OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£440Motor power:650 WBowl capacity:10 LNumber of speed levels:3Number of included attachments:3Weight:27 kg

Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B Review: Compare 41 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B
6.3/10

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
Score components

60%

5.9

Technical score

15%

5.9

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.7, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 87% of stand mixers
6.3

Value for money

Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

6.4

Price

â–¼Worse than 90%
5.9

Technical score

Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components

35%

5.3

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

9.5

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

3.2

Design

10%

10

Safety

â–¼Worse than 79%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.7.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
No expert tests yet
5.9

User score

User score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

5.9

Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.7

Rating

30%

6.1

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 91%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • royal-catering-rcpm-101b
  • royal-catering-rcpm-101b
  • royal-catering-rcpm-101b
  • royal-catering-rcpm-101b
  • royal-catering-rcpm-101b
royal-catering-rcpm-101b
royal-catering-rcpm-101b
royal-catering-rcpm-101b
royal-catering-rcpm-101b
royal-catering-rcpm-101b
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B

Technical score
Technical score
5.9/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 79% of models
Score components:

35%

5.3

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

9.5

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

3.2

Design

10%

10

Safety

5.9
Reviews score
7.7
User score
5.9
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 90% of models
Score components:

70%

6.3

Overall score

30%

6.4

Price

6.3
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
bowl-lift
Motor power
650 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 650 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 78.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
3
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 3 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 97.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 2.4% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
580 RPM
Market range: <180 RPM – >422 RPM
This stand mixer reaches a top planetary speed of 580 RPM, which is faster than the maximum speed of 92.5% of stand mixers.
Show more
Bowl capacity
10 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 10 L, which is larger than the mixing bowl of 93.3% of stand mixers and equal to that of 2.2% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
60 min
Market range: <10 min – >480 min
This stand mixer features a timer up to 60 min, which is longer than the maximum timer of 64% of stand mixers and equal to that of 20% of stand mixers.
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
buttons
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
60 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 60 cm, which is taller than 96.8% of stand mixers.
Width
30 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 30 cm in width, which is wider than 59.8% of stand mixers and equal in width to 2.3% of stand mixers.
Depth
44 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 44 cm, which is deeper than 92.6% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Weight
27 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 27 kg, which is heavier than 95.8% of stand mixers.
Body material
aluminium
Show more
Overload protection
?
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
?

Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 5 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (10 L vs 5 L).
    10 L vs 5 L
  • 0.41 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.5 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.5 m vs 1.09 m
  • 360 RPM higher speed
    This stand mixer whips egg whites and heavy cream into voluminous, stiff peaks more rapidly than the average stand mixer (580 RPM vs 220 RPM).
    580 RPM vs 220 RPM
  • 30 min longer timer
    This stand mixer supports longer unattended kneading and mixing cycles with automatic shut-off than the average stand mixer (60 min vs 30 min).
    60 min vs 30 min
  • 360 RPM higher speed
    This stand mixer whips egg whites and heavy cream into voluminous, stiff peaks more rapidly than the average stand mixer (580 RPM vs 220 RPM).
    580 RPM vs 220 RPM
  • 30 min longer timer
    This stand mixer supports longer unattended kneading and mixing cycles with automatic shut-off than the average stand mixer (60 min vs 30 min).
    60 min vs 30 min
  • 0.41 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.5 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.5 m vs 1.09 m
  • 5 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (10 L vs 5 L).
    10 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 350 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (650 W vs 1,000 W).
    650 W vs 1,000 W
  • 3.6x heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (27 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    27 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 4 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (3 vs 7).
    3 vs 7
  • 25 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (60 cm vs 35 cm).
    60 cm vs 35 cm
  • 12.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (44 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    44 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 23.4% lower user score
    User score
    5.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.9

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    6.1

    Popularity

    5.9 vs 7.7
  • 16.6% worse value for money
    Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (6.35 vs 7.4).
    6.35 vs 7.4
  • 23.4% lower user score
    User score
    5.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.9

    Mark 7.9 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    6.1

    Popularity

    5.9 vs 7.7
  • 16.6% worse value for money
    Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (6.35 vs 7.4).
    6.35 vs 7.4
  • 2.1x more expensive
    Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£440 vs £210).
    £440 vs £210
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 350 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (650 W vs 1,000 W).
    650 W vs 1,000 W
  • 4 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (3 vs 7).
    3 vs 7
  • 3.6x heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (27 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    27 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 25 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (60 cm vs 35 cm).
    60 cm vs 35 cm
  • 12.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (44 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    44 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 2 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (30 cm vs 28 cm).
    30 cm vs 28 cm

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B

  • High-capacity 10-litre bowl allows for handling large batches easily
  • Powerful 650W motor mixes and kneads heavy doughs without stalling
  • Convenient drop-down bowl design via a side lever for quick access
  • Three adjustable speed settings offer flexible control for various ingredients
  • Sturdy and durable build quality using high-grade stainless steel and aluminium
  • Protective safety guard lets users add extra ingredients during operation without switching off

What customers don't like about Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B

  • Large commercial footprint makes it bulky and heavy to move or store
  • Can be overkill and less intuitive for casual, small-scale home baking needs
  • Higher price point compared to standard residential stand mixers

Verdict

The Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B is a professional planetary stand mixer equipped with a 650 W three-speed motor operating at 230 to 580 rpm and a 10-liter stainless steel mixing bowl. Main characteristics and pros include its ability to process up to 1.75 kg of flour per cycle, an aluminum housing, a safety lid for adding ingredients during operation, and a side-lever lowerable bowl system for easy removal. However, its substantial 27 kg weight makes it difficult to move, and it lacks automated digital timer controls.

Compare Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Royal Catering RCPM-10.1B and other stand mixers

No results found