OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Klarstein Bella Pico 2G review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£70Motor power:1300 WBowl capacity:5 LNumber of speed levels:6Number of included attachments:3Weight:3.7 kg

Klarstein Bella Pico 2G Review: Compare 41 technical specifications, 1 expert reviews and 2 best-of lists to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Klarstein Bella Pico 2G
6.8/10

Overall score

Score
6.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 62% of models
Score components

60%

5.8

Technical score

15%

9.2

User score

15%

8.8

List score

10%

5.8

Reviews score

▼Worse than 62% of stand mixers
7.8

Value for money

Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

▲Better than 74%
5.8

Technical score

Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components

35%

6.9

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.2

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

▼Worse than 82%
5.8

Reviews score

Reviews score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 91% of models

5.8

Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.3

Average grade

20%

5.0

Popularity

Grades by review (1)
1 review, with a printed score. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
▼Worse than 91%
9.2

User score

User score
9.2/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
★ Better than 91% of models

70%

8.9

Rating

30%

10

Popularity

★Better than 91%
8.8

List score

List score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (2)
List score: in 2 of 13 lists (15%)
★Better than 94%
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
  • klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
klarstein-bella-pico-2g
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Klarstein Bella Pico 2G

Technical score
Technical score
5.8/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 82% of models
Score components:

35%

6.9

Performance

15%

4.0

Functions

15%

6.2

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

8.0

Design

10%

6.2

Safety

5.8
Reviews score
5.8
User score
9.2
List score
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
7.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 74% of models
Score components:

70%

6.8

Overall score

30%

10

Price

7.8
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
1,300 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 1,300 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 75.5% of stand mixers and equal to that of 4.9% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
6
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 6 speed levels, which is fewer speed settings than on 59.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 31.6% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
5 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 5 L, which is larger than the mixing bowl of 34.8% of stand mixers and equal to that of 18.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
2 kg
Market range: <1.3 kg – >5 kg
This stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2 kg, which is smaller than 56.1% of stand mixers and equal to 14% of stand mixers.
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
no
This stand mixer does not have a display. 27.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
32.5 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 32.5 cm, which is lower than the height of 68.2% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.9% of stand mixers.
Width
22.5 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 22.5 cm in width, which is narrower than 81.3% of stand mixers and equal in width to 3.2% of stand mixers.
Depth
38 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 38 cm, which is deeper than 77.9% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 3.7% of stand mixers.
Weight
3.7 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 3.7 kg, which is lighter than 92.1% of stand mixers.
Body material
abs plastic
Show more
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
no
This stand mixer does not have automatic shut-off, unlike 42.2%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Klarstein Bella Pico 2G vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 300 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,300 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,300 W vs 1,000 W
  • 50.7% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (3.7 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    3.7 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 5.5 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (22.5 cm vs 28 cm).
    22.5 cm vs 28 cm
  • 19.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 91% of models

    70%

    8.9

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    9.2 vs 7.7
  • 2.5 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (32.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    32.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • 3x cheaper
    Klarstein Bella Pico 2G is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£70 vs £210).
    £70 vs £210
  • 4.8% better value for money
    Klarstein Bella Pico 2G has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.75 vs 7.4).
    7.75 vs 7.4
  • 6.0% higher list score
    List score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 13 lists (15%)
    8.8 vs 8.3
  • 19.5% higher user score
    User score
    9.2/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ★ Better than 91% of models

    70%

    8.9

    Rating

    30%

    10

    Popularity

    9.2 vs 7.7
  • 3x cheaper
    Klarstein Bella Pico 2G is cheaper than the average stand mixer (£70 vs £210).
    £70 vs £210
  • 4.8% better value for money
    Klarstein Bella Pico 2G has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.75 vs 7.4).
    7.75 vs 7.4
  • 6.0% higher list score
    List score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
    How we count it
    Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
    Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
    Lists with this model (2)
    List score: in 2 of 13 lists (15%)
    8.8 vs 8.3
  • 300 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,300 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,300 W vs 1,000 W
  • 50.7% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (3.7 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    3.7 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 5.5 cm narrower body
    This stand mixer takes up less horizontal space on the countertop, leaving more prep area than the average stand mixer (22.5 cm vs 28 cm).
    22.5 cm vs 28 cm
  • 2.5 cm lower height
    This stand mixer fits more comfortably beneath low kitchen wall cabinets and shelves than the average stand mixer (32.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    32.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • Does not have soft start
    This stand mixer does not include soft start (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 6.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    38 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 22.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 review, with a printed score. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    5.8 vs 7.5
  • 16.7% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • 1 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (76 dB vs 75 dB).
    76 dB vs 75 dB
  • 22.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    5.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    ▼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    ▼ Worse than 91% of models

    5.8

    Mark 7.6 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.3

    Average grade

    20%

    5.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (1)
    1 review, with a printed score. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    5.8 vs 7.5
  • Does not have soft start
    This stand mixer does not include soft start (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 1 fewer speed levels
    This stand mixer has fewer speed steps and larger jumps between speed settings than the average stand mixer (6 vs 7).
    6 vs 7
  • 1 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (76 dB vs 75 dB).
    76 dB vs 75 dB
  • 6.68 cm deeper body
    This stand mixer extends further front-to-back and requires a deeper countertop area than the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    38 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 0.09 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1 m vs 1.09 m
  • 16.7% smaller dough capacity
    This stand mixer has a smaller dough capacity than the average stand mixer (2 kg vs 2.4 kg). The average stand mixer has a dough capacity of 2.4 kg.
    2 kg vs 2.4 kg
  • Does not have automatic shut-off
    This stand mixer does not include automatic shut-off (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.4
impastatricemaster.com
✓ explicit
Not Dated
Expert review · Compact stand mixer
Verdict
The Klarstein Bella Pico 2G is a compact stand mixer that fits small kitchens and handles cakes and creams well, but it's loud and too light for hard dough.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Klarstein Bella Pico 2G

  • Powerful 1200-1300W motor easily handles standard mixing and whipping tasks.
  • Compact and lightweight footprint makes it ideal for small kitchens with limited counter space.
  • Excellent value for money as an affordable alternative to high-end stand mixers.
  • Five-liter stainless steel bowl offers ample capacity for everyday baking portions.
  • Suction feet on the base provide good stability and prevent the machine from walking on smooth countertops.
  • Planetary mixing system effectively moves ingredients from the edges toward the center.

What customers don't like about Klarstein Bella Pico 2G

  • The motor operates with a relatively loud noise level, especially at higher speed settings.
  • Struggles with very dense or heavy bread doughs, causing the arm or plastic body to flex.
  • Can leave a small amount of unmixed residue or dry ingredients at the very bottom of the bowl.
  • The plastic ABS housing can look and feel less premium compared to heavy-duty die-cast metal mixers.

Verdict

The Klarstein Bella Pico 2G is a compact stand mixer powered by a 1300-watt motor featuring a 6-speed control dial and a pulse function. It features a planetary mixing system, a 5-liter stainless steel bowl capable of processing up to 2 kg of dough, and includes a die-cast aluminum dough hook, mixing hook, and stainless steel whisk protected by a splash guard. Key advantages include its space-saving ABS plastic housing, stable operation secured by four suction feet, and an easy-to-use tilt-head release mechanism. However, a notable drawback is that its aluminum mixing elements are not dishwasher safe and must be washed by hand.

Compare Klarstein Bella Pico 2G with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Klarstein Bella Pico 2G and other stand mixers

No results found