megapixels
N/A
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
Front camera megapixels
1.3 MP
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
This tablet has a front camera resolution of 1.3 MP which is lower than in 80.8% of tablets and equal to that in 5.5% of tablets.
Main camera aperture
N/A
Optical zoom
1xxx
Optical zoom
1xx
▲ Better than 18% of models
This tablet supports 1xx optical zoom which is higher than in 18.4% of tablets and equal to that in 80.7% of tablets.
Show more
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
Battery capacity
6,000 mAh
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
This tablet has a battery capacity of 6,000 mAh which is smaller than the batteries in 54% of tablets and equal to those in 4.1% of tablets.
Charging speed
9 W
Charging speed
9 W
▼ Worse than 94% of models
Market range: <10 W – >60 W
This tablet supports charging speeds of 9 W which is slower than in 94.2% of tablets and equal to speeds in 0.8% of tablets.
Battery life
10 hours
Battery life
10 hours
▼ Worse than 40% of models
Market range: <6 hours – >16 hours
This tablet has a battery life of 10 hours, which is longer than that of 39.1% of tablets and equal to that of 20.5% of tablets.
mixed use
Wireless charging
no
Wireless charging
no
▼ Worse than 2% of models
This tablet does not support wireless charging. 1.5% of tablets support wireless charging.
Fast charging
yes
Fast charging
yes
▲ Better than 50% of models
This tablet supports fast charging. 50.4% of tablets support fast charging.
Show more
LTE support
?
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Wi-Fi connectivity
yes
Category Benchmark
This tablet supports Wi-Fi connectivity. 0.2% of tablets offer Wi-Fi support.
GPS
no
GPS
no
▼ Worse than 83% of models
This tablet does not support GPS. 82.7% of tablets include GPS functionality.
5G connectivity
no
5G connectivity
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support 5G connectivity. 11.1% of tablets support 5G.
NFC
no
NFC
no
▼ Worse than 11% of models
This tablet does not support NFC. 10.9% of tablets support NFC.
Show more
Operating system
Fire
Operating system
Fire
▼ Worse than 82% of models
This tablet uses the Fire operating system, which is less advanced than the one used by 82%.
Update support duration
medium
Update support duration
medium
▲ Better than 47% of models
This tablet offers medium update support, which is longer than the support period of 47.3% of tablets and equal to that of 32.6% of tablets.
Direct OS updates
yes
Direct OS updates
yes
▲ Better than 20% of models
This tablet receives direct OS updates. 20.3% of tablets receive direct updates.
On-device AI
no
On-device AI
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not support on-device AI. 28.3% of tablets support this capability.
App tracking protection
no
App tracking protection
no
▼ Worse than 28% of models
This tablet does not include app tracking protection. 28.3% of tablets include app tracking protection.
Show more
IP rating
not rated
IP rating
not rated
▼ Worse than 16% of models
This tablet has an IP rating of not rated which is lower than that of 16.3% of tablets and equal to that of 83.7% of tablets.
Weight
575 g
Weight
575 g
▼ Worse than 70% of models
Market range: <315 g – >730 g
This tablet weighs 575 g which is heavier than 69.8% of tablets and equal to the weight of 0.2% of tablets.
Backlit keyboard
no
Backlit keyboard
no
▼ Worse than 10% of models
This tablet does not support a backlit keyboard. 9.8% of tablets support backlit keyboards.
Keyboard accessory
yes
Keyboard accessory
yes
▲ Better than 16% of models
This tablet supports a keyboard accessory. 15.8% of tablets support this option.
Pen latency
N/A
Show more
Number of microphones
1
Number of microphones
1
▼ Worse than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This tablet includes 1 microphones, which is more than in 0.2% of tablets and equal to the number in 54.8% of tablets.
aptX Adaptive
no
aptX Adaptive
no
▼ Worse than 7% of models
This tablet does not support aptX Adaptive. 6.9% of tablets offer this codec.
Dolby Atmos support
no
Dolby Atmos support
no
▼ Worse than 31% of models
This tablet does not support Dolby Atmos. 31.5% of tablets support Dolby Atmos.
N. of speakers
2
N. of speakers
2
▼ Worse than 29% of models
Market range: <1 – >6
This tablet includes 2 speakers, which is more than in 9.8% of tablets and equal to the number in 60.9% of tablets.
FM radio
no
FM radio
no
▼ Worse than 19% of models
This tablet does not include an FM radio. 19% of tablets offer FM radio functionality.
Show more

Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) vs the average tablet

246810TotalPerformanceDisplayCameraBatteryConnectivitySoftware & FeaturesDesignAudio & Multimedia
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • 65,790 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    PWM dimming frequency
    65,790 Hz
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <0 Hz – >2.9k Hz
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (65790 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    65,790 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    450 nits
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    TI OMAP 4470
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4470 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,470 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 13.4% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    254 ppi
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 2.08x more popular
    Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • 33 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    254 ppi
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 2.08x more popular
    Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) is more popular than the average tablet (10 vs 4.8).
    10 vs 4.81
  • 11% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the smartphone
    When it matters
    When you want to know how a smartphone handles daily tasks and how reliable it remains over time according to user feedback.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G
    the average tablet
    Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) has a higher user score than the average tablet (8.88 vs 8.000).
    8.88 vs 8
  • More capable chipset
    Chipset
    TI OMAP 4470
    ▼ Worse than 68% of models
    This tablet uses the TI OMAP 4470 chipset, while the average tablet uses MediaTek MT8169A.
    TI OMAP 4,470 vs MediaTek MT8169A
  • 65,790 Hz higher PWM dimming frequency
    PWM dimming frequency
    65,790 Hz
    ★ Better than 98% of models
    Market range: <0 Hz – >2.9k Hz
    This tablet has a higher PWM dimming frequency than the average tablet (65790 Hz vs 0 Hz). The average tablet has PWM dimming frequency of 0 Hz.
    65,790 Hz vs 0 Hz
  • 50 nits higher typical brightness
    Typical brightness
    450 nits
    ▲ Better than 67% of models
    Market range: <300 nits – >600 nits
    This tablet has a higher typical brightness than the average tablet (450 nits vs 400 nits). The average tablet reaches 400 nits typical brightness.
    450 nits vs 400 nits
  • 13.4% higher pixel density
    Pixel density
    254 ppi
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher pixel density than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 224 ppi). The average tablet has pixel density of 224 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 224 ppi
  • 33 ppi higher screen sharpness
    Screen sharpness
    254 ppi
    ▲ Better than 70% of models
    Market range: <149 ppi – >291 ppi
    This tablet has a higher screen sharpness than the average tablet (254 ppi vs 221 ppi). The average tablet has screen sharpness of 221 ppi.
    254 ppi vs 221 ppi
  • Supports fast charging
    Fast charging
    yes
    ▲ Better than 50% of models
    This tablet supports fast charging, the average tablet does not. 49.7% of tablets feature fast charging.
  • Designed for kids
    Designed for kids
    yes
    ▲ Better than 76% of models
    This tablet is suitable for kids, the average tablet is not. 23.7% of tablets are suitable for kids.
  • 36 mm shorter
    Width
    164.0 mm
    ▲ Better than 64% of models
    Market range: <123.8 mm – >274 mm
    This tablet is shorter than the average tablet (164 mm vs 200 mm). The average tablet is 200.0 mm tall.
    164.0 mm vs 200.0 mm
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.21x larger process node
    Process node
    45 nm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7 inches
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • 7.1% worse value for money
    Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) has worse value for money than the average tablet (6.63 vs 7.1).
    6.63 vs 7.1
  • 3 GB less RAM
    RAM capacity
    1 GB
    ▼ Worse than 78% of models
    Market range: <2 GB – >12 GB
    This tablet has less RAM capacity than the average tablet (1 GB vs 4 GB). The average tablet has 4 GB of RAM.
    1 GB vs 4 GB
  • 3.21x larger process node
    Process node
    45 nm
    ▼ Worse than 95% of models
    Market range: <4 nm – >40 nm
    This tablet uses a larger process node than the average tablet (45 nm vs 14 nm). The average tablet uses a process node of 14 nm.
    45 nm vs 14 nm
  • 4 fewer CPU threads
    CPU threads
    2
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2 – >12
    This tablet has less CPU threads than the average tablet (2 vs 6). The average tablet has 6 CPU threads.
    2 vs 6
  • 25% lower CPU speed
    CPU speed
    1.5 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <1.2 GHz – >3.2 GHz
    This tablet has a lower CPU speed than the average tablet (1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz). The average tablet has CPU speed of 2 GHz.
    1.5 GHz vs 2 GHz
  • Worse GPU
    GPU model
    PowerVR SGX544
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This tablet uses the PowerVR SGX544 GPU, while the average tablet uses the stronger Mali-G51. GPU choice is one of the main performance differences between tablets.
    PowerVR SGX544 vs Mali-G51
  • 1,066 MHz slower RAM speed
    RAM speed
    800 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    Market range: <800 MHz – >6.4k MHz
    This tablet has a lower RAM speed than the average tablet (800 MHz vs 1866 MHz). The average tablet has RAM speed of 1866 MHz.
    800 MHz vs 1,866 MHz
  • No big.LITTLE architecture
    big.LITTLE Architecture
    no
    ▼ Worse than 51% of models
    This tablet does not use a big.LITTLE architecture, the average tablet does. 51.3% of tablets use a big.LITTLE architecture.
  • 57% lower memory bandwidth
    Memory bandwidth
    6.4 GB/s
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    Market range: <4.26 GB/s – >60 GB/s
    This tablet has a lower memory bandwidth than the average tablet (6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s). The average tablet has memory bandwidth of 14.9 GB/s.
    6.4 GB/s vs 14.9 GB/s
  • 3 fewer GPU execution units
    GPU execution units
    1
    ▼ Worse than 90% of models
    Market range: <2 – >24
    This tablet has less GPU execution units than the average tablet (1 vs 4). The average tablet has 4 GPU execution units.
    1 vs 4
  • Older DDR memory version
    DDR memory version
    LPDDR2
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet uses an older DDR memory version than the average tablet (LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3). The average tablet uses DDR version LPDDR3.
    LPDDR2 vs LPDDR3
  • 3.1 inches smaller screen size
    Screen size
    7 inches
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    Market range: <7 inches – >12 inches
    This tablet has a lower screen size than the average tablet (7 inches vs 10.1 inches). The average tablet has screen size of 10.1 inches.
    7 inches vs 10.1 inches
  • Lower contrast ratio
    Contrast ratio
    896:1
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet has a lower contrast ratio than the average tablet (896:1 vs 1015:1). The average tablet has a contrast ratio of 1015:1.
    896:1 vs 1,015:1
  • 50% lower touch sampling rate
    Touch sampling rate
    60 Hz
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    Market range: <60 Hz – >300 Hz
    This tablet has a lower touch sampling rate than the average tablet (60 Hz vs 120 Hz). The average tablet has touch sampling rate of 120 Hz.
    60 Hz vs 120 Hz
  • 3.7 MP lower front camera megapixels
    Front camera megapixels
    1.3 MP
    ▼ Worse than 81% of models
    Market range: <1.2 MP – >9 MP
    This tablet has less front camera megapixels than the average tablet (1.3 MP vs 5 MP). The average tablet has 5 MP front camera resolution.
    1.3 MP vs 5 MP
  • No continuous video AF
    Continuous autofocus in video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support continuous video AF, the average tablet does. 57.7% of tablets support continuous video autofocus.
  • No touch autofocus
    Touch autofocus
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not support touch autofocus, the average tablet does. 82.8% of tablets allow touch-to-focus.
  • No manual white balance
    Manual white balance
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This tablet does not allow manual white balance adjustments, the average tablet does. 51.6% of tablets include white balance controls.
  • No panorama mode
    Panorama mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 79% of models
    This tablet does not have a panorama mode, the average tablet does. 78.6% of tablets include panorama features.
  • No BSI sensor
    BSI sensor
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a BSI sensor, the average tablet has one. 52.6% of tablets use BSI sensors for better low-light shots.
  • No timelapse video
    Timelapse video
    no
    ▼ Worse than 58% of models
    This tablet does not support timelapse video, the average tablet does. 57.5% of tablets include timelapse modes.
  • 50% slower charging speed
    Charging speed
    9 W
    ▼ Worse than 94% of models
    Market range: <10 W – >60 W
    This tablet supports slower charging than the average tablet (9 W vs 18 W). The average tablet supports charging speed of 18 W.
    9 W vs 18 W
  • 8.8% smaller battery capacity
    Battery capacity
    6,000 mAh
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    Market range: <4k mAh – >10.1k mAh
    This tablet has a lower battery capacity than the average tablet (6000 mAh vs 6580 mAh). The average tablet battery has capacity of 6580 mAh.
    6,000 mAh vs 6,580 mAh
  • No USB Type-C
    USB Type-C
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet lacks a USB Type-C port, the average tablet includes one. 53.4% of tablets use USB Type-C.
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 63% of models
    This tablet uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average tablet (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average tablet uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No GPS
    GPS
    no
    ▼ Worse than 83% of models
    This tablet does not have GPS, the average tablet does. 82.7% of tablets feature GPS.
  • Older Bluetooth version
    Bluetooth version
    4.0
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This tablet uses an older Bluetooth version than the average tablet (4 vs 5). The average tablet uses Bluetooth 5.0.
    4.0 vs 5.0
  • No face recognition
    Face recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet does not have face recognition, the average tablet does. 56% of tablets support face recognition.
  • Less advanced operating system
    Operating system
    Fire
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    This tablet runs on a less advanced operating system than the average tablet (Fire vs Android). Operating system choice shapes app support, updates, and ecosystem features.
    Fire vs Android
  • No split-screen
    Split-screen support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This tablet does not support split-screen, the average tablet does. 72.4% of tablets support split-screen.
  • No camera/mic privacy toggles
    Camera/mic privacy
    no
    ▼ Worse than 56% of models
    This tablet lacks camera and microphone privacy toggles, the average tablet includes them. 56.2% of tablets offer these toggles.
  • No full-page screenshots
    Full-page screenshots
    no
    ▼ Worse than 53% of models
    This tablet does not support full-page screenshots, the average tablet does. 52.5% of tablets support full-page screenshots.
  • No dark mode
    Dark mode
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This tablet does not support dark mode, the average tablet does. 57.2% of tablets have dark mode.
  • No offline voice recognition
    Offline voice recognition
    no
    ▼ Worse than 76% of models
    This tablet does not support offline voice recognition, the average tablet does. 76.1% of tablets support offline voice recognition.
  • 17.3% heavier
    Weight
    575 g
    ▼ Worse than 70% of models
    Market range: <315 g – >730 g
    This tablet is heavier than the average tablet (575 g vs 490 g). The average tablet weighs 490 g.
    575 g vs 490 g
  • 7 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    ▼ Worse than 85% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This tablet is an older model than the average tablet (2012 vs 2019).
    November 2012
    2012 vs 2019
  • 0.8 mm thicker
    Thickness
    8.8 mm
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    Market range: <6.1 mm – >11.5 mm
    This tablet is thicker than the average tablet (8.8 mm vs 8 mm). The average tablet is 8.0 mm thick.
    8.8 mm vs 8.0 mm

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

T
t3.com
13/03/2013
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 review
E
expertreviews.co.uk
12/04/2013
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9” review
T
trustedreviews.com
30/03/2013
Summary of the review
Kindle Fire HD 8.9 Review
P
phonearena.com
10/12/2012
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 Review
M
mobiletechreview.com
30/11/2012
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 Review - MobileTechReview
C
cnet.com
18/09/2014
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 review: The best Kindle Fire yet - CNET
U
uk.pcmag.com
21/11/2012
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9" 4G LTE Wireless Review - PCMag UK
N
newatlas.com
18/04/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Kindle Fire HD 8.9" tablet - New Atlas
A
au.pcmag.com
22/11/2012
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9" 4G LTE Wireless Review - PCMag Australia
T
theverge.com
21/11/2012
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 review - The Verge
N
newatlas.com
18/04/2013
Summary of the review
Review: Kindle Fire HD 8.9" tablet
C
chip.de
16/05/2013
Summary of the review
Kindle Fire HD 8.9 - Test - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
C
chip.de
10/05/2013
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 (Tablet-PC) Test - CHIP
(Translated)Show original
H
hifitest.de
22/10/2026
Summary of the review
technische Daten Tablets - Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 LTE
(Translated)Show original
S
spiegel.de
13/03/2013
Summary of the review
Amazons Kindle Fire HD 8.9 im Test - DER SPIEGEL
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
13/04/2013
Summary of the review
Test: Tablet Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9
(Translated)Show original
C
computerbild.de
25/11/2012
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 im Test - COMPUTER BILD
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshardware.fr
29/10/2012
Summary of the review
Test Kindle Fire HD: la meilleure tablette d’Amazon
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
13/03/2013
Summary of the review
Test Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9, l'univers Kindle en Full HD
(Translated)Show original
L
lesnumeriques.com
13/03/2013
Summary of the review
Test : tablette Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9
(Translated)Show original
N
notebookcheck.biz
22/11/2012
Summary of the review
Test de la tablette Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9 pouces
(Translated)Show original
E
elespanol.com
19/12/2014
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 (2014): análisis y experiencia de uso
(Translated)Show original
X
xataka.com
13/03/2013
Summary of the review
Kindle Fire HD 8.9, análisis - Xataka
(Translated)Show original
T
teknofilo.com
11/08/2013
Summary of the review
Análisis del Kindle Fire HD 8,9" de Amazon y prueba a fondo
(Translated)Show original
D
dday.it
20/03/2013
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9“. È davvero l'anti iPad?
(Translated)Show original
T
tomshw.it
10/12/2013
Summary of the review
Recensione Kindle Fire HDX da 7" e 8.9", tra i migliori tablet oggi disponibili Do you need specific technical specifications for the 4G LTE bands sup...
(Translated)Show original
W
wired.it
11/12/2013
Summary of the review
Kindle Fire Hdx 8.9, la prova | Wired Italia
(Translated)Show original
T
techpulse.be
21/06/2013
Summary of the review
Amazon Kindle Fire HD: wat je moet weten voor de aankoop
(Translated)Show original

Third-party reviews

What we like about Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB)

  • High-resolution 1920x1200 display with vibrant colors and sharp text for reading
  • Excellent stereo speakers with Dolby Digital Plus, providing clear and loud audio
  • Fast 4G LTE speeds for seamless streaming and browsing away from Wi-Fi
  • Strong value for money compared to premium competitors like the iPad
  • Sturdy and durable build quality that feels reliable in hand
  • Extensive Amazon media ecosystem, especially beneficial for Prime members

What we don't like about Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB)

  • Restricted Appstore with far fewer app and game options compared to Google Play or iOS
  • No microSD card slot for expandable storage, forcing reliance on cloud or initial internal capacity
  • Physical buttons (power and volume) are too flush with the chassis, making them difficult to find by touch
  • Reflective screen and low maximum brightness can make outdoor viewing difficult in direct sunlight
  • Occasional software sluggishness and app instability (freezing/crashing)
  • Heavily modified Fire OS interface can feel restrictive and lacks standard Android customisation

Verdict

The Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8.9" 4G is a media-focused tablet featuring an 8.9-inch IPS display with a 1920 x 1200 resolution and 254 PPI, powered by a 1.5GHz dual-core TI OMAP 4470 processor. This 4G LTE-capable model includes 1GB of RAM and 64GB of internal storage, designed to integrate seamlessly with Amazon’s ecosystem for streaming movies, reading, and web browsing via the Silk browser. Main pros include its vibrant high-definition screen, fast 4G connectivity, and impressive dual stereo speakers with Dolby audio that enhance the entertainment experience. However, notable cons include its lack of expandable storage, the absence of the Google Play Store, a relatively heavy weight compared to modern standards, and occasional performance lag during intensive multitasking.

Compare Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) with other tablets

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Amazon Kindle Fire HD 8 9inch 4G (1GB + 64GB) and other tablets

No results found