OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Kenwood kMix KMX760 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£290Motor power:1000 WBowl capacity:5 LNumber of speed levels:6Number of included attachments:3Weight:9.1 kg

Kenwood kMix KMX760 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications, 6 expert and video reviews and 1 best-of list to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Kenwood kMix KMX760
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 68% of models
Score components

60%

6.5

Technical score

15%

8.6

User score

15%

8.4

List score

10%

8.6

Reviews score

▲Better than 68% of stand mixers
7.5

Value for money

Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

7.9

Price

▲Better than 53%
6.5

Technical score

Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components

35%

7.8

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

5.8

Bowl

15%

3.5

Accessories

10%

7.4

Design

10%

10

Safety

▼Worse than 54%
8.6

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 73% of models

80%

8.6

Average grade

20%

8.9

Popularity

Grades by review (6)
5 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
▲Better than 73%
8.6

User score

User score
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 55% of models

70%

8.7

Rating

30%

8.4

Popularity

▲Better than 55%
8.4

List score

List score
8.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (1)
List score: in 1 of 13 lists (8%)
▲Better than 85%
  • kenwood-kmix-kmx760
  • kenwood-kmix-kmx760
  • kenwood-kmix-kmx760
  • kenwood-kmix-kmx760
  • kenwood-kmix-kmx760
kenwood-kmix-kmx760
kenwood-kmix-kmx760
kenwood-kmix-kmx760
kenwood-kmix-kmx760
kenwood-kmix-kmx760
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.

What reviewers say about the Kenwood kMix KMX760

Based on 5 · 1

Reviewers like its whipping and reliable mixing and kneading, but agree the machine is heavy to move.
Praised
Criticised
Pick a topic to see who said what
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Kenwood kMix KMX760

Technical score
Technical score
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 54% of models
Score components:

35%

7.8

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

5.8

Bowl

15%

3.5

Accessories

10%

7.4

Design

10%

10

Safety

6.5
Reviews score
8.6
User score
8.6
List score
8.4
Value for money
Value for money
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 53% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

7.9

Price

7.5
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
1,000 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 1,000 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 37.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 21% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
6
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 6 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 59.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 31.6% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
What reviewers say
Bowl capacity
5 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 5 L, which is larger than the mixing bowl of 34.8% of stand mixers and equal to that of 18.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
1.35 kg
Market range: <1.3 kg – >5 kg
This stand mixer has a dough capacity of 1.35 kg, which is smaller than 87.9% of stand mixers and equal to 1.9% of stand mixers.
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
What reviewers say
Height
35.5 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 35.5 cm, which is taller than 56.4% of stand mixers and equal in height to 2.3% of stand mixers.
Width
24 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 24 cm in width, which is narrower than 69.9% of stand mixers and equal in width to 6.4% of stand mixers.
Depth
38.5 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 38.5 cm, which is deeper than 82.5% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 1.8% of stand mixers.
Weight
9.1 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 9.1 kg, which is heavier than 62.2% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.9% of stand mixers.
Body material
metal
Show more
What reviewers say
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Kenwood kMix KMX760 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • Includes a recipe book
    This stand mixer includes a recipe book (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 4 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 28 cm).
    24 cm vs 28 cm
  • 0.11 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.2 m vs 1.09 m
  • 11.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 55% of models

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    8.4

    Popularity

    8.6 vs 7.7
  • 14.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 73% of models

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    5 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.6 vs 7.5
  • 1.2% higher list score
    List score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 13 lists (8%)
    8.4 vs 8.3
  • 1.1% better value for money
    Kenwood kMix KMX760 has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.47 vs 7.4).
    7.47 vs 7.4
  • 11.7% higher user score
    User score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 55% of models

    70%

    8.7

    Rating

    30%

    8.4

    Popularity

    8.6 vs 7.7
  • 14.7% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.6/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▲ Better than 73% of models

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.9

    Popularity

    Grades by review (6)
    5 reviews: 5 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. 1 video review, counting half as much as a written test. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.6 vs 7.5
  • 1.2% higher list score
    List score
    8.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (1)
    List score: in 1 of 13 lists (8%)
    8.4 vs 8.3
  • 1.1% better value for money
    Kenwood kMix KMX760 has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.47 vs 7.4).
    7.47 vs 7.4
  • 31 dB quieter operation
    This stand mixer runs with noticeably less motor whine, creating a more pleasant kitchen environment than the average stand mixer (44 dB vs 75 dB).
    44 dB vs 75 dB
  • 4 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (24 cm vs 28 cm).
    24 cm vs 28 cm
  • 0.11 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.2 m vs 1.09 m
  • Includes a recipe book
    This stand mixer includes a recipe book (yes), while the average stand mixer does not (no).
  • 43.8% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (1.4 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    1.35 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 7.18 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (38.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    38.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 21.3% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.1 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.1 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 0.5 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (35.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    35.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • 38.1% more expensive
    Kenwood kMix KMX760 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£290 vs £210).
    £290 vs £210
  • 38.1% more expensive
    Kenwood kMix KMX760 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£290 vs £210).
    £290 vs £210
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 7.18 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (38.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    38.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 21.3% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.1 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.1 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 0.5 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (35.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    35.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • 43.8% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (1.4 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    1.35 kg vs 2.4 kg

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

9.0
underthexmastree
≈ estimated
16/10/2019
Demo · batter mixing and noise check
Verdict
Kenwood kMix KMX760 is very easy to use, with batter mixing that stays tidy even at top speed.
Not graded
Shop video
Shop video
Shop video

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
bbcgoodfood.com
✓ explicit
28/02/2020
Hands-on review · Retro chrome design
Verdict
The Kenwood kMix KMX760 is a stylish, well-built all-rounder with a broad attachment range, pasta tools included, though its chrome finish shows fingerprints.
9.0
trustedreviews.com
✓ explicit
17/09/2019
Hands-on test · Chrome finish
Verdict
The Kenwood kMix KMX760 is sturdy and beats, whips and kneads well, but its full price is steep for the shiny finish.
6.0
lesnumeriques.com
✓ explicit
10/02/2022
Lab test · Bake and dough trials
Verdict
The Kenwood kMix KMX760 is easy to use and handles shortcrust dough well, but it lags at top speed and leaves lumps in sponge batter.
10
iletaitunefoislapatisserie.com
✓ explicit
17/12/2020
Home test · Chrome limited edition
Verdict
The Kenwood kMix KMX760 is an eye-catching, powerful mixer that kneads brioche without shifting, though its head must be lifted by hand and it is louder than the Titanium.
9.0
consigli.it
✓ explicit
08/09/2023
Hands-on test · Direct-drive motor
Verdict
The Kenwood kMix KMX760 is a sturdy, powerful mixer with excellent value for money, though its head is heavy to lift by hand.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Kenwood kMix KMX760

  • Powerful 1000W motor easily handles dense cake batters and stiff bread dough
  • Smart speed control gradually builds up speed to prevent flour clouds and splashes
  • Unique fold function efficiently layers delicate ingredients like soufflés and mousses
  • Generous 5-litre polished stainless steel bowl capacity with a helpful handle
  • Solid, durable build quality that provides excellent stability on countertops
  • Relatively quiet and smooth operation compared to other mixers
  • Easy to clean with dishwasher-safe attachments and removable parts
  • Comes with durable, high-quality baking tools including a K-beater, whisk, and dough hook

What customers don't like about Kenwood kMix KMX760

  • Very heavy and large profile makes it difficult to move and store away
  • High retail price compared to entry-level stand mixers
  • Attachments occasionally leave a small amount of residue at the very bottom of the bowl
  • Shiny chrome and metallic finishes easily show up messy fingerprint marks
  • Included spatula feels a bit flimsy to some users
  • Splash guard can be tricky to detach and clean

Verdict

The Kenwood kMix KMX760 is a heavy-duty, premium stand mixer equipped with a powerful 1000-watt motor and a large 5-liter polished stainless steel mixing bowl capable of preparing heavy bread dough or batter for multiple cakes at once. Key characteristics include its advanced planetary mixing action, six electronic speed levels plus a pulse option, and a smart speed control feature that builds velocity gradually to prevent messy ingredient splashing. It also boasts a unique fold function for delicate layering, a LightLift head mechanism, a slow-speed outlet for optional attachments like pasta rollers, and comes packaged with a splash guard, spatula, and three robust stainless steel bowl tools: a K-beater, balloon whisk, and dough hook. Main pros include its exceptionally quiet and outstanding mixing performance, excellent stability due to an 11.6 kg all-metal construction, and durable, dishwasher-safe attachments. However, notable cons include its high retail price, heavy and bulky footprint that makes routine storage difficult, lack of an integrated weighing scale, and a shiny chrome casing that easily shows up fingerprints and smudges.

Compare Kenwood kMix KMX760 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Kenwood kMix KMX760 and other stand mixers

No results found