OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Zyxel NBG 419N V2 Review | 77 Data compared

Avg. price:~£9Wi-Fi version:Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)Wi-Fi speed:300 MbpsLAN port speeds:100 MbpsMesh Wi-Fi:no

Zyxel NBG 419N V2 Review: Compare 77 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Routers category and whether it is worth buying.

6.3

Overall score

Score
6.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the router's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best routers on the market.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 77% of models
Score components

90%

6.1

Technical Score

10%

8.3

User score

▼Worse than 77% of routers
6.1

Technical Score

Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

26%

4.7

Wireless

20%

5.5

Ports

18%

8.2

Networking

14%

8.5

Security

12%

4.4

Hardware

10%

5.9

Management

▼Worse than 83% of routers
8.3

User score

User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User reviews

30%

8.1

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.2
(1347)
amazon
3.0
(1)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

▲Better than 71% of routers
  • zyxel-nbg-419n-v2
zyxel-nbg-419n-v2

Best prices in UK

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Zyxel NBG-419N v2 is a wireless N300 home router that delivers data transfer rates up to 300 Mbps using 802.11n technology on the 2.4GHz band. Key characteristics include two external 5 dBi omni antennas for enhanced coverage, four Fast Ethernet LAN ports, one WAN port, and a USB port for file sharing. It offers robust security features like a built-in firewall, DoS protection, and WPS for easy setup, along with specialized 'Game Engine' QoS to prioritize gaming traffic. Pros include its DLNA certification for seamless media streaming, physical power and wireless on/off switches for energy saving, and a compact design. However, it is an older model limited to Wi-Fi 4 standards, lacks high-speed Gigabit Ethernet ports, and does not support the faster 5GHz band found in modern dual-band routers.

Technical Specifications of router Zyxel NBG 419N V2

Technical Score
Technical score
6.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of the router's technical performance, covering key areas such as Wi-Fi performance, wired connectivity, security, software features, coverage, and design.
When it matters
When you want to compare routers based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components:

26%

4.7

Wireless

20%

5.5

Ports

18%

8.2

Networking

14%

8.5

Security

12%

4.4

Hardware

10%

5.9

Management

6.1
Zyxel NBG 419N V2 has a technical score of 6.1 points, which is lower than that of 82.8% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you want to know how a router performs in daily use and how reliable it is for speed, coverage, and stability according to user feedback.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 71% of models
Score components

70%

8.4

User reviews

30%

8.1

Popularity

User score:
United Kingdom
amazon
4.2
(1347)
amazon
3.0
(1)

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

8.3
Zyxel NBG 419N V2 has a user score of 8.31 points, which is higher than that of 70.8% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the router.
When it matters
When you prefer to choose a router reviewed and selected by many other buyers.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▲ Better than 68% of models
Popularity:
Zyxel NBG 419N V2 has a popularity score of 8.1 points, which is higher than that of 67.9% of products in this category.
8.1
Zyxel NBG 419N V2 has a popularity score of 8.1 points, which is higher than that of 67.9% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the router's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a router with a good balance between network performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
▼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
▼ Worse than 81% of models
Score components:

60%

6.3

Overall score

40%

10

Price

7.4
Zyxel NBG 419N V2 has a value-for-money score of 7.4 points, which is lower than that of 75% of products in this category.
Brand name
Zyxel
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
Wi-Fi version
Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
▼ Worse than 61% of models
This router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n), which is less advanced than 60.8% of routers and equal to 37.3% of routers.
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
Wi-Fi bands
2.4 GHz
▼ Worse than 75% of models
This router supports 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi bands, which are less versatile than 75.4% of routers and equal to 22.4% of routers.
Wi-Fi speed
300 Mbps
Wi-Fi speed
300 Mbps
▼ Worse than 74% of models
Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
This router delivers 300 Mbps Wi-Fi speed, which is lower than 73.7% of routers and equal to 16.8% of routers.
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz
Channel widths supported
20 MHz + 40 MHz
▼ Worse than 59% of models
This router supports 20 MHz + 40 MHz channel width options, which is fewer than 59.3% of routers and the same as 35.1% of routers.
Show more
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2, WPA, WEP
Wi-Fi security protocols
WPA2, WPA, WEP
▲ Better than 41% of models
This router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP Wi-Fi security protocols, which are more advanced than 40.9% of routers and equal to 17.7% of routers.
DoS protection
yes
DoS protection
yes
▲ Better than 13% of models
This router includes DoS protection. 12.8% of routers include DoS protection.
SPI intrusion protection
yes
SPI intrusion protection
yes
▲ Better than 6% of models
This router includes SPI-based intrusion protection. 6.1% of routers include SPI-based intrusion protection.
MAC address filtering
yes
MAC address filtering
yes
▲ Better than 2% of models
This router supports MAC address filtering. 2.2% of routers include MAC address filtering.
URL filter
yes
URL filter
yes
▲ Better than 3% of models
This router supports URL filtering. 3.4% of routers include URL filtering.
Show more
IPv6 support
yes
IPv6 support
yes
▲ Better than 12% of models
This router supports IPv6. 11.5% of routers are IPv6-ready.
Dynamic routing
yes
Dynamic routing
yes
▲ Better than 48% of models
This router supports dynamic routing. 47.8% of routers support dynamic routing.
Inter-VLAN routing
no
Inter-VLAN routing
no
▼ Worse than 24% of models
This router does not support inter-VLAN routing. 23.5% of routers support inter-VLAN routing.
VLAN tagging
no
VLAN tagging
no
▼ Worse than 62% of models
This router does not support VLAN tagging. 62% of routers include VLAN tagging.
QoS
yes
QoS
yes
▲ Better than 3% of models
This router includes QoS controls. 3.2% of routers include QoS controls.
Show more
N. of LAN ports
4
N. of LAN ports
4
▲ Better than 24% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 4 LAN ports, which is more than 23.7% of routers and the same as 69.2% of routers.
LAN port speeds
100 Mbps
LAN port speeds
100 Mbps
▼ Worse than 73% of models
This router offers 100 Mbps on its LAN ports, which is slower than 73.2% of routers and on par with 26.4% of routers.
N. of WAN ports
1
N. of WAN ports
1
▼ Worse than 9% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 WAN ports, which is more than 1% of routers and the same as 90.1% of routers.
N. of USB ports
1
N. of USB ports
1
▲ Better than 39% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This router has 1 USB ports, which is more than 39.5% of routers and the same as 39.5% of routers.
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
Power over Ethernet (PoE)
no
Category Benchmark
This router does not support Power over Ethernet (PoE). 0.5% of routers can be powered over Ethernet.
Show more
Management interface
Web UI
Management interface
Web UI
▼ Worse than 72% of models
This router uses Web UI for management, which is less advanced than 72.2% of routers and equal to 27.3% of routers.
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, Automatic
Firmware upgrade method
Web UI, Automatic
▲ Better than 35% of models
This router supports Web UI, Automatic firmware update methods, which are more convenient than 35.4% of routers and equal to 37.8% of routers.
Traffic monitoring
no
Traffic monitoring
no
▼ Worse than 82% of models
This router does not include traffic monitoring. 82.1% of routers include traffic monitoring.
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
Guest Wi-Fi network
yes
▲ Better than 9% of models
This router offers a guest Wi‑Fi network. 8.6% of routers offer a guest Wi‑Fi network.
Captive portal
no
Captive portal
no
▼ Worse than 24% of models
This router does not offer captive portal features. 23.5% of routers offer captive portal features.
Show more
CPU clock speed
0.384 GHz
CPU clock speed
0.384 GHz
▼ Worse than 89% of models
This router runs at 0.384 GHz, which is slower than 88.8% of routers and on par with 0.9% of routers.
RAM capacity
64 MB
RAM capacity
64 MB
▼ Worse than 69% of models
Market range: <0 MB – >1k MB
This router has 64 MB of RAM, which is less than 69% of routers and the same as 14.3% of routers.
Internal storage
0.007812 GB
Internal storage
0.007812 GB
▼ Worse than 73% of models
Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
This router has 0.007812 GB of internal storage, which is less than 72.7% of routers and the same as 20.6% of routers.
Hardware acceleration
no
Hardware acceleration
no
▼ Worse than 69% of models
This router does not offer hardware acceleration. 68.9% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
N. of external antennas
2
N. of external antennas
2
▲ Better than 45% of models
Market range: <0 – >10
This router has 2 external antennas, which is more than 45.1% of routers and the same as 13.1% of routers.
Show more

Zyxel NBG 419N V2 vs the average router

246810TotalWirelessSecurityNetworkingPortsManagementHardware
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    Wi-Fi security protocols
    WPA2, WPA, WEP
    ▲ Better than 41% of models
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA2, WPA, WEP, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS.
    WPA2, WPA, WEP vs WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS
  • Removable antennas
    Removable antennas
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This router has removable antennas, while the average router does not. 27.4% of routers have removable antennas.
  • 10x cheaper
    Zyxel NBG 419N V2 is cheaper than the average router (£9 vs £90).
    £9 vs £90
  • 2.1 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    6 W
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <3 W – >18 W
    This router uses less power than the average router (6 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    6 W vs 8.1 W
  • 22 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <28 mm – >98 mm
    This router is thinner than the average router (23 mm vs 45 mm). The average router is 45 mm thick.
    23 mm vs 45 mm
  • 24.5 mm lower height
    Height
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <30 mm – >180 mm
    This router is shorter than the average router (23 mm vs 47.5 mm). The average router is 47.5 mm tall.
    23 mm vs 47.5 mm
  • 10x cheaper
    Zyxel NBG 419N V2 is cheaper than the average router (£9 vs £90).
    £9 vs £90
  • Stronger Wi-Fi security
    Wi-Fi security protocols
    WPA2, WPA, WEP
    ▲ Better than 41% of models
    This router supports the Wi-Fi security protocols WPA2, WPA, WEP, while the average router supports WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS.
    WPA2, WPA, WEP vs WPA2, WPA, WEP, WPS
  • Removable antennas
    Removable antennas
    yes
    ▲ Better than 73% of models
    This router has removable antennas, while the average router does not. 27.4% of routers have removable antennas.
  • 2.1 W lower power consumption
    Power consumption
    6 W
    ▲ Better than 66% of models
    Market range: <3 W – >18 W
    This router uses less power than the average router (6 W vs 8.1 W). The average router uses 8.1 W power.
    6 W vs 8.1 W
  • 22 mm thinner design
    Thickness
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <28 mm – >98 mm
    This router is thinner than the average router (23 mm vs 45 mm). The average router is 45 mm thick.
    23 mm vs 45 mm
  • 24.5 mm lower height
    Height
    23 mm
    ★ Better than 97% of models
    Market range: <30 mm – >180 mm
    This router is shorter than the average router (23 mm vs 47.5 mm). The average router is 47.5 mm tall.
    23 mm vs 47.5 mm
  • Slower LAN ports
    LAN port speeds
    100 Mbps
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This router has a lower LAN port speed than the average router (100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This router uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • No hardware acceleration
    Hardware acceleration
    no
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    This router does not offer hardware acceleration, while the average router does. 68.7% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This router supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average router (2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz). The average router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
  • No VPN server support
    VPN server support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 66.3% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    Web UI, Automatic
    ▲ Better than 35% of models
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, Automatic, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, Automatic vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • 79.7% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    300 Mbps
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
    This router has a lower Wi-Fi speed than the average router (300 Mbps vs 1475 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1475 Mbps.
    300 Mbps vs 1,475 Mbps
  • 5.1% worse value for money
    Zyxel NBG 419N V2 has worse value for money than the average router (7.44 vs 7.8).
    7.44 vs 7.82
  • Older Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi version
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n)
    ▼ Worse than 61% of models
    This router uses an older Wi-Fi version than the average router (Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)). The average router uses Wi-Fi Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac).
    Wi-Fi 4 (802.11n) vs Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac)
  • Fewer Wi-Fi bands
    Wi-Fi bands
    2.4 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 75% of models
    This router supports fewer Wi-Fi bands than the average router (2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz). The average router supports 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz Wi-Fi bands.
    2.4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz + 5 GHz
  • 79.7% slower Wi-Fi speed
    Wi-Fi speed
    300 Mbps
    ▼ Worse than 74% of models
    Market range: <0 Mbps – >6k Mbps
    This router has a lower Wi-Fi speed than the average router (300 Mbps vs 1475 Mbps). The average router reaches Wi-Fi speed of 1475 Mbps.
    300 Mbps vs 1,475 Mbps
  • Narrower channel widths
    Channel widths supported
    20 MHz + 40 MHz
    ▼ Worse than 59% of models
    This router has a lower supported channel width than the average router (20 MHz + 40 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz). The average router supports channel width of 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz.
    20 MHz + 40 MHz vs 20 MHz + 40 MHz + 80 MHz
  • 1 fewer spatial streams
    N. of spatial streams
    2
    ▼ Worse than 50% of models
    Market range: <0 – >10
    This router has fewer spatial streams than the average router (2 vs 3). The average router has 3 spatial streams.
    2 vs 3
  • No band steering
    Band steering
    no
    ▼ Worse than 52% of models
    This router does not support band steering, while the average router does. 51.8% of routers support band steering.
  • No beamforming
    Beamforming
    no
    ▼ Worse than 57% of models
    This router does not support beamforming, while the average router does. 56.7% of routers support beamforming.
  • No VPN server support
    VPN server support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 66% of models
    This router cannot act as a VPN server, while the average router can. 66.3% of routers can act as a VPN server.
  • No VLAN tagging
    VLAN tagging
    no
    ▼ Worse than 62% of models
    This router does not support VLAN tagging, while the average router does. 61.9% of routers support VLAN tagging.
  • Slower LAN ports
    LAN port speeds
    100 Mbps
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    This router has a lower LAN port speed than the average router (100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps). The average router has a LAN port speed of 1 Gbps.
    100 Mbps vs 1 Gbps
  • Limited firmware updates
    Firmware upgrade method
    Web UI, Automatic
    ▲ Better than 35% of models
    This router supports the firmware update methods Web UI, Automatic, while the average router supports Web UI, App, Automatic.
    Web UI, Automatic vs Web UI, App, Automatic
  • Weaker management tools
    Management interface
    Web UI
    ▼ Worse than 72% of models
    This router uses the management interface Web UI, while the average router uses Web UI, App.
    Web UI vs Web UI, App
  • No traffic monitoring
    Traffic monitoring
    no
    ▼ Worse than 82% of models
    This router does not offer traffic monitoring, while the average router does. 81.9% of routers offer traffic monitoring.
  • Less capable NAS services
    Built-in NAS services
    SMB, FTP, web access
    ▲ Better than 52% of models
    This router includes SMB, FTP, web access NAS services, while the average router includes SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access.
    Requires attached USB storage.
    SMB, FTP, web access vs SMB, FTP, time machine, NFS, web access
  • No DLNA support
    DLNA support
    no
    ▼ Worse than 54% of models
    This router does not support DLNA, while the average router does. 54% of routers support DLNA.
  • No hardware acceleration
    Hardware acceleration
    no
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    This router does not offer hardware acceleration, while the average router does. 68.7% of routers offer hardware acceleration.
  • Lower CPU clock speed
    CPU clock speed
    0.384 GHz
    ▼ Worse than 89% of models
    This router has a lower CPU clock speed than the average router (0.4 GHz vs 2x0.5 GHz). The average router has a CPU clock speed of 2x0.5 GHz.
    0.384 GHz vs 2x0.5 GHz
  • 75% less RAM
    RAM capacity
    64 MB
    ▼ Worse than 69% of models
    Market range: <0 MB – >1k MB
    This router has less RAM than the average router (64 MB vs 256 MB). The average router has 256 MB of RAM.
    64 MB vs 256 MB
  • 93.8% less internal storage
    Internal storage
    0.007812 GB
    ▼ Worse than 73% of models
    Market range: <0 GB – >0.5 GB
    This router has less internal storage than the average router (0 GB vs 0.1 GB). The average router offers 0.125 GB of internal storage.
    0.007812 GB vs 0.125 GB
  • 3 older release date
    Release date
    2012
    ▼ Worse than 65% of models
    Market range: <2k – >2k
    This router is an older model than the average router (2012 vs 2015). The average router release year is 2015.
    May 2012
    2012 vs 2015

Graphic comparison of Zyxel NBG 419N V2 and other routers

No results found

Third-party reviews

United Kingdom
amazon
4.2
1347 Reviews
amazon
3.0
1 Reviews

(Reviews last updated: May 2026)

What customers like about Zyxel NBG 419N V2?

  • Affordable pricing, often retailing for around £40
  • Creditable overall performance for a home router in its category
  • Compact and space-saving physical design
  • Includes useful features like QoS (Quality of Service) and parental controls
  • Equipped with two external antennas for better signal management compared to internal-only models
  • Supports various security and networking protocols including DoS protection and VPN passthrough (IPsec, L2TP)

What customers dislike about Zyxel NBG 419N V2?

  • Lacks Gigabit Ethernet ports, being limited to 10/100 Mbps speeds
  • Web user interface can be slow, clunky, or unintuitive
  • Reported stability issues where the router may freeze or require frequent reboots during high throughput
  • Advanced settings, such as wireless power adjustment, are sometimes hidden in 'Expert Mode'
  • Some users reported the web interface becomes unresponsive when the router is under heavy traffic loads

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

O
openwrt.org
18/01/2026
Summary of the review
ZyXEL NBG-419N v2 - [OpenWrt Wiki] Techdata Are you looking for specific benchmark results or firmware update instructions for this router?

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Zyxel NBG 419N V2 with other routers

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)