OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

GIGABYTE Force M9 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£25Connectivity:wireless+wiredMaximum polling rate:125 HzMaximum DPI:2000 DPIWeight:100 g

GIGABYTE Force M9 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

GIGABYTE Force M9
5.0/10

Overall score

Score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 83% of models
Score components

80%

5.0

Technical score

20%

5.3

User score

â–¼Worse than 83% of mice
6.5

Value for money

Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–¼Worse than 85%
5.0

Technical score

Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components

36%

3.5

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.2

Controls

16%

6.4

Design

14%

1.0

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

5.4

Battery & Charging

â–¼Worse than 68%
5.3

User score

User score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

5.8

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
â–¼Worse than 99%
  • gigabyte-force-m9
  • gigabyte-force-m9
  • gigabyte-force-m9
  • gigabyte-force-m9
  • gigabyte-force-m9
gigabyte-force-m9
gigabyte-force-m9
gigabyte-force-m9
gigabyte-force-m9
gigabyte-force-m9
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse GIGABYTE Force M9

Technical score
Technical score
5.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 68% of models
Score components:

36%

3.5

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.2

Controls

16%

6.4

Design

14%

1.0

Features

7%

9.7

Connectivity

5%

5.4

Battery & Charging

5.0
User score
User score
5.3/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 99% of models
Score components

70%

5.8

User ratings

30%

4.0

Number of reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
5.3
Popularity
Popularity
4.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 72% of models
Popularity:
GIGABYTE Force M9 has a popularity score of 4 points, which is lower than that of 71.9% of products in this category.
4.0
Value for money
Value for money
6.5/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–¼ Worse than 85% of models
Score components:

70%

5.0

Overall score

30%

10

Price

6.5
Brand name
Gigabyte
Maximum polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 75.8% of mice and equal to 23.9% of mice.
Wired polling rate
N/A
2.4 GHz polling rate
125 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, which is lower than 71.1% of mice and equal to 28.8% of mice.
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
2.4GHz only.
Show more
Connectivity
wireless+wired
This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, which is more versatile than 56.8% of mice and equal to 43.3% of mice.
connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
yes
This mouse supports proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 38.8% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
yes
This mouse includes a receiver. 37.8% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
AA
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
yes
This mouse uses a removable battery. 77.8% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
3
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 3 side buttons, which is more than 83.8% of mice and equal to 8.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
right-handed
Weight
100 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 100 g, which is heavier than 70.5% of mice and equal to 2% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
N/A
Cable type
N/A
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
0
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, which is less than 52.2% of mice and equal to 47.8% of mice.
Onboard memory size
0 KB
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has an onboard memory size of 0 KB, which is smaller than 12.6% of mice and equal to 87.4% of mice.
no onboard memory.
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
no
This mouse does not support firmware upgrades. 77.7% of mice support firmware upgrades.
Suitable for gaming
no
This mouse is not suitable for gaming. 76.2% of mice are suitable for gaming.

GIGABYTE Force M9 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 1 more side buttons
    This mouse has 3 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    3 vs 2
  • Removable battery
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • Versatile connectivity
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Versatile connectivity
    This mouse supports wireless+wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired / 2.4 GHz.
    wireless+wired vs wireless
  • Receiver storage inside mouse
    This mouse has receiver storage inside the mouse, while the average mouse does not. 45.9% of mice have receiver storage inside the mouse.
  • Removable battery
    This mouse uses a removable battery, while the average mouse does not. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
  • 1 more side buttons
    This mouse has 3 side buttons, while the average mouse has 2 side buttons.
    3 vs 2
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • No firmware upgrades
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 22% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 100 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    100 g vs 82 g
  • 83.8% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 65 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    65 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • 80% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • Not suitable for gaming
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.
  • 52% lower user score
    User score
    5.3/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    GIGABYTE Force M9
    the average mouse
    GIGABYTE Force M9 has a lower user score than the average mouse (5.26 vs 8).
    5.26 vs 8
  • 12.1% worse value for money
    GIGABYTE Force M9 has worse value for money than the average mouse (6.52 vs 7.3).
    6.52 vs 7.31
  • 59.2% less popular
    GIGABYTE Force M9 is less popular than the average mouse (4.01 vs 6.4).
    4.01 vs 6.38
  • 87.5% lower maximum polling rate
    This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 83.8% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 65 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    65 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • 80% lower maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 2000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    2,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 87.5% lower 2.4 GHz polling rate
    This mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 125 Hz, while the average mouse has a 2.4 GHz polling rate of 1,000 Hz.
    125 Hz vs 1,000 Hz
  • 600 DPI higher minimum setting
    This mouse has a minimum DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse has a minimum DPI of 200 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • No angle snapping support
    This mouse does not support angle snapping, while the average mouse does. 54.4% of mice support angle snapping.
  • 305 DPI coarser step size
    This mouse has a DPI step size of 400 DPI, while the average mouse has a DPI step size of 95 DPI.
    400 DPI vs 95 DPI
  • 1 fewer stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 4 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    4 vs 5
  • 22% higher mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 100 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    100 g vs 82 g
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • 3.3 mm taller mouse height
    This mouse has a height of 43 mm, while the average mouse has a height of 39.7 mm.
    43 mm vs 39.7 mm
  • 9 older release date
    This mouse has a release date of 2012, while the average mouse has a release date of 2021.
    June 2012
    2012 vs 2021
  • 7 mm wider mouse width
    This mouse has a width of 73 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    73 mm vs 66 mm
  • No firmware upgrades
    This mouse does not support firmware upgrades, while the average mouse does. 77.6% of mice support firmware upgrades.
  • 1 fewer onboard profiles
    This mouse supports 0 onboard memory profiles, while the average mouse supports 1 onboard memory profiles.
    0 vs 1
  • Not suitable for gaming
    This mouse is not suitable for gaming, while the average mouse is. 76.1% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Not graded

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

K
kitguru.net
07/07/2012
Summary of the review
Gigabyte Force M9 ICE Mouse Review
T
techgage.com
17/08/2012
Summary of the review
GIGABYTE Force M9 ICE Wireless Mouse Review Are you interested in technical specifications or drivers for this legacy model? Copy
G
gadgetrytech.com
01/08/2012
Summary of the review
Gigabyte Force M9 ICE Wireless Mouse KitGuru

Third-party reviews

Based on ratings from across the web.
Reviews last updated: November 2026 · How we calculate this

What customers like about GIGABYTE Force M9

  • Exceptional battery life, lasting up to 2 years and capable of running on a single battery.
  • Versatile tracking with 'ICE' technology that works on various surfaces, including glass and leather.
  • Good ergonomic design and aesthetics for a mainstream mouse.
  • On-the-fly DPI switching with an LED indicator.
  • Lightweight and simple SIM software for button customization without bloatware.
  • Fair pricing for the features and performance offered.

What customers don't like about GIGABYTE Force M9

  • Common reports of random cursor freezing or jumpy behavior.
  • Limited wireless range; performance can suffer if line-of-sight to the receiver is blocked.
  • Subpar button feel, particularly with the left and right click buttons.
  • The right-side button is considered poorly placed or almost useless by some users.
  • Low polling rate (125 Hz) and maximum DPI (2000) compared to dedicated gaming mice.

Verdict

The Gigabyte Force M9 is a right-handed wireless productivity and gaming mouse featuring a 2.4GHz connection and a high-accuracy IR optical tracking system. It offers a 4-stage adjustable resolution (800/1200/1600/2000 DPI) with a dedicated on-the-fly switching button and a four-stage LED indicator. Notable characteristics include its 6 programmable buttons, GIGABYTE SIM software support, and 'Free-Scrolling' technology for efficient web browsing. Key pros include an exceptional battery life of up to 2 years on two AA batteries (though it can operate on just one), a lightweight 100g design, and integrated storage for its nano-receiver. However, common cons include a relatively low 125Hz polling rate, potential range issues if line-of-sight is blocked, and reported instances of cursor jitter or 'jumpy' sensor behavior in some units.

Compare GIGABYTE Force M9 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of GIGABYTE Force M9 and other products in the Mice category

No results found