Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Electrolux EKM3700 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£300Motor power:800 WBowl capacity:4 LNumber of speed levels:6Number of included attachments:6Weight:6.8 kg

Electrolux EKM3700 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Electrolux EKM3700
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

60%

6.5

Technical score

15%

6.5

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.7, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 64% of stand mixers
7.1

Value for money

Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

â–¼Worse than 71%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components

35%

7.0

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

5.9

Bowl

15%

7.6

Accessories

10%

8.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

â–¼Worse than 53%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.7.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
No expert tests yet
6.5

User score

User score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10

6.5

Mark 8.4 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.6

Rating

30%

7.9

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 73%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
  • electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
electrolux-ekm3700
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading...
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Electrolux EKM3700

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

35%

7.0

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

5.9

Bowl

15%

7.6

Accessories

10%

8.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

6.5
Reviews score
7.7
User score
6.5
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

7.8

Price

7.1
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
?
Motor power
800 W
This stand mixer delivers 800 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 8.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
6
This stand mixer offers 6 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 59.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 31.6% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
4 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 84.4% of stand mixers and equal to that of 6.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
6
This stand mixer comes with 6 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 87.9% of stand mixers and equal to that with 3.7% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
yes
This stand mixer includes a meat grinder, unlike 9.1%.
Show more
Height
32 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 32 cm, which is lower than the height of 72.7% of stand mixers and equal to that of 2.3% of stand mixers.
Width
38 cm
This stand mixer measures 38 cm in width, which is wider than 77.2% of stand mixers and equal in width to 2.7% of stand mixers.
Depth
19 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 19 cm, which is shallower than 97.2% of stand mixers.
Weight
6.8 kg
This stand mixer weighs 6.8 kg, which is lighter than 57.9% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Body material
plastic
Show more
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
no
This stand mixer does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 42.2%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Electrolux EKM3700 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 3 more included attachments
    This stand mixer equips you with more versatile tools out of the box without needing extra purchases than the average stand mixer (6 vs 3).
    6 vs 3
  • 12.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (19 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    19 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 3 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (32 cm vs 35 cm).
    32 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.11 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.2 m vs 1.09 m
  • Includes a meat grinder
    This stand mixer includes a meat grinder (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 9.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (6.8 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    6.8 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 12.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (19 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    19 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 3 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (32 cm vs 35 cm).
    32 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.11 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.2 m vs 1.09 m
  • 9.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (6.8 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    6.8 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 3 more included attachments
    This stand mixer equips you with more versatile tools out of the box without needing extra purchases than the average stand mixer (6 vs 3).
    6 vs 3
  • Includes a meat grinder
    This stand mixer includes a meat grinder (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 1 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4 L vs 5 L).
    4 L vs 5 L
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 10 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 28 cm).
    38 cm vs 28 cm
  • 15.6% lower user score
    User score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.5

    Mark 8.4 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    6.5 vs 7.7
  • 4.6% worse value for money
    Electrolux EKM3700 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.07 vs 7.4).
    7.07 vs 7.4
  • 42.9% more expensive
    Electrolux EKM3700 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£300 vs £210).
    £300 vs £210
  • 15.6% lower user score
    User score
    6.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10

    6.5

    Mark 8.4 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.6

    Rating

    30%

    7.9

    Popularity

    6.5 vs 7.7
  • 4.6% worse value for money
    Electrolux EKM3700 has worse value for money than the average stand mixer (7.07 vs 7.4).
    7.07 vs 7.4
  • 42.9% more expensive
    Electrolux EKM3700 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£300 vs £210).
    £300 vs £210
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 10 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 28 cm).
    38 cm vs 28 cm
  • 1 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4 L vs 5 L).
    4 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Electrolux EKM3700

  • Highly versatile with multiple included accessories like a meat grinder, vegetable cutter, and 4-blade blender.
  • Powerful 800W motor with 6 speeds and a dedicated pulse function.
  • Includes a dishwasher-safe 4-liter stainless steel bowl suitable for family meals.
  • Features non-slip suction cup feet on the bottom for excellent stability during operation.
  • Comes equipped with a helpful splash guard to minimize kitchen messes.

What customers don't like about Electrolux EKM3700

  • The motor can slow down or struggle when handling heavy loads like dense, sticky bread dough.
  • The machine experiences notable vibration and movement if processing large batches or if the rubber feet get wet.
  • The actual working capacity is limited compared to the total 4-liter volume, requiring users to split very large recipes into smaller batches.

Verdict

The Electrolux EKM3700 is a versatile tilt-head kitchen machine powered by an 800-watt motor and equipped with six speed settings plus a pulse function. This compact model features a 4-liter stainless steel mixing bowl, a 1.2-meter power cord, suction cup non-slip feet, and a comprehensive multi-purpose accessory bundle that includes a wire whisk, dough hook, flat beater, 1.5-liter plastic blender, meat grinder, vegetable cutter/shredder, and a transparent splash guard. Its primary advantages are its excellent multifunctional value, space-saving footprint, and dishwasher-safe components that ensure simple cleaning. However, notable drawbacks include flour occasionally getting trapped at the very bottom of the bowl requiring manual scraping, and a lacked digital display or advanced connectivity features.

Compare Electrolux EKM3700 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Electrolux EKM3700 and other stand mixers

No results found