OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0: the technical score from the specifications is the base, and independent expert and video reviews (up to ±0.5 points), owner opinions (up to ±0.3) and best-of lists (up to +0.3) move it up or down.
Explore Stand Mixers Methodology v3.0

CASO KM 1800 review: 41 specs compared

Avg. price:~£220Motor power:1800 WBowl capacity:6 LNumber of speed levels:10Number of included attachments:3Weight:7.25 kg

CASO KM 1800 Review: Compare 41 technical specifications and 2 expert reviews to see how this product ranks in the Stand Mixers category and whether it is worth buying.

CASO KM 1800
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
Our main score for this model, 1–10. It combines specs, best-of lists, ratings from across the web and expert reviews.
How we count it
Parts: Technical score 60%, List score 15%, User score 15%, Reviews score 10%
Marks: Each part gets a mark out of 10. For reviews, lists and owners, a typical model in this category gets about 8 and the best one gets 10.
No data yet: A part with no data shows "?". It counts as the mark of a weaker model in this category (4 in 5 models with data score higher). This way, models with reviews, lists and owners usually come out ahead.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 69% of models
Score components

60%

7.1

Technical score

15%

7.1

User score

15%

?

List scoreNot enough data yet, so we use 7.5, the mark of a weaker model in this category

10%

8.5

Reviews score

â–²Better than 69% of stand mixers
7.7

Value for money

Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

â–²Better than 66%
7.1

Technical score

Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components

35%

8.1

Performance

15%

5.8

Functions

15%

8.3

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.1

Design

10%

10

Safety

â–²Better than 77%
8.5

Reviews score

Reviews score
8.5/ 10
✕
What it is
Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
How we count it
Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 65% of models

80%

8.6

Average grade

20%

8.0

Popularity

Grades by review (2)
2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
â–²Better than 65%
7.1

User score

User score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
How we count it
Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models

7.1

Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

70%

8.3

Rating

30%

7.1

Popularity

â–¼Worse than 62%
?

List score

List score
7.5/ 10
✕
What it is
How often independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers put this model in their best-of lists for this category.
How we count it
Points: The model in the most lists of this category gets 10; the others get 8 to 10 in proportion. In no list yet: 7.5. Lists count 15% of the overall score.
Enough data: Every list counts, even a single one. With fewer than 5 best-of lists in the category, this part is left out.
Lists with this model (0)
Not in any best-of list yet, so this part counts as 7.5. Models in a list get 8 to 10.
Not in any best-of list yet
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
  • caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
caso-km-1800
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of stand mixer CASO KM 1800

Technical score
Technical score
7.1/ 10
✕
What it is
How good the specs are compared with the other models in this category, 1–10.
How we count it
Areas: We rate the specs in each area against the other models in this category.
Weighting: The areas that matter most to buyers count more. The shares are shown under Score components.
Share: The technical score is 60% of the overall score.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 77% of models
Score components:

35%

8.1

Performance

15%

5.8

Functions

15%

8.3

Bowl

15%

3.1

Accessories

10%

7.1

Design

10%

10

Safety

7.1
Reviews score
8.5
User score
7.1
List score
?
Value for money
Value for money
7.7/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the stand mixer's overall rating with its price.
When it matters
When you are looking for a stand mixer with a good balance between quality and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 66% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

8.5

Price

7.7
Mixer type
planetary
Head design
?
Motor power
1,800 W
Market range: <350 W – >1.5k W
This stand mixer delivers 1,800 W of motor power, which is higher than the rated power of 93.8% of stand mixers and equal to that of 3.1% of stand mixers.
Number of speed levels
10
Market range: <6 – >11
This stand mixer offers 10 speed levels, which is more speed settings than on 65.1% of stand mixers and equal to that on 22.8% of stand mixers.
Maximum speed
?
Show more
Bowl capacity
6 L
Market range: <4 L – >7.6 L
This stand mixer features a bowl capacity of 6 L, which is larger than the mixing bowl of 69.2% of stand mixers and equal to that of 0.9% of stand mixers.
Dough capacity
?
Bowl material
stainless steel
Splash guard included
yes
This stand mixer has a splash guard, unlike 90.5%.
Dishwasher-safe parts
yes
This stand mixer has dishwasher-safe parts, unlike 85.1%.
Built-in scale
no
This stand mixer does not have built-in scale, unlike 89.5%.
Heating function
no
This stand mixer does not have heating function, unlike 96.6%.
Maximum timer
?
Display
yes
This stand mixer has a display. 73.2% of stand mixers have a display.
Control type
touch control
Show more
Number of included attachments
3
Market range: <3 – >6
This stand mixer comes with 3 included attachments, which is more accessories than with 2.8% of stand mixers and equal to that with 65.1% of stand mixers.
Dough hook included
yes
This stand mixer has a dough hook, unlike 100%.
Flat beater included
yes
This stand mixer has a flat beater, unlike 96.3%.
Wire whisk included
yes
This stand mixer has a wire whisk, unlike 99.5%.
Meat grinder included
no
This stand mixer does not include a meat grinder, unlike 90.5%.
Show more
Height
35.5 cm
Market range: <28.2 cm – >41.9 cm
This stand mixer has an overall height of 35.5 cm, which is taller than 56.4% of stand mixers and equal in height to 2.3% of stand mixers.
Width
39 cm
Market range: <21 cm – >40.2 cm
This stand mixer measures 39 cm in width, which is wider than 82.2% of stand mixers and equal in width to 3.7% of stand mixers.
Depth
20.5 cm
Market range: <22 cm – >42 cm
This stand mixer has a depth of 20.5 cm, which is shallower than 95.4% of stand mixers.
Weight
7.25 kg
Market range: <3.98 kg – >13.2 kg
This stand mixer weighs 7.25 kg, which is lighter than 53.7% of stand mixers.
Body material
aluminium
Show more
Overload protection
yes
This stand mixer has overload protection, unlike 99.3%.
Safety locking system
yes
This stand mixer has safety locking system, unlike 97.5%.
Automatic shut-off
yes
This stand mixer has automatic shut-off, unlike 57.4%.
Non-slip feet
yes
This stand mixer has non-slip feet, unlike 100%.

CASO KM 1800 vs the average stand mixer

246810TotalPerformanceFunctionsDesignBowlAccessoriesSafety
  • 800 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,800 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,800 W vs 1,000 W
  • Has a display
    This stand mixer has a display, while the average stand mixer does not. 27.1% of stand mixers have a display.
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • 1 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (6 L vs 5 L).
    6 L vs 5 L
  • 10.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (20.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    20.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 13.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 65% of models

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.5 vs 7.5
  • 3.8% better value for money
    CASO KM 1800 has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.68 vs 7.4).
    7.68 vs 7.4
  • 3.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (7.3 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    7.25 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 13.3% higher review score
    Reviews score
    8.5/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    Average grade from independent test sites, magazines and video reviewers, 1–10.
    How we count it
    Grades: Each review's own score is converted to 1–10; without one, we grade the review ourselves. Big test sites count more, short reviews half as much as full tests. A video review counts half.
    Score: The average grade is 80% of the review mark; the number of reviews is the other 20% (1 review = 5, the typical number in this category = 8, the most-reviewed model = 10).
    Enough data: With few reviews, the average grade is pulled toward the typical grade of this category. No reviews yet: 7.7 for now.
    Share: Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–² Better than 65% of models

    80%

    8.6

    Average grade

    20%

    8.0

    Popularity

    Grades by review (2)
    2 reviews: 1 with a printed score, 1 estimated from the review. Reviews count 10% of the overall score.
    Ratings from across the web count in the User score, not in this score.
    8.5 vs 7.5
  • 3.8% better value for money
    CASO KM 1800 has better value for money than the average stand mixer (7.68 vs 7.4).
    7.68 vs 7.4
  • 800 W more motor power
    This stand mixer kneads dense bread doughs and heavy batches with greater torque and ease than the average stand mixer (1,800 W vs 1,000 W).
    1,800 W vs 1,000 W
  • 3 more speed levels
    This stand mixer allows finer speed tuning from gentle folding to intense whipping than the average stand mixer (10 vs 7).
    10 vs 7
  • Has a display
    This stand mixer has a display, while the average stand mixer does not. 27.1% of stand mixers have a display.
  • 10.83 cm shallower depth
    This stand mixer fits cleanly on standard worktops without protruding past the counter edge compared to the average stand mixer (20.5 cm vs 31.3 cm).
    20.5 cm vs 31.325 cm
  • 3.3% lighter
    This stand mixer is lighter than the average stand mixer (7.3 kg vs 7.5 kg). The average stand mixer weighs 7.5 kg.
    7.25 kg vs 7.5 kg
  • 1 L larger bowl capacity
    This stand mixer accommodates larger batch baking, multiple bread loaves, and party-sized frostings than the average stand mixer (6 L vs 5 L).
    6 L vs 5 L
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 11 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (39 cm vs 28 cm).
    39 cm vs 28 cm
  • 4 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (79 dB vs 75 dB).
    79 dB vs 75 dB
  • 7.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models

    7.1

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.1

    Popularity

    7.1 vs 7.7
  • 0.5 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (35.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    35.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.04 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1.1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.05 m vs 1.09 m
  • 4.8% more expensive
    CASO KM 1800 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£220 vs £210).
    £220 vs £210
  • 7.8% lower user score
    User score
    7.1/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    How happy buyers are with this model, based on ratings from across the web.
    How we count it
    Enough data: A model needs at least 1 rating from across the web. Without one, it counts as 8.0, the mark of a weaker rated model in this category.
    Share: User score counts 15% of the overall score.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models

    7.1

    Mark 8.0 is below the typical mark 8.5 of this category, so it cannot lift the score above the technical score

    70%

    8.3

    Rating

    30%

    7.1

    Popularity

    7.1 vs 7.7
  • 4.8% more expensive
    CASO KM 1800 is more expensive than the average stand mixer (£220 vs £210).
    £220 vs £210
  • Does not have pulse function
    This stand mixer does not include a pulse function (no), while the average stand mixer does (yes).
  • 4 dB louder operation
    This stand mixer produces more audible motor noise during heavy kneading sessions than the average stand mixer (79 dB vs 75 dB).
    79 dB vs 75 dB
  • 11 cm wider body
    This stand mixer occupies wider countertop area and crowds adjacent baking tools compared to the average stand mixer (39 cm vs 28 cm).
    39 cm vs 28 cm
  • 0.5 cm taller height
    This stand mixer has a taller vertical build that may interfere with overhead cupboards when tilting the head compared to the average stand mixer (35.5 cm vs 35 cm).
    35.5 cm vs 35 cm
  • 0.04 m shorter power cord
    This stand mixer has a shorter power cord and must sit closer to a wall outlet than the average stand mixer (1.1 m vs 1.09 m).
    1.05 m vs 1.09 m

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

9.0
imtest.de
✓ explicit
22/10/2025
Lab test · Everyday mixer
Verdict
The CASO KM 1800 Black-E suits cake batter, whipped cream and folding in, but it is loud and leaves dry flour at the bowl edge with heavy bread dough.
9.0
bbqpit.de
≈ estimated
02/04/2025
Hands-on test · Design mixer
Verdict
The CASO KM 1800 Black-E is a good-looking, compact mixer whose suction feet keep it still on heavy dough, a good value for home bakers.
9.0
imtest.de
✓ explicit
22/10/2025
Lab test · Everyday mixer
Verdict
The CASO KM 1800 Black-E suits cake batter, whipped cream and folding in, but it is loud and leaves dry flour at the bowl edge with heavy bread dough.
9.0
bbqpit.de
≈ estimated
02/04/2025
Hands-on test · Design mixer
Verdict
The CASO KM 1800 Black-E is a good-looking, compact mixer whose suction feet keep it still on heavy dough, a good value for home bakers.

Third-party reviews

What customers like about CASO KM 1800

  • Powerful 1800-watt motor that efficiently handles most mixing and whipping tasks
  • Thorough ingredient mixing due to the effective planetary stirring system
  • Generous bowl capacity, offering either a 6-litre stainless steel or 4.5-litre glass bowl
  • User-friendly LED display featuring responsive touch controls and an adjustable timer
  • Stable and secure operation on countertops supported by strong suction cups
  • Easy cleanup since all standard accessories and mixing bowls are dishwasher-safe
  • Solid and durable build quality with an elegant matte-black cast aluminium housing

What customers don't like about CASO KM 1800

  • Relatively high noise levels during operation, measuring up to 79 decibels on high settings
  • Struggles to fully incorporate ingredients from the sides when kneading heavy bread doughs
  • The mixing tools do not sit perfectly at the bottom edges and lack a height adjustment feature
  • The pivoting motor arm opens with a somewhat rough, jerky motion

Verdict

The CASO KM 1800 is a powerful 1800-watt stand mixer built with an elegant matte black cast aluminum housing and featuring an efficient planetary mixing action. It comes equipped with 10 speed settings, an LED touch display, and a built-in timer with an auto-stop or counter function, offering either a 6-liter stainless steel bowl (Black-E) or a 4.5-liter glass bowl (Black-G). Main pros include its highly robust full-metal construction, exceptionally powerful motor capable of processing up to 2 kg of dough, strong suction feet for maximum stability, and dishwasher-safe accessories. However, some minor cons include its loud operation when running at higher speeds and a slightly abrupt, jerky motion when unlocking and opening the mixing swivel arm.

Compare CASO KM 1800 with other stand mixers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of CASO KM 1800 and other stand mixers

No results found