OVERALL
ALTERNATIVES
SPECS
VS AVERAGE
REVIEWS

Cooler Master MM720 Review | 78 Data compared

Avg. price:~£55Connectivity:wiredMaximum polling rate:1000 HzMaximum DPI:16000 DPIWeight:49 g

Cooler Master MM720 Review: Compare 78 technical specifications and user reviews to see how this product ranks in the Mice category and whether it is worth buying.

7.4

Overall score

Score
7.4/ 10
✕
What it is
An overall evaluation of the mouse's quality, based on technical analyses and user reviews.
When it matters
When you need a quick reference to identify the best mice on the market.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components

80%

7.0

Technical Score

20%

8.8

User score

â–²Better than 75% of mice
7.0

Technical Score

Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components

36%

6.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.5

Controls

16%

9.5

Design

14%

10

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

â–²Better than 73% of mice
8.8

User score

User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 4,910 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
â–²Better than 82% of mice
  • cooler-master-mm720
  • cooler-master-mm720
  • cooler-master-mm720
  • cooler-master-mm720
  • cooler-master-mm720
  • cooler-master-mm720
cooler-master-mm720
cooler-master-mm720
cooler-master-mm720
cooler-master-mm720
cooler-master-mm720
cooler-master-mm720

Best prices

*As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.

Best rankings

Available: ranking among products currently available (including other versions of this product).All: ranking among all products in the database.
Loading category ranking...

Verdict

The Cooler Master MM720 is an ultra-lightweight gaming mouse featuring a unique ergonomic claw-grip design with a dedicated ring finger rest and a honeycomb shell that brings its weight down to just 49 grams. It is equipped with a high-end PixArt PMW3389 optical sensor supporting up to 16,000 DPI, durable optical switches rated for 70 million clicks, and high-grade PTFE feet for a smooth glide. Its primary advantages include its exceptional comfort for wide-grip users, a flexible 'Ultraweave' cable that minimizes drag, and an IP58 dust and water resistance rating for added durability. However, its niche ergonomic shape may not suit users with smaller hands or those who prefer a palm or fingertip grip, and it features a limited number of programmable buttons.

Technical Specifications of mouse Cooler Master MM720

Technical Score
Technical score
7.0/ 10
✕
What it is
An assessment of technical performance for products in the Mice category across these key areas: Performance & Sensor, Connectivity, Battery & Charging, Controls, Design, Features.
When it matters
When you want to compare mice based on technical performance and available features.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 73% of models
Score components:

36%

6.4

Performance & Sensor

22%

7.5

Controls

16%

9.5

Design

14%

10

Features

7%

1.1

Connectivity

5%

1.0

Battery & Charging

7.0
Cooler Master MM720 has a technical score of 7 points, which is higher than that of 73.3% of products in this category.
User score
User score
8.8/ 10
✕
What it is
A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 82% of models
Score components

70%

8.9

User ratings

30%

8.6

Number of reviews

Based on 4,910 buyer reviews from online shops.
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →
How we calculate this
User ratings – average star rating across all shop listings, weighted by how many reviews each has, on a 1–10 scale.
Number of reviews – how many buyer reviews the product has, on a logarithmic scale; the 8% most-reviewed models in the category get 10.
8.8
Cooler Master MM720 has a user score of 8.84 points, which is higher than that of 82.1% of products in this category.
Popularity
Popularity
8.6/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator based on the number of reviews received by the mouse.
When it matters
When you prefer a mouse that has already been chosen and reviewed by many other users.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 79% of models
Popularity:
Cooler Master MM720 has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than that of 78.6% of products in this category.
8.6
Cooler Master MM720 has a popularity score of 8.6 points, which is higher than that of 78.6% of products in this category.
Ratio quality/price
Value for money
8.2/ 10
✕
What it is
An indicator that combines the mouse's overall rating with its cost.
When it matters
When you are looking for a mouse that offers a strong balance of performance, features, and price.
Score distribution
â–¼
<55-66-77-88-99-10
â–² Better than 75% of models
Score components:

60%

7.4

Overall score

40%

10

Price

8.2
Cooler Master MM720 has a value-for-money score of 8.2 points, which is higher than that of 75.1% of products in this category.
Brand name
Cooler
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
Maximum polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 28% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >8k Hz
This mouse has a maximum polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 27.8% of mice and equal to 55% of mice.
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
Wired polling rate
1,000 Hz
â–² Better than 13% of models
Market range: <125 Hz – >1k Hz
This mouse has a wired polling rate of 1,000 Hz, which is higher than 13.2% of mice and equal to 77.4% of mice.
2.4 GHz polling rate
N/A
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
Bluetooth polling rate
0 Hz
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
Market range: <0 Hz – >125 Hz
This mouse has a Bluetooth polling rate of 0 Hz, which is lower than 36% of mice and equal to 64% of mice.
wired only.
Show more
Connectivity
wired
Connectivity
wired
â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
This mouse supports wired connectivity, which is less versatile than 65.1% of mice and equal to 34.9% of mice.
connection modes: wired.
Bluetooth support
no
Bluetooth support
no
â–¼ Worse than 36% of models
This mouse does not support Bluetooth. 35.6% of mice support Bluetooth.
Bluetooth version
N/A
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
no
â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
Receiver included
no
Receiver included
no
â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
This mouse does not include a receiver. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
Show more
Battery life
N/A
Battery capacity
N/A
Battery form factor
N/A
Rechargeable battery
no
Rechargeable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 46% of models
This mouse does not use a rechargeable battery. 46% of mice use a rechargeable battery.
Removable battery
no
Removable battery
no
â–¼ Worse than 22% of models
This mouse does not use a removable battery. 22.3% of mice use a removable battery.
Show more
N. of buttons
6
N. of buttons
6
â–¼ Worse than 37% of models
Market range: <4 – >9
This mouse has 6 buttons, which is more than 23.2% of mice and equal to 40% of mice.
N. of side buttons
2
N. of side buttons
2
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
Market range: <0 – >3
This mouse has 2 side buttons, which is more than 15% of mice and equal to 68.6% of mice.
N. of programmable buttons
6
N. of programmable buttons
6
â–² Better than 36% of models
Market range: <0 – >9
This mouse has 6 programmable buttons, which is more than 35.6% of mice and equal to 31.2% of mice.
DPI switching button
yes
DPI switching button
yes
â–² Better than 15% of models
This mouse includes a DPI switching button. 14.7% of mice include a DPI switching button.
Profile switching button
no
Profile switching button
no
â–¼ Worse than 16% of models
This mouse does not include a profile switching button. 16% of mice include a profile switching button.
Show more
Orientation
ambidextrous
Weight
49 g
Weight
49 g
★ Better than 93% of models
Market range: <52 g – >125 g
This mouse weighs 49 g, which makes it lighter than 92.9% of mice and equal to 1.8% of mice.
Extra weights
0 g
Extra weights
0 g
â–¼ Worse than 5% of models
Market range: <0 g – >25 g
This mouse comes with 0 g extra weights, which is less than 4.6% of mice and equal to 95.4% of mice.
Cable length
1.8 m
Cable length
1.8 m
â–² Better than 18% of models
Market range: <1.5 m – >2 m
This mouse comes with a 1.8 m cable, which is longer than 18.4% of mice and equal to 65.2% of mice.
Cable type
paracord
Show more
Onboard memory profiles
5
Onboard memory profiles
5
â–² Better than 81% of models
Market range: <0 – >5
This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, which is more than 81.4% of mice and equal to 18.2% of mice.
Onboard memory size
512 KB
Onboard memory size
512 KB
★ Better than 94% of models
Market range: <0 KB – >128 KB
This mouse has 512 KB of onboard memory, which is larger than 93.7% of mice and equal to 5.8% of mice.
Software name
MasterPlus+
Firmware upgradable
yes
Firmware upgradable
yes
â–² Better than 22% of models
This mouse supports firmware updates. 22.5% of mice support firmware updates.
Suitable for gaming
yes
Suitable for gaming
yes
â–² Better than 24% of models
This mouse is suitable for gaming. 23.9% of mice are suitable for gaming.

Cooler Master MM720 vs the average mouse

246810TotalPerformance & SensorConnectivityBattery & ChargingControlsDesignFeatures
  • 40.2% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    49 g
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 49 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    49 g vs 82 g
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    5
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • 40 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    70 million clicks
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 70 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    70 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 60% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    16,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 16000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    16,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • Protective IP rating
    IP Rating
    IP58
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    This mouse has an IP rating of IP58, while the average mouse has an IP rating of not rated.
    IP58 vs not rated
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    50 G
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 10.5% higher user score
    User score
    8.8/ 10
    ✕
    What it is
    A rating that combines user reviews and the total number of reviews received by the mouse.
    When it matters
    When you want to understand how a mouse performs in daily use or gaming and how reliable it is in terms of comfort, button feel, tracking accuracy, and long-term durability.
    Score distribution
    â–¼
    â–¼
    <55-66-77-88-99-10
    Cooler Master MM720
    the average mouse
    ★ Better than 95% of models
    Cooler Master MM720 has a higher user score than the average mouse (8.84 vs 8.000).
    8.84 vs 8
  • Adjustable lift-off distance
    Lift-off distance adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 54% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable lift-off distance, while the average mouse does not. 46.5% of mice support adjustable lift-off distance.
  • 60% higher maximum DPI
    Maximum DPI
    16,000 DPI
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <1.6k DPI – >26k DPI
    This mouse has a maximum DPI of 16000 DPI, while the average mouse has a maximum DPI of 10000 DPI.
    16,000 DPI vs 10,000 DPI
  • 25% higher maximum acceleration
    Maximum acceleration
    50 G
    â–² Better than 55% of models
    Market range: <10 G – >50 G
    This mouse has a maximum acceleration of 50 G, while the average mouse has a maximum acceleration of 40 G.
    50 G vs 40 G
  • 100 DPI lower minimum setting
    Minimum DPI
    100 DPI
    â–² Better than 59% of models
    Market range: <50 DPI – >1k DPI
    This mouse goes as low as 100 DPI, while the average mouse goes as low as 200 DPI.
    100 DPI vs 200 DPI
  • 2 more stored DPI steps
    DPI steps stored
    7
    ★ Better than 91% of models
    Market range: <3 – >6
    This mouse stores 7 DPI steps, while the average mouse stores 5 DPI steps.
    7 vs 5
  • 40 million clicks longer switch lifespan
    Switch durability
    70 million clicks
    â–² Better than 69% of models
    Market range: <5 million clicks – >90 million clicks
    This mouse offers switch durability of 70 million clicks, while the average mouse offers switch durability of 30 million clicks.
    70 million clicks vs 30 million clicks
  • Adjustable debounce time
    Debounce time adjustable
    yes
    â–² Better than 72% of models
    This mouse supports adjustable debounce time, while the average mouse does not. 28.2% of mice support adjustable debounce time.
  • 40.2% lower mouse weight
    Weight
    49 g
    ★ Better than 93% of models
    Market range: <52 g – >125 g
    This mouse weighs 49 g, while the average mouse weighs 82 g.
    49 g vs 82 g
  • Protective IP rating
    IP Rating
    IP58
    ★ Better than 100% of models
    This mouse has an IP rating of IP58, while the average mouse has an IP rating of not rated.
    IP58 vs not rated
  • 4 more onboard profiles
    Onboard memory profiles
    5
    â–² Better than 81% of models
    Market range: <0 – >5
    This mouse stores 5 onboard profiles, while the average mouse stores 1 onboard profiles.
    5 vs 1
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • Limited connectivity
    Connectivity
    wired
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • 10.52 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    76.52 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 76.5 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    76.52 mm vs 66 mm
  • 57.1% more expensive
    Cooler Master MM720 is more expensive than the average mouse (£55 vs £35).
    £55 vs £35
  • 57.1% more expensive
    Cooler Master MM720 is more expensive than the average mouse (£55 vs £35).
    £55 vs £35
  • No proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    Proprietary 2.4 GHz support
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless, while the average mouse does. 61.3% of mice support proprietary 2.4 GHz wireless.
  • No receiver included
    Receiver included
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 62% of models
    This mouse does not include a receiver, while the average mouse does. 62.3% of mice include a receiver.
  • Limited connectivity
    Connectivity
    wired
    â–¼ Worse than 65% of models
    This mouse supports wired connectivity, while the average mouse supports wireless connectivity.
    connection modes: wired.
    wired vs wireless
  • No automatic sleep mode
    Auto-sleep
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 61% of models
    This mouse does not support auto-sleep, while the average mouse does. 60.5% of mice support auto-sleep.
  • No battery level indicator
    Battery level indicator
    no
    â–¼ Worse than 59% of models
    This mouse does not include a battery level indicator, while the average mouse does. 59.4% of mice include a battery level indicator.
  • 10.52 mm wider mouse width
    Width
    76.52 mm
    â–¼ Worse than 87% of models
    Market range: <60 mm – >78 mm
    This mouse has a width of 76.5 mm, while the average mouse has a width of 66 mm.
    76.52 mm vs 66 mm

Graphic comparison of Cooler Master MM720 and other products in the Mice category

No results found

Third-party reviews

Based on 4,910 buyer reviews from online shops.
Reviews last updated: May 2026 · How we calculate this
Read buyer reviews on Amazon →

What customers like about Cooler Master MM720?

  • Unique ergonomic shape with a dedicated ring finger rest that many users find extremely comfortable
  • Incredibly lightweight design at approximately 49-50 grams
  • High-quality 'Ultraweave' cable that is highly flexible and feels almost wireless
  • Excellent value for money with high-tier specs like the Pixart 3389 sensor
  • Optical switches provide an instant response and are rated for 70 million clicks
  • IP58 rating for dust and water resistance
  • Includes extra PTFE feet and grip tape in the box

What customers dislike about Cooler Master MM720?

  • Primary mouse clicks (LK optical switches) are frequently described as 'mushy' or lacking tactility
  • MasterPlus+ companion software is often reported as buggy, heavy on resources, or prone to crashing
  • Stock PTFE feet can feel scratchy or have sharp edges on some mousepads
  • Unconventional wide and short shape is highly subjective and may not suit users with large hands or specific grip styles
  • Side button placement can feel awkward or too far forward for some hand sizes
  • Built-in hardware mouse acceleration is noted by some reviewers as impossible to fully disable, affecting competitive aim
  • Build quality can feel somewhat cheap or 'toy-like' with occasional reports of creaking or rattling

Video reviews

Hands-on testing, unboxing, and real-world video evaluations

Compare Cooler Master MM720 with other products in the Mice category

1Product to compare no. 1
VS
2Product to compare no. 2
VS
3Product to compare no. 3 (optional)