Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£140Motor power:1000 WBowl capacity:4.3 LNumber of speed levels:5Number of included attachments:3Weight:4.5 kg

Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI Review: Compare 41 technical specifications and 3 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

6.2

Technical score

15%

9.1

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

6.2

Reviews score

â–¼Worse than 61% of stand mixers
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

â–²Better than 58%
6.2

Technical score

Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

7.6

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.2

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.7

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

â–¼Worse than 66%
6.2

Reviews score

Reviews score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

6.2

Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

8.3

Popularity

Grades by review (3)
3 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
â–¼Worse than 80%
9.1

User score

User score
9.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

70%

8.7

Rating

30%

9.9

Popularity

â–²Better than 84%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
  • kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
kenwood-prospero-khc29a0si
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI

Based on 3

Reviewers mostly appreciate the range of attachments, which is the main point of praise for this mixer.
Praised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI

Technical score
Technical score
6.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

7.6

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.2

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.7

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

6.2
Reviews score
6.2
User score
9.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

9.3

Price

7.6
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
?
Motor power
1,000 W
This stand mixer delivers 1,000 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 37.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 21% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
5
This stand mixer offers 5 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 91.8% of stand mixers and equal to that on 2.4% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
4.3 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4.3 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 79.5% of stand mixers and equal to that of 4% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
What reviewers say
Height
24 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 24 cm, which is lower than the height of 99.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.5% of stand mixers.
Width
24 cm
This stand mixer measures 24 cm in width, which is narrower than 69.9% of stand mixers and equal in width to 6.4% of stand mixers.
Depth
28 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 28 cm, which is shallower than 59% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 1.8% of stand mixers.
Weight
4.5 kg
This stand mixer weighs 4.5 kg, which is lighter than 83.2% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 1.9% of stand mixers.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
no
This stand mixer does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 42.2%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 11 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 35 cm).
    24 cm vs 35 cm
  • 40% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.5 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.5 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 4 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 28 cm).
    24 cm vs 28 cm
  • 18.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    9.9

    Popularity

    9.1 vs 7.7
  • 3.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (28 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    28 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 50% cheaper
    Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£140 vs £210).
    £140 vs £210
  • 2.2% better value for money
    Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.56 vs 7.4).
    7.56 vs 7.4
  • 18.2% higher user score
    User score
    9.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    9.9

    Popularity

    9.1 vs 7.7
  • 50% cheaper
    Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£140 vs £210).
    £140 vs £210
  • 2.2% better value for money
    Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.56 vs 7.4).
    7.56 vs 7.4
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 11 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 35 cm).
    24 cm vs 35 cm
  • 40% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (4.5 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    4.5 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 4 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 28 cm).
    24 cm vs 28 cm
  • 3.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (28 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    28 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 2 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (5 vs 7).
    5 vs 7
  • 0.7 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.3 L vs 5 L).
    4.3 L vs 5 L
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 17.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.2

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    3 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    6.2 vs 7.5
  • 17.3% lower review score
    Reviews score
    6.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.2

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.3

    Popularity

    Grades by review (3)
    3 reviews: 3 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    6.2 vs 7.5
  • 2 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (5 vs 7).
    5 vs 7
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 0.7 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.3 L vs 5 L).
    4.3 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded
Not graded
Not graded
Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

8.0
idealhome.co.uk
✓ explicit
24/08/2021
Hands-on test · Compact multi-tool
Verdict
The Kenwood Prospero KHC29 is a powerful, compact mixer with 11 attachments that cut prep time for cakes and bread, but it cannot go in the dishwasher.
9.0
hausgeraete-test.de
✓ explicit
06/01/2020
Hands-on test · Multi-attachment mixer
Verdict
The Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29 replaces several small kitchen gadgets with its attachments and mixes evenly, but it is hand wash only, which takes more effort.
5.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
17/12/2022
Hands-on test · Compact stand mixer
Verdict
The Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29 is a compact mixer with a big bowl and many attachments, but its plastic build, loose head and poor fit for small batches hold it back.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI

  • Compact design that takes up minimal kitchen counter and storage space
  • Excellent value for money, making it an affordable entry-level mixer
  • Powerful 1000W motor that handles basic baking and everyday tasks efficiently
  • Efficient planetary mixing action that covers the entire bowl well
  • Lightweight and easy to move around the kitchen
  • Comes with essential non-stick baking tools like the K-beater, whisk, and dough hook
  • Versatile multi-functional capabilities with various top-hub attachments

What customers don't like about Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI

  • The mixer shakes, wobbles, and flexes significantly at the main joint when kneading heavy dough
  • Constructed with a lightweight plastic body that can feel fragile or less durable compared to older all-metal models
  • The mixing bowl continues to spin automatically even when using top-mounted attachments like the blender
  • Can be quite loud during operation, especially on higher speed settings
  • Requires occasional scraping of the bowl sides for lighter or smaller mixtures
  • Not ideal for heavy-duty batch cooking or processing large volumes of dense dough

Verdict

The Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI is a compact, silver stand mixer featuring a powerful 1000-watt motor, a 4.3-liter brushed stainless steel bowl, and total planetary mixing action. Its main characteristics include variable electronic speed control with a pulse option, a safety interlock system, and non-stick metal bowl tools comprising a K-beater, balloon whisk, and dough hook. Key pros include its space-saving ergonomic design that easily fits under kitchen cabinets, dishwasher-safe components, and sufficient power to efficiently handle heavy mixtures like pizza dough. However, noted cons include a plastic outer body construction, a relatively short power cord, and the fact that the stainless steel bowl does not feature a handle.

Compare Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kenwood Prospero+ KHC29.A0SI and other stand mixers

No results found