OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS
Scored using Mice Methodology v1.0
Mice Methodology v1.0
Mathematical & Unbiased Scoring
Products in this category are scored under Frontum Mice Methodology v1.0: technical specifications plus authentic consumer ratings, with 0% commercial bias.
Explore Mice Methodology v1.0

G-Wolves Hati HT M Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:16000 DPIWeight:61 g

G-Wolves Hati HT M Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

G-Wolves Hati HT M
7.3/10

Overall score

Score
7.3/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components

80%

6.9

Technical score

20%

8.9

User score

â–²Better than 74% of mice
8.1

Value for money

Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

â–²Better than 74%
6.9

Technical score

Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components

36%

6.7

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.2

Controls

16%

8.9

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 70%
8.9

User score

User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

â–²Better than 84%
  • g-wolves-hati-ht-m
  • g-wolves-hati-ht-m
  • g-wolves-hati-ht-m
  • g-wolves-hati-ht-m
  • g-wolves-hati-ht-m
  • g-wolves-hati-ht-m
  • g-wolves-hati-ht-m
g-wolves-hati-ht-m
g-wolves-hati-ht-m
g-wolves-hati-ht-m
g-wolves-hati-ht-m
g-wolves-hati-ht-m
g-wolves-hati-ht-m
g-wolves-hati-ht-m
Where to buy
*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Best rankings
Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Technical Specifications of mouse G-Wolves Hati HT M

Technical score
Technical score
6.9/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 70% of models
Score components:

36%

6.7

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.2

Controls

16%

8.9

Design

14%

9.7

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

6.9
User score
User score
8.9/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 84% of models
Score components

70%

9.0

User ratings

30%

8.8

Number of reviews

8.9
Popularity
Popularity
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 81% of models
Popularity:
G-Wolves Hati HT M has a popularity score of 8.8 points, which is higher than that of 81.2% of products in this category.
8.8
Value for money
Value for money
8.1/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 74% of models
Score components:

70%

7.3

Overall score

30%

10

Price

8.1
Brand name
G
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
61 g
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 61 g, which makes it lighter than 74.5% of mice and equal to 1.1% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.6 m
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse has a cable length of 1.6 m, which is less than 83.6% of mice and equal to 3.1% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
5
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, which is more than 81.4% of mice and equal to 18.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
?
Software name
?
Firmware upgradable
yes
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

G-Wolves Hati HT M vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 25.6% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 61 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    61 g vs 82 g
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 60% higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 16,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    16,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 11.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    G-Wolves Hati HT M
    the average mouse
    G-Wolves Hati HT M has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.94 vs 8).
    8.94 vs 8
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 11.8% higher user score
    User score
    8.9/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    G-Wolves Hati HT M
    the average mouse
    G-Wolves Hati HT M has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.94 vs 8).
    8.94 vs 8
  • 37.4% more popular
    G-Wolves Hati HT M is more popular than the average mouse (8.77 vs 6.4).
    8.77 vs 6.38
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 60% higher maximum DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 16,000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10,000 DPI.
    16,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 2 more stored DPI steps
    This mouse stores 7 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    7 vs 5
  • Adjustable debounce time
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 25.6% lower mouse weight
    This mouse weighs 61 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    61 g vs 82 g
  • Detachable cable
    This mouse comes with a detachable cable, while the average mouse does not. 43% of mice come with a detachable cable.
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • 37.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 250 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    250 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Thin glide feet
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • 57.1% more expensive
    G-Wolves Hati HT M is more expensive than the average mouse (£55 vs £35).
    £55 vs £35
  • 37.5% lower tracking speed
    This mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 250 IPS, while the average mouse has a maximum tracking speed of 400 IPS.
    250 IPS vs 400 IPS
  • Poor default DPI tuning
    This mouse uses a default DPI of 800 DPI, while the average mouse uses a default DPI of 1,000 DPI.
    800 DPI vs 1,000 DPI
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • No RGB lighting
    This mouse does not have RGB lighting, while the average mouse does. 56.3% of mice have RGB lighting.
  • Thin glide feet
    This mouse uses 0.6 mm thick mouse feet, while the average mouse uses 0.8 mm thick mouse feet.
    0.6 mm vs 0.8 mm
  • 0.2 m shorter cable
    This mouse has a cable length of 1.6 m, while the average mouse has a cable length of 1.8 m.
    1.6 m vs 1.8 m

Expert reviews

In-depth analysis and verdict from leading tech publications

R
rtings.com
11/12/2019
Summary of the review
G-Wolves Hati HT-M Classic Edition Review - RTINGS.com
P
prosettings.net
10/09/2019
Summary of the review
G-Wolves Hati Review - ProSettings.net
D
damiancooper.medium.com
07/02/2026
Summary of the review
HTM Plus Review: G-Wolves Finally Go Big - Damian Cooper (Medium)

Third-party reviews

What customers like about G-Wolves Hati HT M

  • Extremely lightweight honeycomb design weighing under 60 grams
  • Comfortable ambidextrous shape heavily inspired by the popular Logitech G Pro Wireless
  • Highly flexible, paracord-like cable that effectively minimizes drag
  • Flawless sensor performance utilizing top-tier Pixart optical sensors
  • Excellent unboxing experience with a premium tin case and extensive spare parts (skates, grips, switches, extra cable)
  • Great overall comfort for medium-to-large hands, especially for claw and palm grip styles

What customers don't like about G-Wolves Hati HT M

  • Inconsistent quality control with some users reporting side-wall flexing, bottom flexing, and creaking
  • Main click buttons and scroll wheel can feel loose or exhibit noticeable side-play/wobble
  • Long-term structural durability issues reported after several months of heavy use
  • Stock mouse feet can feel slightly scratchy or high-friction before a long break-in period
  • Subpar companion software that can be difficult to use or set up

Verdict

The G-Wolves Hati HT-M is an ultra-lightweight, honeycomb-shell wired gaming mouse weighing approximately 61g (58g–61g depending on the version) with an ambidextrous shape inspired by the Logitech G Pro Wireless. It typically features a PixArt PMW3360 or 3389 sensor with a sensitivity of up to 12,000 or 16,000 DPI, 250 IPS tracking speed, and 50G maximum acceleration. Main characteristics include its 6 programmable buttons, flexible paracord-like cable, and high-performance TTC Golden dustproof micro switches rated for millions of clicks. Pros include its exceptional glide from 100% white PTFE skates, comfortable ergonomics for claw and fingertip grips, and a generous accessory package that often includes extra cables, switches, and grip tape. However, some users have noted cons such as potential quality control issues, including minor shell flex, wobbly main buttons on some units, and the absence of a physical DPI LED indicator on the mouse itself.

Compare G-Wolves Hati HT M with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)

Graphic comparison of G-Wolves Hati HT M and other products in the Mice category

No results found