OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

Beko KMD3102W review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~ÂŁ220Motor power:1000 WBowl capacity:4.6 LNumber of speed levels:12Number of included attachments:3Weight:9.2 kg

Beko KMD3102W Review: Compare 41 technical specifications and 2 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

Beko KMD3102W
7.2/10

Overall score

Score
7.2/ 10
âś•
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 61% of models
Score components

60%

7.0

Technical score

15%

?

User scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 8.0, the mark of a weaker model in this category

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

7.0

Reviews score

â–˛Better than 61% of stand mixers
7.6

Value for money

Value for money
7.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 58% of models
Score components

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–˛Better than 58%
7.0

Technical score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 71% of models
Score components

35%

8.4

Performance

15%

5.8

Functions

15%

6.6

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.1

Design

10%

10

Safety

â–˛Better than 71%
7.0

Reviews score

Reviews score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–Ľ Worse than 62% of models

7.0

Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

80%

8.1

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (2)
2 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
â–ĽWorse than 62%
?

User score

User score
8.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
No ratings from across the web yet, so it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
No ratings from across the web yet
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
âś•
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • beko-kmd3102w
  • beko-kmd3102w
beko-kmd3102w
beko-kmd3102w
Where to buy
    N/A~ ÂŁ220
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer Beko KMD3102W

Technical score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
âś•
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 71% of models
Score components:

35%

8.4

Performance

15%

5.8

Functions

15%

6.6

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.1

Design

10%

10

Safety

7.0
Reviews score
7.0
User score
?
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.6/ 10
âś•
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–Ľ
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–˛ Better than 58% of models
Score components:

70%

7.2

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.6
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
tilt-head
Motor power
1,000 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 1,000 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 37.1% of stand mixers and equal to that of 21% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
12
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 12 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 92.7% of stand mixers and equal to that on 5.3% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
264 RPM
Market range: <180 RPM – >422 RPM
This stand mixer reaches a top planetary speed of 264 RPM, which is faster than the maximum speed of 65% of stand mixers.
Show more
Bowl capacity
4.6 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 4.6 L, which is smaller than the mixing bowl of 75.5% of stand mixers and equal to that of 1.3% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
9.983 min
Market range: <10 min – >480 min
This stand mixer features a timer up to 9.983 min, which is shorter than the maximum timer of 96% of stand mixers and equal to that of 4% of stand mixers.
Display
yes
This stand mixer has a display. 73.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
dial
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
35 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 35 cm, which is lower than the height of 46.4% of stand mixers and equal to that of 4.6% of stand mixers.
Width
38 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 38 cm in width, which is wider than 77.2% of stand mixers and equal in width to 2.7% of stand mixers.
Depth
22.5 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 22.5 cm, which is shallower than 83.4% of stand mixers and equal in depth to 0.9% of stand mixers.
Weight
9.2 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 9.2 kg, which is heavier than 64.5% of stand mixers.
Body material
metal
Show more
Overload protection
?
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

Beko KMD3102W vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 5 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (12 vs 7).
    12 vs 7
  • Has a display
    This stand mixer has a display, while the average stand mixer does not. 27.1% of stand mixers have a display.
  • 8.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 44 RPM higher speed
    This stand mixer whips egg whites and heavy cream into voluminous, stiff peaks more rapidly than the average stand mixer (264 RPM vs 220 RPM).
    264 RPM vs 220 RPM
  • 2.8% better value for money
    Beko KMD3102W has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.61 vs 7.4).
    7.61 vs 7.4
  • 2.8% better value for money
    Beko KMD3102W has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.61 vs 7.4).
    7.61 vs 7.4
  • 5 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (12 vs 7).
    12 vs 7
  • 44 RPM higher speed
    This stand mixer whips egg whites and heavy cream into voluminous, stiff peaks more rapidly than the average stand mixer (264 RPM vs 220 RPM).
    264 RPM vs 220 RPM
  • Has a display
    This stand mixer has a display, while the average stand mixer does not. 27.1% of stand mixers have a display.
  • 8.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (22.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    22.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 10 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 28 cm).
    38 cm vs 28 cm
  • 0.4 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.6 L vs 5 L).
    4.6 L vs 5 L
  • 22.7% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 6.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    7.0/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–Ľ Worse than 62% of models

    7.0

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    2 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    7.0 vs 7.5
  • 20.02 min shorter timer
    This stand mixer has a shorter timer limit and may require resetting the countdown on extended dough kneading than the average stand mixer (10 min vs 30 min).
    9.983 min vs 30 min
  • 4.8% more expensive
    Beko KMD3102W is more expensive than the average stand mixer (ÂŁ220 vs ÂŁ210).
    ÂŁ220 vs ÂŁ210
  • 6.7% lower review score
    Reviews score
    7.0/ 10
    âś•
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–Ľ
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–Ľ Worse than 62% of models

    7.0

    Mark 8.1 is below the typical mark 8.2 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    80%

    8.1

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    2 reviews: 2 with a printed score, 0 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    7.0 vs 7.5
  • 4.8% more expensive
    Beko KMD3102W is more expensive than the average stand mixer (ÂŁ220 vs ÂŁ210).
    ÂŁ220 vs ÂŁ210
  • 20.02 min shorter timer
    This stand mixer has a shorter timer limit and may require resetting the countdown on extended dough kneading than the average stand mixer (10 min vs 30 min).
    9.983 min vs 30 min
  • 10 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (38 cm vs 28 cm).
    38 cm vs 28 cm
  • 22.7% heavier
    This stand mixer is heavier than the average stand mixer (9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    9.2 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 0.4 L smaller bowl capacity
    This stand mixer has a more compact bowl and may require splitting big holiday batches into multiple mixes compared to the average stand mixer (4.6 L vs 5 L).
    4.6 L vs 5 L

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

7.7
cuistolab.com
âś“ explicit
13/05/2019
Hands-on test · Baking
Verdict
The BekoChef KMD3102W is easy to use and whips egg whites and cream well, but its sandwich loaf rose poorly and tasted bad.
6.7
altroconsumo.it
âś“ explicit
12/2020
Lab test · Stand mixer
Verdict
The Beko KMD3102W whips egg whites and cream very well and kneads cake batter well, but it is loud and hard to move around.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about Beko KMD3102W

  • Powerful 1000 W motor handles heavy dough and mixtures effectively
  • Planetary mixing action provides 360-degree thorough bowl coverage
  • Generous 4.6-litre stainless steel bowl capacity is great for family baking
  • Features a wide range of speed options with 12 variable settings and a pulse function
  • Includes a helpful integrated kitchen machine timer for precision baking
  • Sturdy construction with anti-slip suction feet that keep the mixer stable on the countertop
  • Comes with a comprehensive pastry kit including a non-stick dough hook, balloon whisk, and flat beater
  • Equipped with a practical splash guard to prevent messy splatters during high-speed mixing

What customers don't like about Beko KMD3102W

  • Main body is relatively heavy, making it less convenient to move around or store away frequently
  • Like most tilt-head mixers, the mixing head can slightly block direct access to the bowl when adding ingredients mid-cycle
  • The bulkier footprint takes up a noticeable amount of permanent kitchen countertop space

Verdict

The Beko KMD3102W is a versatile 1000-watt kitchen machine featuring a die-cast metal body, 12 electronic speed settings, and a 4.6-liter stainless steel bowl with an ergonomic handle. Its primary characteristics include 360-degree planetary mixing coverage, an integrated digital timer, dual motor outlets for modular attachments, and a convenient auto cable-winder. Main pros include its highly durable all-metal housing, stable performance secured by anti-slip feet, and comprehensive standard accessories like a non-stick dough hook, stainless steel beater, whisk, and splash guard. However, its substantial 4.6-liter footprint may be bulky for compact countertops, and some users note it can be relatively loud when operating at high speeds or processing heavy doughs.

Compare Beko KMD3102W with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of Beko KMD3102W and other stand mixers

No results found