OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Continental Edison CERP800R review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£60Motor power:800 WBowl capacity:4.3 LNumber of speed levels:10Number of included attachments:3Weight:3.5 kg

Continental Edison CERP800R Review: Compare 41 technical specifications to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Continental Edison CERP800R
6.7/10

Overall score

Score
6.7/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 66% of models
Score components

60%

6.4

Technical score

15%

6.4

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

?

Reviews scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.7, the mark of a weaker model in this category

â–¼Worse than 66% of stand mixers
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 66%
6.4

Technical score

Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components

35%

7.6

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.2

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

9.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

â–¼Worse than 55%
?

Reviews score

Reviews score
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
Grades by review (0)
We have not found an independent test of this model yet. Until we do, its review part counts as 7.7.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
No expert tests yet
6.4

User score

User score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

6.4

Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

6.6

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 78%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • continental-edison-cerp800r
  • continental-edison-cerp800r
  • continental-edison-cerp800r
continental-edison-cerp800r
continental-edison-cerp800r
continental-edison-cerp800r
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Continental Edison CERP800R

Technical score
Technical score
6.4/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 55% of models
Score components:

35%

7.6

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.2

Bowl

15%

4.6

Accessories

10%

9.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

6.4
Reviews score
7.7
User score
6.4
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

70%

6.7

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.7
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
800 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 800 W of motor power, which is lower than the rated power of 65.6% of stand mixers and equal to that of 8.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
10
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 10 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 65.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 22.8% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
4.3 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4.3 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 79.5% of stand mixers and equal to that of 4% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
35.6 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 35.6 cm, which is taller than 59.1% of stand mixers and equal in height to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Width
28 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 28 cm in width, which is narrower than 46.6% of stand mixers and equal in width to 5.5% of stand mixers.
Depth
22 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 22 cm, which is shallower than 87.6% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 3.7% of stand mixers.
Weight
3.5 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 3.5 kg, which is lighter than 93.9% of stand mixers and equal in weight to 0.5% of stand mixers.
Body material
abs plastic
Show more
Overload protection
?
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
no
This stand mixer does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 42.2%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Continental Edison CERP800R vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 53.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (3.5 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    3.5 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 9.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 0.11 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.2 m vs 1.09 m
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Continental Edison CERP800R is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£60 vs £210).
    £60 vs £210
  • 4.2% better value for money
    Continental Edison CERP800R has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.7 vs 7.4).
    7.7 vs 7.4
  • 3.5x cheaper
    Continental Edison CERP800R is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£60 vs £210).
    £60 vs £210
  • 4.2% better value for money
    Continental Edison CERP800R has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.7 vs 7.4).
    7.7 vs 7.4
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 53.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (3.5 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    3.5 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 9.33 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 0.11 m longer power cord
    This stand mixer reaches wall outlets across the countertop with greater freedom than the average stand mixer (1.2 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.2 m vs 1.09 m
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 0.7 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.3 L vs 5 L).
    4.3 L vs 5 L
  • 16.9% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

    6.4

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    6.6

    Popularity

    6.4 vs 7.7
  • 0.6 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (35.6 cm vs 35 cm).
    35.6 cm vs 35 cm
  • 16.9% lower user score
    User score
    6.4/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 78% of models

    6.4

    Mark 7.8 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    6.6

    Popularity

    6.4 vs 7.7
  • 200 W less motor power
    This stand mixer provides less motor torque and may strain on stiff, multi-pound dough batches compared to the average stand mixer (800 W vs 1,000 W).
    800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 0.6 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (35.6 cm vs 35 cm).
    35.6 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.7 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.3 L vs 5 L).
    4.3 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Continental Edison CERP800R

  • Affordable, budget-friendly purchase price
  • Generous 4.3-litre stainless steel bowl capacity suitable for family use
  • Includes basic baking attachments like a stainless steel whisk, dough hook, and flat beater
  • Features 10 adjustable rotation speeds plus a functional pulse mode
  • Comes with a useful transparent splash guard featuring an ingredient chute

What customers don't like about Continental Edison CERP800R

  • 800W motor can struggle or overheat under heavy workloads like thick bread dough
  • Build quality feels less durable, relying heavily on plastic outer components
  • The mixing attachments do not fully reach the sides or bottom of the bowl, requiring manual scraping
  • Can be noisy and lose stability or shake on the countertop at high speeds

Verdict

The Continental Edison CERP800R is an 800-watt pastry stand mixer featuring a 4.3-liter stainless steel bowl, a robust ABS plastic housing, and an adjustable speed dial offering 10 rotation speeds plus a pulse function. Operating via planetary mixing action, it includes three standard baking attachments (a whisk, a flat beater, and a dough hook) alongside a transparent anti-splash lid equipped with a pouring chute. Main advantages include its versatile speed options, a family-sized bowl capacity, dishwasher-safe accessories, and non-slip feet for stabilization during operation. However, its downsides include an overall plastic body construction and operational time limitations, as it requires cool-down periods and shouldn't run continuously for extended periods or handle heavy dough volumes exceeding 500g of flour.

Compare Continental Edison CERP800R with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Continental Edison CERP800R and other stand mixers

No results found